A guy with a bigger dick?%0D\
A guy with bigger balls?%0D\
Is there any connection between anatomy and load size?%0D\
Any yes, I understand that a guy who hasn''t come for two weeks is probably going to shoot, on a one-time basis, a bigger load than a guy who wanked off 30 minutes ago.
I hardly have anything, but I produce more semen than anyone I''ve ever seen,
after many years of casual sex, you raise a question I cannot answer. I have never been able to predict how much a guy will shoot. Had a straight FB(he was trade) who always came 3 times when we were together. Had another who was always good for at least 4 copious loads and actually met a guy on one occasion at a sex club who fed me 6 loads in one night. To your exact question about who shoots the biggest loads I can only say I have found that guys who advertise on their profiles that they shoot a huge load,actually do. Though guys may exaggerate about age, weight, and cock size, they are are usually honest about the size of their load.
Uncut guys shoot more powerful loads than cut guys.
I''ve never heard that before, R3.%0D\
I would think how much a guy shoots depends a great deal on how long it''s been since he last had an orgasm -- i.e., a guy who hasn''t cum in a week is going to shoot a lot more than a guy who came just this morning or last night or a guy who''s been jacking off every day for a week. It''s all about how much you''ve got backed up down there.
Just one theory
R4, uncut guys tend to have more powerful ejaculations. Being cut diminishes the strength of the orgasm because of the damage caused to the skin shaft system and the ability to increase friction and have a more powerful orgasm.
That''s certainly true, R4, but even if everyone is fully loaded, there is significant variation.
I would love to take a look at the science on this. How was the research conducted? Did they ask 1000 random cut/uncut guys to j/o into a beeker and measure their output?
It has nothing to do with cocksize or if they have that disgusting foreskin intact. It''s genetic, pure and simple. Some guys shoot big loads and some don''t. Most guys have a whopper load when they save up.
It''s pretty obvious, R7. Watch some porn films and you''ll notice that on average (although not every time) uncut guys have more powerful ejaculations.
It is all about the internal plumbing. There is no way to tell from outward physical features. %0D\
There is no way to tell before it happens. Much like you cannot tell how big a dick a guy has until you actually see it.%0D\
You would think young, thin, fit guys would shoot the largest load but I have seen older fat short dicked guys who shoot huge loads.%0D\
No real way to tell until it happens.
It''s also the longer you go before cumming. If you fool around for an hour or two without coming, you''ll shoot a bigger load than if you just have sex for 4 minutes.
Wowr5/r3 (i.e. limburger sausage), you really are so desperately anti-cut that you''ll make up anything to prove your point, eh?
I notice when I use my super size dildos the additional prostate stimulation appears to enhance the amount of subsequent ejaculate. The large and extra large ones produce less. You might try experimenting with this to see if you agree.
Any of the thousands of uncut Latinos who indiscriminately have sex with New York Dataloungers in places such as FAO Schwartz,Le Cirque, or the subway platform. Just read the many fantasy posts.
i have usually noticed that the guys under 30 will have nice size loads......
It happens to be true, R13.
No, it isn''t, r17. None of the things you cite are factors in the production of ejaculate.
R18, uncut guys tend to shoot more powerful and bigger loads. Watch some porn and after you have watch hundreds of guys cum, you''ll notice the difference.
Guys in porn shoot big loads because the scene takes 6 hours to shoot. If you''re edging for 6 hours, your gonna shoot a big load to.
I have an average sized dick; I''m uncircumcised, and I shoot a lot of cum...and far. I rarely run into anyone who can shoot more than me. Dick size and big loads have no correlation unless you''re very small since the stroking action does help your generate quantity and shooting distance. Big dicks generally seem to produce next to nothing.%0D\
I agree that uncut guys in general shoot more. It''s probably mostly genetic, but jacking off an uncircumcised dick is so much more fun and effective for the explosive end result. It''s so anti-climatic that cut guys stroke and stroke, take forever; often times can''t seem to climax. It become so medical and such a task, and then their cut loads are pitiful.
No its not R21. No one wants to hear your continued lobbying campaign to make uncut cocks acceptable to Americans. They''re fine in Europe. Cut cocks are cleaner, nicer and more aesthetically pleasing.
I wonder what kind of loads Bea Arthur produced...
My load depends on how long I''ve been at it. Most definitely. The longer, the bigger.
Don''t know who''s the bigger idiot, the uncut troll or the guy who claims to have a straight FB.
what r22 said. Uncircumcised trolls, either get it fixed or begone.
R22 sitting there in all of his ignorance holding his poor little mangled, cut dick.
Guys who use Ball Refill! Seriously, I use it and it works. I also use Azifa to get massive hards on.
There''s no need to fix anything, R26. Perfectly uncircumcised here; and it works, feels, looks and fucks just fine.
Uncircumsized men think that they shoot more to make them feel better. There is no relation here.
R30. Watch your eyes. And the cum shots on the wall over your headboard. Uncut here.
^^ I once could do that R31. \
If you''re like me your plumbing will some of its vigor over time.\
I''m still better than most guys my age, but no more headboard shots.
R22 and R26 are idiots. Let me guess - you are circumcised Americans right? Not able to accept the fact that uncut is natural and what the majority of men in the world have?
You''re an idiot, OP.%0D\
I have neither an exceptionally large dick, nor exceptionally large balls, but I shoot exceptionally large loads. I also ooze a LOT of precum.
Peter North (who never did gay porn, I swear that was a stunt ass!)
Why is OP an idiot for raising the question?
He''s an idiot for assuming it has anything to do with the size of genitalia, r36.
He didn''t assume anything, dumbass, he just asked the question.
[quote]What Type Of Guy Shoots The Biggest Load?%0D\
[quote]A guy with a bigger dick?%0D\
[quote]A guy with bigger balls?%0D\
[quote]Is there any connection between anatomy and load size?%0D
Here''s a video illustrating the powerful loads that uncut guys produce:
usually, a nice body-built guy who exercise regularly should shoot a bigger load. The enjoyment during sex plays apart too.
Here is the sure fire way to tell. The guy who sweats the most will also cum the most. Go to the gym and pick up the guy who is soaking wet from a moderate amount of exercise and that is who will shoot the most. Try it and report back.
My average ejaculation is probably half what it was when I was 25, even though I am having 1/2 the number of ejaculations per week I did then, so age decreases it.
I'm a 43 year old white American (Irish/German) and I've been shooting enormous loads since I was 13. I'm also a very heavy pre-cummer, once I get going it is a constant stream of the clear sticky stuff until I shoot a huge gusher. Guys into precum LOVE to blow me, it's awesome. I love edging for hours with a talented oral bottom feeding off of me, sucking my juices right out of me. My cock is average length but very thick. I'm told I have nice big balls too.
Oh and I'm circumcised.
R44 has a fascinating theory, I sweat like crazy. Big dick, huge balls, never work out, can hit my face with my load even if I jack off every day. Size of the load depends on if I've saved one up but it always shoots far, even if it's not big.
Uncut guys get more stimulation. Sex is more powerful for them. They're a million times more sensitive because the head of their penis is always covered. Cut guys are always exposed and rubbing on material, thus they get less sensitive because of it. If they didn't, they'd cum every time their penis rubbed their underwear. That doesn't mean that cut guys can't explode though. It's just a bit more difficult to get the instant pleasure an uncut guy will receive. They also don't need lube. The foreskin is almost like having another hand rubbing the head of your cock. It doesn't feel the palm of your hand automatically. Cut guys are better for women because they can potentially last longer since they have less stimulation. It's more difficult to get them off if they're not premature ejaculators, which is psychological.
I love precummers, but I can only produce it if I'm really horny, and I mean REALLY aroused by something or somebody. If I get to that point, I drip and dribble beyond belief. It almost looks as if I'm cumming. It's great.
Now, if you go without cumming for a few days, your load will be pretty massive, however, I can't remember how long it takes, but after a certain period of time, the body absorbs the semen back into the body. You'll either have a wet dream, or it'll just reabsorb.
Edging for me is just painful.
The uncut troll really is tiresome. By the way, best shooter in porn remains the very circumcised Peter North aka Matt Ramsey.
Peter North? Uh, no, and just a little tip, the majority of male porn stars inject their balls. It's well known, and disgusting.
Give it up r48. You're converting no one here. R22 is right.
[quote]Cut guys are always exposed and rubbing on material, thus they get less sensitive because of it.
God, you're stupid. How would anyone know how the other half lives? I'm cut and I can assure you it's rarely exposed and tends to stay put in my pants. Any rubbing is minimal, and far less than the abuse I put it through with just my hand. By your logic, the more you use your dick the less sensitive it becomes. Mere "exposure" can risk loss of sensation. I guess I should be more careful at the urinal then. Moron.
Your entire post is just beyond idiotic, and no, I'm not pro or con circumcision.
To rejuvenate your erections and increase ejaculate, read the book at the link and do the exercises every day.
Even if you think your dick is dead, within a few days or a few weeks, you will be so fucking horny, you'll be humping the walls and have a hard-on like tree branch.
Seriously. I'm 57 and thought my fucking days were over in my late 40s and that I'd be reduced to Viagra and bottoming.
This is way better.
LoL "it has nothing do with with having that disgusting foreskin intact" says anonymous. The foreskin is the primary erogenous tissue in a human male and where the majority of pleasurable sensations are felt and expressed - not the head of the penis contrary to popular belief. The head of the penis is the least sensitive of the 5 special regions of the penis, the other 4 being part of the foreskin/frenulum; the structures removed during circumcision. Circumcision removes 20,000 fine touch meisner's corpuscle nerve endings along with stretch receptor nerves that get stimulated during the forward to retracted motion. These nerve endings significantly contribute to the male's orgasm. So, it could only make sense that, on average, an intact man will have more powerful ejaculations than a circumcised man. Like the other post said, watch porn. The two big names right now in shooting huge loads are Manuel Ferrara and Winston burbank, both of whom are intact. Just another reason that circumcision should be the decision of the kid subject to having part of his dick cut off, not the parents. But that's a whole different topic of conversation...
Miss Peter North is cut and is well-known for the massive loads she shoots.
(No doubt because she is thinking about being corn-holed bareback by her husband)
[quote]Peter North? Uh, no, and just a little tip, the majority of male porn stars inject their balls. It's well known, and disgusting.
That has to be one of the most ridiculous things said here. And go to XHamster.com and search Peter North or Matt Ramsey. He is by far the King of Cum in Porndom.
Drink more liquids, shoot bigger loads.
Ok, so I want all you men who shoot massive loads to contact me. I will take all you got.
The guys who think there's no difference men shooting loads between cut and uncut r fucked in the head!!! I know this for a fact. At 40 I had to have a circumsizim becuase the for sick wouldn't stretch and I tried creams and anything else that was prescribed, nothing worked. So this my story of proof!!
Before the operation I could pull out on a woman and it would shoot and hit her in the face/head ( in a michanry postion with me on top). Not i have about 20% less feeling as posed to before and now when I cum it just drips out!!! Know lie, just drips out!!
And having 22 yrs of being uncut was the best feeling I ever had.
Anyone who doesn't have to look at your ugly ass.
Whatever the type send em my way. I love my face covered in the rich cream goo.
Im average size balls and shaft but i shoot big loads all the time, dont know why
I haven't tested a large enough scientific sample to have reliable data.
[quote]Guys in porn shoot big loads because the scene takes 6 hours to shoot. If you're edging for 6 hours, your gonna shoot a big load to.
Curious, I always assumed that they shoot the money shot first and then move on to the action shots. Would make more logistic sense.