[quote] Comic-book Bobby has always been presented as overcompensating with women, scoring hot chicks only to have the relationships fail, and building close relationships with other beautiful women (Rogue) but not consummating it, while also building very heartfelt and curious relationships with men. [/]
If that's the case, Robert Drake of the comics does not differ overmuch from his 20th C. Fox counterpart, R54. I came up with a few supporting notions.
Bobby's first scene in the trilogy of films was with St.John/Pyro rather than Rogue, Bobby's designated paramour, and the first sequence between Iceman and Pyro showed the two rivals wordlessly playing with their powers behind their desks in a dull lecture theatre and showing off for their classmates/one another. I urge you to watch it again and read it differently, as it very clearly spells out their dynamic as a tense and escalating passion, and an overriding compulsion. If that's not sexual I don't know what is.
In the second movie, Bobby's dialogue with other characters saw him getting defensive about his burgeoning but frankly near-stalled sex life with Rogue (he got sharp with fucking WOLVERINE about this very topic). By X3, Robert chose to hold hands and settle with chastely liplocking his best galpal and sister figure Kitty Pryde (another highly 'queer' X-men mutant) rather than continue his frustrated advances to the 'hot chick' of the film and, let's reiterate, his designated canonical love interest. Rogue did have her hangups, yes, especially when it came to physical intimacy, but let's be real---if you were a horny and hard-up teenage het male protagonist (which Bobby is intended to represent) and you had the most beautiful het girl protagonist in your vicinity willing if not entirely able to bang you, you'd make it work....unless, of course, you had no desire to bang (chicks) at all.
Bobby gets Rogue in the movie, sure...but he doesn't get far with her, and they mutually separate by the trilogy's end, having kissed only once and with ugly consequences. That is not the consummate! consummate! consummate! formula used for Hetero romances in summer blockbusters. If Bobby was really, truly a typical straight boy, and if this were a typical straight film, this would not have happened. The message is clear, I think.
As for the 'heartfelt and curious relationships with men', if you don't think Shawn Ashmore's Bobby flirted with Stanford's Pyro throughout (hard to see how you'd miss that), how about examining his relationship with Scott Summers? Both X1 and X2 showed Bobby following Scott like a lovesick puppy in at least one scene, and it is implied that Bobby is being groomed to take Scott's place. There's something quite like erotic fascination in Bobby's desperation to resemble and get close to macho, handsome, fit and courageous Cyclops.
I will, however, concede that movie-Bobby is written as a more secure young man than comic-Bobby, who tries too hard to impress both women and men, but I think this stems in part from Shawn Ashmore's own self-confidence bleeding into the role, rather than a deliberate attempt by writers to pin Bobby down to a 'straighter' identity. I also concur that Singer had a huge hand in unearthing deeper subtext within these character arcs, and in making obvious what may have slipped by as nuance or alt interpretations in other retellings.
But, does that make it non-canon, and does that mean we can't accept certain aspects of movie-Bobby as true to the character.....? Until Stan Lee explicitly says X2 was horseshit, then I'm keeping my interpretation of Iceman as a blend of comic book and film portrayals. Both are gay gay gay, to my (gay) nerd brain.