Hello and thank you for being a DL contributor. We are changing the login scheme for contributors for simpler login and to better support using multiple devices. Please click here to update your account with a username and password.

Hello. Some features on this site require registration. Please click here to register for free.

Hello and thank you for registering. Please complete the process by verifying your email address. If you can't find the email you can resend it here.

Hello. Some features on this site require a subscription. Please click here to get full access and no ads for $1.99 or less per month.

Jennifer Aniston rented two suites at the Four Seasons to discuss her Oscar Nomination with the press

How embarrassing for her. At least she has her children. (oh wait)

by Anonymousreply 94March 26, 2021 4:55 AM

Link please

by Anonymousreply 1January 15, 2015 7:55 PM

HA HA

by Anonymousreply 2January 15, 2015 7:57 PM

here

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 3January 15, 2015 7:58 PM

Link that she rented two suites at the Four Seasons to discuss her Oscar Nomination with the press

Link please

by Anonymousreply 4January 15, 2015 8:00 PM

I hope this is true!

by Anonymousreply 5January 15, 2015 8:27 PM

Everything about her grates on my nerves but even I feel a bit sorry for her today. She tried so hard. And spent a small fortune. And now she can't even go to the Super Bowl because John Mayer is schtooping Perry for choice seats. Take another hit, honey. You deserve it.

by Anonymousreply 6January 15, 2015 8:44 PM

This can't be true. In any case, no one, and I repeat NO ONE, expected "Jen" to be nominated. It's bad enough that Steve Carrell (total TV actor) and Bradley Cooper got nominated. Bradley Cooper, OMG, WTF?

by Anonymousreply 7January 15, 2015 8:49 PM

Was she supposed to be nominated for that film in which she wore no make-up? Because wearing no make-up usually means you'll get the nom.

On second thought, wearing no make-up on camera won't help her until she gets rid of that hideous voice. After she takes voice lessons, she might want to try again for the Oscar.

by Anonymousreply 8January 15, 2015 8:52 PM

Not True. I was able to cancel those rooms by noon the same day as the reservation

by Anonymousreply 9January 15, 2015 8:53 PM

ROFL. This story gets better by the minute.

How humiliating for her!!!

I was having a bad day, until I read this.

BWAHAHAHAHAHA!!!

by Anonymousreply 10January 15, 2015 8:57 PM

She is so damn superficial.

by Anonymousreply 11January 15, 2015 8:59 PM

I could not feel sorry for her if I tried to. She is just as greedy, self-absorbed, shallow, looks obsessed, hyper-competitive and phony as any other A-lister.

Hollywood has been trying to tell us for years that Anniston is a beautiful, sexy leading lady who should be a beloved film star.

And the American public keeps telling them, "No, she isn't! She is an average looking, one-note actress who was really fortunate to get the opportunity to star on a sitcom, which was hugely popular for some reason, for which she was paid a staggering $1 million per episode. And we don't believe for a second that, with her money, she uses Aveeno products!"

When the Friends cast began demanding their $1 million per episode contract agreement Dick Wolf (a Law & Order producer)strongly advised the producers of Friends to start firing actors and that Anniston should be the first one to go.

She lied about her terminally ill "first love", she shamelessly courted public sympathy during her divorce, probably thinking in some way she hurting Brad Pitt and a former roommate of hers wrote a thinly veiled book about her calling her the ultimate "frenemy" and an "underminer".

She is anything but America's sweetheart, she is a phony, spoiled, privileged little bitch.

by Anonymousreply 12January 15, 2015 9:47 PM

[quote]When the Friends cast began demanding their $1 million per episode contract agreement Dick Wolf (a Law & Order producer)strongly advised the producers of Friends to start firing actors and that Anniston should be the first one to go.

Yeah, I'd really take the advice of Dick Wolf who never produced a show that wasn't pre-digested formulaic crap.

by Anonymousreply 13January 15, 2015 9:52 PM

She's Greek what do you expect

by Anonymousreply 14January 15, 2015 9:56 PM

They tried to scare JA by bring Reese in as a guest star (just before Legally Blonde came out).

by Anonymousreply 15January 15, 2015 9:58 PM

R8, Moore plays a woman with Alzheimers who is somehow never seen without makeup and she got the nom.

R12 = Aniston's mom.

by Anonymousreply 16January 15, 2015 9:59 PM

Well, R16, I was actually joking about the makeup thing.

But the voice? Not so much.

by Anonymousreply 17January 15, 2015 10:14 PM

r7, Bradley Cooper is excellent in "American Sniper".

by Anonymousreply 18January 15, 2015 10:30 PM

Anyone have real dirt on aniston?

Did she have to send photos with cum on her face and whore herself out to top producers a la J Law?

by Anonymousreply 19January 15, 2015 11:13 PM

R19's acting career did not pan out.

by Anonymousreply 20January 15, 2015 11:15 PM

She can still have her first annual "Sore Losers" party.

by Anonymousreply 21January 15, 2015 11:17 PM

She seems like a nice gal to me. I don't get the hate.

by Anonymousreply 22January 15, 2015 11:18 PM

Maybe she just doesn't suck good dick? R20

by Anonymousreply 23January 15, 2015 11:18 PM

She has experience in working the tabloids, not the Academy.

by Anonymousreply 24January 15, 2015 11:21 PM

She helped out a guy I know with his career and didn't have to. There's definitely worse out there

by Anonymousreply 25January 15, 2015 11:22 PM

IIRC, we used to have someone here who was part of her team at one point who said she was hideously insecure and you had to compliment her non-stop. She'll just roll this whole thing into her "Poor Jen" narrative that she's been milking for the past 10 years. I'm just glad Jolie wasn't nominated either or the tabloids would have been blaring that she had Aniston blacklisted.

by Anonymousreply 26January 15, 2015 11:23 PM

Thanks for adding some positive light to the thread, R25. I thought she was spectacular in Cake and her performance outdoes Moore's by miles.

by Anonymousreply 27January 15, 2015 11:24 PM

I'm usually neutral about Aniston. But occasionally I recall that photo shoot she did for Vanity Fair after Pitt dumped her. She was posing in her panties clutching her head , making 'I am in torment' faces for the photographer and in others, was giving it her best 'adorable heartbroken waif' thang and I just thought, get your fucking clothes back on you silly manipulative dope and have some dignity, you are not the first woman who married out of your looks league and who then got dumped.

by Anonymousreply 28January 15, 2015 11:26 PM

R23 True. She'd probably have a SAG, a BAFTA and an Oscar by now. Now all she has is a free lifetime supply of Aveeno moisturizer. At least that will help her give good hand jobs.

by Anonymousreply 29January 15, 2015 11:26 PM

Guess she could have her cake and eat it...

by Anonymousreply 30January 15, 2015 11:27 PM

R28, are you saying the photographer and whoever was there from VF weren't telling her how to pose?

by Anonymousreply 31January 15, 2015 11:38 PM

Oh R31, relax, stick on your Friends DVDs, no-one is stopping you enjoying a trip down Aniston lane if that's what gets you off.

by Anonymousreply 32January 15, 2015 11:40 PM

She's still living off of her ex-ness as the ex-Mrs. Pitt. She mentions it in almost every magazine interview. Because without that on her resume, she's just another mediocre white actress.

by Anonymousreply 33January 15, 2015 11:42 PM

This is not the poor darling's week, is it?

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 34January 15, 2015 11:42 PM

No, R32. Attack people based on things they control, not on things they don't.

by Anonymousreply 35January 15, 2015 11:42 PM

Upon the release of the highly anticipated "Friends:The Reunion Movie, Anniston will finally get her long anticipated recognition.

by Anonymousreply 36January 15, 2015 11:43 PM

Grow up, R35. She's not a fucking marionette. VF were keen as mustard to get her on the cover yapping about Pitt. She had say. And she posed the way she wanted to, to give off the messages she wanted to : Look at poor little me! How could he! etc.

by Anonymousreply 37January 15, 2015 11:45 PM

Was Jennifer's long-suffering, I mean, long-term fiancé with her?

by Anonymousreply 38January 15, 2015 11:46 PM

Of course you're right, R37. Then again, given your tone, I'm sure you're always right about everything.

Jennifer Aniston is the most horrible human being who ever lived. She deserves to be boiled in oil because she breathes.

Feel better now?

by Anonymousreply 39January 15, 2015 11:49 PM

Has Justin asked for his ring back?

by Anonymousreply 40January 15, 2015 11:50 PM

R26 no we never had "someone from her team here" ever. I've been here since 1998, I've clicked on all these threads and what is bad is when someone like you makes up bs out of the clear blue sky. IOW - you're full of shit, but I can see you're a stupid "team Jolie" bs person. GTFOOH. You Brangeloonies are sick fucks. No one on DL wants you people here.

by Anonymousreply 41January 15, 2015 11:54 PM

So is Op a troll or is this real?

by Anonymousreply 42January 16, 2015 12:02 AM

LOL, r41, you're way more invested in this than I ever was. I said IIRC because I read it somewhere but didn't remember if it was here or maybe on another forum, like Fametracker. There is more than one source for celebrity gossip than DL. I'm by no means a Brangeloonie. They all seem like insufferable, uneducated twats to me. Do you really think any of them would have one interesting thing to say in real life?

by Anonymousreply 43January 16, 2015 12:04 AM

"In any case, no one, and I repeat NO ONE, expected "Jen" to be nominated."

Umm, what am I, a mirage?

by Anonymousreply 44January 16, 2015 12:10 AM

The guy who colors Jen's hair is dating one of the famous YouTube twins who came out to their father over the phone yesterday, so I highly doubt she cares about some insignificant award.

by Anonymousreply 45January 16, 2015 12:25 AM

R45. Well, now that you tell us that little secret...that is quite high up in the pecking order.

Oscar, Schmoscar.

by Anonymousreply 46January 16, 2015 12:41 AM

No doubt her studio paid for the rented suites. Did anyone from the press show up? As the one character in "The Christmas Carol" stated "I'll go if a lunch is provided, I must be fed."

by Anonymousreply 47January 16, 2015 12:45 AM

This rented suites rumor is just that. A rumor. Jen spent the day on the island with Justin and Austin.

by Anonymousreply 48January 16, 2015 12:51 AM

R40, come on now you don't think he really bought the ring. It's hers to keep

by Anonymousreply 49January 16, 2015 12:54 AM

It's probably the same ring she used the last eleven times

by Anonymousreply 50January 16, 2015 1:04 AM

Her boyfriend looks so silly with his dyed hair. He's about 20 years too old to be dressing like he does.

by Anonymousreply 51January 16, 2015 1:19 AM

Are they ever getting married?

by Anonymousreply 52January 16, 2015 1:27 AM

Rachel? Getting married?

Please.

by Anonymousreply 53January 16, 2015 1:28 AM

[quote] Are they ever getting married?

Justin's just there for sex.

Jennifer's waiting to marry the CEO of Pepsi Cola, and adopt a child.

by Anonymousreply 54January 16, 2015 1:30 AM

Both Aniston and Jolie are at that trainwreck of an awards show. Jolie looks like she wants to cut a bitch. Jen is trying waay too hard to look chipper. Jolie looks better than Aniston. Fury and Unbroken are up for several categories. Brad is up for best actor. Jolie for best director. It's going to be a looong night for Rachel Greene.

by Anonymousreply 55January 16, 2015 1:49 AM

What channel r55?

by Anonymousreply 56January 16, 2015 1:50 AM

R56 It must be the Critics Choice Awards on the A&E channel

by Anonymousreply 57January 16, 2015 1:56 AM

poor rachel greep

by Anonymousreply 58January 16, 2015 1:57 AM

It's being broadcast on A&E, r56. I'm in New York. A&E is on channel 46 on Time Warner Cable.

by Anonymousreply 59January 16, 2015 1:58 AM

I don't think Aniston is a bitch.

Angelina, on the other hand, seems like a total ice queen.

by Anonymousreply 60January 16, 2015 2:00 AM

What if Cake is a good movie? You creatures won't even give her a shot

by Anonymousreply 61January 16, 2015 2:01 AM

Of course she's not a bitch, r60. That's Chelsea "Cheap Shot" Handler's job. She never misses an opportunity to diss Jolie. As far as I know Angie didn't steal HER husband.

by Anonymousreply 62January 16, 2015 2:05 AM

I have tried to watch Friends. Can't stomach more than five minutes of it. I have watched Aniston in several movies. All bad. She didn't impress. Not once. I find her boring on every level. I wish I never had to hear about her or her projects or her love life ever again. Mainstream media makes that impossible. So I will take out my frustration by talking shit about her any chance I get. I doubt I am alone.

by Anonymousreply 63January 16, 2015 2:15 AM

A lot of the threads started recently are a real drag, man

by Anonymousreply 64January 16, 2015 2:25 AM

The thing is Friends is super popular with young people in their teens and 20's today. Netflix took it off and it started a twitter and internet storm.

by Anonymousreply 65January 16, 2015 2:31 AM

[quote]Her boyfriend looks so silly with his dyed hair. He's about 20 years too old to be dressing like he does.

And yet he's incredibly sexy and I want to BE him!

by Anonymousreply 66January 16, 2015 2:38 AM

I like Jennifer Anniston enough. I think she's a perfectly fine actress who plays the same sort of roles a lot. It's probably all she gets offered.

by Anonymousreply 67January 16, 2015 2:40 AM

I muted Kevin Costner five minutes ago and good lawd he's still on my t.v. Just how embarassing was his speech? Poor Renee Russo. She was on Latifah's show today and came out as bi-polar. It looks like she self-medicated. I really like her. Pity.

by Anonymousreply 68January 16, 2015 2:43 AM

Why the hell should anybody feel "sorry" for Jennifer Aniston because she didn't get an Oscar nomination? Jesus Christ!

by Anonymousreply 69January 16, 2015 2:46 AM

I think she was really good on Friends, and she has talent. IMO, she just doesn't have the range to be a film actress. In the trailer for Cake, her character reminds me of Aniston herself as she comes across these days, e.g., on Inside the Actors Studio, and in the paparazzi documentary from a couple of years ago -- guarded, slightly defensive, indignant and not the sweet person she used to be. There's an underlying bitterness there, perhaps only reserved for the media, but still.

(Having said this, I enjoyed her in Wanderlust, of all things).

by Anonymousreply 70January 16, 2015 5:25 AM

She's made tens of millions. Will never have to worry about money for the rest of her life.

Let this narcissist just go away and disappear!

by Anonymousreply 71January 16, 2015 5:27 AM

Re the R34 link, it doesn't sound like Jennifer was implying that she was with her ex-boyfriend when he was ill. His widow needs to back off.

Jennifer has an anger about her that she didn't used to have. She's an extremely ambitious person, and she's female and a target of the media, so perhaps that's what's jaded her.

by Anonymousreply 72January 16, 2015 5:32 AM

I like her and wish her all the best.

by Anonymousreply 73January 16, 2015 6:14 AM

R7 you sound like a moron. You don't want people nominated for an Oscar because they were TV actors or you don't like them? It's people like you that the Oscars suck so much and the winners are always unworthy.

At any rate, many pundits were predicting Aniston, especially after she was nominated for three of the four precursors -- Golden Globe, Critics Choice, SAG. They had her battling out with Amy Adams for the 5th spot. Cotillard was the one who was not expected to make it.

Get your facts straight before you make a fool of yourself.

by Anonymousreply 74January 16, 2015 6:34 AM

Patricia Arquette is a TV actor. You don't want her nominated?

by Anonymousreply 75January 16, 2015 6:40 AM

Agree with R69.

She has more money than she knows what to do with. Why not retire, relax and just enjoy life? She had her time, and more.

Ingrate.

by Anonymousreply 76January 16, 2015 7:46 AM

[quote]She has more money than she knows what to do with. Why not retire, relax and just enjoy life? She had her time, and more.

you could say that about any successful person.

by Anonymousreply 77January 16, 2015 8:02 AM

R76, that advice would never be given to a man. Why should she retire and relax at the age of 42 when she clearly still loves what she does and is committed to it?

Such a sexist attitude.

by Anonymousreply 78January 16, 2015 8:06 AM

(^ age of 45, not 42.)

by Anonymousreply 79January 16, 2015 8:07 AM

How is it sexist? What the fuckity fuck? Unbelievable. JFC, you fucking MORON. You fucking cunt.

This thread is about JENNIFER fucking ANISTON.

If this thread were about Johnny Depp, I'd say EXACTLY the same thing.

These people still want to be famous, just because. Both of them could do charity work or whatever. They don't NEED to work. They don't NEED fame. They've had their time.

SJW need a kick in the collective nuts. If it's not racism, it's sexism. They just lie in wait to be offended.

Fuck off back to tumblr, you nitwit.

by Anonymousreply 80January 16, 2015 8:10 AM

R77, I do say that about any successful person.

For some, enough is never enough. They want more, more, more. More fame, more money, more power.

by Anonymousreply 81January 16, 2015 8:14 AM

[quote]The thing is Friends is super popular with young people in their teens and 20's today. Netflix took it off and it started a twitter and internet storm.

I sent them a message asking if it was possible to block it from view while browsing. I already voted it one star and clicked "not interested." I don't want to see it or her or anyone on that show anywhere.

by Anonymousreply 82January 16, 2015 8:22 AM

[quote]You creatures won't even give her a shot

Only because most of the posters here are against guns.

by Anonymousreply 83January 16, 2015 8:24 AM

I just nominated another girl as my girlfriend. All good things go by three.

by Anonymousreply 84January 16, 2015 9:21 AM

Jeez, R28, you bring up that fucking photo shoot in every single thread about Aniston. Okay, it grates on your nerves, but enough already.

It doesn't help your case when you can look up other spreads by Mario Testino and see him posing LOTS of women with their hands over their mouths, on their heads, crossed over them -- looking insecure seems to be a theme in his photos. But hey, that's not as much fun as pretending like those photos could see into the truth of Aniston's soul, or whatever-the-hell it is you're claiming.

by Anonymousreply 85January 16, 2015 9:52 AM

R76 because she wants RESPECT. Especially as a film actress. You reach that age (mid 40s) and you start to think about your legacy. I wouldn't think that's such a hard concept to grasp.

If I'm going to analyze this, then I would just come to the conclusion that her campaign to be a "respected actress" was too transparent. Remember, someone like McBongo took a full two years of "respected" performances to retool his image. Maybe had Aniston had been showing a seriousness of purpose for a sustained period of time, voters, would have been more receptive (I suspect they would have). You can't just turn everything around with one movie, or it's very rare - especially one with mixed reviews and shaky distribution (which is why she had to campaign her ass off to begin with).

by Anonymousreply 86January 16, 2015 10:10 AM

There is such a thing as too much campaigning, you know.

by Anonymousreply 87January 16, 2015 10:15 AM

[quote] These people still want to be famous, just because.

Exactly. That's what I despise most about her.

She has paid shills all over Hollywood and all over the internet, putting her name out there - EVERYWHERE.

Trending? Jennifer Aniston. Commercials? Jennifer Aniston. Crappy Rom-Com? Jennifer Aniston. Oh, and guess what?? Jennifer Aniston took a shit! News at 11.

This bitch has been trying to stay relevant for the past 20 years, and now she is even trying to buy herself an Oscar.

When you're that desperate, and spending that kind of money, and you STILL don't get nominated for the most prestigious award in Hollywood, then it's time to take a step back and chill the fuck out.

But based on her history, it's evident that she will probably force herself down our collective throats, even more than before.

She'll stop at nothing to get that award.

by Anonymousreply 88January 16, 2015 12:28 PM

I saw Cake, and she was terrific in it. I really didn't expect a performance that good out of her.

I think the reason for the snub is 1.) The movie around her isn't very good, and 2.) The Academy was probably turned off by her tabloid fame.

by Anonymousreply 89January 16, 2015 12:47 PM

I know, R21. Supposedly grown men discussing this is embarrassing.

by Anonymousreply 90January 16, 2015 1:55 PM

Went to a film group over the weekend. For naming American film awards, many felt Jennifer Aniston's work should have won an Academy Award nomination. over a foreign film & Frenchwoman. Close, but no cigar, Jen. Later the movie PEYTON PLACE was discussed far too long. Today a member sent me this: "… thought apropos of the Oscars' announcement you would enjoy this." :

Lana Turner Has Collapsed! Frank O'Hara (1952)

Lana Turner has collapsed! I was trotting along and suddenly it started raining and snowing and you said it was hailing but hailing hits you on the head hard so it was really snowing and raining and I was in such a hurry to meet you but the traffic was exactly like the sky and suddenly I see a headline LANA TURNER HAS COLLAPSED! there is no snow in Hollywood there is no rain in California I have been to lots of parties and acted perfectly disgraceful but I never actually collapsed oh Lana Turner we love you get up

by Anonymousreply 91January 19, 2015 11:31 PM

R27=Jennifer Aniston

by Anonymousreply 92January 25, 2015 4:23 AM

Loser

by Anonymousreply 93March 26, 2021 4:24 AM

You talking about the idiot who bumps old threads, R93? I agree.

by Anonymousreply 94March 26, 2021 4:55 AM
Loading
Need more help? Click Here.

Yes indeed, we too use "cookies." Take a look at our privacy/terms or if you just want to see the damn site without all this bureaucratic nonsense, click ACCEPT. Otherwise, you'll just have to find some other site for your pointless bitchery needs.

×

Become a contributor - post when you want with no ads!