To absolutely no one's surprise, Neil Patrick Harris and David Burtka make a ridiculous spectacle of themselves at Met Gala

Well, they ARE gay you know.

They're not exactly low key.

They are at a fancy dress gala, they look fabulous! Op, you're a sourpuss.

Marys!

I agree with r3. OP is jealous.

My gosh thats tacky, even for David Burtka.

No socks? Just, no. Does Neil have a terminal disease? He looks 60. And David is the in the running for Gayest Man Alive.

R5, jealous????? Of what exactly? They both look terrible and tacky as hell, when they could have simply worn traditional formal wear and call it a night. It's like they went out of their way to be made fun of.

But but but NOBODY even LOOKS at YOU, OP..or even bothers to 'judge' your, 'ensembles', and it kills ya, don't it?

[all posts by childish idiot removed]

I like Neil, but he really doesn't look well here. Maybe it is just the lighting or a bad photo. Or maybe he is just over-doing the dieting to play a tranny.

As long as they have fun With it. It is totally fine. Burtka is gorgeous. NPH needs to drop all the make up, it looks bad. " NPH flaunted a face full of makeup—including eyeliner, contoured bronzer and heavy Foundation".

It is a white tie affair is it not?

[quote]Burtka is gorgeous.

Mmkay.

Yes R9, I am jealous. Jealous that I didn't think up "Harley Quinn's lesbian sister" as a Halloween costume last year.

[all posts by childish idiot removed]

Yes, OP, gay celebrities should of course blend in and not be loud and make a fuss. The blander we are, the more acceptable we will be.

JESUS FUCKING CHRIST!

First it was Ellen being shoved down our throats year after year,then Elton John and his trick,now I guess it those two pukes. Apparently there can only be one gay "IT" couple at a time.

Totally - the gays must wear sequins, glitter, and feathers AT ALL TIMES with NO EXCEPTIONS.

"and David is in the running for the Gayest Man Alive"

r7 has been bitter ever since losing the part of Miss Wales in Gentleman's Agreement to June Havoc. I don't blame him, he was and remains a natural for the role of a self-loathing Jew.

R17, there's being bland and there's throwing blood on a wedding dress. Only really attention whores would choose the latter.

WTF! Why did they do this? Luckily most people don't even know the MET Gala exists so this will go unnoticed by them.

I've never seen jackets cut like that. I kinda like the look: it's conceptually interesting. Sick of the classic suit.

Will someone please tell me where the "Simon Hall's bag of oranges" reference comes from? It's on like every tenth DL thread.

I don't get anyone defending their ridiculous outfits. I don't care how one feels about NPH, this is simply beyond any kind of reasonable argument. They look grotesque, end of story.

R23, the reference originates from a photo of Matt Bomer with a cut on his face. The story is that Simon thrashes him with bags of oranges so that he won't bruise (Bing Crosby did this to his kids).

[all posts by tedious, racist idiot removed.]

The bag of oranges reference comes from the movie The Grifters. A bag of oranges was used to torture someone who fucked up.

To me this is Burtka screaming for attention.

(after all remember how they moved back to NY so David could return to the theatre?.....but wait isn't NPH the one in the show?)

Neil looks cinched for the Inch. David looks fertile in argyle.

NPH purposely shed a ton of weight for Hedwig, he is really into the part and wanted to look like a burnt-out mess.

[all posts by tedious, racist idiot removed.]

Is that G as Cruella on the extreme right? Glad she's working again. I love those puppy movies she does.

The Met Ball supports The Costume Institute.

The Costume Institute was the brainchild of Diana Vreeland.

Diana Vreeland would have probably loved these outfits and be the first to condemn the narrow-mindedness on display in this thread.

R33 = thinks name dropping Vreeland makes him the second coming of Edith Wharton

Even if she didn't love these outfits (hell, I don't love them either) she wouldn't have condemned them. She might have even found them in bad taste. But she famously said she had no problem with bad taste. It was no taste she had a problem with.

I agree that Neil Patrick Harris is running on fumes at this point and seems to be hellbent on playing to a stereotype in the waning moments of his 15 minutes of fame.

I like the guy, but I'm also exhausted by him. He's the gay equivalent to the Kardashians to me. I don't understand the popularity when he had it at its highest. He's bound to know he's on the downward side of the fame hill, for now at least. Why not try to dim as a classy, likable guy, the way everyone came to like him?

At this point, I just hope he stays away once his current bout of fame goes dormant.

r36, NPH does not have 15 mins of fame. He has a career, he is multi-tallented, he is a bonafide star. He may not be YOUR type of star, but he is an enduring star.

SOrry, fangurl @ R38. He was a sitcom star who hosted a couple of awards shows, one that nobody watches except gay guys and old ladies on the East Coast.

He is not a "star" at all, actually. He's a celebrity. Not necessarily a C list celebrity, but a celebrity still. He is no star or a-list star.

Now get back to your tub of Ben & Jerry's before it melts into the plaid sofa.

[quote] I'm also exhausted by him. He's the gay equivalent to the Kardashians to me. I don't understand the popularity when he had it at its highest. At this point, I just hope he stays away once his current bout of fame goes dormant.

What's wrong with you? Why should he stay away and not peruse the life he wants? How about you not paying so much attention to a complete stranger? You can get help, you know.

Overexposure is always an issue for anyone who's having a moment, no matter how long that moment may last. Madonna has been overexposed for decades.

NPH is extremely talented and successful. And he's having a great time with his life. Of course he's going to inspire opprobrium.

He's an invidious gay. Of course he's going to get trashed on DL.

I don't love these clothes, but they are fun and work for the occasion. And they are not the train wreck some are making them out to be. Far from it.

Are we doing the sockless thing again?

[quote][The clothes] are not the train wreck some are making them out to be. Far from it.

Oh, they're far beyond a train wreck. They should be so lucky as to to have stopped at that point.

The Met Ball is usually about women wearing gowns and outfits inspired around a particular designer or theme where men are both REQUESTED and encouraged to wear traditional white tie.

These two queens couldn't help themselves. They crave both attention and playing dress up because they want to be women, so they embarrass themselves and come like this.

They make Andre Leon Talley looks presentable by comparison.

If you look at most of the men at the ball, they're all wearing appropriate attire as well as attire that was requested of them. These two queens knew they'd get photos taken, but even that wasn't enough for them, so they chose to come as gay clowns.

They look like fucking minstrels. It's amazing how NPH, DB and others in the Hollywood bubble have zero self awareness.

NPH needs to gain about 15 pounds. he is starting to look drawn and wizened.

r40, I do not think you know what "invidious" means.

[quote]They make Andre Leon Talley looks presentable by comparison.

Don't be ridiculous.

What the hell is Burtka wearing? A "Suit of Lights" for an extremely depressed matador?

[quote]What the hell is Burtka wearing? A "Suit of Lights" for an extremely depressed matador?

I think it's safe to say that the suit of lights is wearing the extremely depressed matador - and the extremely depressed matador is none too pleased with the situation.

Say what you will about the ridiculous Andre Leon Talley, he fucking owns those black Hefty trash bags -- the trash bags don't wear him.

Neil is almost always appropriately dressed to formal events, and he's usually understated. This had to be Burtka's idea.

They're having fun, and more power to them for that. My only exception is that they look a bit too old for those outfits (Burtka especially)--they're middle-aged, and those outfits would look better on young men.

NPH is too thin, but that's for the role he's playing on Broadway. Once it's over he'll fill out again.

[quote]Is that G as Cruella on the extreme right? Glad she's working again. I love those puppy movies she does.

That, M, is the fabulous Amy Fine Collins, the true queen of Conde Nast.

I forgive a lot. High water pants on formal wear (and I am using that term very loosely) looks ridiculous.

[quote] To absolutely no one's surprise, Neil Patrick Harris and David Burtka make a ridiculous spectacle of themselves at Met Gala

They looked better than a lot of women that attended. Some of them looked like clowns. And that works out well since Neil and David dressed like circus ringmasters

NHP looks fine, though that dark hair he has for Hedwig doesn't become him outside of the theater. Don't know why he felt the need to shed weight for the show - he's pretty trim to begin with.

Burtka looks ridiculous in that outfit. He also looks too "filled out" in general, particularly in his face, to the point where that stereotypical twink/flip hairdo smacks of desperation.

[quote]The Met Ball is usually about women wearing gowns and outfits inspired around a particular designer or theme where men are both REQUESTED and encouraged to wear traditional white tie.

I know nothing about fashion but I thought I read in a different thread that the instruction for men to wear white tie was such a throwback that the designer's of menswear had to scramble to create white tie attire, which apparently no one wears any more outside of this little costume party.

White tie (I am told) requires tails and a top hat. Outside of A CHORUS LINE, when was the last time any group of men appeared publicly in NYC wearing top hats?

[quote]the designer's of menswear

Oops, forgive the extraneous apostrophe. I know nothing about fashion but I am usually a correct speller.

They look fabulous, but I have to say, David looks better with his natural dark hair.

wow........this makes a very good case for ALWAYS having photo approval. NPH looks very very sick

NPH lost a ton of weight for his (highly acclaimed) role in Hedwig & the Angry Inch on Broadway.

"NPH has become gayer than a bag of show tune-singing dildos"

Please, please, won't someone help me by answering the pressing question: Did NPH lose weight for his role in Hedwig?

Maybe it's internalized homophobia, or maybe it's just because I grew up in Boston in a fairly puritanical family who believed in being understated and not doing anything to draw attention to oneself, but I just think they're outfits are wrong. It's almost like they thought "hey, we're gay!" and felt the need to out-mary every mary who's ever mary'd. It just screams bad taste to me. I want to yell, "You're gay, I get it!" at them.

I always say, 'Never wear as a couple what you wouldn't wear if you were going stag'.

You can tell they'd been fielding major shade ever since they'd arrived. NPH looks like he could crawl into a hole.

I thought Jim Parsons and his partner looked wonderful.

They followed the dress code and were photographed holding hands.

They were lovely...a couple, not a COUPLE.

[all posts by tedious, racist idiot removed.]

R62 Yes. 22lbs for the role.

Why was Neil wearing makeup? Jesus Christ he looked like death. His partner is an asshole.

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

They look like absolute shit. I think they both lost their minds. Why else dress like clowns? Are they that desperate for attention? Even amidst the never-ending freak show parade that the Met Ball was this year, their choice of accoutrement managed to stand out as the most epically bad choice. Not a small feat considering some of the other participants.

Its was a fucking costume/fashion show. Christ, the world is still turning.

[quote]They look like absolute shit. I think they both lost their minds. Why else dress like clowns? Are they that desperate for attention?

Of course they're desperate for attention. Remember, these are the same guys that wear costumes on Halloween along with their kids and post pics of themselves non-stop on social media.

sweet jaysus they give Andre Leon Talley a run for his money in the :OOK AT ME!! contest.

I think they look terrific! What a bunch of jealous bitches here.

You need your eyes checked, r75.

r38, @ R38, who does not know how to ref, Dear sad pitiful little thing that you are, NPH sings, dances, has great comedic timing, has done television, film and Browdway. He is an out gay man, has a sense of bravura and self deprecation simultaneously, has a good looking husband and beautiful children.

In short, he has nothing in common, and common is the denominator, with the unfortunate ankle biting creature you are.

I return to my pint of gelato...

NPH looks like he's dying. I can't get past his scrawny face to even look at the clothes.

[quote]but I just think they're outfits are wrong.

Oh deer.

Our obsessed NPH fangurl is about to lose what's left of her damn mind over all the snarking over these two ridiculous queens.

Hey R72, we're all aware it was a costume ball and is ultimately insignificant. But why would you expect and want to oppress people sharing comments and opinions over a group of vapid millionaires who dressed-up and pranced out in front of cameras to show the world their silly outfits if they didn't want and expect the attention?

Oh, and is the irony of your looney rants lost on you? It's a motherfucking discussion forum, not a U.N. Security Council vote. Unclench, Mary.

R80, I'm not R72, but if I had to choose one of you to die in a grease fire, it would be your cuntescent, low-value self that would go up in flames.

NPH was looks like the Crypt Keepe, and Burtka looks like a cheesy old queen. What an unattractive pair of desperate attention whores.

R36 think NPH's 15 minutes of fame are up... etc etc. Fact is, he has been famous for decades due to successful TV series currently playing a heterosexual lothario type. Now he is in a major B'way hit, his out, he is married, he is a nice guy, he reinvigorated the Tony Awards... and dozens on this thread go after him like he was Roy Cohn.

DL is amazing.

A talented out actor and entertainer who is a big star, and even a nice guy having fun at a totally ridiculous NYC event-

Some of you need to loosen up and set your nasty sights on something else- if you must.

R83, there are some really nasty, bitter people on DL who hate all out successful people. They also hate many gay allies (such as Jay Leno) for random reasons. But give them a hot, homophobic straight guy, and they fawn and drool non-stop. They're sad, pathetic basement dwellers who should be pitied.

Bad taste, whatever the circumstances, is still bad taste!

Thom Browne is impossible to wear.

They should have gone with the other Tom: Tom Ford.

Was there a theme to this event? Could that somehow explain their choices?

And do we know who designed the outfits?

Trash gala so expect dressing be trashy as well.

[quote] I agree that Neil Patrick Harris is running on fumes at this point and seems to be hellbent on playing to a stereotype in the waning moments of his 15 minutes of fame.

If NPH's career is an example of someone running out of fumes in waning moments of his last 15 minutes of fame who isn't?

[quote]flag: [ww] [ff] [troll-dar] Was there a theme to this event? Could that somehow explain their choices?

And do we know who designed the outfits?

by: Anonymoustreply 88t05/07/2014 @ 12:05PM

Their outfits were designed by American designer Thom Browne, whose major contribution to menswear is the shortening of the trouser length over the past decade.

The Gala's theme, or rather instruction, for the men was simply White Tie. For the women it's Charles James, the late designer being honoured.

Hey does "white tie" mean you're supposed to wear a white bow tie? I noticed Jackman has on a white jacket but a black bow tie. Any of you fashionistas know? Thanks in advance.

[quote] Fact is, he has been famous for decades due to successful TV series currently playing a heterosexual lothario type. Now he is in a major B'way hit, his out, he is married, he is a nice guy, he reinvigorated the Tony Awards... and dozens on this thread go after him like he was Roy Cohn.

Fact is, while I couldn't give a shit about his TV series or Hedwig or the Tony awards, I don't dislike Neil Patrick Harris. I'm not jealous. I don't wish him ill. I don't begrudge his accomplishments or successes. But when two celebrities dress quite intentionally as painted birds not just to turn heads but to shock and scandalize, when they pose intentionally and repeatedly for photos, then they're fair game for critique.

For the defenders who insist, "Oh it's just a bit of fun", have a look at those grim visages. Do a Google Images search and hunt for the least glint of "fun" in any of the many photos of those two sour faces. Sophie had a happier face as she was deciding which of her children to send to the gas chamber and which to the labor camp.

I think these two could have worn classic Tom Ford formal attire and still gotten their photo snapped. This is just not an attractive look. I'm embarrassed for them. They should bring Richard Simmons along for the next event and wear matching jogging shorts.

Well, they got the "white tie" part right anyway......

Dear LORD! Is the man in the first of R93's pictures wearing BOOTS with white tie???!?!?!? God damn, I hate people.

R92 It's information that is easy to google, but white tie is more formal than black tie. Where black tie is just tuxedo and cocktail dress, white tie would be tuxedo with tails and a tophat, stiff shirt, gloves, and the women's dresses can't be short they should be full length and not slutty, lots of expensive jewelry.

Just imagine the Royal Wedding. That's basically white tie, whereas the Oscars used to be white tie, they have probably dropped to black tie because some women don't dress up as much as they should anymore or look more slutty than they should and men rarely wear tails, just regular tuxedos.

The best thing that could be said for them is that they look absolutely ridiculous.

[quote] But when two celebrities dress quite intentionally as painted birds

They are dressed in black, white and gray.

Try another metaphor to express your keen fashion sense.

He is indeed. It's Ralph Lauren's son.

The attire has something/everything to do with NPH's turn in Hedwig. He has gone all "Cabaret host exotic" with the extreme weight loss, greasy hair and make-up. This look, as well as David's bizarre gay clown tux (and that HAIR! UGH!), are making some sort of statement. It doesn't seem like a happy statement, though. Those dour faces are on purpose. Are they going for a heroin chic look here? Sending up the entire event? Is there "irony" in those fugly tuxes? Are they wearing them with a "wink and a nod to costume" or something? If so, then why? Who would KNOW that? It is supposed to be about glamour. And, yeah, some of the other outfits are outrageous, yes, but in a different way. These two guys are the only famous gay couple in attendance, yes? And THIS is what they do? Well, I don't really care one way or another but the outfits are certainly not flattering in the least and whatever they were trying to do is lost on most people, I am quite sure. Perhaps an instruction booklet should have been given to the general public on what the hell that was supposed to be.

Hey Neil, you wouldn't have been in this silly situation if you'd have stuck with women in the first place... surely your wife or girlfriend would never let you leave the house looking like that.

What happened to NPH's face?

Yeah I like NPH and David Burtka fine enough, but this was just not classy. It was an attention grab like when Bjork wore that swan tutu thing. It's just ugly and they should know better.

But even Hugh Jackman didn't get white tie right. If you want an example of white tie look at Benedict Cumberbatch or John Legend.

[quote]They should bring Richard Simmons along for the next event and wear matching jogging shorts.

As a matter of fact, Mr Thom Browne, the designer responsible for the madcap outfits did show up at the Gala in his trademark (in)famous shorts. 2nd from left in the pic below:

R93, who is the guy in pic #2?

And David Burtka, how old is he? He has to be pushing 40 but he's bleaching a stipe of his hair like he's a 19 year old Hot Topic twink?

Even if it didn't look horrible, it's just not age appropriate.

[quote]Just imagine the Royal Wedding. That's basically white tie

No. Royal weddings take place in the daytime and require formal day-wear known as Morning Dress which involves neither black nor white tie.

R93- you need lotsa drinks, fast.

Thank you, R108. Some of the DL crowd needs to be schooled about proper fashion, at least historical fashion. Morning dress would not be something a man would ever get a chance to wear unless he were from a higher social class. Or traveled in those circles. Maybe once in a lifetime would one attend or be a member of a wedding where morning dress was required.

DL is the land of caftans, flip-flops, Ralph Lauren knock-offs and manpris.

Yes R108, you are correct. I used the words "imagine" and "basically" to give a frame of reference to someone who said they knew nothing about the subject to oversimplify it.

If you don't know what white tie is you probably don't know morning dress either.

DB. At least his initials are appropriate for the attire.

NPH looks haggard. Is he in his 40's?

[quote]DB. At least his initials are appropriate for the attire.

Delta Burke?

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

They look like Borat's gay cousins just in from Kazakhstan.

It's tacky.

The bitches having meltdowns over someone daring to criticize NPH (I was unaware that he made sainthood) and his choice of wardrobe need to get a grip. I mean, really, it's that personal for you?

The only miserable, unhappy people posting in this thread seem to be you. This place loves to wave the pride flag and demand that everyone get in line only when a small pocket of famous successful white gay men get talked about here. It's tiresome.

R117 is a vagina-wearing -- or at least vagina-influenced -- racist and sexist. Long may s/he/it be dragged from the back of her boyfriend's pickup truck through the back roads of Twatswallow, Florida.

Eff the attire. NPH looks deathly ill, and I am not buying the "it's all for Hedwig" baloney. he needs to have his head examined if he did that to himself simply for the one time Broadway role... Tony Award or not. I am assuming that he desires employment post-Hedwig, and his Raul Julia impression will likely nix any possible offers currently being mulled over by producers who have working eyes. I say that assuming he is in fact well. If he is indeed ill, he certainly chose poorly in selecting both his attire and his role as Hedwig.

David needs to get a job, or lay off the bon-bons because bitch is getting fat.

LMAO they look just horrendous

[quote]I used the words "imagine" and "basically" to give a frame of reference to someone who said they knew nothing about the subject to oversimplify it.

You also said that white tie was worn with a tuxedo jacket. It isn't. White tie is worn with a cutaway coat with tails.

NPH used to be cool, laid back, quasi-masculine. Lately, he has been so flamboyant, feminine, and stereotypical. Not cool.

NPH is naked on the cover of Rolling Stone magazine. Nice body.

I think that they are tremendous!

The other guy is eating all the food

Yawn with these two.

LOL @ R126

HEY! We were supposed to be moving to NYC for my career!!

and where's my wedding ring?

OMG

I can't stop laughing.

Both look utterly ridiculous.

Get a tailor who's not strung out on meth.

they looked better as TWEEDLE dum and Tweedle dee

Haters gotta hate. They look great.

pointless bitchery r132 get used to it or find another site

I heard NPH is in talks to take over Craig Ferguson's show after he leaves. Makes sense to me.

You're right, R133. Very little is as pointless as the bitches on this thread.

[all posts by childish idiot removed]

r135=fanboi

All NPH needed was a monocle and a pencil mustache to pull this look together.

R131 that's exactly what I thought!

I don't know why so many men had trouble wearing white tie. Are they really that stupid??

At least these two have the decency to look ashamed of themselves.

The guys in the white jackets are wearing the summer version of a tux.

R122 Not sure if you are lying or just trying to troll me or just didn't read what I wrote.

In R97 I wrote BLACK tie was tuxedo. When talking about white tie I specifically mentioned tails and said it was more formal.

Not sure why you are so obsessed with finding something wrong with what I said, but you're wrong and managed to misquote me twice, but good luck with your obsessive need to "correct" people in the future.

Pointless bitchery indeed.

That's "fanboy," you retard at R137. Do I sound French?

A real question, since I am not at all familiar with Broadway shows. But aren't the shows on, on every night? So how come NPH could attend this gala, especially as I had read somewhere that he has no understudy for his role as Hedgwig?

TIA!

r142 they usually get Monday off (NPH actually gets Monday and Tuesday off)

Thank you r143.

I guess I should start paying less attention to menswear and more to Broadway...

What a couple of Fancy Nancys.

The partner is juvenile and gross.

Burtka would have been better off in a Burka....

And just what is that thing he's wearing made of? It looks like someone printed an argyle pattern on light cardboard.

Together, he and NPH look like they crawled out from under Sarah Jessica's circus tent dress when she lifted it to show off her hooves.

If Cirque du Soleil puts o a new show called Gaytopia, David could be the ring master

Thom Browne is certainly not for everyone

^ Hear Hear.

I'm embarrassed for them. Thanks to those Met Ball pics, they're now the laughingstock of all many sites and blogs. I think their desperate-for-attention antics are finally causing a backlash.

NPH was interviewed by Kelli Ripa and he unwittingly let out some revealing tidbits about their relationship.

He said he and David had a few days off so David surprised him by taking him to a hotel without the kids where they just slept. He also mentioned they eat a lot of take-out.

Now my question is if they are eating take-out, what the hell does David actually do all day? Wasn't he posing on tv as some sort culinary artist? Couldn't he at least make a salad for NPH EVERY NOW AND THEN?

They looked like shit. If they didn't argue all the way there, the pictures of they took of this event will certainly have them fighting all the way home.

I cannot believe that a 40 y/o man would wear that in public. That getup would embarrass Justin Bieber.

Take out for them isn't McD's R152. They are no doubt getting take out orders or deliveries from some of NYC's best restaurants.

Adorable!

Nice cut on the suits, the length is perfect, the colors compliment each other. Very clean look for both of them.

I also like how the less-famous half of the couple is more low-key, yet still stylish in his own right.

This is how it is done.

PS... the holding of the hands is both subtle and adorable and really speaks volumes.

R156 Jim is turning me on in that pic. He never looked better. His boyfriend is equally dashing.

[quote]Now my question is if they are eating take-out, what the hell does David actually do all day? Wasn't he posing on tv as some sort culinary artist? Couldn't he at least make a salad for NPH EVERY NOW AND THEN?

When I was a catering chef (like David), the LAST thing I wanted to do when I got home at night was cook.

P.S., R152, you write "cunty."

Neil Patrick Harris looks like a clown. David Buthka looks almost as bad, his pants are too high and his shoes are about four sizes too big.

NPH is starring in Hedwig on Broadway so that's why he looks the way he does. Not sure what David's excuse is. He looks ridiculous haha. Queens!

Er, actually, R141, not necessarily. Same denotation, different connotations. And, yes, I'm French and would think to know when to use which.

I hate that "boi" crap, R161. Just hate it. There is a perfectly good word out there called "boy." It still works. Guaranteed.

I am really, really over NPH being "America's Gay!" He's....just not.

Really, R163? Who, pray tell, is [quote]your[/quote] "America's Gay!"?

R164, my comment was quite clear - and the effort to be that bitchy by quoting two words belies that you are incredibly, incredibly fat.

R163 R165, you are incredibly, incredibly stupid. And (if I'm as fat as you say I am) I can diet.

And you failed to answer my question, R165, which I will repeat rather than confuse you again with my misuse of the quote function:

WHO IS YOUR IDEA OF "AMERICA'S GAY"?

That was clear enough for you, wasn't it?

R166, as you've proven your whole life, "can" and "will" are two very, very different things. Take care, lardo!

R167, easy or not, you make it happen. Don't ever change, you unsightly monster.

David looks like he's packing a big one

"When I was a catering chef (like David), the LAST thing I wanted to do when I got home at night was cook.

P.S., [R152], you write "cunty."

Oh please, a "catering chef"? David is a catering chef the way that Seinfeld wife is a gourmet chef. Since appearing off-Broadway displaying his large penis, he has not done a damn thing. Call my writing "cunty", but I call it the truth.

Whoa, trolldar r167 and watch the thread turn yellow with specific and UBER-CUNTY defenses of pretentious NPH and David.

Please invite Anderson Cooper and his hunk next year. At least these two still look like men and can wear a suit.

Those clothes they're wearing should have stayed in the closet.

postively Johnny Weirish

David looks like he's trying to let out a burrito fart without lifting his left cheek.

They're a cute couple, but not as cute as Michael and Vito.

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

bump

NPH

Jelous

I would hardly call being the "life of the party" make a spectacle of one's self.

Why is it surprises the no one?

Just tell me why???!!!!!!!!

Zombie thread from 14 months ago. Killit.

Wow..i think they might be gay. I'm shocked i tell you!

They're so cute together, fuckin' cute in fact.

Yeah they should knock it off

Will someone please block/ban the neurotic ratchet ass old cunt who has been going on a neil patrick harris spree on here? Rain man called, he said to shut the fuck up, shut the fuck up, shut the fuck up....

david looks stupid but neil is nice

Kill you OP