Sandra Bullock Seemed Sad Last Night

all she got out of Gravity was an Oscar nom and a lousy 70 million dollar cut.

She might be "over it" as the kids say. She's said that making Gravity had a profound effect on her and has changed the way she thinks about life. Perhaps she sees through the bullshit and wants to spend time with her family, leaving the America's Sweetheart stress to JLaw.

I agree, OP. she seemed distraught.

Could Sandy being sad and quiet have anything to do with what Cate Blanchett said to her in her speech: "Sandra, I could watch that performance till the end of time, and I sorta felt like I had.”

I read that her father isn't well. Maybe it's worse than something temporary because I thought she looked sad, too.

That Galadriel bitch was supposed to diminish and go off into the fucking West!

[quote]Could Sandy being sad and quiet have anything to do with what Cate Blanchett said to her in her speech: "Sandra, I could watch that performance till the end of time, and I sorta felt like I had.”

That was a joke (relating to the edge of the seat nature of watching that particular film), not an insult.

Cate throwing shade on her didn't help. Sitting next to Leo's mother probably didn't help. Sandra didn't even have a date. She just made $70 million and can't afford an escort?? Plus seeing her ex McBongo winning didn't help.

I don't think Bullock cares much about money. I mean, I'm sure she appreciates it, but I don't think it's what drives her or makes her happy.

She did seem sad. I think it must be something personal, all of the Gravity winners were so gracious to her. She did seem truly happy for Alfonso Cuaron, though.

Assuming Cate's comment was just a joke, it is completely nonsensical. It masturbates my confusion as to Cate's diminished intellectual acumen.

The first gravity clip they showed (might have been about the music) had her fighting tears. I thought wow something must be going on in her personal life. So if her dad is sick that makes sense.

Well, that's sad. It means you have no sense of humour and no sense of proportion. And I doubt your "intellectual acumen" as well.

How can she cry when we made 70 million?

She is one greedy woman!

Maybe it was the echo inside her head that distracted her?

She should sent some of that money over to poor Barkhad Abdi.

"It masturbates my confusion as to Cate's diminished intellectual acumen."

What does this mean?

She needs a MAN, baby!

She was basically the only nomination that Gravity lost.

I'd cry too.

LOSER!

Bullock needs to lay off Botox. It's seriously affecting her looks.

In Gravity her face looked like a mask. I think it contributed to her performance seeming rather hollow.

When Ells asked her for cash for the pizza guy's tip she said she didn't have any?

Maybe she has lost a lot of her money?

R20, she just made $70 million for Gravity last week. I think she just meant she didn't have any money on her.

R2, what 'family'?

You call having one young son age 4 or 5, and no partner, no spouse, a family?

Just wondering.

Maybe she has a crush on George Clooney.

She said she loved working with him on Gravity, and when he left the set for good after finishing his part, she said the heart and soul went out of the work for her.

And maybe she is sad that George Clooney never dates or has relationships with women of his own age.

And being 49, as Sandra is, can be difficult without a partner, a spouse, a relationship, or someone to date. Maybe she sees no prospects in that area, and finds it disheartening.

When Jesse James took his massive porncock away, the light went out of her life.

Sandra looked spectacular at the Palm Springs International Film Festival the weekend of January 3, 2014 in Palm Springs, Calif.

She wore a dark pink and orange lace dress above the knee length which was gorgeous and she looked gorgeous in it.

And her hair was straight and not styled, which is vastly the way that looks best.

She looked a million times better at the Palm Springs Film Festival than at the Oscars - like night and day.

The dress at the Oscars looked a bit dowdy and ill-fitting, and did not emphasize her very good figure.

And her hair at the Oscars was wrong - all to one side, curled, waved, crimped - not an attractive look for her.

I Sandra looked pretty last night, but she seemed a bit down.

Menopause. It's a bitch.

The director of Gravity gave Sandra wonderful compliments from the stage when he accepted an award.

He said Sandra is one of the best people he has ever met. And that her presence in making the film and starring in the film was remarkable.

Sandra got tears in her eyes when he gave her those compliments.

Bullock's Oscar dress was old-school Hollywood glamour and absolutely fucking gorgeous.

She did seem a bit more reserved than usual. Maybe she was making up for the total lack of reserve or dignity shown by the woman behind her whose sister just committed suicide.

She IS one of the few Hollywood types that you almost never hear anyone say a bad word about.

Wow, R22, what a judgmental asshole. Yeah, it's still called a family when you have a single mom and a kid. Just because there isn't a "spouse" or a "partner" doesn't mean it's not a legitimate family anymore.

Sheesh, you sound like one of those moronic Bible-thumping types who say the only valid families have a man, a woman, and 2.3 children. A lot of families in the world don't look like that at all - they involve grandparents, two moms, single dads, aunts, cousins, whatever - get your head out of your ass.

[quote]Maybe she was making up for the total lack of reserve or dignity shown by the woman behind her whose sister just committed suicide.

LOL!

Sorry, I do not find a mother and one child a family.

And no I'm not a Bible thumper nor conservative.

And I know families look different these days.

Well, I did think it was a bit odd that Roberts was acting so giddy after all the recent tradegy in her family.

R31, I would say it's a family if it is a mother and two kids.

One kid and a mom just doesn't define a family for me.

Fine that it does for you.

[quote] "Assuming Cate's comment was just a joke, it is completely nonsensical. It masturbates my confusion as to Cate's diminished intellectual acumen."

R10, what on earth does "masturbates my confusion" mean? (I have a sneaking suspicion that someone has let auto-correct do their stuttering for them...)

Sandra doesn't have to worry about anything. She has her Oscar and is still a commercially viable actress. She also has the respect of many of her peers in the business. She's a true star in every sense of the word.

It has been very disappointing to see how Blanchett carried herself this year. Her speeches all lacked humility and were full of snark. She seems to think she's above everyone else.

Bullock and her son. There is a caretaker who takes care of a kid. How is that not a family, blood related or not?

Regardless of how you "find" them, R33, a parent and child are, indeed, a family. Add in grandparents, aunts, uncles, cousins, etc. and you have an even bigger family. A spouse or partner or more than one child are not required to form a "real" family.

She realized she's utterly corn fed.

There was a rococo blind on CDAN about how Jesse James had tapes of he and Sandra dressed in leather fetish outfits, including Nazi outfits, and scat was involved.

Maybe she's got the sads because he's threatening to leak them unless he gets half her Gravity bonanza.

Well, R35, whatever you or I think, I'm pretty sure the only person whose opinion matters on Sandra Bullock's family is her own, so she and her mega-millions can probably tell you (and me) to go fuck ourselves with what we think about whether she has a true "family" or not.

You said she maybe wants to be with her family.

I highly doubt that aunts, uncles, cousins, and even grandparents are very accessible to Sandra and her little boy on a regular basis or a daily basis.

Most people these days do not live anywhere near their aunts, uncles, cousins, and often grandparents. Most are strewn all across the country.

I think a mother and two kids would be a family; but I do not call a mother and one kid a family.

T

R41, never believe anything you read on that site. Between the lying sack "lawyer" and the redneck/frau comments it's a cesspool.

Don't worry about Sandra. Because if you were sad, she wouldn't be posting about you.

R43, you're a fucking lunatic.

Sandra Bullock and her son ARE a family. Your bizarre denial of that fact says a lot about you and absolutely nothing about her or her family.

Face frozen from Boxrox. Cant move

R43, you are a short-sided idiot. She and her son are a family. I bet you have siblings and parents and have a crappy relationship with all of them. Moron.

[quote]short-sided idiot

Oh, dear. Which side is short?

Um, Sandra and her son are a family. The poster claiming a mother and her child does not constitute a family is crazy.

The only movie I enjoyed in which she starred was "While You Were Sleeping" which also had the gorgeous Bill Pullman ..another one who has not aged well.

Nice catch, R49. I am tired and had a bad day. I meant short sighted.

R51 love that film. Classic Christmas time viewing

r51 "If you fit in my pants I'll kill myself." I love that movie. Very sweet.

A spouse or partner is not needed to form a family. Of course not.

But I find a mother and two kids to be a family.

Or a father and two kids is a family.

Look at the definition at dictionary.com

It emphasizes that a family is a parent and children (plural children) not one child.

No, R55, you're wrong. You are completely and utterly wrong so just shut the fuck up about it.

So you can re-define it, R56, that's fine.

I thought Cate's comment was snarky.

During the red carpet she mentioned that gravity did change her life and wouldnt go into details. Here is hoping her dad is ok.

Are a husband and wife without kids a family?

Or a same sex couple without kids a family?

A family means more than one person to relate to.

She's been depressed looking all through the awards season. She doesn't have any work lined up either. Her father and sister live in Austin and she used to live in Austin too, maybe she's full time in LA now and lonely.

Maybe being a mother has sucked all the attention-whore out of her.....

oh.. Sandra Bullock misses BAFTAs to take care of her sick son

Oh for fuck's sake, guys. "Masturbates my confusion" is a dig at Cate using the wrong words when she speaks, getting her "big words" mixed up.

Between the airheads who can't get a simple joke and the dipshit fundies whining that a single mom with an adopted child isn't a "real" family, I can only assume that the thread exists because all the conservative mommy blogs are down today.

[quote]A spouse or partner is not needed to form a family. Of course not. But I find a mother and two kids to be a family. Or a father and two kids is a family. Look at the definition at dictionary.com It emphasizes that a family is a parent and children (plural children) not one child.

You can't be for real. I mean really. Two people can form a family union. Two men together form a family. Two women together form a family. A woman and a child form a family. And so on...

Thanks, R63. I thought it was pretty damn obvious I was "pulling a Cate".

Yikes.

I think she is planning some kind of political career, and is pensive. She looks pensive, not sad.

Listen people, she's got one hundred million dollars. She's America's Sweetheart.

Ronald Reagan wasn't even a popular actor and look what he achieved.

She sad coz she old and not out

R55 exhibits the mentality of some backwoods fundie frau from Arkansas who's thinking about getting a GED one of these days.

She didn't attend any after parties. Maybe she's over the whole Hollywood scene?

Let's all feel sorry for a woman who just earned $70 million. I think I'll slit my wrists.

"Sandra didn't even have a date"

She would have been much happier if she had taken ME!!!!! Sandra and I are deeply in love.

It's been reported that her son was very sick.

[quote]Are a husband and wife without kids a family?

Yes.

[quote]Or a same sex couple without kids a family?

Yes.

[quote]A family means more than one person to relate to.

No, it doesn't mean that at all and it never has meant that outside of your extremely fucked up and tediously limited imagination.

Try this, Ellie Mae: I'm a father with two kids. If one of them dies, would my son and I still be a family or would we stop being a family the day my daughter died? t

Her face is turning into latter day Michael Jackson.

Just a thought.....

one finds out that a husband or wife (without kids) is not family, the minute that husband or wife drops you from their life, and divorces you against your wishes

and

one fines out that a partner of either sex (without kids) is not family, the minute that partner drops you from their life, and severes all ties with you against your wishes

A husband or wife without kids and a partner of either sex without kids is not family.

Oh my god, would the "family" troll just drop it? Here's some advice for you, since I suspect you're one of those people who isn't capable of reading social cues that well and wonders why people get offended by what you say - most people are deeply protective of their loved ones, whether blood relatives or found families, and get extremely offended when others try to tell them their relationships or their identities are illegitimate because they don't fit someone's (limited) textbook definitions.

It happens with same-sex marriage ("You don't have a real marriage - marriage is between a man and a woman"). It happens with gender and self-identity ("You're not really a woman. Gender is determined by the genitals you were born with.") It happens with love ("You don't really love him. Love is something different.")

Family is what you make of it. As a side-note, the English language is also what we make of it, and is constantly evolving to include new words and updated understandings of old ones.

If you need to turn to a dictionary to figure out what "family" is and think it's defined by the gender or number of people within the unit, then the one you grew up in probably didn't do right by you, and you should spend more time building a new, loving "family" for yourself rather than telling others that they don't really have one.

Well-stated, R76

But ask and husband or wife (of either gender) if they consider the husband or wife they just divorced against the wished of their spouse to be their family

and ask a partner (of either gender) if they consider the partner they just dropped against the wishes of their partner to be their family.

Two spouses or two partners (both without kids) are not really families.

Dictionary definition or not.

Your points are stated very articulately R76, and I do understand dictionary definition versus making one's own definition, but that does not sum up all of the factors.

any, not and

both husband and wife, and partners above in R77 without kids

Lots of couples claim their dogs as their 'kids,' what do you guys think about that?

The Millions of Families Don't Exist Troll has far outlived her entertainment value.

It masturbates my confusion, and confuses my masturbation, the elation of my erection, and the Confucian of the Eurasian.

Stars really are just like us, well some of them. The have disapointments, failures, personal problems, medical problems, their fathers get ill, they are not immune from life. So point is nobody knows whats going on with her except her. Or maybe she wanted to come off more poised than hillbilly Julia Roberts whose image has really taken a nose dive.

Bullock was feeling guilty that her shitty movie won multiple Oscars.

I can believe that R84. She had no right being nominated.

I really think it's menopausal.

But the movie for which Sandra Bullock won any Oscar was mediocre dreg, as was the part she played and the way she played it.

The wig she wore in that movie was atrocious as was her fake accent.

The movie looked like a movie on Lifetime channel or worse.

dreck, not dreg

Sandra was crying because she knows why Gravity was made: it was to fulfill the prophecy of Revelations.

Hollywood is the Woman on the Beast.

The Golden cup is the Oscars.

The seven heads and ten horns = 7 + 10 = 17 letters = "Hollywoodland" the original Hollywood sign

"Now a great sign appeared in heaven, a woman clothed with the sun, with the under her feet, and on her head a garland of twelve stars" == this explains Sandra in space, a reference to winner Cate Blanchette with her Judy Garland quip, and twelve stars meaning celebrities.

More to come...

*with the moon under her feet

Woman on the Beast = Hollywood's cocaine addiction and economy

Hollywood rides the white horse, meaning people take coke and heroin to dissolution.

Maybe she was pensive because the last time she was nominated she was with that idiot ex-husband of hers and it made her sad to think about how much her world has changed since her last nomination.

I was thinking today how fortunate she has been to overcome that huge embarrassment of her husband cheating and she bringing him to the Oscars ceremony where she publicly thanked him, singled him out, and called him her best friend, all while he was betraying her.

(and even if she and Jesse had an agreement, it was still embarrassing publicly when the media did a massive number of stories and photos about his rampant cheating and betrayal, when he was supposed to keep it quiet)

Sandra came out of all of those headlines and stories with her reputation intact and her star status not tainted.

She adopted that black baby a few months before her Oscar win but didnt let iy come out until after. I liked that. Most actresses would have used something like thst for publicity and to gain votes.

And where is that cheating scum of an ex-husband now? Two failed engagements to women who aren't worthy of shining Sandra's shows and no Sandra or the kids. Loser!

Are Clooney and Sandra really that close? Is it true that the former said they could never date because they're too much alike? Or is it because one of Bullock's exes is a friend of George's?

Bullock and Clooney are good friends, yes.

I think Sandra could deal with it. I, for one, have never won Best Actress, despite my impressive filmography and undeniable acting talent. Some dumb bitch whose no longer an actress robbed me for my greatest performance. What was her name again?

r97, you just won Best Actress last week.

[quote]Some dumb bitch [bold]whose[/bold] no longer an actress robbed me for my greatest performance.

Sounds like something Cate the Great would write.

R92 I think she came out f it well because she gave him the fucking boot straight away unlike Cheryl Cole who let her husband cheat and embarrest her numerous times. It made Sandy look like a tough cookie nd he public like that.

Don't make me exacerbate you! Ya grammar basterds! I'm sorry my xanax wore off and I forgot that I won last week. I'm so used to losing and being ignored for one-hit wonders. But seriously, I deserve more than just two Oscars for losing to the likes of Goop, JHud, and Tilda, who I'm convinced was in the wrong category. Sandra can go suck it, like her bff Julia.

I think I am actually a little bit in love with Sandra Bullock.

....

....

.

I think she always seems suicidally depressed now because, while making Gravity, she discovered that the Moon landings were fake and that the daily press releases about modern civilization are all lies. Or she could be upset that she fucked her own face up and was publicly humiliated her homely gutterpunk Nazi ex.

she has been a depressive type person for many yrs

fame over substance. sad

[quote]r9 I don't think Bullock cares much about money.

Maybe she can send us some?

she has suffered from depression for long time, hence all the plastic surg......MESS