Hello and thank you for being a DL contributor. We are changing the login scheme for contributors for simpler login and to better support using multiple devices. Please click here to update your account with a username and password.

Hello. Some features on this site require registration. Please click here to register for free.

Hello and thank you for registering. Please complete the process by verifying your email address. If you can't find the email you can resend it here.

Hello. Some features on this site require a subscription. Please click here to get full access and no ads for $1.99 or less per month.

Gore Vidal's Family Challenge His Will And Say He Was A Pedophile

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 203March 3, 2019 6:12 PM

Wow! The really amazing part of this whole story is that Gore Vidal has $37 million bucks?

by Anonymousreply 1November 10, 2013 4:36 AM

[all posts by tedious, racist idiot removed.]

by Anonymousreply 2November 10, 2013 4:38 AM

I always hated him. I win.

by Anonymousreply 3November 10, 2013 4:40 AM

Well we see why these brats were left out of the will.

Pray tell, what is their defense of themselves for keeping their mouths shut about it for so long, if they are so sure that it was going on?

by Anonymousreply 4November 10, 2013 4:40 AM

He was entitled to leave his money to anyone he wished, of course, but there are so many organizations that do good in the world that need money much more than the already stupendously rich Harvard University.

by Anonymousreply 5November 10, 2013 4:42 AM

$37M, and a devoted,furious, angry leftist.

"I'm shocked!" said no one.

by Anonymousreply 6November 10, 2013 4:45 AM

BUMP. (Is that a pun in this thread's case?)

by Anonymousreply 7November 10, 2013 4:46 AM

Well, he came from money. His father was successful in business. When Vidal sold his novels to Hollywood, he would have known to invest the money.

by Anonymousreply 8November 10, 2013 4:47 AM

[quote]Mr Steers said he would drink single male scotch

Deliberate typo, or just the usual Daily Mail sloppiness?

by Anonymousreply 9November 10, 2013 4:47 AM

He was a devoted Democrat, r6, not a monk with a vow of poverty.

by Anonymousreply 10November 10, 2013 4:49 AM

Exactly, r4. Absolutely vile if it is true, they knew, and never said a word until now.

Can they be arrested for that?

by Anonymousreply 11November 10, 2013 4:55 AM

He was a pederast and his cut-off age was 26.

by Anonymousreply 12November 10, 2013 4:58 AM

People shouldn't be able to contest ironclad wills. They're obviously greedy. And bitter.

by Anonymousreply 13November 10, 2013 4:58 AM

I doubt he was a pedophile. He was a very public person and he made ALOT of enemies, not just Buckley. If he were doing something that heinous, this info would have been released big time.

His relatives are just greedy cunts

by Anonymousreply 14November 10, 2013 4:59 AM

He was out of his mind! He left his entire $37 million estate to a 17-year old male stripper!

Oh, wait, no...He left his entire estate to his bull dog named Roosevelt!

No, that' not right, either..... He left his entire estate to Harvard University! So he was obviously out of his mind!

by Anonymousreply 15November 10, 2013 5:01 AM

Why is the allegation that he was a pedophile even relevant in contesting the will if the reason for contesting is that he was suffering from dementia.

And why did the half-sister pay his legal fees if he has $37 million? It's not like all that money fell into his lap the week before he died. The dispute with Buckley happened decades ago.

None of this makes any sense.

Also he had a longtime partner of many, many years, and it was the death of his partner I think that really brought about the end for him.

by Anonymousreply 16November 10, 2013 5:23 AM

If these allegations are fake, then his half-sister and her son are total cunts. The only thing worse than a pedophile is a serial killer.

by Anonymousreply 17November 10, 2013 5:30 AM

Why are people using "alot" in this thread?

by Anonymousreply 18November 10, 2013 5:31 AM

Agreed R16 - what does the pedophile issue have to do with a will?

But I do find it odd that we would donate everything to an already extremely wealthy university where $37 million is a drop in a bucket - and a place he never attended. It doesn't really make much sense - he knew that money could be used in much better ways.

I wonder what the original will was - one year prior.

by Anonymousreply 19November 10, 2013 5:34 AM

The pedophilia accusation is to turn public opinion against him, which they think will make it easier to get their grubby hands on his inheritance. Obviously Gore chose wisely writing these greedy creeps out of his will. This Steers sleezebag should have to worry that exposing himself as a ruthless vulture will backfire on his directing career, but I guess it won't, or he wouldn't be doing it.

by Anonymousreply 20November 10, 2013 5:35 AM

[all posts by tedious, racist idiot removed.]

by Anonymousreply 21November 10, 2013 5:39 AM

Vidal was nothing else if not a snob. Of course he would leave money to Harvard.

His asshole relatives sound like homophobes.

r6 sounds like the idiot he is.

by Anonymousreply 22November 10, 2013 5:43 AM

R19, not everyone thinks about where money is most needed. He may have simply respected the institution, or perhaps some of the faculty, many of whom he may have known personally through professional or personal connections.

There is no way to know why he chose Harvard. But the fact that he chose a well respected institution over family members, I think, indicates it was not an oversight on his part.

by Anonymousreply 23November 10, 2013 5:43 AM

I'm surprised he didn't leave it St. Albans School, where his beloved Jimmy Trimble and he met. Trimble died young, and Vidal said Trimble was the love of his life -- essentially a boy was the love of his life.

by Anonymousreply 24November 10, 2013 5:44 AM

Maybe they're pissy because they kept his dirty secrets all these years and that's how he repaid them. The guilt should still be overwhelming.

by Anonymousreply 25November 10, 2013 5:46 AM

Did Trimble love him back or did they have a relationship of any kind?

Why did Gore get engaged to Joanne Woodward at one point?

by Anonymousreply 26November 10, 2013 5:49 AM

Perhaps he didn't leave money to St. Albans because he found out that Jimmy Trimble was in love with a woman?

The link is interesting. He met JT's mother. She showed him letters from JT to her about his love for Christine White.

They mention there is one tryst in the bathroom at a dance when they're 17 years old, that was it, I suppose Gore sucked him off then.

JT never mentioned GV ever. GV was in love with a figment of his own imagination & OCD.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 27November 10, 2013 5:58 AM

Nina and Burr: fuck off.

by Anonymousreply 28November 10, 2013 6:03 AM

And r25, maybe it's easy to make any kind of accusation without a shred of proof, and especially when the person accused is dead.

by Anonymousreply 29November 10, 2013 6:04 AM

In Palimpsest, Vidal talks about he had his first sexual experience with Trimble - I think they jerked each other off (Trimble gripped him like a baseball bat, I think he wrote). But that seemed to have been around 8th grade or so.

by Anonymousreply 30November 10, 2013 6:09 AM

He could have really made a difference with that money had he left it to institutions/individuals who needed it. Oh well...

by Anonymousreply 31November 10, 2013 6:09 AM

Actually, his relatives are despicable either way. If they are lying out of greed and avarice, then they are terrible people. But, if they knew Vidal was a pedophile for all those years and kept quiet so as not to threaten their inheritance, then they are criminal accomplices themselves.

by Anonymousreply 32November 10, 2013 6:10 AM

Leaving it to Harvard, though largely pointless, is still better than leaving it to greedy, backstabbing relatives.

by Anonymousreply 33November 10, 2013 6:12 AM

What R32 wrote.

by Anonymousreply 34November 10, 2013 6:13 AM

I agree, r32. Are we talking pedophile or ephebophile though?

If it was the latter, it makes more sense that they said nothing. Not that I agree with it, but there is a difference in a lot of people's minds between, say, a 9 year old and a 17 year old.

by Anonymousreply 35November 10, 2013 6:18 AM

The weird thing is that Gore Vidal made most of his money from a now-forgotten series of mystery novels he wrote under a pseudonym, Edgar Box, in the Fifties. That furnished his major real estate purposes like the mansion on the Hudson and his beautiful house on the cliffs of Ravello on the Amalfi Coast. he got a lot of money when he sold the latter.

He admitted during his lifetime that he regularly used underage boys around Ravello for sex (he would pay money for it, just like Sebastian in "Suddenly Last Summer," for which he wrote the screenplay). I'm not at all surprised then if he had sex with other boys who were underage. He was a pretty amoral person--he was one of the worst liars of the 20th century. Remember when he announced that he was related to Jimmy Carter, and then to Al Gore? or when he said he only hired Fred Kaplan to write his official biography, after he didn't like what the latter had written about him, because he was under the mistaken impression he was Justin Kaplan?

by Anonymousreply 36November 10, 2013 6:27 AM

We procured for him!

by Anonymousreply 37November 10, 2013 6:33 AM

No one should entertain these accusations without any proof, it's too easy to just make shit up about people you hate, such as rich relatives who didn't leave you anything. Or that fag who didn't leave us anything. If we can't get the fag's money, at least we can smear his good name, and tarnish his legacy. And the beauty is every homophobe will believe it without a shred of evidence.

by Anonymousreply 38November 10, 2013 6:34 AM

So Vidal's 'family' are now doing what Buckley never quite did.

Either they kept quiet on the expectation of a nice slice; or there's nothing beyond what Vidal made known, which was 'paid sex in the afternoons' with young hustlers. It's beyond cynical to link the latter with the Sandusky case.

Plainly Vidal had their number, wet brain or not, and they are now underlining his judgement.

Harvard is the college he declined to attend, though things worked out quite well for him anyway. Harvard will protect and promote his legacy in the way he would have wanted. The facts of his singular career will easily see off this sordid cash-grab from his 'family.'

Re: the $37m. Vidal always credited his late partner Howard with being a very good manager/businessman. Film fees were clearly invested well; and their last home in Ravello would have sold for a healthy sum.

by Anonymousreply 39November 10, 2013 6:34 AM

Obviously he sought to burnish his legacy by associating his name with hallowed Harvard.

His relations sound like money grubbers, but what do they have to lose?

by Anonymousreply 40November 10, 2013 6:43 AM

With a first name like Gore, there was bound to be trouble.

by Anonymousreply 41November 10, 2013 7:06 AM

I met Gore about two years ago and he was not anywhere near "brain gone." Very witty and gave a lecture on his thoughts of current states of the world. These bitches probably got what they deserved....nothing.

by Anonymousreply 42November 10, 2013 7:10 AM

With a half-sister named Nina Straight, there was bound to be more trouble.

by Anonymousreply 43November 10, 2013 7:21 AM

Those Straight girls.

by Anonymousreply 44November 10, 2013 7:30 AM

We'll never know, of course, even if some youngsters purporting to have been used by him come forward. However, his spending a lot of time in Thailand is damning indeed.

by Anonymousreply 46November 10, 2013 7:49 AM

R18 made me laugh.

by Anonymousreply 47November 10, 2013 7:58 AM

R45 I hope you burn in Hell, you piece of shit. Making disgusting remarks about older gay men on this site, just fuck off back to the turd dwelling where you belong. Just fuck off.

by Anonymousreply 48November 10, 2013 8:18 AM

Pedophilia = sexually interested in pre-pubescent youth.

Are they saying he was diddling little kids, or 15 year olds with pubic hair?

by Anonymousreply 49November 10, 2013 8:31 AM

Was Burr Steers named for Aaron or Raymond or Tilstrom?

by Anonymousreply 50November 10, 2013 9:30 AM

If they guy was into kids, why would his relatives want even a paper clip that belonged to him? I remember when they had Micheal Jackson's auction. Like hell would I want a pencil that was once belonged to someone who was a molester.

Those of you who ask if he was into little kids or 15 year old hustlers is a ridiculous question.Having sex with teenagers is still sick.I don't care what the age of consent is according to the law. It is sick for someone who is 10, 15, 20 years older going after a teen. If you don't want someone your own age or someone a bit younger than your age,you have major dysfunctional problems.

by Anonymousreply 51November 10, 2013 10:28 AM

"Well, if we can't get any of the estate back, we've set the stage for a good 'tell-all' book deal"

by Anonymousreply 52November 10, 2013 1:24 PM

Sickening what people will do for money, how low, asserting a relative was something he was not. Pitiful relatives, they deserve nothing.

by Anonymousreply 53November 10, 2013 1:33 PM

He was a fucking pedophile but we still want his money.

The Jackson Family.

Oh, wait, we're talking about Gore Vidal's relatives this time.

by Anonymousreply 54November 10, 2013 1:38 PM

He was a nasty homophobe.

by Anonymousreply 55November 10, 2013 1:42 PM

Vidal's relationship with Howard Austen was sexless. I don't doubt that Vidal liked them young, but I don't think he went THAT young. Though he claimed not to give a shit about what other people thought of him, he was aware that he had a number of enemies. This would have come out years ago I imagine. Will be interesting to see if Joanne Woodward addresses the claims - she must be one of his only close friends still living.

by Anonymousreply 56November 10, 2013 1:52 PM

Vidal was good friends with Jay Parini, who is now his official biographer.

I imagine Parini will observe family ructions and cash-in books with cool interest; then deal with them summarily in his big book.

Big it will need to be, since Gore had quite the life. Knowing what we do about Vidal's character, I imagine he still has surprises in store.

by Anonymousreply 57November 10, 2013 4:39 PM

[quote]Vidal was good friends with Jay Parini, who is now his official biographer.

He already had an official biographer: Fred Kaplan.

by Anonymousreply 58November 10, 2013 4:50 PM

"Most old gay men of means are pedophiles... FACT"

No. Most of them are bottoms (like most gay men in general) who want to get topped by burly guys, not little kids.

"Those of you who ask if he was into little kids or 15 year old hustlers is a ridiculous question.Having sex with teenagers is still sick.I don't care what the age of consent is according to the law. It is sick for someone who is 10, 15, 20 years older going after a teen."

Poe married his cousin when she was 13 and he was 30-ish....are you going to go to the library and burn every Poe book? Are you going to protest the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame and get them to de-induct Jerry Lee Lewis?

by Anonymousreply 59November 10, 2013 4:56 PM

The New York Times article was written by Tim Teeman. Teeman recently publshed a book on Vidal, "In Bed with Gore Vidal: Hustlers, Hollywood and The Private World of an American Master." It's not a Darwin Porter-type bull-shit book

His nephew, Burr, took care of Vidal during the last years of his life. Burr believes he had been promised Vidal's Hollywood house, as stated in the article.

Teeman likes Vidal, but Gore still comes across as an entitled, selfish asshole who believes his books have not received the praised they deserve. Good luch with that, Mr. Vidal.

A less self-involved person would have split the will between the people who took care of him in his last years and Harvard University. I agree that Harvard was a poor choice, but fit with Vidal's upper-class ways. I should say that I liked Vidal before reading the book, not so much now.

by Anonymousreply 60November 10, 2013 4:58 PM

The British pronounce oedophile with a long e. I think it sounds ridiculous, like someone who pees on others for sexual pleasure.

by Anonymousreply 61November 10, 2013 5:01 PM

The long-term question is not whether Vidal had sex with underage boys. It's whether his writing will stand up fifty-seventy five years from now.

That's why Vidal chose Harvard.

by Anonymousreply 62November 10, 2013 5:03 PM

I would love Lily Tomlin to revive Ernestine to give her take on "Mr. VEED-duhl"'s final days.

by Anonymousreply 63November 10, 2013 5:06 PM

[quote] She described the alleged circumstances as 'Jerry Sandusky acts', referring to the former Penn State assistant football coach convicted of child molestation.

Well I guess that makes her just as guilty as Joe Paterno if she knew it was happening and said nothing. Interesting to frown upon child molestation yet tote it all out in public after you're cut out of said molester's will.

by Anonymousreply 64November 10, 2013 5:06 PM

[quote]oedophile

Is that someone who likes young wines?

by Anonymousreply 65November 10, 2013 5:07 PM

[quote]The British pronounce oedophile with a long e.

They also spell it PAEDO, not PEDO.

by Anonymousreply 66November 10, 2013 5:08 PM

I suspect R62 is correct. Nobody reads his books now, except maybe the essays (and those not for much longer) - certainly not the novels.

by Anonymousreply 67November 10, 2013 5:09 PM

I typo'd. You caught me.

by Anonymousreply 68November 10, 2013 5:23 PM

I'm with those who are critical of Harvard as his heir. Despite many and multifarious progressive teachers and students, it's really an elite, reactionary institution. I'm not surprised, neither am I dismayed, by the size of his fortune, nor does that disqualify his status as a progressive, which is a fatuous idea. I think he was a great essayist, but not a very nice person. But what does "pedophilia" mean? How many gay folk, especially those who are older now, haven't had sex with a willing 17 year old. When I was a young man on vacation, a 14 year old Puerto Rican looked at me (Old San Juan) and mouthed the words: "I want you to fuck me" to me. But he was really MUCH too young, despite my incredible (!) temptation!!

by Anonymousreply 69November 10, 2013 5:45 PM

Yes, but who reads anything good nowadays, anyway? Very few. Vidal is clearly a gifted essayist, though not much of a novelist (except for Julian), I agree.

by Anonymousreply 70November 10, 2013 5:47 PM

"How many gay folk, especially those who are older now, haven't had sex with a willing 17 year old"

And of course many, many straight men would love to have sex with a 17-year-old girl

by Anonymousreply 71November 10, 2013 5:51 PM

Why would they even want the money of a pedophile? Greed is amazing.

by Anonymousreply 72November 10, 2013 5:53 PM

[all posts by tedious, racist idiot removed.]

by Anonymousreply 73November 10, 2013 6:01 PM

Gore was also obsessed with the Oklahoma bomber too, remember? And he defended him too.

by Anonymousreply 74November 10, 2013 6:23 PM

What Gore Vidal did or did not do during his lifetime is completely irrelevant to how his estate should be handled after his death. He was under no obligation to anyone to justify who he left his estate to.

The only argument his relatives could possibly have is that he was not mentally competent to decide how the estate should be handled after his death [italic]AND[/italic] that someone was unduly influencing him to change his will to their advantage (for which there is absolutely no evidence).

Promises made to relatives in the past do not count, nor is he obligated to repay favors they may have done for him.

Discussion of what constitutes pedophilia and whether or not Vidal was a pedophile are completely beside the point, no matter how titillating the discussion might be.

by Anonymousreply 75November 10, 2013 6:38 PM

[quote]Discussion of what constitutes pedophilia and whether or not Vidal was a pedophile are completely beside the point, no matter how titillating the discussion might be.

Beside the point to the question of his will, yes; but absolutely not beside the point more generally. It's very interesting.

by Anonymousreply 76November 10, 2013 6:41 PM

In his first memoir, Arthur Laurents wrote that Gore had more sex than anyone he knew.

by Anonymousreply 77November 10, 2013 6:42 PM

Even if the allegations are true how will the family prevail in challenging Gore's will ? They don't have an iceberg's chance in Hell.

by Anonymousreply 78November 10, 2013 6:46 PM

Oh, please. He was not a pedophile, he was a "pederast", continuing the great tradition of Greek "man/boy love". That's how all these great "gay" artists like him, Wilde, Gide etc. would justify their perversion.

by Anonymousreply 79November 10, 2013 6:49 PM

WTF?! He didn't leave his money to his partner of 50 years?

by Anonymousreply 80November 10, 2013 6:49 PM

[all posts by tedious, racist idiot removed.]

by Anonymousreply 81November 10, 2013 6:51 PM

[quote]Oh, please. He was not a pedophile, he was a "pederast",

You say "to-may-toe," I say "to-mah-toe."

by Anonymousreply 82November 10, 2013 6:53 PM

I read the article in the NYT, and it doesn't say he was a pedophile. It says that Vidal was afraid that Buckley had information saying that Vidal was a pedophile. That's two different things. In other words, the article gave me the impression that Vidal was afraid Buckley would just make shit up.

by Anonymousreply 83November 10, 2013 6:55 PM

But if Nina corroborates that he was "Sandusky-like" he probably was. Interesting that Buckley's son got rid of the file.

by Anonymousreply 84November 10, 2013 7:00 PM

Vidal was indeed NOT a pedophile, ever.

by Anonymousreply 85November 10, 2013 7:05 PM

R82. Did you read my whole reply? I think you didn't.

by Anonymousreply 86November 10, 2013 7:15 PM

I agree with R69 that Harvard is an elitist school (no one would disagree there), but why is it necessarily reactionary? If Harvard is reactionary, so are all the Ivy colleges, and Stanford, University of Chicago, etc. Frankly, that seems like an argument Gore Vidal in his prime would have made successfully or not.

For the record, his name was Eugene Gore Vidal, he dropped Eugene early on.

by Anonymousreply 87November 10, 2013 7:21 PM

I found this (from the Daily Beast article linked above) interesting:

[quote]Fifty-three years after he first met Trimble, Vial had lunch with his great love’s mother, Ruth Trimble Sewell, in a Washington hotel. She wanted to speak to him about the dedication “To J.T.” in his novel “The City and the Pillar,” a story of the love between two young men.

[quote]“Kind friends wrote me from all over to say how upset I must be,” she told Vidal by his account, then adding “Perhaps, I overreacted.”

[quote]The mother stunned Vidal when she suggested that she had split with her second husband because he was gay and that he might have molested Trimble—in her words, “liked him rather too much.”

by Anonymousreply 88November 10, 2013 7:49 PM

[quote]For the record, his name was Eugene Gore Vidal, he dropped Eugene early on.

Actually he was born Eugene Louis Vidal, later changed to Eugene Luther Vidal. At 13 he was christening and added "Gore" (so he was Eugene Louis Gore Vidal); at 14, he dropped "Eugene" and "Louis" because he thought "Gore Vidal" sounded more fitting for a great writer or a great national leader (he wanted to be both).

He was pretty batshit crazy, his whole life. A textbook narcissist with huge delusions of grandeur, and a consistent liar.

by Anonymousreply 89November 10, 2013 7:55 PM

I believe you, R89. I met him at one Book Expo in NYC (before his illness) and he was surly, churlish, ornery.

by Anonymousreply 90November 10, 2013 9:24 PM

r59, Poe did marry his thirteen year old cousin, but it's doubtful he ever actually fucked her.

I don't have trouble believing Gore Vidal was a pedo, but if these people knew all about it and covered for him when he was alive, only to go public because they're trying to get a payday out of it, they need to die in a grease fire.

by Anonymousreply 91November 10, 2013 9:36 PM

Harvard probably promised to house his original manuscripts and give them the praise and attention he thought they deserved.

Those family members are making a good case for why they should not see a cent.

by Anonymousreply 92November 10, 2013 9:42 PM

I went to Wikipedia to read up on Jimmy Trimble. I wonder who wrote it up -- certainly not an English-as-a-first-language person.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 93November 10, 2013 9:47 PM

I seriously doubt he was a "pedo," I.e., into children under 12; it would be extremely difficult for a famous and controversial out gay man to engage in that type of behavior over time without being exposed. And though it is extremely politically incorrect to say so, rates of sexually interaction between adults and children (not adolescents, but children) have been vastly overinflated. In the classic iteration of rape it is an accusation easily made and virtually impossible to disprove; anyone so accused will always be soiled regardless of how flimsy the evidence, and their accusers (often adults with an agenda) will always be able to simply wail "think of the children!" and most people will turn their reasoning skills and skepticism off.

by Anonymousreply 94November 10, 2013 9:54 PM

Why would they want to inherit money from an alleged pedophile?

I love that they brought this about after the man is dead.

The one who says she is owed $1 million, just file a claim against the estate

by Anonymousreply 95November 10, 2013 9:54 PM

Gore could give a good read/dressing down like few others! I used to love him in Bill Maher's old show Politically Incorrect-"My memory is quite sound,THANK YOU!"

by Anonymousreply 96November 10, 2013 9:55 PM

"We were whole" -- Gore Vidal's version of "he fucked me."

by Anonymousreply 97November 10, 2013 10:02 PM

Vidal was a top. He also seemed to think that this among many other things made him not a homosexual but a homosexualist. He didn't "do labels" long before it was cool to make that claim.

I find him fascinating but infuriating.

by Anonymousreply 98November 10, 2013 11:16 PM

I can understand feeling hurt and entitled to something from the estate because one of them was a caretaker and the other supposedly loaned money for the legal fund. Especially if someone was caretaker for someone with dementia. It's really hard and taxing. However, these people are just so, so low. Makes me wonder if they learned it from the master himself. Another crazy family story. Wills and bequests (or the lack of) bring out the worst in people.

by Anonymousreply 99November 10, 2013 11:36 PM

Jackie's half-brother, James Auchincloss, who was also related to Gore in an extended family way, was jailed on child porn charges.

by Anonymousreply 100November 11, 2013 12:35 AM

Some random information that has not already been mentioned:

In addition to everthing else, Gore Vidal was also diabetic near the end. Drinking so much only made things worse, if that is possible

I have some sympathy for his half-sister and nephew. Vidal also had a nephew who died of AIDS. Gore helped him financially, but refused to publicly endorse AIDS organizations that helped his nephew.

Gore did publicly scold Jacqueline Onasis for not also pitching in with money, but she was a more distant relative than Gore.

by Anonymousreply 101November 11, 2013 1:01 AM

Is this half-sister Nina who's making the claims originally an Auchincloss? And Jackie O's step-sister. apologies if it was already noted here.

As r100 said Nina's younger half-brother (and Jackie's) was jailed recently for kiddie porn and is a pedophile. What's with that family?

by Anonymousreply 102November 11, 2013 1:16 AM

STOP DISCUSSING THIS PEDOPHILIC HOMOPHOBIC AIDS-RIDDEN BITCH WHOSE LOOSE PROSTATE IS NOW EATEN BY WORMS!

by Anonymousreply 103November 11, 2013 1:42 AM

"STOP DISCUSSING THIS PEDOPHILIC HOMOPHOBIC AIDS-RIDDEN BITCH WHOSE LOOSE PROSTATE IS NOW EATEN BY WORMS"

Thank you, Bill Buckley.

by Anonymousreply 104November 11, 2013 2:36 AM

R104 Papa wouldn't have written anything so jejeune

by Anonymousreply 105November 11, 2013 3:59 AM

Good luck fighting Harvard lawyers for the inheritance. They will make minced meat out of nasty shit stains.

Also, YES, the GOP would have used this "proof" if they had it, long, long, long ago.

by Anonymousreply 106November 11, 2013 4:05 AM

The issue is, what was in the prior will, and was he competent to change it without being unduly influenced.

That will be the fact to prove. The rest is just noisy distraction.

by Anonymousreply 107November 11, 2013 4:47 AM

Even if he were a pedophile, why would that entitle his family to his money if he didn't leave to them??

by Anonymousreply 108November 11, 2013 5:59 AM

They are just hoping for a book deal. They can say all kinds of sensational stuff to sell it.

Real scumbags. If they knew about it all those years ago and didn't report it aren't they accomplices? If they are just inventing it, they are just as bad.

I have no idea if he was or wasn't a pedo but they sound like greedy scum.

by Anonymousreply 109November 11, 2013 6:30 AM

How papally glamorous!

by Anonymousreply 110November 11, 2013 6:37 AM

[quote]jejeune

Oh dear.

by Anonymousreply 111November 11, 2013 6:43 AM

Gore Vidal was always wary about family (especially his own) and American puritanism and hypocrisy. His life's work is housed in the manuscripts collection of Houghton Library at Harvard, where his money will be much better spent.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 112November 11, 2013 7:49 AM

[quote]Gore Vidal was always wary about family (especially his own)

And yet paradoxically enough he milked every cent he could out of his family connections, and kept claiming he was related to everyone famous even when he wasn't. That is, he was descended (not directly) from people like Aaron Burr and his grandfather was a senator, but he also claimed he was related to people like Al Gore whom he was not related to at all, and claimed "his family" had "governed" the United States since the seventeenth century (which is not true).

by Anonymousreply 113November 11, 2013 7:55 AM

"Those of you who ask if he was into little kids or 15 year old hustlers is a ridiculous question.Having sex with teenagers is still sick.I don't care what the age of consent is according to the law. It is sick for someone who is 10, 15, 20 years older going after a teen."

Poe married his cousin when she was 13 and he was 30-ish....are you going to go to the library and burn every Poe book? Are you going to protest the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame and get them to de-induct Jerry Lee Lewis? t

R59, you are a lunatic! I said it was sick behavior to have sex with kids and teens. I didn't say I was going to change society dumass! Also, did I point out gay guys? I said ANYONE! which means gay or straight who have sex with kids and teens. I think Jerry Lee Lewis is repulsive.

About Edger Allen Poe, it was very common back in the 1800s,1700s, etc. for people to marry at a very young age because they did not live long. Also, there were cases in which men, such as Edger Allen Poe, who would get married after they were able to establish a career and make money so they were able to provide stability to marry and have a famliy. They usually married someone much younger who was able to bear children and who was able to outlive them. If they died when they were established in their lives, they were confident knowing that their wife and children were taken care of.

BTW, my great, great, great, grandfather married my great, great, great, grandmother when she was 16 years old and he was 28 years old in the early 1800s.

by Anonymousreply 114November 11, 2013 9:26 AM

I had hoped to open this thread and find erotic stories about Gore and Paul Newman.

But nope, just standard DL pointless bickering and bitchery.

by Anonymousreply 115November 11, 2013 9:33 AM

It's well known that Gore Vidal hired many, many hustlers in Italy and now we know about Thailand. What we do not know is whether Vidal hired under-age guys either over seas, or in the U.S.

So far all we know is that William Buckley's son threw away a file on Vidal kept by his father.

For his immediate family member to notify the authorities, they would have to present specific information not just rumors.

by Anonymousreply 116November 11, 2013 11:40 AM

If Joanne Woodward would ever write a candid autobiography, it would be an immediate best seller.

by Anonymousreply 117November 11, 2013 11:51 AM

I love that one delicious quote from Vidal when Christopher Hitchens interviewed him back in the early 90s. Hitchens asked him about Martin Amis, and in bitchy Vidal fashion, he said: "I will say that he writes better than his father, but then so do most people."

Legend!

I don't believe for one minute he was a pedophile. Buckley and his crew would have revealed that shit ages ago when Vidal was at the height of his career. Vidal was apologetically liberal, WASPY and bisexual, and such information would have buried him because he was already seen as too much of a threat.

by Anonymousreply 118November 11, 2013 12:00 PM

[quote]had had sex with underage men

if they were underage, then they were not men.

by Anonymousreply 119November 11, 2013 12:20 PM

*unapologetically

by Anonymousreply 120November 11, 2013 2:08 PM

Gore Vidal spoke at the Miami Book Fair in 2008 and his mind was as clear and lucid as ever.

by Anonymousreply 121November 11, 2013 3:00 PM

Does she?

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 122November 11, 2013 3:16 PM

[all posts by tedious, racist idiot removed.]

by Anonymousreply 123November 11, 2013 3:57 PM

Posted this once before but can't see it on the thread. Met him at Book Expo in NYC before his illness and he was the petulant, surly, churlish, ornery Gore that made him infamous.

by Anonymousreply 124November 11, 2013 4:02 PM

Can someone elaborate about Newman, Woodward and Gore? People keep alluding to it but I don't know what it's about.

by Anonymousreply 125November 11, 2013 4:32 PM

"About Edger Allen Poe, it was very common back in the 1800s,1700s, etc. for people to marry at a very young age because they did not live long"

It was never common at any point in the 1800s for grown men to marry 13-year-old girls. We have these things called statistics....maybe you have heard of them. Most women married in their late teens or twenties. And they usually married men who were relatively close to their own age, usually just a few years older.

(Kind of funny how society loves to attack men who have sex with young boys but men who have sex with young girls are lauded. Jerry Sandusky is a monster...but Roman Polanski is just a tragic misunderstood soul! Let's sign some petitions in his defense! I always thought it was homophobic straight men who were guilty of this kind of thinking but you find a lot of it at the datalounge, too)

by Anonymousreply 126November 11, 2013 4:54 PM

Wasn't Roman Polanski some kind of fugitive? His HW friends supported him but the public at large saw him (and still does to an extent) as a child rapist.

by Anonymousreply 127November 11, 2013 5:03 PM

Vidal was a bundle of contradictions. A liberal firebrand who like to drop royal and blueblood names... a gay man with a yen for hustlers (ldunno about them being kids), but devoted to one fellow for most of his adult life.

It is strange that he left his money to Harvard, and institutino he reviled for much of his adult life. One would think there were some people he would leave something to in his presonal life-

Article in the NY Times last week painted a nasty decline and late life alcoholism- as well as a mean streak which I thought was a hallmark of his character ever since I became aware of him which was in the late 60s.

I was not and am not a fan of his. I guess he was a good writer, but he was kind of like the Oliver Stone or authors- hysterical conspiracy nut. His writing was also much too self conscious for me- it reeked of I like readers to know first and formost that I am a great writer.

And his nonsense about not being homosexual... speaks for itself.

Not my kind of hero- not even all that interesting because he was so full of bullshit.

by Anonymousreply 128November 11, 2013 5:05 PM

"Wasn't Roman Polanski some kind of fugitive?"

Yep. But he is attracted to the opposite gender unlike me so the world defends him

by Anonymousreply 129November 11, 2013 5:06 PM

R128 - charlie?

by Anonymousreply 130November 11, 2013 5:07 PM

r129 I don't want to derail the thread but how is the world "defending" RP? He is considered by most people a pedo and rapist. Unfortunately, his victim came to his defense a few years ago which might have helped him but I doubt the average person thinks better of him still or would leave their young daughters in his presence.

Also, wasn't it France that gave him shelter all those years? If anyone is to blame for him not being punished, it's them and they are not "the world".

Why are you pissed off about Sandusky? You make it sound like he's some kind pf persecuted gay man when all he is is a child rapist and deserves to burn in hell.

by Anonymousreply 131November 11, 2013 5:17 PM

France does not extradite its citizens. It's not a particular shelter for citizen Polanski.

by Anonymousreply 132November 11, 2013 5:20 PM

"Why are you pissed off about Sandusky? You make it sound like he's some kind pf persecuted gay man when all he is is a child rapist and deserves to burn in hell."

I didn't say he didn't deserve to be in prison. I'm just pointing out that heterosexual men (and probably some gay men, too, based on things people have posted here) would defend him if his victims had been girls. But it's useless trying to argue with someone who thinks hell actually exists.

by Anonymousreply 133November 11, 2013 5:45 PM

[quote]I'm just pointing out that heterosexual men (and probably some gay men, too, based on things people have posted here) would defend him if his victims had been girls

And what does THAT tell you? Because to me it means that things are fucked up and that it's misogynistic.

I also don't know how you concluded that "heterosexual men" would defend an adult man raping a 12-13 girl.

by Anonymousreply 134November 11, 2013 5:57 PM

[quote]I'm just pointing out that heterosexual men (and probably some gay men, too, based on things people have posted here) would defend him if his victims had been girls.

Uh, no.

by Anonymousreply 135November 11, 2013 6:19 PM

Gore Vidal is not and never was progressive or clear-minded. If he sounded somewhat progressive in the last ten years of his life, it was because the nation had become a toilet of right-wing lunacy, not because he himself had any kind of brain. Gore Vidal will never be taught in upper level American Literature, at Harvard or anywhere else.

by Anonymousreply 136November 11, 2013 6:19 PM

If his will requires it they may offer a novelty class in him but he will never make the mainstream.

by Anonymousreply 137November 11, 2013 6:20 PM

"I also don't know how you concluded that "heterosexual men" would defend an adult man raping a 12-13 girl."

Maybe you could ask Roman Polanski fanboi Johnny Depp. Or the many celebs who have worked with Polanski. Or the media outlets who barely gave any coverage to guys convicted of abusing young girls like Chad Curtis. I started a thread about Curtis here that hardly got any response. If he had been convicted of abusing boys the media would be frothing at the mouth. The media was frothing at the mouth over Sandusky before he was even convicted of anything. The media was frothing at the mouth over Bernie Fine even though his accusers admitted they were lying and the police didn't arrest him because they didn't have enough evidence against him.

by Anonymousreply 138November 11, 2013 6:27 PM

People who couch their arguments in absolutes will lose their arguments, e.g. "heterosexual men will do this thing," or "gay men believe this..."

by Anonymousreply 139November 11, 2013 6:29 PM

I don't agree with that, R137. For his essays alone he will be remembered, and he was certainly America's greatest and funniest essayist since H.L. Mencken. His book of essays 'United States' is a classic.

Even if one ignores his essays, 'The City and the Pillar' and 'Myra Breckinridge' will forever be discussed in regards to its contribution to queer literature. No one in this country were writing novels of that kind before Vidal.

by Anonymousreply 140November 11, 2013 6:30 PM

r139 First of all, you are preaching to the choir. I'm all for rapist scumbags being punished severely, no matter who their victims are.

Second of all, I don't know why you're giving me celebrities as proof that the mainstream feels the same. As far as I'm concerned, HW and shobiz celebs aren't rolemodels or moral examples I look up to.

I also want to understand what you're saying. Are you claiming that the media somehow sees male child/teen rapists as GAY and that's why they make a fuss while they ignore/don't make a fuss/even condone when rape case victims are female?

I disagree.

by Anonymousreply 141November 11, 2013 6:44 PM

They sound like angry greedy people

by Anonymousreply 142November 11, 2013 6:56 PM

The family strikes me as a bunch of greedy, entitled, self-centered bastards who will do and say anything to get their hands on money.

by Anonymousreply 143November 11, 2013 7:00 PM

Yes, that is the impression I get, R145

by Anonymousreply 144November 11, 2013 7:03 PM

[quote]Even if one ignores his essays, 'The City and the Pillar' and 'Myra Breckinridge' will forever be discussed in regards to its contribution to queer literature.

"forever"??

No.

by Anonymousreply 145November 11, 2013 7:05 PM

I have to agree with the poster(s) who said that these two are setting themselves up for a book deal. And maybe even a film. Harvard's lawyers will make mincemeat of their contentions and the legal fees are going to be huge if they decide to pursue. They're probably writing the book as we speak.

by Anonymousreply 146November 11, 2013 7:16 PM

R141: I read a relatively short book of Vidal's essays from the 1960s recently. They are dated now. He was obsessed, of course, with the Kennedys and other subjects that are dated in 2013. Vidal writes well. So does Mailer, Capote and other writers from his era.

Perhaps things will change, but college professors will assign "In Cold Blood" and "Armies of the Night" before any of Vidal's work.

No wonder Gore drank so much.

by Anonymousreply 147November 11, 2013 7:19 PM

How much of Vidal was a legend in his own mind?

by Anonymousreply 148November 11, 2013 7:46 PM

If Little Nina thought Gore owed her a million bucks for that old Buckley case, why didn't she sue him for it while he was alive? I don't believe a word she says. He may have promised Burr the house, that at least seems reasonable, but Burr will have to prove it and I doubt he will be successful against a wall of Harvard lawyers.

Gore Vidal was never a "Sandusky" type of pedophile, nor was he a pedophile of any kind. If he enjoyed himself with younger men, so what? He paid them well. I can't recall ever hearing any complaints about Vidal's sexual behavior with them nor with anyone else.

He was a guest lecturer at Harvard. He knows they will archive his papers meticulously and preserve his reputation. It's no surprise that he left them his money. Their lawyers will see to it that Frick and Frack, the greedy cunt-relatives, get nothing.

For those in this thread who are screeching terrible things about Gore Vidal, you are pathetic right wing shit-stains. You aren't fit to lick Gore's decomposing shitter.

by Anonymousreply 149November 11, 2013 8:08 PM

Unlike others here, I have some sympathy for the family although their methods are questionable. Gore Vidal delighted in feuding with people and letting them down.

by Anonymousreply 150November 11, 2013 8:12 PM

Somewhere, Gore's arch enemy Truman Capote is smiling.

by Anonymousreply 151November 11, 2013 10:13 PM

Why is everyone referring to him as a gay man? Wasn't he openly bisexual?

by Anonymousreply 152November 11, 2013 10:41 PM

So in the Gore v Capote feud, which side do you fall on?

by Anonymousreply 153November 11, 2013 10:51 PM

Gore never referred to himself as gay or homosexual. In his words he was a homosexualist. He did like men younger than himself but I know this in part because he came on to me when I was 40 an he was 78. He had a rapier wit and little reverence for for other peoples mores. He did like men for rent. I met a few over the years but none of them had been under 18 when they met him. It might have been different in Ravello. I only met them in NY and LA. He was a flawed and angry man but the charges of his sister are a bit far flung. She echoes his mother in her anger and bitterness. Burr on the other hand he was very proud of so this is sad.

by Anonymousreply 154November 11, 2013 10:59 PM

[quote]For those in this thread who are screeching terrible things about Gore Vidal, you are pathetic right wing shit-stains.

Childish name-calling.

by Anonymousreply 155November 11, 2013 11:02 PM

FWIW Mia Farrow defended Polanski. Just another reason she's a skank.

by Anonymousreply 156November 11, 2013 11:06 PM

Famous Gore Vidal Quotes!

"Whenever a friend succeeds, a little something in me dies."

"Andy Warhol is the only genius I've ever known with an I.Q. of 60."

"Half of the American people have never read a newspaper. Half never voted for President. One hopes it is the same half."

On Barbara Walters: "A hyena in syrup."

On Truman Capote: "Every generation gets the Tiny Tim it deserves."

by Anonymousreply 157November 12, 2013 1:35 AM

r160 rofl. He's entirely bitchy and fab.

by Anonymousreply 158November 12, 2013 1:40 AM

According to the NY Times article, the family feels the one person who really was hurt was his personal housekeeper and chef who was devoted to Vidal. Also the article mentions Vidal felt insecure (if that was possible) because he did not graduate from a prestige university, hence his gift to Harvard. He was terrified that Buckley had the "goods" concerning his sexual encounters. He always appeared pompous.

by Anonymousreply 159November 12, 2013 1:48 AM

More Gore:

"It is not enough to succeed. Others must fail."

"I can understand companionship. I can understand bought sex in the afternoon, but I cannot understand the love affair."

"As one gets older, litigation replaces sex."

"Never pass up a chance to have sex or appear on television."

"Apparently, 'conspiracy stuff' is now shorthand for unspeakable truth."

"I am at heart a propagandist, a tremendous hater, a tiresome nag, complacently positive that there is no human problem which could not be solved if people would simply do as I advise."

"The United States was founded by the brightest people in the country — and we haven't seen them since."

"Religions are manipulated in order to serve those who govern society and not the other way around."

"I suspect that one of the reasons we create fiction is to make sex exciting."

"You hear all this whining going on, "Where are our great writers?" The thing I might feel doleful about is: Where are the readers?"

"You know, I've been around the ruling class all my life, and I've been quite aware of their total contempt for the people of the country."

by Anonymousreply 160November 12, 2013 1:54 AM

R159, really? wow! Mia is nuts! I never could stand her.

The media has pointed out that a lot of people in Hollywood has stood behind Roman Polanski. But, what they haven't pointed out that there is a much greater list of celebrities who are against Polanski. Melissa Gilbert was one of the names I recall who was on the list of names against Roman Polanski.

A poster said the victim is on his side is not a correct statement. She said she is disgusted and moved on in her life. She has moved on in order to mentally survive. In an interview, she seemed defeated and worn out by talking about probably because she knows it is a waste of time and justice will not be served.

by Anonymousreply 161November 12, 2013 6:54 AM

Just what is a homosexualist, r98?

by Anonymousreply 162November 12, 2013 7:27 AM

I agree that the essays above all deserve to last, and I believe that they will.

They constitute the intellectual autobiography of a singular intelligence. Vidal said somewhere that essay writing allowed him to continue his education throughout life. Few autodidacts are so productive, informative and entertaining.

Even if some essays are dated, they still evoke the concerns and attitudes of their time - and Vidal's unique contrary response.

His range, and love of literature, are admirable. The wit is always rewarding. I remember in one of his long essays on the NYT best sellers, he quoted a chunk of copy, then commented: "That isn't at all bad, except as prose."

by Anonymousreply 163November 12, 2013 7:36 AM

St. Albans in DC would have made more sense.

by Anonymousreply 164November 12, 2013 7:51 AM

With a name like "Gore" I suppose being a top is mandatory.

by Anonymousreply 165November 12, 2013 8:24 AM

Please. Gore had sex with younger men who were of legal age. That is not pedophilia.

BBC Radio, on the other hand, did a hagiographic interview with Bill Wyman this week, who (like Elvis) dated and married a girl in her young teens. The BBC talks a big game about post-Savile responsibility and then they pull this kind of shit and interview Wyman breathlessly because he's a Rolling Stone.

by Anonymousreply 166November 12, 2013 9:36 AM

Vidal was a brilliant left-wing essayist who reveled in exposing and mocking the illogic of the right.

I'm not shock at all by this. It used to be, all you'd need do to discredit a person was label them homosexual. Think H. Clinton. Now they have to be a homosexual pedophile.

I hate no one but the right is changing my attitude.

by Anonymousreply 167November 12, 2013 9:55 AM

He probably was a pedo, but his family's case isn't helped when they would've gladly stayed silent had he left them some money.

And for the record. Gore Vidal's staunch defenders are the reason why children continue to be sexually abused. I understand the implications of a prominent gay man being a pedophile, since bigots will use it to prove a point about all shy men. However, nobody is too smart, rich, renowned, or interesting to sexually abuse children! I learned this the hard way when my young niece revealed that my brother in law had molested her. It was difficult to come to terms with an admission that tore apart the facade of their "perfect" family, but that's why a lot of pedophiles who follow through on their impulses think they can get away with their behavior.

by Anonymousreply 168November 12, 2013 10:53 AM

"He probably was a pedo."

On what do you base the conclusion that he "probably was a pedo"? Because the claim has been made in a court filing seeking his money? Because someone says that William Buckley said he had a file in which he said he had "proof" of said pedophilia, but he just never bothered to use it, and neither did any of the increasingly rabid right-wingers with whom he made common cause over the years?

And for the record, children continue to be sexually abused because there continue to be adults who wish to prey on them. Including the adults who prey on them by using them as innocent weapons in their wars on other adults. His family is the lowest type who wrap themselves in flags and children to justify the worst kind of baseless accusations and protect those accusations from even the most minimal critical scrutiny.

by Anonymousreply 169November 12, 2013 11:12 AM

"But, what they haven't pointed out that there is a much greater list of celebrities who are against Polanski. Melissa Gilbert was one of the names I recall who was on the list of names against Roman Polanski"

Melissa Gilbert is a Z-lister. A-listers defend him.

"And for the record. Gore Vidal's staunch defenders are the reason why children continue to be sexually abused"

So far no one has claimed to have been abused by him.

by Anonymousreply 170November 15, 2013 7:31 PM

Gore very vain. Kept signed intimate pics of his conquests (like Paul Newman) in public view at his house. Lame in that his endless talk show battles with flamboyant gays like Truman were intended to imply he was superior/straight.

One of the great bitchy eps of all time though was (claimed, at least) by Gore: "Everytime a friend of mine succeeds, a part of me dies."

by Anonymousreply 171November 15, 2013 7:42 PM

Weird that these revered authors (Capote, Tennessee Williams, Vidal) all seemed to have died sad and virtually alone.

It's cruel that he left not a penny to his relatives. If he was so worried about his legacy, fifty thousand or so each would have been a nice symbolic gesture.

Their revenge is now he'll be remembered as a cheap, bitter, humorless old self-loathing perv.

by Anonymousreply 172November 15, 2013 9:22 PM

"...the ever-opinionated Vidal had a strange and controversial take on the abuse perpetrated by Catholic priests. 'He would say that the young guys involved were hustlers who were sending signals'... In 2009, Vidal hit headlines for referring to the 13-year-old victim in the Roman Polanski rape case as a 'young hooker'."

This is the mentality of a pedophile. Pedophiles all believe that kids are constantly sending sexual signals, and that THEY are the ones who come on to adults.

by Anonymousreply 173November 15, 2013 9:46 PM

"Their revenge is now he'll be remembered as a cheap, bitter, humorless old self-loathing perv."

Nope. It's the relatives who will be seen as bitter.

by Anonymousreply 174November 16, 2013 12:15 AM

#173: Melissa Gilbert is such a 'Z-Lister' that she recently started tweeting about her move to bum-fuck Wisconsin.

by Anonymousreply 175November 16, 2013 1:42 AM

All the millions you have. That's what it costs to get your legacy taught at Harvard. Why would a 'famous' literary figure betray his companion(s) and family, re-write his will to give all to America's premier university --though not our nation's best literature department by a long shot.

1) GV believed his oeuvre was insubstantial and harbored bitter resentment to those who more easily wrote fiction and found fame 'easily' in his view. Hence the bitchiness and jealousy --and the honesty --in his witty epigrams.

2) Knew that fiction, not at all his forte no matter how hard he tried, and he tried!, was key to fame. He shouldn't have been embarrassed, Burr was good. But he knew he wasn't canonical. Cynically, at the end, tried to buy legacy.

3) Never was there such a bitter and jealous man about others' talent. Hated geniuses, visionaries who just had 'it' . Felt it was unfair, he was so smart, why couldn't he have a spark of genius? QED. Always referred to the truly talented (Warhol, et al) as morons. Stupid. Wishful thinking. Thought he was terrible on Maher and other talk shows, since the 70s his appearances revealed rehearsed wit that soon devolved into bitter. mean, jealous diatribes. Whig.

by Anonymousreply 176November 16, 2013 2:11 AM

I don't think this ever got answered. About Gore and Paul Newman and Joanne Woodward. Gore and Woodward were pals in the 1950's when she met Newman. She and Newman fell in love but he was still married. Gore invited the couple to stay at his place together and pretended Woodward was his fiancee, not Newman's. In time Newman got his divorce and was free to marry Woodward.

Oh yeah, it would be great if Joanne wrote a memoir!

by Anonymousreply 177November 16, 2013 2:28 AM

"Why would a 'famous' literary figure betray his companion(s) and family, re-write his will to give all to America's premier university --though not our nation's best literature department by a long shot."

His family members are assholes who don't deserve a dime.

by Anonymousreply 178November 16, 2013 2:29 AM

Interesting post R179. Vidal's problems surely lay in his vaulting ambition. He evidently believed that being the first gay two-term President who wrote canonical fiction was within his grasp.

He was always aiming for both the Nobel Prize, and Mount Rushmore (left profile).

Thus everyone who made it to the Oval Office, or who wrote work which will Last, earned his committed sardonic attentions.

He tried to appear above the games he desperately wanted to win. That's what makes his essays, at their best, his most readable work; readable, but by definition secondary.

It had to hurt Vidal that his despised Capote wrote two works which still pour from the presses; and that Capote inspired two good films.

Vidal tried to demolish Updike in a fascinating long piece in the TLS, but it didn't take. (At a guess, Vidal hoped that his exhaustive criticism - Updike's support for the Vietnam War, for example - might just cost Updike The Nobel.)

The 'Rabbit' books will clearly last; and Updike was a more versatile essayist than Vidal, if not as witty. But then, Updike wasn't distracted by active politics.

Vidal's multifarious act somehow prevented anyone from daring to pin the label "Jack of all trades" upon him, probably because he was the best such Jack, and always good copy. Everyone however knows the Jack he longed to be.

by Anonymousreply 179November 16, 2013 8:14 AM

Buckley's file on Gore included his having sex with Rock Hudson, Fred Astaire and others.

Rock, I can see, but Fred?

by Anonymousreply 180November 16, 2013 12:07 PM

"Buckley's file on Gore included his having sex with Rock Hudson, Fred Astaire and others."

Link please!

by Anonymousreply 181November 16, 2013 4:44 PM

[quote] The 'Rabbit' books will clearly last; and Updike was a more versatile essayist than Vidal, if not as witty. But then, Updike wasn't distracted by active politics.

Updike was a boring writer and he's certainly not in the league of Vidal as an essayist. Vidal wrote with such keen insights on literature, philosophy, history, cinema, politics, religion, .etc, that he was truly in a league of his own. Even Norman Mailer thought Updike was a terrible writer (Vidal didn't agree with Mailer; Vidal's problem with Updike was that he subject matter was too mundane and his prose too pedestrian.)

His essay for TLS about Updike was Vidal at his bitchy, sardonic best. One of my favorite quips from Vidal when describing Updike's grandiloquent prose: "Might Updike not have allowed one blind noun to slip free of its seeing-eye adjective?"

Sure, the "Rabbit" books will be remembered by those New York yuppies because in the age of "Mad Men" such tales are deemed "high art," but I suspect most of Updike's novels will be forgotten by others. Twenty years from now people will still write about "The City and the Pillar" for being the first novel to boldly depict the normality of gay relationships.

by Anonymousreply 182November 16, 2013 5:05 PM

"The City and the Pillar" will be remembered for the way it treated gay relationships, but not for its literary quality. The rest of Vidal's novel, with the exception of "Julian," have already been forgotten. Surely, part of Vidal's sharp decline and change of his will to favor Harvard Univ. was because he knew that he might otherwise be forgotten.

by Anonymousreply 183November 16, 2013 5:25 PM

DL's motto could be his epitaph.

A life filled with gossip and pointless bitchery doesn't ensure much of a legacy, however.

by Anonymousreply 184November 16, 2013 6:44 PM

Gore must've suffered demenia is he thought that Harvard needs any money.

by Anonymousreply 185November 16, 2013 6:53 PM

Does anyone remember when Gore and Chuckles Heston got into a fight over the gay content in Ben Hur? The booklet that comes with the DVD release of The Celluloid Closet has bitchy letters they wrote about each other

by Anonymousreply 186November 16, 2013 7:13 PM

What the hell does having sex with underage men - assuming it's true just for the sake of the question - have to do with whether one's will should be invalidated?

by Anonymousreply 187April 16, 2014 3:56 AM

Kevin Spacey’s Gore Vidal Film Includes Him Trying to Seduce Younger Man, Will Likely Never be Released

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 188March 2, 2019 8:44 PM

Too bad Spacey's such a creep, the movie sounds interesting and I'd liked to have seen Spacey's take on Vidal.

Whatever happened to the family lawsuit, anyway? Did they settle with Harvard or end up with nothing.

Always thought Vidal was good for quotes, but too obsessed with his own ego to be a really good writer. I found the parts of his novels I'd read just kind of flat and unbelievable.

by Anonymousreply 189March 2, 2019 9:14 PM

Whatever. Gore Vidal hit on me from his wheel chair in his last few years and I was in my late 20s. Not a pedophile. ;)

by Anonymousreply 190March 2, 2019 9:54 PM

Two lying losers making a last gasp effort to rip off a rich famous person. We hope they get not one penny and are ordered by the judge to pay all court costs.

BTW, the only reason Miss V left her money to Harvard is because she received the income from it for life tax free on the conditia that it went to Harvard at her death. We knew another rich eldersister here who did the same thing.

by Anonymousreply 191March 2, 2019 10:01 PM

Well, he WAS a pedophile. Everyone knew it, and he basically admitted it. he was like the real-life Sebastian Venable.

It is still a wonder to me the boys of Ravello, Italy didn't devour him in front of the horrified eyes of Elizabeth Taylor.

Whether that somehow means his niece and nephew are entitled to his dough is another thing altogether.

by Anonymousreply 192March 2, 2019 10:01 PM

R189 It appears that Harvard got it. The party was last Fall.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 193March 2, 2019 10:07 PM

It was so typical of him to give the money to Harvard. His entire adult life it stuck in his craw he never went to college after Exeter, and he always felt he SHOULD have gone to Harvard because he was such an unrepentant snob and saw himself as so socially important because of who his grandfather was. So he gave all his money to them even though they don't need it and he still never got the degree.

His mother was infamously one of the worst snobs of all time, and she totally did a number on his brain as a child. That's what he and Truman Capote had in common, although Capote could not pretend to be from American aristocracy the way Vidal did.

by Anonymousreply 194March 2, 2019 10:13 PM

Someone clearly needs to tell those two money grabbers exactly what a 'pedophile' is. He might have been a chicken hawk/pederast, I have no idea, but from what I've read he was no pedophile.

by Anonymousreply 195March 2, 2019 11:21 PM

r195 But anyone who is under18 is a CHILD!

by Anonymousreply 196March 2, 2019 11:44 PM

Nina Straight has always been a greedy, nasty, useless cunt.

by Anonymousreply 197March 3, 2019 12:03 AM

R196 - A 7-year old is a child. A 17 year old is an adolescent. Pedophiles are attracted to the 7 year old, not the 17 year old. Gore Vidal was no pedophile. Yes, he was a chicken hawk but not a pedophile. Also remember, he lived in Italy for a while where the age of consent is 16.

by Anonymousreply 198March 3, 2019 1:23 AM

If Harvard has it now no 'litigants' will get a penny of it. No matter what.

by Anonymousreply 199March 3, 2019 5:50 PM

[quote]Q: Are Gore Vidal and Vice President Albert Gore Jr. related? A: Depends upon whom you ask. Vidal says his grandfather, Sen. Thomas P. Gore of Oklahoma, and Al Gore's father, Sen. Albert Gore Sr. of Tennessee, were sixth cousins. That would make Gore Vidal and Al Gore Jr. seventh cousins, once removed. But a professional genealogist who has charted Vice President Gore's family tree in great detail finds no traceable link between the two Gore families. You can see this genealogy here and decide for yourself who's right (scroll down to the very bottom to page to see what he has to say about Gore Vidal). As it turn sout, it seems more likely that he's fifth cousins with President Jimmy Carter - better than an almost-president anyway.

by Anonymousreply 200March 3, 2019 6:12 PM
Loading
Need more help? Click Here.

Yes indeed, we too use "cookies." Take a look at our privacy/terms or if you just want to see the damn site without all this bureaucratic nonsense, click ACCEPT. Otherwise, you'll just have to find some other site for your pointless bitchery needs.

×

Become a contributor - post when you want with no ads!