Why would he label himself 'gay' if he has relationships (or just fucks) both men and women?
That would be incorrect.
SCROLL THE FUCK DOWN THE PAGE, OP.
Jesus. Some of you are so goddamned lazy.
R2, I wouldn't have any problem with him labeling himself as bi, or even pan, considering that's most likely what he is. What I do however have a problem with, is the fact that he refuses to label himself as ANYTHING. He should be open and proud and it would do wonders for gay visibility too.
What you have a problem with is reading comprehension, you fucking moron.
R3 YOU'RE an idiot. It clearly says he's open about what he does....the need to label it a word and put himself in a box for your liking is ridiculous. Don't think he's too worried about "your problem with it." It's not as if he is lying, denying, or bearding. Jesus, you are the reason more gay and bisexual famous men don't come out.... Worry about your side of the street!
This is MSNBC PR panicking. They hired their "millennial" star, then looked at their tanking ratings, his (likely) limited on-camera skills and their other out anchors with sliding ratings (Rachel Maddow and Steve Kornacki) and decided to do some damage control.
There's no difference between "not labeling it" (which is a pure cop-out and which is completely intellectually dishonest), and calling yourself bi or pan sexual.
He's just being a douche.
He's not being or doing anything, for the 15th time, this is the POST.
R7, if there is no difference, than why do you demand it only your way? Fucking hypocrite.
Because it's more honest, and less douchy, dipshit.
He can label himself as he wishes.
You silly cunts can hold the hems of your dresses and cry about how he isn't fitting into your idea of the world all you want. I doubt it will hurt him.
You're a category addict, R10. Honesty isn't the point - not for you, anyway.
He is gayer than gay. Have you heard his voice seen his mannerisms?! Self-loathing pos.
All the "ooooh, I don't want to be labeled" and "don't put me in a box" children are just insecure, poser cunts with the intellectual capacity of a tree frog.
Farrow's a cute kid, we'll see how things go as he matures.
And you're just an idiot douchebag trying to deny reality. Jesus, what the fuck is wrong with you?
Really, why the fuck have words for anything?
Get in your box, bitch.
Yeah, all words are just fake labels, get out of your box and stop using words for anything! WORDS ARE TYRANNY!
Language is a virus.
Does anyone think there is even a remote chance that Woody Allen is this young man's father? Even if the whole Sinatra thing is totally apocryphal, I can see absolutely NONE of Woody's DNA in Ronan's stature or facial features. Whaddaya think?
Is that THE swf?
Oh, please! He's nellier than Nellie Oleson. He wouldn't know what to do with a pussy, except maybe hit it with a fly-swatter.
Fact: insecure gay men requiring men to label themselves with a word that they themselves use to describe their own "entity"...because let's face it, if they don't do it, you don't exist, right?
Yes my love...and would you help the old girl? It's been so long since I replied to another specific post, I have forgotten how to do the "underline/bracket/#" thingy.
I am off the drugs(for now), but my memory is still a tad foggy. Thank you for remembering me.
Capitol R then the number, no spaces.
Sounds like progress to me
An old BI (05/08/2012):
[quote]BlindGossip] This franchise actor has publicly denied that he is gay. He is even occasionally photographed with his girlfriend. However, he also has a new “boyfriend” in private. The “boyfriend” is the son of two celebrities and is accomplished in his own right (and, luckily for him, looks more like his mother than his father). We call him a “boyfriend” because we don’t know for sure if the two men are intimate. However, for two guys who are not in the same business and who live far away from each other, they sure are spending an awful lot of time texting and calling and visiting together. In fact, it’s as much time as the actor spends with his current girlfriend! If the actor is gay, do not expect him to come flying out of the closet any time soon. In the meantime, these two men certainly do make a very cute couple!
Why do I think this is all leading up to RF getting married by the time he's in his early thirties, and banging out a few kids?
Then the conservatism will slowly creep in, more to distance himself from his crazy insane mother.
He looks sort of like what early Leo DiCaprio looked like, and we all know that Leo's beauty faded pretty fast. Same will happen to Ronan. Look what happened to the formerly gorgeous Prince William as well.
He can't win. If he called himself bisexual, people would just say he hasn't come out yet.
[quote]Does anyone think there is even a remote chance that Woody Allen is this young man's father? Even if the whole Sinatra thing is totally apocryphal, I can see absolutely NONE of Woody's DNA in Ronan's stature or facial features. Whaddaya think?
Yes, I think he's Woody's kid although I agree that he looks nothing like him. Mia would have used alternate paternity to burn Woody years ago if he wasn't Satchel/Ronan's father.
Ronan looks just like Mia's father, John Villiers Farrow.
He doesn't look "just like" John Farrow at all, just a passing resemblance.
No, R30, it's much more than a passing resemblance. He looks almost exactly like Mia's father.
People will look at the photo and make up their own minds about it.
I have to agree that he looks just like the Farrow men. But how could he not have even a touch of the "Woody-ish" characteristics? He seems to have some height, and Woody is a shrimp.
This is beyond gross, so I apologize for going there, but I even considered the possibility of his being the product of Mia and her ne'er do well brother...who appears to have some sexual impropriety issues. Probably not-but he does look like he has 100% O'Sullivan/Farrow genetic material.
Yes, r19...from outer space.
r32 He may or may not be WA's son but the argument that he can't be his because he doesn't look like him at all is wrong. I've known people who looked the spitting image of one parent and nothing like the other.
Please that gay boy is Frank Sinatra's son blue eyes and glowering eyebrows and all.
r32 and r29 you need to get your eyes checked.
maybe he's bisexual
Bisexual men very much exist, R37 .
I am one.
I date men and women, and do not have a particular preference. I do believe in monogamy, though.
I was in a six-year relationship with a woman and now am with my male partner of five years. Gender had nothing to do with it. It was all about dealing with issues that had nothing to do with sexuality.
Bisexuals exist. Just deal with it.
r38 cracks me up!!!! lol!!!
Ronan looks like John Farrow. Almost an exact copy. Scroll down.
To add: the reason that I left the woman who I was in love with was because she didn't want to marry me. She got back together with her ex when he happened to pass through town, "the love of her life".
We broke up. I was single for almost two years.
I happened to meet a man who is wonderful,funny, sexy, and on and on. We are going to get married next month. I love him more than I can express.
I love everything about him and will be with him for always. It has nothing to do with also being attracted to women. God, why is bisexuality so hard to understand?
It's not a cop-out. It's just who I am.
You can't have even a drop of the woodman in you and not have some significant homely to deal with.
Maybe he is the child of Mia and her brother, hmmmmmm. And they blamed that nice Sinatra boy.
r38=tell it to a psychiatrist we don't care about you, this is a thread about Ronan
No, he isn't r40. Enough pushing this, as well as the Freeper Obamacare bullshit you're posting in other threads.
yes he does r45
Why is he suddenly in the media? Did he hire a publicist?
r47 IDK, but I think when Mia said he "might be" Sinatra's son all of a sudden he got a show on MSNBC after that. It raised his profile & I think Mia is a crazy lunatic stage mother.
[quote[the need to label it a word and put himself in a box for your liking is ridiculous.
A fact is a fact, it's not a label. Just because he doesn't "label" himself as something doesn't mean he's not it. That whole "label" shit is so lame. It's like saying, "I don't label myself as white." You don't have to idiot, you just are. People should just say I'm not discussing with you who I am, and leave that "label" excuse for the birds.
I never understood people who say they "don't like to label themselves." Of course you do. You label yourself by gender, by nationality, by race, by profession, by your political affiliation: it is how you orient yourself in the symbolic order. You can argue that current notions of sexuality do not adequately describe your sexual identity, but to say that you don't label yourself is ridiculous and arrogant.
but who taught how to make pee pee in coke?
Great post, R38 - thank you.
You freaking biphobic assholes would be all over Ronan's ass for "lying" if he used the word "bisexual". The way you are here when anyone uses it - you deny and say it doesn't exist; you ignore men who say they are attracted to both and only hear that they are gay.
I call myself bisexual; like R38 I have had long term romantic - and sexual - fulfilling relationships with both sexes - not both sexes at the same time. Monogamously, and I have never cheated. I have always been out to family, friends and employer (and fought for LGBT rights publicly with a same-sex partner via a same-sex immigration case ). And there is a sizeable percentage of gay men here who are *closeted*, and yet their gold-star gayness trumps the fact that I have led an open queer life with a same-sex partner (over a decade)???
I swear (Jack), half the time I think this is related to misogyny: no man can imagine that a woman could have as much pull over a same-sex attracted man as a man would .
So good for Ronan - he's being honest, and sorry he's not joining your exclusive little club (nor mine, apparently - but at least I'm not accusing him of lying etc.).
boy you like to talk about yourself r52
Little cocksucker hasn't seen pussy since he was born.
"Oh my God. I'm back. I'm home. All the time, it was... We finally really did it ... You Maniacs! You blew it up! Ah, damn you! God damn you all to hell!"
We are switching to the new platform for The DataLounge this weekend. All of our mobile users have been using it for over a week and all first time users have been using it for about a month - which adds up to well over one million users. So we're ready to end this phase of the testing and move everybody to the new site. (more)
And yes, we've changed the look and some of how it operates.
Yes, we know you just *hate* it in well in advance.
Yes, we know we suck.
Yes, we are the biggest suckers that ever sucked.
But it was time for a change and with the huge shift to mobile it was long overdue. We've taken this opportunity not only to update the look but also make major changes under the hood (or "bonnet" if you're either British or pretentious or both). And we have to prepare for 2016 - a presidential election year where we can normally expect to see a 60% jump in traffic (yes, we've seen 5 presidential elections so far…Christ we're old).
The site has a bunch - nay, plethora - of new features which will make the site more usable: better search, the ability to ignore posters and threads, see link previews, to pick up a thread where you left off, spam and malware filtering and more.
If you want you can go explore and see for yourself, Click here.
And while running the tests we've noticed two interesting reactions to the new system - people are spending more time on the site and more people that come stay around longer and look at more stuff. Both good things. Yay!
Possibly we've not slain all the dragons and there will be issues that come up during the switchover. There's a help button in the lower right hand corner of the page which you can use to send us bug reports.
Please include as much information about the hardware (PC, Mac, Tablet, Phone etc), operating system (Windows, Mac OS, Android, iOS etc) and browser (Chrome, Safari, Opera, Internet Explorer etc) that you are using as possible to help us replicate and fix the problem.
Please note that complaints about colors, fonts, icons and the like are not "bugs" - they are design choices that we've made and we expect one or two cases of world-class bitching. But they won't actually cause headaches, scurvy, heart attacks, Restless Leg Syndrome, Morgellon's Disease or the vapors (but have your smelling salts at hand just in case).
Talking to DataLounge servers. Please wait a moment...