I forgot how cringe inducing this film truly is.
Juliette Lewis portraying a mongoloid.
Not much of a stretch if you ask me.
Young Sarah Paulson as a dyke.
I saw that in the listings too, and cringed remembering that I actually went to see this in the theater! Even by Garry Marshall's low-brow standards, but it was particularly bad. Seemed to kill Juliet Lewis' career too, with her unbearably screechy performance. Lewis probably saw it as her chance to cash-in, but she should've known to stay away no matter what they were offering.
Seriously, who thought making a film about intellectually disabled people having sex was a good idea?
I could see Waters or Solondz having fun with it, but Garry fucking Marshall?
Most unintentionally funny scene has to be when Daniel is drunk and hector Elizondo is trying to get the wine bottle away from him. Elizondo actually throws something in the other direction to distract Daniel so that he can grab the bottle...like you would do to a cat.
WE CAN TAKE CARE-AH EEESHHOTHA!
LOL@ R3. It took me some time to figure it out, but well worth the effort.
You'd have to have a differently abled, mentally challenged girl in your family to appreciate how perceptive and incisive the screenplay was on the topic.
This was a horrid film. Cringe inducing is apt. I don't like Lewis as an actress, and this is her "acting" at it's worst. Run away from this flapping hands.
Is this the one with Diane Keaton? Killed her career, too.
Yes, R7. Diane played Juliette's mother.
The confrontation between Lewis and Keaton was electric and should've nabbed Oscar nods for both.
They should do a remake, but a loose comedy. Like 21 Jump Street.
This film is a cringe fest but I like Juliette overall. She's done a lot of good stuff. Ribisi not so much.
For portrayal of mental illness/disability I found Benny And Joon way worse.
At R11, Sean Penn's performance in "I am Sam" is another one that I find deeply annoying & self-seeking.
I know this will NEVER happen, but I wish Hollywood would cast real mentally disabled actors in these movies instead of non-disabled actors trying to win Oscars.
Actual impaired actors are capable of giving a good performance. Look at the guy who played Corky (sp?) in "Life Goes On".
I used to love Diane Keaton but geez, she really gave up and resigned herself to mommy roles starting with Baby Boom back in 1987, I think, and hasn't done a single interesting thing since. Oh well, guess she had to pay for all that west LA real estate flipping.
Anyhow a couple of Scientologists like Lewis and Ribisi playing at retard isn't so much of a stretch.
Joe Flanigan looked cute as the brother-in-law, though.
"Actual impaired actors are capable of giving a good performance. Look at the guy who played Corky (sp?) in 'Life Goes On.'"
Total asshole retard.
R16 No Other Love? Or was that the made for TV movie with Richard Thomas and Julie Kavner? That aired around the same time as the Purl/Cassidy movie. Anyway, of the four of them I think Shaun Cassidy pulled off playing mentally disabled the best but he's got kind of a downs syndromy look to begin with. So that gave him an edge.
i must get too serious when i get here, like with the wine ive just had, but cmon it was a beautiful movie, im guessing you all live in gentrified towns, where mental illness doesn't exist.
Go watch Steel Magnolia's again boys, where there is no place for a homo in that group
R20, hell, I have "mental illness" and my family have a history of it. It was simply an awful film.
"Oh my God. I'm back. I'm home. All the time, it was... We finally really did it ... You Maniacs! You blew it up! Ah, damn you! God damn you all to hell!"
We are switching to the new platform for The DataLounge this weekend. All of our mobile users have been using it for over a week and all first time users have been using it for about a month - which adds up to well over one million users. So we're ready to end this phase of the testing and move everybody to the new site. (more)
And yes, we've changed the look and some of how it operates.
Yes, we know you just *hate* it in well in advance.
Yes, we know we suck.
Yes, we are the biggest suckers that ever sucked.
But it was time for a change and with the huge shift to mobile it was long overdue. We've taken this opportunity not only to update the look but also make major changes under the hood (or "bonnet" if you're either British or pretentious or both). And we have to prepare for 2016 - a presidential election year where we can normally expect to see a 60% jump in traffic (yes, we've seen 5 presidential elections so far…Christ we're old).
The site has a bunch - nay, plethora - of new features which will make the site more usable: better search, the ability to ignore posters and threads, see link previews, to pick up a thread where you left off, spam and malware filtering and more.
If you want you can go explore and see for yourself, Click here.
And while running the tests we've noticed two interesting reactions to the new system - people are spending more time on the site and more people that come stay around longer and look at more stuff. Both good things. Yay!
Possibly we've not slain all the dragons and there will be issues that come up during the switchover. There's a help button in the lower right hand corner of the page which you can use to send us bug reports.
Please include as much information about the hardware (PC, Mac, Tablet, Phone etc), operating system (Windows, Mac OS, Android, iOS etc) and browser (Chrome, Safari, Opera, Internet Explorer etc) that you are using as possible to help us replicate and fix the problem.
Please note that complaints about colors, fonts, icons and the like are not "bugs" - they are design choices that we've made and we expect one or two cases of world-class bitching. But they won't actually cause headaches, scurvy, heart attacks, Restless Leg Syndrome, Morgellon's Disease or the vapors (but have your smelling salts at hand just in case).
Talking to DataLounge servers. Please wait a moment...