If not, why? They're costing the company an arm and leg!
If I see a film that had a budget of 30m, does that include the actors' paychecks?
I don't think so, but I've always thought it's crazy that they pay actors millions of dollars.
[quote]I don't think so, but I've always thought it's crazy that they pay actors millions of dollars.
Why? The studios make billions of their backs.
[quote]Why? The studios make billions of their backs.
Most movies would become a hit even without certain actors in the lead roles.
Yes, a film budget includes all above-the-line costs for talent directly engaged on the project.
[quote]Most movies would become a hit even without certain actors in the lead roles.
Doesn't matter. You need actors to create the films. No actors = no movie.
Yes, R6. But you can get unknown actors and still have the same results. You don't need to pay millions to an actor just because he/she has a "name".
[quote]You don't need to pay millions to an actor just because he/she has a "name".
A "name" gets bums in seats. People are more likely to flock to the theater for a name than a nobody.
Nowadays the actor has far less pull than in the old days of Hollywood. People don't go to see name actors today. They go to see the subject matter of the film.
Not necessarily, R8. Most action and superhero movies have a built in audience. They become hits no matter who is in the lead. You can find a cheaper actor and save a few millions. It's really just a risk. A "name" might greenlight a project but if the movie stinks, it stinks. An actors name won't save it. Pitt, Depp, Smith are not an insurance that the movie will do good anymore but they still get millions.
names actors are dying out, studios are not paying the super salaries anymore because very few people can bring in the people
name some bankable stars under 40, there are very few.
I hardly go see movies because of story line or certain directors/studios/producers.
If they don't put good and interesting actors in the main roles the movie usually sucks. Many factors to make a good movie, but you just can't pull off an interesting movie without talented actors.
If you have a good song, good musicians, a great bandleader and the singer can't tell the story with their interpretations, artistic expressions and personality, the song looses half of it's magic.
Funny how Data Lounge attacks (rightly, I hasten to say) overpaid CEOs and profit raking corporations.
Many big name actors ARE overpaid. Sure they might be part of a movie you enjoyed, but do these deserve those millions and millions of dollars? IMO, no.
Crew and other production staff also work hard and only get a fraction of the money.
Actors who are paid millions are in the 1 per cent.
[quote]Actors who are paid millions are in the 1 per cent.
yes we are
If a movie makes over a billion and an actor makes 20 - 50 million, I am not complaining. Esp not if the movie is good and the actor gives a great performance. Mostly the actors are the ones who bring people into the cinemas in the first place anyway.
plus actors bring press....cast an unknown and you can't get them on talk show or magazine covers
But you can use the same argument for overpaid CEOs, r15 and r16.
If some corporation makes a billion dollars in profit, say, you could argue that the CEOs are entitled to their $80 million salary.
It is the exact same thing.
NO ONE works hard enough for the millions of dollars CEOs and some actor are paid.
They are equally in the 1 per cent.
R16, if the studios have millions to waste on one actors salary then they most certainly have the money to waste on advertisement and to push an unknown actor into the limelight. The money they would save would go to advertisement. And when Hollywood wants to push an actor down the publics throat they do a great job.
what's so bad about the 1 percent? drop the crazy class envy and work harder!!
Unknown actors don't put butts in seats.
studios saw the light. Icons like Denzel Washington and Tom Cruise are taking pay cuts up front in exchange for a bigger cut of DVD sales and distribution deals on the back end.
"Oh my God. I'm back. I'm home. All the time, it was... We finally really did it ... You Maniacs! You blew it up! Ah, damn you! God damn you all to hell!"
We are switching to the new platform for The DataLounge this weekend. All of our mobile users have been using it for over a week and all first time users have been using it for about a month - which adds up to well over one million users. So we're ready to end this phase of the testing and move everybody to the new site. (more)
And yes, we've changed the look and some of how it operates.
Yes, we know you just *hate* it in well in advance.
Yes, we know we suck.
Yes, we are the biggest suckers that ever sucked.
But it was time for a change and with the huge shift to mobile it was long overdue. We've taken this opportunity not only to update the look but also make major changes under the hood (or "bonnet" if you're either British or pretentious or both). And we have to prepare for 2016 - a presidential election year where we can normally expect to see a 60% jump in traffic (yes, we've seen 5 presidential elections so far…Christ we're old).
The site has a bunch - nay, plethora - of new features which will make the site more usable: better search, the ability to ignore posters and threads, see link previews, to pick up a thread where you left off, spam and malware filtering and more.
If you want you can go explore and see for yourself, Click here.
And while running the tests we've noticed two interesting reactions to the new system - people are spending more time on the site and more people that come stay around longer and look at more stuff. Both good things. Yay!
Possibly we've not slain all the dragons and there will be issues that come up during the switchover. There's a help button in the lower right hand corner of the page which you can use to send us bug reports.
Please include as much information about the hardware (PC, Mac, Tablet, Phone etc), operating system (Windows, Mac OS, Android, iOS etc) and browser (Chrome, Safari, Opera, Internet Explorer etc) that you are using as possible to help us replicate and fix the problem.
Please note that complaints about colors, fonts, icons and the like are not "bugs" - they are design choices that we've made and we expect one or two cases of world-class bitching. But they won't actually cause headaches, scurvy, heart attacks, Restless Leg Syndrome, Morgellon's Disease or the vapors (but have your smelling salts at hand just in case).
Talking to DataLounge servers. Please wait a moment...