Don't see how this can be the same guy. The badpuppy image is dated 1997 and he ran for attorney general in 1998, one year later? I don't think so, he looks like he is about 14 in the pic. He has a man dick but he is a little kid
r7, it says in the article that the picture is from Badpuppy.com and was posted in 1997, but was likely taken between 1980 and 1984 when he was in college. So it's basically a vintage-vintage pic on a vintage site.
As much as I'd love to believe it's him, the pic doesn't look anything like him.
Can the Rentboy and cocaine be far behind?
What do y'all think his hourly rate was?
C'mon, one of you bitches has to have the uncensored photo of the judge's swinging gavel....
Oops. missed the earlier message.
What a disappointment.
It kinda has this kiddie porn exploitation vibe to it that's disturbing.
It is absolutely him.
Did he do any action shots, or just poses?
You wanted action, you had to pay.
I bet he says he was underage / exploited.
He says it's not him so I doubt that he'll claim that.
It seems kind of strange that he'd take the time to respond to a blogger twice to offer a denial. If that pic really isn't him, he would've ignored the guy.
Of course it's him. What he's really hiding is the rentboy past that goes along with it.
His wife must be having such conniptions. No wonder she wouldn't let the family go to Disney on Gay Day. She has enough trouble watching the kids without having to keep an eye on her hubby sneaking off to the restroom again.
We will say a lot of this in the coming decades what with all the sexting going on!!!
tres jolie Coco!!!
Has it been proven without a doubt it is him? The guy in the porn pic has a larger square jaw and chin. Bill Pryor has somewhat of a wimpy chin.
he's getting off on this exposure
Unfortunately,I have to call bullshit on this entire concocted non-story...it's obvious to any honest person that it's two different guys. First of all the pic looks like it was taken in the 70s and the nude guy has a much longer mid-face,narrower head,smaller mouth and significantly greater distance between the nose and upper lip. Also,unless the nude pic has been reversed,one may note the direction of hair growth appears to originate from the right side of the head whereas Pryor's seems to generate from the left.
The whole thing is just a silly "smear" attempt on an contemptible,heterosupremacist asshole judge...if only it WERE true.