This is the best I've seen Jennifer look in at least a decade. She's put on some weight, but she needed that. Her hair looks good. She looks radiant.
Jesus, she's only 45. Should all women, as prudely you suggest, cover up ankles to wrist in conservative dowd, to look respectable? Who wants to be respectable all the time?
She's got great legs, why cover them up? Who came up with this idea that women should suddenly start dressing like Sophia Petrillo as soon as they hit 30?
OP needs to realise that he isn't the arbiter of what anyone else should be wearing otherwise we'd all be struggling under the weight of enormous caftans and earrings.
her hair pushed off one side of her face looks awful. I bet she never wears it that way again
She has her own production company and has some interesting projects in her portfolio and she chooses this? Coward...
I think she looks great.
She could choose better projects
Grandma? OP must be a hick where they still marry barely out of their teen years.
Heck no. Her body is, as they say, slammin'.
She's very put together. But, she's made her nose way too small.
OP is surely one of the beauty starved ugly people who never had it, and never will. A person who is in no position to judge a dog-fight, let alone one of America's most unique beauties.
I totally agree with R4. Other than that, she looks great.
My bad. I thought this was another Madonna thread.
She looks great.
Who wrote the invisible rule that people must start dressing like Mildred and Morty Frump once they hit 40? Arbitrary bullshit. Do what makes you happy and fuck what anyone thinks.
OP is a sad, sad resentful frau whose ankles look like a subway map.
She doesn't have to dress like a frump but that flower print dress is way too youthful looking for somebody over 40. No matter how good she looks for her age, she's not a kid anymore and that dress isn't doing her any favors.
I love flower print dresses, and don't see anything wrong with a 45 year old woman wearing them.
Her hair sucks in these pictures but her face and body are gorgeous. I hate that idea that once women turn 40 they need to dress like Queen Elizabeth in boxy lady suits.
I think she looks really good in those photos, too and I am not a fan.
In some ways, she looks better than she did in 1998.
[quote] No matter how good she looks for her age
If she looks good for her age, she can wear whatever she wants. If she looks bad for her age, she can wear whatever she wants.
Who gives a fuck? Why should someone not do what makes them happy because of their age and what age-obsessed strangers on the Internet say?
She looks great for any age. Live it up, dress it up, feel happy and good.
Such a dumb culture.
There's really no one on par with her. She's pretty and has good comedic timing. People like Sandra Bullock, Katherine Heigl, Christina Applegate try to do it but are poor imitations.
She looks really good.
I assume the new hairstyle is a sly way of "softening" the face without drawing attention to the fact.
OK, OP! In other words, we seem to all be giving you a big FUCK YOU! on your stupid post.
I bummed many cigs from her when she was at that Mexico place she always goes to. She's very sweet, funny, and hot in person. I defended her in this post as a matter of full disclosure. She's very attractive in person but as my grandma always watched Days I always will think she looks like her father (not that it's a bad thing...it's just how I feel).
Sorry, by Mexico place I mean Mexican restaurant (Marix)