[quote]HEIR’S a glimpse of the future — as this computer picture predicts what little Prince George might look like as a teenager.
Published: 5 hrs ago
The handsome lad is imagined with his mum Kate’s nose and eyes and dad William’s mouth and chin.
The image was produced by US expert Dr D’Lynn Waldron, who said she took into account “genetics, lifestyle, personality and environment”.
handsome? looks like any average limey to me.
anyway WHO GIVES A FUCK? he and his family are not important in world matters.
You wish r1.
What's up with the slapped cheeks inherited from Charles AND Dianna? Is that a Limey thing, or what?
Let's not overlook the possibility that George, the teenager, will be in a head to toe Wham! outfit.
R2 are you disputing that this family isn't important? They don't matter except to morons who cling to outdated traditions and the concept that they're inherently better than us due to birth.
R5, there are a LOT of those morons worldwide, so that pretty much negates your claim
R6 just because those morons have an interest in this family, it doesn't mean the family is important. They don't do anything that changes the world. In fact, they are a symbol of social progress being halted.
R5 sounds poor.
I hope he gets his hair genes from mom's side.
Good morning peasants, minions and bitches. Yep, I've got my mum's hair, my dad's bank account, and a much better dentist than most of my subjects. Still working on the wardrobe though. Kisses.
Anyone going to answer my question about the slapped cheeks?
It's just rosacea, R12. It's not an English thing per se, just in some people with fair skin in general. Bill Clinton has it too.
It's not even rosacea. It's just a healthy flush. Plenty of fair-skinned people have it. It's what millions of women try to imitate with makeup.
That picture looks nothing like either parent. Neither has that awful nose.
Based in part on his personality?
The kid's a few days old, who the hell knows what his personality is like??
[quote]anyway WHO GIVES A FUCK?
You do, R1. Unlike many who passed right by this thread, you cared enough to read what it's about. Unlike many who read what it's about and didn't comment, you cared enough to comment. Thanks for playing.
WE WANT MORE!
What will George look like as a 5 year old?
10 year old?
After he's had his first wank?
What will he look like in RAF uniform?
What will his future siblings look like?
We NEED princesses to dote over!!!
WHAT WILL GEORGE'S CHILDREN LOOK LIKE?!!?!
OMG, computerized pictures of what this baby will look like when he's a teenager?! This kid doesn't stand a chance with a public as insane as it is watching every move he makes.
You people are nuts.
Too bad he will be bald by 25, or 30 at the most.
Perhaps not, R20. Maybe he'll take after Kate rather than William in the hair department.
Why the neck mole? Is the artist trying to honor Edward Snowdon in some manner?
Also, "D'Lynn"? Can one really trust someone named D'Lynn?
Well, because Elizabeth the Queen Mother was a commoner, and Phillip was 100% Danish/German, Elizabeth II was 50% Old English, Charles 25% old English. Then Diana, just like QETQM, 100% Old English now makes William the FIRST future king to have a maturity of Old English blood since those German Hanoverians shifted the royal family genetics.
And William, at 62.5%, is less English than his son, George Alex, at 75%.
Charles takes the Hanovers with him to the grave.
Start tearing it apart DataLounge!!!
Definitely doable, when he is of age.
I don't get this weird idea that the English and the Germans are somehow genetically isolated races, as r24 somehow believes.
r26, it's an ETHNIC thing.
[quote]It's just a healthy flush. Plenty of fair-skinned people have it
I've seen rosy cheecked people, I myself am pale, but sans rosy cheeks. This is different. Their cheeks look slapped hard, or burned. NOT A GOOD LOOK.
I don't care what he looks like as long as he's kept intact.
He's fucking hot in that pic!
I'm hoping he is snipped, R29.
British males are not mutilated. The kid's penis will remain whole.
William and Harry are intact. The new Prince George will be too.
Nice try, pro-skin trolls, but the males of the Royal Family have traditionally been circumcised, and The Queen even had a mohel circumcise Prince Charles and his brothers.
R35. But Diana said no, and Will and Harry were luckily spared from the scalpel and not cut.
And the previous royals only from Queen Victoria's time (not throughout history) were cut because she thought she was descended from the Jewish David somehow justifying her slicing her kids. Thankfully, Diana came along and said 'fuck that,' no one is putting a knife to my kids.
That is just a rumor. There is no proof that William & Harry are uncut and they have never confirmed it.
R38. William's pissing pics caught by the paparazzi clearly showed that he's uncut.
He won't be bald. Boys inherit their maternal grandfather's hair, and Michael Middleton has a full head of hair though he's in late middle age.
We don't know whether those photos are genuine.
R41. You are ridiculous. Everyone knew that William's piss pics were real including William.
Did he ever confirm them, R42?
R43. Yes, there was confirmation. The paparazzi followed Will into the field adjacent where he has just finished a polo match. He thought he was alone and couldn't be spotted. William and the palace were angry as hell when the pics were published, but there was nothing they could do about it. The pics are of him pissing.
Where have you been; under a rock for the past five years? It was quite the news and Internet sensation when it happened.
Christ, why does EVERY damned thread on DL have to devolve into a fight between the uncut/cut trolls?
R40, that is not true, unfortunately. It is more of a lottery. Both parents can pass on baldness.