Tell me what it takes to tolerate Wagnerian opera, please.
I love opera - from Monteverdi through Purcell and Handel and the baroque to Mozart and the classical, into Gluck and then through the German, French and Italian traditions. I love the Romantics. I'm catholic in my tastes and enjoy the range of styles. And I like the later comers, through Britten and into the contemporary scene. I go, see, listen, and support.
But I cannot "get" Wagner - especially later Wagner. I've seen most of his works (almost all filmed, not live) and it mostly seems overwrought, overly portentous with unconvincing plotting, falsely mythic, and dull. Even when the universe is exploding, it feels like a big ball of bullshit. God, those dreary scorings and the pacing and spirit of an army of slugs heading slowly into the sea.
Not everything, of course - individual motifs and the occasional aria, duo or combination are stirring. But it's rare, and a tiny part of the whole dull affair. As a composer he is so fucking ungenerous and full of himself. Blah blah blah ad infinitum. I read Shaw's essays and wonder what the hell he was hearing.
SO what do I need to do to experience what others do? How do I care? I thought it would take me getting older, but I'm as mature now as I'm going to be, and if anything I'm less patient. I can sit through almost anything, but not the Ring. Or Parsifal. Or T&I. Etc.
Some say about Wagner's music, "It really isn't as bad as it sounds." I say, "Yes, it really *is* as bad as it sounds."
What you need isn't "what it takes," but rather the ability to accept that you agree with the latter statement. For me, "enjoy" and "Wagner" are only used together in a sentence like this.
It's very possibly just not for you. I love Wagner, but I also tend toward the German operas in general and things that are "denser" than your average "Figaro". This is not to degrade any of it, it's a matter of taste.
I love the scope and the speed of Wagner - when I go see one of his operas, I know I'm in for a long immersive experience. The better I get to know it, the more I find myself totally engaged.
I also think there's nothing wrong with letting your mind wander a bit, and just basking in the sound and the atmosphere of where you are and what's going on. God knows some of the Wotan soliloquies can meander on for a while without much happening musically. But I even accept those as a part of the whole.
Personally I'm not so into the Italian stuff. I like the "Traviatas" and the "Bohemes" just fine, but I'd never go out of my way to see them. But a Wagner, or a Strauss, or (I can't believe I'd say this) a Berg? I'm there.
Different strokes. Totally fine if it's not your bag, but for me and many others, it transports me to a place nothing else in music does. Yeah it's pretentious and overblown and the guy was a Grade-A dickhead a lot of the time and who was unfortunately co-opted by some truly evil motherfuckers, but it grabs me. The hairs on the back of my neck stand up just thinking about the opening of Act Two of "Parsifal". Nothing in opera makes me cry like the last 15 minutes of "Walküre", though a great orchestra thundering through Siegfried's Funeral March comes close.
"Rienzi", though? Overblown bullshit. No argument here.
Just make it Nazi themed, and people will talk about it non stop!
OP, I have really tried to embrace the operas but I just cannot "connect" with them.
OP, it's okay if you don't like Wagner.
I adore his operas myself, and it's not because of my German ancestry, or my interest in ancient European pagan religions. I just think the music is beautiful. So lush, so romantic, so filled with emotion! And so complex, if you look at it in detail or try to sing it, but it's the feeling that makes it work for me and not the technicalities.
Now, can someone tell me how to appreciate Bel Canto?
If you like opera you don't necessarily like all opera, just as if you like rock and roll you don't like all rock and roll.
I love most 19th century opera, but I cannot stand anything before Mozart (like Gluck and Handel), and I'm not even as fond of Mozart as other people are. I love some 20th century opera (Strauss, Benjamin Britten, John Adams, Bartok) but cannot stand more cerebral stuff (Die Soldaten, Berg).
I love Wagner, but many people don't.
I agree with the others, it's "okay" to not like Wagner. But if you're asking for the best way to enjoy it, I would say do your homework. Know the plot before you go, and get familiar with the motifs. Listen to the music around the house. Work out to Die Walkure.
I've gone through years where I've loved Wagner, and years where I've hated it. But if you really make an effort, it can be sublime.
I think knowing the motivic structure of the operas and their philosophical concepts gives the auditor a much greater appreciation of the Wagner canon (check out the annotated RING libretti, published by Phaidon, for a comprehensive overview). It took me a LONG time to get to that place, years of study, in fact (and I'm a musician), and I'm a much bigger fan as a result. Wagner's grasp of myth is quite profound, his music extraordinarily beautiful and his theatrical concepts, however limited by their Victorian dramaturgy, audacious and astounding.
No one has yet said, "just smoke copious amounts of pot, silly." So I will say it.
I vaguely remember liking Wagner in music class I love minor keys and haunting sad music. Was he a biz or did the nazis just love his music?
I used to adore Vaggghnuh, but the portentousness slowly started to grate and I finally just drifted away.
This is a white people's thread.
The British wit Frank Muir, I think it was, quipped, "A Wagner opera is where you go in at
6 pm, and four hours later you look at your watch and it says 6.20."
"Was he a biz"
Wagner is the shit, yo. Fuck all y'all!
Phil Spector is a huge Wagner fan.
Being an opera fan doesn't mean you have to like all of it. I love Wagner, mostly, though I find Meistersinger a bore. I love Meyerbeer and hate Gounod. Find most of Rossini's "serious" operas tedious and forgettable, but have a soft spot for Zandonai's Francesa. It's impossible to tell what people will or won't like--as it is, no one's really quite sure why any piece of music appeals to an individual person (though there are theories). Why worry about it? You're only missing something if you're convinced you're missing something, and if that's the case, you'll go about working on developing an appreciating for it. But keep in mind the fact they you just might never be successful at that. And that's okay.
Even as a casual Wagner fan, this always makes me laugh.
Wagner was one of the greatest of all composers. But his works are not for all tastes. They demand attention and patience, and a certain degree of obsession, I must admit. They are not inherently 'dull', but many experience them that way. Give me Wagner over Donizetti/Rossini/Bellini any day.
I often freestyle over Wagner.
It's not my tastes either OP.
He was a rabid anti Semite
Has anyone been to the Wagner Festival in Bayreuth?
OP--You are clearly knowledgeable about music so you know this is a silly request. You either like it or you don't. It's not a matter of argument or persuasion. Wagner is not a man I admire, to say the least, and his adoption by the Nazis is another turn-off. I don't want to like the music, but I've been hooked since I first heard parts of Siegfried's Funeral March in the soundtrack of Excalibur.
"Oh my God. I'm back. I'm home. All the time, it was... We finally really did it ... You Maniacs! You blew it up! Ah, damn you! God damn you all to hell!"
We are switching to the new platform for The DataLounge this weekend. All of our mobile users have been using it for over a week and all first time users have been using it for about a month - which adds up to well over one million users. So we're ready to end this phase of the testing and move everybody to the new site. (more)
And yes, we've changed the look and some of how it operates.
Yes, we know you just *hate* it in well in advance.
Yes, we know we suck.
Yes, we are the biggest suckers that ever sucked.
But it was time for a change and with the huge shift to mobile it was long overdue. We've taken this opportunity not only to update the look but also make major changes under the hood (or "bonnet" if you're either British or pretentious or both). And we have to prepare for 2016 - a presidential election year where we can normally expect to see a 60% jump in traffic (yes, we've seen 5 presidential elections so far…Christ we're old).
The site has a bunch - nay, plethora - of new features which will make the site more usable: better search, the ability to ignore posters and threads, see link previews, to pick up a thread where you left off, spam and malware filtering and more.
If you want you can go explore and see for yourself, Click here.
And while running the tests we've noticed two interesting reactions to the new system - people are spending more time on the site and more people that come stay around longer and look at more stuff. Both good things. Yay!
Possibly we've not slain all the dragons and there will be issues that come up during the switchover. There's a help button in the lower right hand corner of the page which you can use to send us bug reports.
Please include as much information about the hardware (PC, Mac, Tablet, Phone etc), operating system (Windows, Mac OS, Android, iOS etc) and browser (Chrome, Safari, Opera, Internet Explorer etc) that you are using as possible to help us replicate and fix the problem.
Please note that complaints about colors, fonts, icons and the like are not "bugs" - they are design choices that we've made and we expect one or two cases of world-class bitching. But they won't actually cause headaches, scurvy, heart attacks, Restless Leg Syndrome, Morgellon's Disease or the vapors (but have your smelling salts at hand just in case).
Talking to DataLounge servers. Please wait a moment...