Do you like him? I find him sort of fake-ish. No evil villain would spend the amount of time he spends just talking. The guy who plays him looks girl-ish. Other than that, he's alright as an evil villain. I expected more, though.
I think he's fabulous, and Tom Hiddleston is gorgeous.
yessssssss new TH thread my precioussssssss
I find Loki played by TH sexy but not the actor himself most of the time.
Please, do not turn this into a Jane Arthy discussion. I really do not give two shits..
Is not dis simpler, biatch? Is dis not yo' natural state, biatch? It aint nuthin but tha unspoken truth of humanity, dat you crave subjugation. I aint talkin' bout chicken n' gravy biatch. Da bright lure of freedom diminishes yo' gamez joy up in a mad scramble fo' power, fo' identity. Yo ass was made ta be ruled. Y'all KNOW dat shit, muthafucka! In tha end, yo big-ass booty is ghon always kneel.
Loki: Da Casket wasn't tha only thang you took from Jotunheim dat day, was it, biatch?
Odin: No. In tha aftermath of tha battle I went tha fuck into tha temple n' I found a funky-ass baby. Right back up in yo muthafuckin ass. Lil Small-Ass fo' a Giant's offspring, abandoned, suffering, left ta take a thugged-out dirt nap. Laufey's son. I aint talkin' bout chicken n' gravy biatch.
Loki: Laufeyson, biatch?
Odin: Yes yes y'all.
Loki: Why, biatch? Yo ass was knee-deep up in Jotun blood. Y'all KNOW dat shit, muthafucka! I be fly as a gangbangin' falcon, soarin all up in tha sky dawwwwg! Why would you take me son, biatch?
Odin: Yo ass was a innocent child. Y'all KNOW dat shit, muthafucka!
Loki: No. Yo ass took me fo' a purpose. What was it?... TELL ME!
Odin: I thought we could unite our mackdaddydoms one day. It make me wanna hollar playa! Brin bout a alliance, brang bout permanent peace... all up in yo thugged-out ass.
Loki: What, biatch?
Odin: But dem plans no longer matter n' shit.
Loki: So I be no mo' than another jacked relic, locked up here until you might have use of me son, biatch?
Odin: Why do you twist mah lyrics, biatch?
Loki: Yo ass could have holla'd at mah crazy ass what tha fuck I was from tha beginning! Why didn't yo slick ass, biatch?
Odin: You're mah son... I wanted only ta protect you from tha real deal...
Loki: What, cuz I... I... I be tha monsta muthafathas tell they lil pimps bout at night, biatch?
Odin: [unwell] No! No!
Loki: Yo ass know, all dat shiznit make sense now, why you favored Thor all these years, cuz no matter how tha fuck much you claim ta ludd me, you could never gotz a Frost Giant chillin on tha throne of Asgard hommie!
[an overcome Odin collapses]
Loki: Guardz muthafucka! Guards, please help!
LOLOLOLOL where did R9 and R10 come from LMAO.
Let's fill the Eric Draven thread up first before we move the "tea" here.
I think R10 used a gangsta to english translator
R12 you mean English to Gangsta. I'd love TH to try reciting these Gangsta lines, he's proven that he could do that in the Whoollywood Shuffle radio show.
That one,yes R12.
I was just excited to be able to write "gangsta" and didn't pay attention to the order
Alan Cumming was more fun as Loki.
let's see what is gonna happen in Thor the dark world
" I love Loki"
Interesting interview w/Tom Hiddleston just published in Collider although the actual interview took place last October during the filming of Thor 2 TDW.
As usual, Tom gave the reporter a break and did most of the talking himself, LOL
Nice interview. Very curious when he says
"Yeah, there absolutely is. There’s a moment there where I’m definitely in a different costume."
He is so sassy! I love him
From the old thread:
[quote]Despite what TH said in the article, he was seen with JA recently. He's not quite over it if the sighting is to be believed.
Is this a new sighting or was it from the old tea?
What day exactly? Where? The tea is useless without details.
Not the person who suggested Toronto but throwing in my 2 cents. He probably did. TIFF flocks with hoes who take advantage of the fact that actors are in town.
R23 I think every film festival is like that. He is going to be filming Crimson Peak in Toronto. More chances for him to have fun.
R21 It's the sighting from a week ago. Nothing new since then :-) And next week he's in Sydney promoting Thor 2
The sighting starts page 12 on the previous thread (TH really wants to play Eric Draven).
Continuing the old thread here I guess!
I don't care who he bangs, how often, or how many. He can bang the sofa if he wants. Bang the door, bang them up, bang them down. Bang in Toronto, Sydney, Bejing. Just let it hang out of your pants, Hiddles. We all know.
But man, he has got to learn how to treat people decently and not be such a self absorbed asshole. There are at least 500 ways of leaving your lover that do not involve being a douchebag. Classic narcissism throughout that interview, and if the tea on the last thread is true (and it sounded true to me), it is even worse.
At least now we have a somewhat better idea as to why he is is alone most of the time.
[quote] What I can't understand however is why he went home with her and then apparently hooked up with her again (as they were seen out on the Sunday)
(pretending the tea is true)
He might just have walked her home.
Yes, I know they were cozy, but since your friend has only seen them outside this cafè we have no way to know what happened next. Sunday, I don't remember well what you said about Sunday, that they were talking? (but seriously how unlikely it is that no one in that cafè would take a pic of the 2 of them?)
Hmm. Ok. I'm trying to have a DL detox because this place is getting a bit too fangirl and toxic for me. Couple of things....
1. If he had copy approval, why call the journo to clarify a point? Why not just amend it on the proofs? He isn't a big enough star to demand copy approval. A nice friendly article, yes, but not full copy approval. GQ is a big deal to TH, this is a coup, why hazard that by demanding full copy approval?
2. Dylan Jones handing control of anything that appears in his magazine to anyone externally? Nuh-uh. Not unless they were a major player, or there was some contra deal going on. TH doesn't front any labels etc - nothing to trade. (Although I'd guess that would be coming soon given his growing style creds)
3. Deliberately trash your carefully crafted image as a perfect English gentleman? The one that you've spent so long working on and is pretty much your bread and butter? In one of the biggest mags in the UK? That would be a very silly thing to do and our boy is definitely not silly.
Conclusion: He did not have anything to do with the name check and is probably on the phone now profusely apologising.
There seem to be a lot of people posting here who are probably a bit young. Without sounding patronising - y'all need to grow up just a little. He's a grown man, he has lovers. There's no excuse for running 'she who will not be named's' name through the mud just because she may or may not be dating the guy you fancy. A guy you know very little about. You do not know the situation.
I don't think she deserves the vitriol she gets - imagine if it was you on the receiving end? Some decorum, ladies, please.
Remember that when you are five years older and wiser and you're no longer a fan, these bitchy little comments will still be on the Interweb. They won't go away. You google her name in five years and this shit is what you will find. That's horrific.
I know this is a gossip site but if you don't have anything to say that isn't just your own assumption, keep it to yourself... This isn't the place for unfounded character assassinations.
And no, I don't know anyone and I'm not anyone but some of you fangirls have been making me feel very uncomfortable for quite some time...
And your point is....That nobody is supposed to comment?
You say her name shouldn't be dragged into the mud, true, but if you had bothered to read, what most people in DL did was comment her strange behaviour on twitter, body language at Wimbledon, the fact that something must have happened for TH to behave the way he did since it was unusual for him. And then there's this latest tea at the café, that we are all calling tea or gossip and some are also debunking.
And if there's a place where fangirls don't have it easy it's here.
That being said, I agree with point 3. To me he sounded like he was saying, at the beginning of August, "I'm single there's nothing going on in my private life. I hope there'll be and when there is I'll talk about it" Especially if you pair it to what he said in an interview at SDCC.
R30 I'm sorry if the fangirl posts are bothering you.
You obviously know how these articles work - would him/his pr see the final version before it was published?
I'm not saying don't comment, I'm saying don't post inane assumptions and keep the personal attacks out of it...
The very existence of gossip sites it's a personal attack. You think that the comments on Celebitchy ( to make an example) aren't personal attack to TH? Or personal attacks are only ok with him?
Besides, as I said, people commented on JA, they didn't attack her. At least here.
[quote]I find Loki played by TH sexy but not the actor himself most of the time.
I feel the same way.
R32: It depends and varies massively and it depends on the publication and the star. An A+ lister might say - copy approval or I'm not talking. Someone further down the scale might not get that and would rather not rock the boat by insisting. Diva-ish behaviour gets you nowhere. In most cases it's a 'ill scratch your back' situation but GQ us a massive coup for TH and I'd guess he wouldn't want to jeopardise it by demanding copy approval. As I say, they were probably very kind to him but they have no reason not to be.
And like I said, if he had copy approval, why would he call to clarify? Why not mark it up in the proofs?
When I say personal attacks, I mean the 'famewhore' comments etc and making out she is doing something wrong or acting desperately. It's old fashioned bullying and none of us know her or her situation. Remember, he signed up for this - she didn't. And if one person gives me that shite about 'well then don't date a famous person' I'll scream. She owes you nothing and imagine if it was YOU dating him - how would you feel of people were saying this stuff about you?
Honestly, women have a hard enough time in life already without attacking each other.
Journalist said "clarify a quote" not a sentence/phrase, a quote, so probably some shakespearian stuff
This Jane Arthy talk is so boring. I think he is just not ready to settle down yet and Jane is a just a fwb, nothing more. I am still leaning on the idea that he is bi.
I think the Female First fraus have been posting on the TH threads here.
I bet on straight/occasionally bi
Honestly, women have a hard enough time in life already without attacking each other." ...exactly, and most of the time they are getting a hard time from other women.
The famewhore came by a facebook entry she did before she made it private, but nobody could provide a capture of it. (Contrary to general belief, nobody hacked her facebook page, it was all public, that's how her photos ended up on tumblr). There was also a supposed co-worker here that claimed she bragged about dating TH and about meeting his PR agent, but we called bullshit on that back in July. It's nor really DL fault if people don't read.
As for the "she is doing something wrong or acting desperately" well she did, she ran her mouth with a journalist telling her she was TH's gf, she started to follow TH friends after SDCC, just to unfollow them a few days later, as well as following events TH will be attending. Pointing out that her behaviour seemed of a person desperate to get TH attention back it's hardly bullying.
Susannah had a whole blog dedicated to hate her. Now, that's bullying.
[quote] And like I said, if he had copy approval, why would he call to clarify? Why not mark it up in the proofs?
This is absolutely true, but I doubt GQ's laid a trap for him and he's hardly a newbi at the game, or naive or stupid. Yes, he was there alone for this interview but surely his agent asked how the interview went.
But did she run her mouth? We don't know. People presume but if I saw a girl holding a guys arm, I'd presume she was his gf too.
Plus the colleague thing was bs. The Twitter thing maybe but the point is - we are presuming everything.
And of course a journo worth his salt would add in a juicy bit he's seen
And R41: precisely this...
A tabloid would assume basing on holding arms, an ELLE UK journalist that was in that VIP area and talked with TH too (she wrote he was very funny), no.
She wouldn't write she was his gf unless somebody told her so, but TH wouldn't introduce her as his gf to a media person and then step back when it goes on twitter. Not to mention this GQ thing.
If in his mind she was nothing more than a simple date, all the more reason not to introduce her as his gf.
Elimination process says it was JA. And since you agree on the twitter, it all fits together.
And R41 and R43 you are on a gay gossip site, in case you missed it.
These are backstage picture, he met Cara that day and he already hugged her like a old friend. Hiddleston has an enthusiastic physicality. He hugs all his costars or even his fans. but according to pictures and tea (if it's true) we've never seen this with jane
Thanks for the reminder R44. But since none of that appears to be available, I'll stick to the 'love thy sister' diatribes if it's all the same to you...
R46 The reminder was to make you notice that you are assuming it's women who are commenting on JA. But your "women shouldn't attack each other" makes no sense here.
R47: I presumed from the tone of the comments it was just the fangirls, with the regulars just standing by aghast, but the message stands to everyone - don't make nasty comments based on little knowledge. She doesn't deserve it.
And the comment makes perfect sense given the majority of posters seemed to be female. But I'm happy to open that up - nobody of any gender should be throwing vicious presumptions out about a woman nobody knows anything about. Gossip is gossip but a lot of this seems a personal attack.
Oh come on. He knew perfectly well what he was saying, and so did the journalist. JA's name did not just sneak in there as a gotcha. There are a dozen graceful ways in which he could have handled this, and he chose this. Even if he did not get to mark up the final copy his answers were well chosen and carefully thought out, (This isn't black and white btw: I've worked as a journalist and have done plenty of interviews like this. We tend to take great care to get the details right, and there is a lot of discussion both before and after the interview. The editor gets the final say, but a detail like JA's name would never go in without the interviewee's full knowledge, and he would have every opportunity to say "No, no, please no names..."
I'm amused though to see the logical hoops people will leap through to make excuses for him. Anything to maintain that pink cloud.
Another journalist chiming in here. This interview was conducted a few weeks after TH's appearance w/JA at Wimbledon and it was the first time in a long while that he had been publicly linked/seen out and about with an official date.
Both TH and the John Naughton knew they were talking about JA whether or not her name was mentioned. Hiddleston isn't big enough at this point to demand editorial control/quote approval which is rarely given. He had been photographed with her just weeks before. Can't put that genie back in the bottle. Fair question. Tepid answer, that obviously makes people thirsty for actualdirty Hiddles tea!
Exactly. No copy approval (former journalist here too). I still think JA might have been added in as an after thought but I guess that's bad practice. And I don't think he's a big perfect prince, just a normal bloke who shags about.
And is perfectly fine throwing his ex-GF under the buss in an international interview. Seriously, if this is just "clumsiness" he is truly inept with women.
So is he inept with women or is he some kind of player? I don't think you can be both. The details of what went on with JA are very sketchy. We don't know what has been said between them. It is mere assumption. I still think TH is basically a decent guy. I don't think you can judge his way with women by one quote in an article. Sure he has his faults but who doesn't.
R53 Co-signing on your post. However, he created a monster by trying to manage the fangirls by simultaneously pandering to and encouraging them while trying to keep them at bay. Now he tries being vague about his personal life. No celebrity owes it to the public to tell them anything. But his current rabid fanbase is tied closely to Loki and fangirls' fantasies about him & Loki. He has about as much chance of deterring them in their quest for details about JA and any other woman as he would taking a bone away from a pit bull!
It will be interesting to see how long Hiddleston-mania persists after the media blitz for Thor 2 & Coriolanus subsides.
I'm sure he'l be a decent character-actor on the BBC for a few years. Hope he's enjoying his sex-symbol phase now though since I doubt that'll last
I've read nothing on here or any blogs attacking JA at all. In fact people are sympathising her for the way TH has been with her. ( ie ignoring her at Wimbledon , unfollowing her on twitter , leading her on by sleeping with her then act stand offish) yes we agree sometimes she been silly with the twitter stalking and for putting up with this behaviour but many people put this down to reaction on how HE is acting. I still feel sorry for her and hope she doesn't take this crap from him again.
TH only loves one person- himself
You have no clue if they are even dating, if they ever had anything more than that little outing at Wimbledon. Nothing NEW /CURRENT confirmed that she is actually a GF.
And for the sightings of them making out and having a date in a cafe that you call tea? You have nothing at all there. A troll claiming knowledge and baiting everyone.
Yes this is a gossip site for gay news, gossip and nothing gay about JA so why can't the tumblr crew go home and take the teen fan girls and their chatter with them.
I don't see TH said anything offensive in his remark concerning his personal dating status. Hell after all this CURRENT shit storm I can't blame him for keeping mum.
I don't think anyone really thinks JA is his GF. I do believe it is plausible they met up in a cafe. The tea didn't say they made out just that they were seen at the cafe together and shared a hug and kiss outside her door.
It is true he created a bit of a monster concerning the fangirls. I think if he is smart when he does get serious with someone he needs to kind of spoon feed the news to his fans. He doesn't owe anyone that but if he just shows up out of nowhere and says he is engaged or whatever the fangirls would go ballistic. Just like they did when Susannah was misidentified as his wife. The fangirls were really angry and felt betrayed because he didn't say anything about being married. It was a mistake on the journalist part but still.
I can't take seriously a villain who has insect antennas on his helmet. Sorry.
R59 Dammit Thor how many times do I have to tell you they are not antennas!!!!
They are horns or as I like to think of them, handles.
Anyone else notice that JA deleted her twitter bio? It used to be "hello friend...I do stuff with music. london." Fallout from the GQ article perhaps?
Well, it is not like there was anything meaningful there. Shrug.
I think there is going to be a lot of fallout for TH. Its kind of sad. A GQ interview should be an awesome thing, but this one consisted of a lot of very unflattering tired looking photos which underscore how much he is NOT a Fassbender, and a smug, pompous profile whose headline making feature is his swipe against a lady. Whether you feel the last part is real or imagined, its all anyone is talking about right now. I'm amazed no one saw this coming.
I don't see why deleting her bio would have anything to do with that.
The whole GQ spread on him was subpar. The photos and clothing he wore were not flattering. I thought GQ was better than this.
I am looking forward to the Thor 2 press tour. I hope it will be interesting.
" A GQ interview should be an awesome thing, but this one consisted of a lot of very unflattering tired looking photos which underscore how much he is NOT a Fassbender, and a smug, pompous profile "
THIS! He's no Fassbender, that's for sure. I had high hopes for him. I thought he was going to let his work do the buzz, but his unicorn-like image is really bugging me now.
An I'm tired of reading an interview about him and always finding the same old quote: Oh yes, I went to school with Prince William! Shut up already! There must be something more interesting about you besides that!
Wonder if fwb will show up on his arm tomorrow at that premiere at the bfi's? Any bets?
Fwb would look a mug if she did turn up on his arm after that interview. I agree with what someone said earlier. He needs to be honest and truthful with the fangirlies. The fallout if he isn't is going to be honest with them is hoing to be massive and they'll think he's betrayed them and not trusted them in their minds.
 maybe because she doesn't do stuff with music, she just promotes her clients actually
OLLA and tom will be at bfi on 19th october
he will be on his way to Australia by tomorrow.
She can change her twitter bio in "hello friends I did stuff with TH"
The ONTD fraus are irritating.
R76 Where they can't make a comment without a gif? I think it's fair to say it's a gathering point for TH's tumblr fangirls. I bet they didn't even have the guts to comment this GQ interview.
They don't, apart naughtyhiddles, on tumblr that interview doesn't exist
It looks like these threads have been invaded by fangirls who don't get the whole "hook-up" thing.
R73 & R74 And ONTD is irritating - there doesn't seem to be any criticism of him over there - he's always a "flawless prince" or "he's so perfect". He's not, he's a human being whom makes mistakes and has issues like everyone else. The stans are going to get a rude awakening if any juice about him does come out.
Will he make the appearance dressed as Loki?
Actually, I saw some pretty bitchy comments about JA on tumblr after this interview, but mostly yes, they don't comment on it at all.
The GQ interview was okay but it could have been better. I took the 'nothing to write home about' comment as his personal life is pretty boring. I dont think it was a swipe at Arthy at all. I doubt she will go to Australia with him.
 show with her after what he said? What a jerk
I doubt she will go everywhere with him.
anywhere sorry (stupi spell checker)
R78 Really? Link?
He didn't bring JA to anything before this interview, why on earth would anyone think he will bring her anywhere now? This story was over months ago.
He really should stop giving interviews. They are not helping him. Perhaps just stick to photo shoots, where he doesn't speak.
He has spent the last three years endlessly promoting himself as this English-gentleman-sparkling-unicorn-prince. Clearly, clearly, this is an act. His complete overuse of the word "I" and his actions suggest who he really is: a not-so-nice, not-so-thoughtful, self-absorbed man, who panders to everyone and everything to get attention. Probably wouldn't care, but his sense of importance is unequal to his talent as an actor.
Even in his "private life" (taking a ?date? to a world-famous sporting event, where he hoped he would be photographed- then speaking disrespectfully about her in a national magazine), he seems to be rather unkind. All speculation, of course. But I am rather hoping he goes away after Thor 2.
83, I saw two or three of such comments. Try "mynameiswillgraham.tumblr", there was one of them. How do I attach links to posts? Please, explain.
Copy and past in URL section below message section
I can't say I blame him for that GQ reply about his private life.
If it was meant in a general sense it's not a big deal of an answer, if it was directed to JA, he must have been pissed with her. And after reading yesterday recap of the woman behaviour, making it clear that there was nothing going on makes sense.
If like you said he has been protecting his image so much, why would he risk it in a GQ interview?
R85 and others, there's a help page, click on "help" where the thread watcher is, where you can find how to make quote or direct reply. For urls, put the link int he url box when you reply.
Maybe he wants to protect himself from her crazy behaviour like "I don't know her, I don't know what you're talking about"
R83 Thanks, read. Well, that comment is more bitchy on Tom than JA.
I think, when they go public with someone, they trace the reaction of an audience afterwards. The rumour about her appeared, it was negative, was it true or not. Then she started with her twitter antics. All on all, not good. Let's see what comes next.
If someone means somenthing you don't give a damn what people say. Cumberbatch, fassbender, redmayne, they all have/had girlfriends. But TH,poor baby,can't
In fact when he was with Susannah he didn't, even after they split up he didn't say anything bad about her. (scroll down to the TH related part)
I tend to agree that JA must have made him angry to earn that comment. Unless it was meant in general.
Well, Cumberbatch was pretty fast to dismiss this model after Ibitza and subsequent rumors about her. I think they pay attention, but, of course, it means these women are not "special".
I was talking about Anna Jones
R94 that it was Susannah that left him it's old news. Somewhere, lipstick alley?, there was a screencap of her facebook where she commented the false news of her and Tom being married in tones that made it clear he was more invested in that relationship than her.
Showing up in public with this self-absorbed douchebag again? Might as well change her bio to "I have no self-esteem whatsoever!"
It's strange, you know, but you made me think now about Anna lady. In fact, the story reminds me of THs comment in GQ. There was an article where BCs sister hinted that Anna was not bright enough for BC or something. Very similar situation, in fact.
I remember when Susannah was mistaken for his wife. Sometime later on her facebook page she put in all caps WE ARE NOT MARRIED. And then him commenting on not being a proper boyfriend at the moment. Maybe he is a bit of a workaholic and he just pushes women to the side when it comes to his work. I guess a lot of women won't put up with that.
I genuinely think that Susannah got him by the balls
 after they split up
R100 there was also a bit of a conversation with somebody in that facebook entry I think. She wrote something like, "now, I'm gonna have sex".
Can't find the screecap.
R93, no matter what she may have done or what he thinks of her, there is no excuse for his comment. He forfeits his PR-generated rep for gracious manners. There is no context in which this is anything but ugly and rude.
Btw it is possible to be both a player and inept in relationships. I think he is skilled with hookups but fumbles anything that goes much deeper, and I don't think it is because he is focused on his career right now. That's just a convenient excuse. I suspect women find him very disappointing after the first bite.
I can't believe how much time some of you have spent into over analyzing that comment. And someone on here, a few pages back actually made the statement that "it is all everyone is talking about" and seemed to imply that the whole readership of GQ is obsessed with that one comment.
Let me tell you this, when normal people read that article, what they get out of it is a guy who doesn't have a serious thing in his life right now, or at least not a serious thing that he is ready to talk about. Normal people do not read that as a slam on JA. It is just Tom saying vaguely, that not much is going on and if there were, he would eventually share that.
Why is this viewed as dig on Arthy. Lots of busy adults have casual relationships that aren't intense and serious. And given that Tom didn't mention her name and the journalist did, we have no idea if the Journalist even used her name directly to Tom or just added that in to the written article. If I recall correctly, the question is more like what about your love life, and then parenthetically, the journalist notes that he had been seen with Jane Arthy.
I did not get the impression that the journalist asked Tom, "Are you dating Jane Arthy?"
And, lots of celebs are intentionally vague when talking about dating. Some deny, deny deny deny for a long time, even in the presence of photographic evidence. Sandra Bullock and Matthew McConaughy(Sp?) always denied dating, even though they were spotted together all the time. Vince Vaughn flat out denied dating Jennifer Aniston to David Letterman, and in other interviews.
It happens all the time, and anyone who dates a celeb should be prepared for that, as much as they should be prepared to have rabid, idiotic fangurls hack their twitter or facebook.
Nobody hacked her fb. She left it wide open, even though she was in contact with his pr people and had met his publicist.
I'm gonna say this straight out. I saw her Facebook before the whole Wimbledon fiasco and lemme tell you this: she didn't have shit on her page. Just lots of drunken photos from festivals and parties but she looked presentable for the most part. No status. No bragging about shagging Tom. Nothing. Her own posts weren't accessible to the public.
Nothing scandalous. Last time I saw her FB was literally the day the news got out but she still had her page locked up to some degree, no one could see her statuses or posts, only what her friends posted on her wall.
No one hacked her facebook, no one exclusively saw any posts she made. The only legit thing that got out the the "public" were her photos that some weirdo posted on Tumblr. End of discussion.
I don't think that one comment in GQ really makes him into a douchbag. Now if he got a woman pregnant and bailed out on her that in my book would put him in the status of douchbag behavior.
R106 relax, nobody was making much of a fuss about her facebook, we called bs on people claiming thee were incriminating posts. We called bs even on the troll that claimed to be a colleague of her and said she would brag at work about shagging TH and meeting his PR agent.
(though I'm curious, why were you following her facebook page prior to Wimbledon?)
But I imagine going to office these days might be slightly more awkward than these past months.
Here's that pic of him and Susannah. Body language is a lot different than with Jane.