the bride led the bad dressed parade.
but they look happy.
I like the bride's getup. The rest are awful. Her mother is named after toilet paper only spelled different. 'Sharman'. Cute.
I think she looks great. Very modern. Her husband should always wear sunglasses. Without them he's fug.
At least it seemed simple and low key.
Well, that really is the definitive hipster doofus wedding photo shoot. Her headband or whatever the hell that "leftover from Woodstock" thing is on her head looks like it is made of human teeth strung together. Bleech.
Some girl on one of the photos appears to be wearing army boots. Hilarious.
An Oscar winning actress marrying a British rock star? How original!
Oh, except she's never won an Oscar.
My thoughts exactly, R4.
I mean good for them, but it's as though they were going for "posterchild hipster" just to be ironic.
Wow, cheap dress and bad hair. Didn't expect this from Keira Knightley.
The bride and the groom looked pretty decent actually. As for their guests, well ...
Is that a string of Christmas lights in her hair?
Wonder if she did any tricks with her jaw to entertain guests?
Isn't that just the civil ceremony? Good for her! Pompous celebrity weddings are so tacky.
She looks great.
She's beautiful. I respect her for not ever getting a boob job, too.
Why is the article about how low-key their wedding is when there is a shot of a white tent on her property that looks like Ringling Brothers has showed up?
Keira Knightley, another talentless, ugly white girl who keeps getting work just because Hollywood loves white people with British accents. Carey Mulligan is another one just like her.
R15 = Bitter Racist
R16 = frau with horrible taste who thinks Keira is "so classy".
Good for her. Invited close friends only. Kept it under the radar. Married on her terms. Keeping it real without the extravagance, pomp and circumstance. Rare for the famous among us. The Kardashians should take a note. . .or several.
Yeah, she looks cute and happy. Low key and small is good.
[quote]Rare for the famous among us. The Kardashians should take a note. . .or several.
You apparently fail to realize that without the "LOOK AT ME!" stunts, the Kardashians simply don't exist.
Knightley is an accomplished actress. She doesn't need publicity stunts to get attention. Publicity stunts is ALL the Kardashians are.
[quote]Keeping it real without the extravagance, pomp and circumstance. Rare for the famous among us. The Kardashians should take a note. . .or several.
Wouldn't they have to master basic literacy first?
Like she cares if you find the "terms" of her wedding acceptabe. LOL Only on DL.
At least her husband has a career, unlike AnnE's guy.
R11, she is a devout atheist, so I doubt she would have gone for anything other than a small non-spiritual civil ceremony.
That pic of her Provence estate? Fuck. Gorgeous. I'd never leave.
[quote] At least it seemed simple and low key.
She rented an estate in Provence - how simple and low key is that? Not really.
It doesn't seem to be her estate - just a rental. This is supposed to be just informal and not official vows taking. An earlier article says they will be officially wed when they sign the Registry back in England. So this really isn't a wedding - just the party to celebrate it.
Well I looked at the link and that article says she or her family own the estate. So who knows.
She looks lovely and since she is Chanel's model she wore a Chanel jacket. I have always loved short wedding dresses. This return of the ultra formal wedding in the aughts with a horde of bridesmaids and ALL the brides wearing essentially the same long strapless gown is boring as hell.
Since French laws require the couple to be in residence continuously for about a month before the wedding ceremony not sure what they did at city hall - of course, one can obtain a waiver of both the banns (public announcement) and the residency requirement, so maybe they actually did get legally married there at town hall.
A nice gathering of 50 friends with a band and great food and wine at your estate in Provence sounds rather ideal to me.
R26 former skeptic above
I can't believe she's worth 30 million pounds. Christ.
That said, it looks like a wedding I'd actually like to attend.
What's with the chick in the icky yellow dress wearing army boots?
These rich assholes couldn't comb their hair, wear something appropriate to a wedding and put on a pair of decent shoes? Pretentious morons.
R29, it isn't like the bride was in some giant, fancy Vera Wang monstrosity. It seems like the invitation probably said casual dress was what they wanted.
Its not like they showed up to the Royal Wedding looking like that.
Take the stick out of your ass.
R15 R17 = bitter racist cunt who thinks its OK to use skin color as a derogatory description.
Cunty racist is probably pissed that they never get invited to anyone's parties, ever, because they're such a fucking awful boring cunty racist.
Everyone looked awful. It is one thing to have a low key celebration, but being under-dressed is tacky.
I think that girl in the boots is Alexa Chung, who introduced the couple.
R30. Dressing casual is one thing. Dressing like a slob is another.
Learn the difference.
I'm crying.She was the sexiest Guinever ever then Chrie Lunghi.If they make more Star Wars,she or Jennifer Lawrence should play Princess Leia's daughter.
She seems to be absolutely determined to NEVER wear anything pretty or flattering, and she's held to it on her fucking wedding day!
That little beige thing is as blah as can be, and it emphasizes her flat chest so much it makes me wonder if her husband likes boys.