Sure. If "horseplay" = "sucking on the boy's cocks."
WOW, grounds for a new trial, based on there was no homosex.
Free Jerry, Free Jerry!!!!!
He doth protest too much.
I wanna get up in Mike Mcqueary
Jerry didn't get a fair trial. He needs a change of venue. Plus there wasn't enough evidence to convict him.
Jerry hasn't had sufficient compression to suck anything off. He even had to have his tootsie pops microwaved before he could suck on them. He a saint who has had to pay the price of loving his fellow's children too much and too hard. Jerry never had sex with those studs, his orgasms were spontaneous and totally unrelated to anything he had in his mouth or in his ass.
A mother fuckin' saint, I tells ya.
[quote]Plus there wasn't enough evidence to convict him.
You're kidding, right?
The accounts of half a dozen victims, and an eyewitness
"Just tickling, hugging, horseplay."
WHY would an old man be interested is that with young boys if he wasn't a pedophile?
And the pedophile is trying to clear Paterno's name while he is at it. He is just a gag fest.
John Ziegler, some "talk show host" (never heard of him) was just on TMZ Live ranting about how Sandusky is innocent and good 'ol JoePa was "framed". Ziegler announced that he would release the name of "victim 2" on his site "FramingPaterno" tomorrow. I wonder if Anonymous knows about this?
#9, why would a young boy enjoy it either?
I think the mothers pimped them out: "Go down in the basement with him, see if he tries anything. We'll sue and hit the jackpot".
This 12-yr. old turned down (and turned in) the sexual advances from a blonde ex-cheerleader. Don't tell me these boys don't know how to say no and leave.