I was watching a PBS film on the restoration of the Boynton House that was restored a little while back. The couple who bought the house spent over $800,000.00 to buy it and then over 2 million to restore it after discovering what bad shape it was in. It is now good for at least another 100 years.
Typical FLW house. They are so easy to spot once you know what he did as an architect. Very impressive.
I went to visit Fallingwater several years back and was admonished by the tour guide because I accidently brushed against a painting.
Anyone else like this sort of stuff?
Isn't Fallingwater all nasty and moldy now from the moisture?
The Turkel House in Detroit was for sale about 25 yrs. ago for about $125,000.
I had thought about making an offer at that time, but then thought it too risky given its location.
Now I wish I had. Even if it is located in the city of Detroit.
I do like his houses but they seem to be priced very high for what they are.
I love the ones that include the furniture and fittings that were designed to go with the house. Also love the FLW room on display at the Metropolitan Museum of Art.
Fallingwater was being restored when I was there. Certain areas of the house were not accessible to the hordes of tourists being guided through the house.
Looking at some of the pictures at the link at r1, I have to say that the house was not as big and roomy as those pics indicate. It felt very small to me. Of course the selling point is having that stream rushing under the place. It was so calming and restful, but then I always loved the sounds of rushing waters.
Here's a slide show on the refurb of the Boynton House.
[quote]Of course the selling point is having that stream rushing under the place. It was so calming and restful, but then I always loved the sounds of rushing waters.
Doesn't the sound make you want to pee about 10 minutes?
I wish I had a pergola just so I could say I have a pergola.
Maybe a gazebo instead or.....maybe a pergola leading to a gazebo.
Talk about classy!
There was an FLW home in my hometown.
The town talk was that it leaked like a sieve.
Have no idea if this was true or not.
I have been to many plays at The Dallas Theater, designed by FLW.
R15: Wright buildings often have tricky roofs (often flat or somewhat flat with problem-fraught systems of drainage), and the construction techniques often represent a mix of cost-saving and experimental techniques. As a result, the problems of Wright buildings are so well known as to be sometimes overstated: everyone assumes a Wright building will need expensive work to stabilize ill-conceived foundations, that the roof leaks like a sieve, and that the place will be a textbook example of how concrete is not forever.
Part of the problem is that, as modern buildings, expectations are high for all the mod cons being in place and ready to move in and enjoy. A lot of Wright houses have been over-restored multiple times over when it would have been better had they found owners who were happy with what they had rather than some ideal that can't be overlaid with great success upon Wright's reality.
The frequent complaint that Wright had very specific and inflexible ideas for how each space should be used (ideas that didn't always go over well with his clients and haven't always grown more accepted with time). For me, Wright houses are always interesting but only occasionally lovely or desirable. It comes down to aesthetics and I don't like the mean, low-ceilinged spaces that are common to varying degrees throughout much of his work. His earliest houses, while regarded as less innovative, tend to be more pleasing spaces in terms of volume and scale.
Those low ceilings were a great response to post-Victorian McMansion proportions. So many of the houses pushed on the market had junior-exec footprints with ridiculously high ceilings.
His leaky corner metal windows were adopted by many cool houses built in late 40s and 50s. You can see where many people have swapped them out with vinyl shit just for the insulation value.
I always wondered, how does the flat roof handle over time with rain and snow?
I can see myself living in this one, r6.
Really like the ambience.
Thanks for the link.
Buy it for me? Pretty please, with a cherry on top?
R17, I agree. I lived in a later FLW house. It was unlivable. He certainly was one of the early architects that had no idea, or did not give a damn how people actually lived. He also was typically sexist in that his kitchens and laundry areas are unusable. He clearly had no idea about what "women's work" entailed.
Not a house, but an college campus of buildings in Central Florida designed by Wright.
Slide show opens in another window with 75 photos.
R4, that was Taliesin, in SW Wisconsin. I grew up and currently live 45 minutes away from there. I went there as part of a class trip in middle school, but can barely remember it. Last summer, I thought it would be a fun day trip to go back up for a tour. I looked online, and the full tour ( house, studio, grounds) was around 80 bucks. The " house only" tour wasn't much less. I like FLW, but not that much.
Does anyone know if Frank Lloyd Wright was ever summarily dismissed from a commission?
For being an unmitigated horse's ass to his clients?
The actress Anne Baxter was one of FLW's descendants.
Prairie school is my favorite style of architecture. I had no idea the interiors of the later homes were so unlivable from a practical perspective.
Ages ago a friend had a key to the Robie House, and we would get high there in the late afternoon. It was amazing to watch the light and shadows move as the sun set outside that house.
[quote] The actress Anne Baxter was one of FLW's descendants
Yes, she was his granddaughter.
"Oh my God. I'm back. I'm home. All the time, it was... We finally really did it ... You Maniacs! You blew it up! Ah, damn you! God damn you all to hell!"
We are switching to the new platform for The DataLounge this weekend. All of our mobile users have been using it for over a week and all first time users have been using it for about a month - which adds up to well over one million users. So we're ready to end this phase of the testing and move everybody to the new site. (more)
And yes, we've changed the look and some of how it operates.
Yes, we know you just *hate* it in well in advance.
Yes, we know we suck.
Yes, we are the biggest suckers that ever sucked.
But it was time for a change and with the huge shift to mobile it was long overdue. We've taken this opportunity not only to update the look but also make major changes under the hood (or "bonnet" if you're either British or pretentious or both). And we have to prepare for 2016 - a presidential election year where we can normally expect to see a 60% jump in traffic (yes, we've seen 5 presidential elections so far…Christ we're old).
The site has a bunch - nay, plethora - of new features which will make the site more usable: better search, the ability to ignore posters and threads, see link previews, to pick up a thread where you left off, spam and malware filtering and more.
If you want you can go explore and see for yourself, Click here.
And while running the tests we've noticed two interesting reactions to the new system - people are spending more time on the site and more people that come stay around longer and look at more stuff. Both good things. Yay!
Possibly we've not slain all the dragons and there will be issues that come up during the switchover. There's a help button in the lower right hand corner of the page which you can use to send us bug reports.
Please include as much information about the hardware (PC, Mac, Tablet, Phone etc), operating system (Windows, Mac OS, Android, iOS etc) and browser (Chrome, Safari, Opera, Internet Explorer etc) that you are using as possible to help us replicate and fix the problem.
Please note that complaints about colors, fonts, icons and the like are not "bugs" - they are design choices that we've made and we expect one or two cases of world-class bitching. But they won't actually cause headaches, scurvy, heart attacks, Restless Leg Syndrome, Morgellon's Disease or the vapors (but have your smelling salts at hand just in case).
Talking to DataLounge servers. Please wait a moment...