Reading comments on Gawker and elsewhere, he was apparently an obnoxious little shit who has no friends and had it coming.
How in the world did he get that gig at Reuters? How much did Anthony De Rosa know about this kid's
I thought Anonymous were the good guys?
On the one hand, Matthew faces up to 30 years in prison and a $750,000 fine for giving Anonymous access to the Tribune servers so they could make a very small, childish defacement to the L.A. Times website that was quickly and easily fixed. Nobody died.
On the other hand, it turns out that Matthew turned out to be quite the sociopath.
30 years??? That is ridiculous- the punishment does not fit the crime!
Obviously it's a stern warning message for everyone who even thinks to support Anonymous or help them.
Outrageous over-reaction by the fascist state.
Indicted Reuters Editor Was Infamous LiveJournal Troll
Employers are going to have to be vigilant about hiring a generation of job seekers whose youth is spent wasted on trolling social media. I often wonder what kind of adults some of these forum and social media trolls would be become. The things they post online you'd think they had no parents, morals or education.
Twitter is troll central.
Prosecutorial overreach led to Aaron Swartz's suicide. I'd hate to see another of our bright, troubled queer men driven to despair and drastic action by the fascist state before ever getting the chance to mature and atone.
[quote]Twitter is troll central.
By the time Twitter came along, Matthew Keys had reached the pinnacle of legitimate journalism as the deputy social media editor at Reuters. It's his adolescent LiveJournal antics (and willingness to sabotage a former employer's web presence) that should have raised red flags.
Sorry r11 but hackers are the 21st Century terrorists. This guy Keys was a troll in his youth and he graduated to become a hacker.