She was never beautiful, not even pretty. Cute face & a good figure.
I always thought Courtney Cocks was the most beutiful cast member.
I never got all the hype over Jen Anniston
Eh, good body, cute enough face, straight guys straight frauen like her because she seems like she'd be fun to hang out with.
Correction: Cute face and thin.
She's somewhat attractive, has great hair, supreme marketing, women relate to her and her issues, she was married to Brad Pitt, she has a girl next door vibe and on and on.
She's aged out and still plays her Rachel character from Friends in every movie she's cast in. I have never found her believable in any of her movies. She always plays it safe. She's not on as many fashion magazine covers as she used to be. Her upcoming marriage will keep her in the spotlight and on covers for a few more years.
Can't say I blame her.
When she wears her hair up, you can see how homely she really is. Like Ethel Merman.
Sorry to disagree R6 but she does have a nice body. She's got a cute ass, perky tits and lean legs.
Now that Angelina has gotten so thin Jennifer has a much better body.
I swear by Aveeno baby lotion, it is nonscented (so you can't tell it's baby lotion) and it keeps my winter skin soft without being greasy.
I thought she was a heavy smoker. Why doesn't she look like one? She's also a sun addict. Are Greeks known for aging well? I thought the opposite.
I don't think AJ has ever had a good body. Maybe briefly. She's always been gawky and scrawny looking with little pancake tits.
R11 most of the women I know who have Greek ancestry age fairly well and all of them have great hair. They tend to get fat though. Aniston is lucky because she has the money to stave off aging from sun and smoking.
Not pretty, but she seems to have good skin, so this isn't too much of a stretch.
Angelina looked good when she was more filled out when she played Gia. Now she is a bag of bones.
From what I read Aniston smokes like a chimney and is always tanning so she looks good despite of it. A lot better than Courtney Cox who has messed too much with her face.
[quote] I thought she was a heavy smoker. Why doesn't she look like one?
Because she spends a fortune on her skin and beauty maintenance.
Whatever turns you on, R9.
I agree with R12.
Unlike you faggots, Jennifer Aniston is somebody that lots of straight guys would love to put their dick in.
Courtney was always more beautiful, but for some reason not marketed as such.
However, I agree with R14 that she has inexplicably jacked her face up recently.
I think the closet-case at R17 is jealous!
[quote] Angelina looked good when she was more filled out when she played Gia.
IMO Angelina never had a great body per se, yeah she had nice tits, but her body was blah, flat ass and all.
She wins the beauty contest with Anniston only with that face of hers. She had a face beaten for the gods
her nose is too small - she's had one too many procedures. but, agree - she does have great hair and a great body (which she probably works at 24x7)
I'm suing for copyright infringement.
We will never stop finding Jen endlessly fresh and fascinating, no matter how old she gets, vow American heterosexual women between 18 and 55!
I think you could change that to American women between 18 and 65.
She's not beautiful but she has a youthful looking body. Have you ever seen her on a talk show? She's the biggest bore ever.
she uses extensions and weaves - so much for her great hair.
she was marketed endlessly and she married a superstar - hence the reason why the least attractive and least talented female Friend got the most fame.
and she is very homely naturally and not aging all that well. That aveeno commercial is shot through Lucille Ball's leftover vaseline vats.
She's aging fine R26.
I don't know anyone who claims she's a great beauty but she's cute in that girl next door way that straight guys get into. That's her appeal.
She is our generation's June Allyson.
here's some crow's feet
looks like her forehead has lines too.
AJ, hon, I wouldn't talk about foreheads. What the hell is that huge vein going down yours?
Jennifer is pretty and has a nice body.
I wonder how long will it be when Jennifer Anistons' name will be mentioned w/out Jolies mentioned afterward....
The commercial is about soft skin and JA's skin looks good. She's a good rep for the product. Not for aging, not for talent, not for hairstyle, crows feet that come naturally, etc. OP get over it.
Now if a product called Red Blood needed a rep...
Not a PR person
JA looks a lot like my first cabbage patch doll.
Sorry R32. Despite what Jen's PR machine tells us, JA is not, nor will ever be, a great cinematic beauty. You get over it.
Can someone please bump up the "Let's Make a Jennifer Anniston film" thread?
What is with all of the frauen on DL? Gay men don't care about this actress.
She smokes, she overtans, she drinks, she was never beautiful, she's over forty and underweight... and her skin STILL looks good.
That makes her a good spokeswoman for a moisturizer.
I never said she was a great cinematic beauty just that she had nice skin. I doubt her PR or her thinks she a great cinematic beauty or even a cinematic actress. Personally, I think she and herPR team are greatful she has lasted this long.
she has nice skin, maybe Aveeno is goodstuff.
[quote]I always thought Courtney Cocks was the most beutiful cast member.
You are right. Courtney was not only the prettiest of the girls, but she was probably the most known of all the cast and had the most credits at the beginning. I never got the hoopla over Jennifer Aniston either. Sure, she has good hair and a nice figure, and she's not NOT attractive, but there's something Alfred E. Newman-ish about her face.
so if gay men don't care about this actress, who started the thread and who kept it going, Ms. Jealous@36?
Maybe Aveeno listened to John Mayer. He said in an interview that Jennifer had the softest skin.
Why does this bitch have to be associated with Aveeno?! I'm surprised they did this, as they have enough word of mouth.
I suppose it makes sense as she seems to have OK skin and is obsessed with grooming with that silly hair of hers.
On the flip side, for her it's a very cool premium product to be associated with and actually one worth shilling. They actually work and can be used for eczema etc and dermatologists prescribe them.
I've seen pictures of Aniston and she has very rough skin mon her face and elsewhere. They'll need to photoshop her as they've already done in this ad campaign.
Using a spokesperson who has been a lifelong smoker and sun tanner and who has admitted to regular laser treatments on her face was not the brightest idea.
She stopped smoking a few years ago bitches. Get with the program.
R43 what's wrong with admitting to laser treatments? It's actually very acceptable in Hollywood and doesn't even have the same taboo as botox (the use of which can only be admitted with a "I tried it once but didn't like it" story).
R45, you are missing the point. The point is that Aveeno is using someone to convince you that their product gives you beautiful skin or protects it. They are offering her up as an example.
Yet that spokesperson has used everything under the sun to correct her bad skin - her skin is not the result of using Aveeno. So that's a bit of a fraud - hey, use our product but you alos need to use lots of expensive procedures. Even at that they are photoshopping Aniston's real skin which is not good or healthy looking.
"Homely", R2, really? What kind of women do you think are average-looking if you consider her homely? As for the "least attractive" of the female Friends cast, Lisa Kudrow wins that prize.