It's from a straight erotic comedy (the plot mainly consists of the boyish protagonist bedding every woman in sight). Do you think it was included to cater to homoerotic impulses among the mainly straight intended audience, or just to a straight femdom fetish?
But there are men gleefully holding him down/watching, r4/r5.
And why make a boy's naked ass the center of a scene in an erotic film for a straight male audience?
Hell yeah it is. The attractive men in the scene are grinning as the "punishment" is doled out.
The women are made unappealing and unattractive (except the peeping Thomasinas) even when it's clear the actresses are quite good-looking.
And why pick a boy with such feminine soft curves? (Where's that thread about men with womanly hips so we can add this chum's name to the list?)
I voted homo with intent (subtext would have been a better word)
[quote]And why make a boy's naked ass the center of a scene in an erotic film for a straight male audience?
In that case, you make as much sense the OP's headline, which makes no sense.
The spanked boy reminds me of Jim Bob Walton.
OP / r7, back then some softcore movies were intended for both men and women. There even is one about a group of friends spending their vacation together at some Mediterranian beach and it features a gay subplot (about one of the male friends falling in love with a local, but the local's dad being completely against the fling).