A few things:
They rebooted all the books at #1. Wasn't this reboot suppose to allow people to pick up the titles with no knowledge of the characters, and start from a fresh new beginning? I decided to look at a few of them, and they really didn't give any explanations as to who or what was going on. It became sort of obvious that you had to already know the previous history of the character. I know they did an issue #0 for all the books a few months ago. Was that suppose to be the 'origin' stories to give new readers an understanding as to who the characters are, and their back stories? I would imagine it would also be for longtime readers, giving them knowledge as to who the characters are meant to be today.
Was Green Arrow always this young?
DC rebooted comics before, right? Wasn't there a name for that? I know each big change becomes an era that a string of the comics fall into, like Pre-Crisis, Post-Crisis. Will the New 52 become a new era, like 'Bronze Age' or whatever?
Help me out here geekzoids! ;)
In theory, yes, it was supposed to allow people to pick up new titles and understand the story with no knowledge of the character's histories. In actuality, it wasn't.
It depends on the writer. Some of them succeeded in starting #1 as a genuine beginning. Others couldn't help but not ignore the decades of history. And then others, well, they just couldn't write.
#0 issues were indeed origins. Basically, after about a year, people complained that shit was too confusing now, because only half the DC Universe actually got rebooted. The zero issues were meant to smooth things over and establish each character/titles role in this new universe.
No, Green Arrow was not always this young. Pre reboot he had a son about the same age he's portrayed now. Mind you, he's not the only one who was made younger. Batman, Superman, Aquaman, Wonder Woman. Basically, all the adults had a couple, or a couple dozen in some cases, years knocked off. Because god forbid characters grow up.
DC has rebooted before, sort of. Crisis on Infinite Earths did sort of reboot the universe, but at the same time, it didn't really erase 50% of the history. Likewise, there have been other Crises. Infinite Crisis, Final Crisis. These all mainly just altered the universe, whereas the reboot erased parts of it.
The "______ Age" wouldn't be determined by something DC solely did. It's a term that would be affected by the comics industry as a whole.
Thanks so much, r1.
I don't know if you saw Wonder Woman #0, but did they just use a past comic and put it into that one? I seem to recall it saying that it was from a different decade or something, and they were just reprinting it.
Justice League of America looks good, but Justice League, and then another book called Justice League OF AMERICA. That's really weird. I know there are multiple Batman titles, but did they really need to make another Justice League?!
I get the Bronze Age thing. That makes total sense, but could this become like The New 52 era, like the Crisis eras, maybe something people could refer to in future decades to come. I mean it really is a reboot.
One last thing, the origins -- did they do total revamps on anyone, in terms of history I mean? If so, which one had the greatest amount of change? I saw the Catwoman one, and they basically gave her the Batman Returns origin.
[quote] Wasn't this reboot suppose to allow people to pick up the titles with no knowledge of the characters, and start from a fresh new beginning?
In theory, yes, but Batman and Green Lantern in particular barely had their continuities reset.
It also hasn't helped that DC editorial has been playing roulette with the creative teams. It's very rare for an artist and writer to stay on the same book for more than six issues or so.
The Voice of the Night
Popular characters like Batman stay basically the way they were while less popular characters are drastically changed. Wonder Woman has had a revamp every few years, ever since she lost her powers back in 1968.
The Incredible I Ching
[quote]I don't know if you saw Wonder Woman #0, but did they just use a past comic and put it into that one? I seem to recall it saying that it was from a different decade or something, and they were just reprinting it.
I think the writer wanted to make it seem like a reprint of an old issue, but it wasn't. It was all new.
R2 Marvel has something like 12 Avenger and 15 X-Men comics coming out a month,so JLA at two isn't that bad!So DC should quit while they are ahead and just keep two.
R3 Voice, that's Bob Harras at work. He did a similar thing at Marvel. He gave his editors too much leeway there.Changing shit left and right. In addition, Morrison, Snyder ,Johns and a few others were given carte blanche to do whatever the heck they wanted. And others like George Perez had to suffer because of it.
Speaking of the new 52, Scoot Clark artist of Deathstroke has died. I recently saw his name mentioned when Liefeld ripped his artwork on that title,one of the editorial differences that made him leave DC/The New 52.
How did he die? I haven't seen it mentioned at all.
"Oh my God. I'm back. I'm home. All the time, it was... We finally really did it ... You Maniacs! You blew it up! Ah, damn you! God damn you all to hell!"
We are switching to the new platform for The DataLounge this weekend. All of our mobile users have been using it for over a week and all first time users have been using it for about a month - which adds up to well over one million users. So we're ready to end this phase of the testing and move everybody to the new site. (more)
And yes, we've changed the look and some of how it operates.
Yes, we know you just *hate* it in well in advance.
Yes, we know we suck.
Yes, we are the biggest suckers that ever sucked.
But it was time for a change and with the huge shift to mobile it was long overdue. We've taken this opportunity not only to update the look but also make major changes under the hood (or "bonnet" if you're either British or pretentious or both). And we have to prepare for 2016 - a presidential election year where we can normally expect to see a 60% jump in traffic (yes, we've seen 5 presidential elections so far…Christ we're old).
The site has a bunch - nay, plethora - of new features which will make the site more usable: better search, the ability to ignore posters and threads, see link previews, to pick up a thread where you left off, spam and malware filtering and more.
If you want you can go explore and see for yourself, Click here.
And while running the tests we've noticed two interesting reactions to the new system - people are spending more time on the site and more people that come stay around longer and look at more stuff. Both good things. Yay!
Possibly we've not slain all the dragons and there will be issues that come up during the switchover. There's a help button in the lower right hand corner of the page which you can use to send us bug reports.
Please include as much information about the hardware (PC, Mac, Tablet, Phone etc), operating system (Windows, Mac OS, Android, iOS etc) and browser (Chrome, Safari, Opera, Internet Explorer etc) that you are using as possible to help us replicate and fix the problem.
Please note that complaints about colors, fonts, icons and the like are not "bugs" - they are design choices that we've made and we expect one or two cases of world-class bitching. But they won't actually cause headaches, scurvy, heart attacks, Restless Leg Syndrome, Morgellon's Disease or the vapors (but have your smelling salts at hand just in case).
Talking to DataLounge servers. Please wait a moment...