Couldn't he have been trying to respond to someone?
I follow him on FaceBook and his feed all weekend made sense, though I realize it's not the same as Twitter.
Sorry, but I like the guy. He was truly moderate, he didn't spew hate or homophobia while in office. He was dumped for no good reason and would have helped modernize and make more moderate the repuklican party.
Having worked with Liz Warren for a short time, I detest her. She's a megalomaniac, a liar, and feels entitled. You can flame me for it but not every Democrat is a good person. Brown was a good guy. With faults of course, but he deserved more of a chance.
And, of course, you have so much credibility, R21.
R21: Gotta disagree. Brown and Warren each demonstrated their respective characters during campaign season. She was combative as a challenger but in terms of content, she kept it on the issues; whereas he tried to rile up his base into making fun of her. Kept calling her "PROFESSOR Warren" pointedly during debates, etc.
He was freakin' useless as a Senator and did nothing except kept one more seat from staying in Democrats' hands. If he had defeated a wingnut in Alabama, replacing extremism with moderation, then great - that would back up your argument. But he was holding Teddy Kennedy's seat. In Massachusetts. That is not a switch any Democrat should want. IN terms of principles and the issues at hand, Liz Warren is a far more worthy and natural successor to Kennedy's voting record - and to the wishes of his constituents.
Brown was a race-baiting cunt. That whole Native American episode was ugly, and a big part of why he ultimately lost.
Fuck off, freeper at R21.
Brown got a lot of votes simply because he was photogenic. He's a phony, asshole that will sellout his voters, that's why he didn't get reelected.
He just tweeted "Sorry. Fantastia had my phone."
I suspect a distraction tactic aka The Naked-Yoder.
What is the bigger BAD news surrounding Brown that his people are trying to divert us from?
Freeper at 21, read the damned story before you respond and make yourself look like a fool.
He sent three different "whatever"s to three different critics.
1) This response is childish and it says nothing. It calls more attention to Brown's lack of intelligence than "Whatever" he was responding to. he literally had no logical response.
2) Twitter is a public form. Anything a public servant puts on it is up for critique, discussion and debate. Especially if it looks like an inane waste of tax-payer time and money.
Yes, r29... It's the republican "look over there"! Tactic, you could be on to something.
Yes, we'll all be sure to take the word of a "Democrat" who loves Scott Brown and hates Elizabeth Warren. Ha ha, ok, winky-wink, "Democrat".
[quote]Am I the only one who finds it strange when politicians spend large amounts of time on Twitter?
Drunk? Does that mean he'll let a gay man suck his cock?
R21 obviously doesn't realize that Scott Brown is against gay marriage.
Can someone explain to me what bqwhatever even means and why it is scandalous?
R36, presumably it was a careless misspelling.
I was on Twitter when the whole thing went down the other night. Brown got into an argument with Zach Green, who is a cute Jewish liberal Democrat that runs multiple Twitter feeds for left-leaning groups. I'm one of his followers and have chatted with him in the past.
Zach was criticizing Brown for something and Brown sort of snapped and sent back a series of misspelled Tweets to Zach.
It's just a typo, I guess he was trying to say whatever. Either way, he needs a BlackBerry with a keyboard. People can't fucking type on those virtual touchpads. They suck!