[quote] A real memoir would be “the ultimate narcissistic con job.” He smiles. “I’m not writing a memoir,” he says. “Don’t make me barf.”
He really has no sense of self, does he?
I miss writers being a bit more gruff and a bit less pampered. Vulture pads the hell out of that article trying to make Ellis into something worth analyzing.
The bf made a music video which is clearly filmed in Ellis's apartment.
This is what they call an "otter", right?
That is what they call someone who needs to get more sleep.
The way Ellis goes on about "the 26-year-old" I was expecting some hunky porn star who Ellis pays to stick around. This is...disappointing.
Actually he has exactly the kind of boyfriend one would expect for somebody whose formative years were defined by abuse from a physically imposing father. Very innocuous... benign.
The boyfriend, who in Ellis fashion is a privileged Westsider (dad produces "The Simpsons"), is obviously working through father issues of his own rather than looking for somebody to buy him dinner.
He is beyond vile.
One hit wonder.
Repellant human being. Why do people care what he says about anything?
[quote] "I just have these random thoughts, go to bed, and then next day it’s sort of world news,” Ellis says, waving a hand."
no, darling, the next day it's being re-posted and dismissed by dozens of old queens.
He's not remotely good-looking. With hundreds of sexier daddies in that area alone, why would the BF choose BEE?
Ummm... he's famous and connected, r9.
Interesting anecdote on how he found sex partners when he started working in film:
"I was really shocked when I was writing and producing The Informers and it was being cast, and as a writer this is what became available to me, I was shocked, and it was true. I had never received more offers for sex from women and men, boys and girls, than I’ve ever had in my life during that six month, pre-production casting."
"...I’ve only had one movie made, and it was a big expensive independent, and it had a very big cast, and there were a lot of attractive women, boys and girls, needed for the movie. But look, whatever, I helped a lot of people. I didn’t necessarily fuck all of those people but I helped them."
He's not that connected. If the BF is the son of a "Simpsons" producer, he's not going to need BEE's fourth-rate 'help'.
Socially connected, dumbass. BEE can take him out to Soho House or Chateau Marmont, a few celebs drop by and say hello, then a party in the hills where he can watch movie stars doing drugs. This is what people in LA live for.
Someone has not read "Less Than Zero."
It's not the 80's anymore, cuntface. His dad has better connections than a sleazy, disdained hack like BEE.
I don't think his father is going to take him to parties where people are doing drugs.
If you're alive in 2013, you don't need to go to a party to find drugs.
R15, why do you enjoy being a contrarian braindead tool?
Damn, but that was dull.
Never has so much fuss been made over so little substance....
[quote]Ummm... he's famous
Ummm... he is?
Oh, fuck off, R16. He's right about everything - Ellis is a has-been, and there's no good reason for anyone to want to be with him at this point.
Maybe he's hung like a pony and gives really good head? Who knows...
Erm... did anyone watch the "music" video in the link? What garbage lol
BEE's first "novel" was really his journal; a writing teacher suggested it could be a novel, etc.
His 2nd novel was a total flop.
He only had a 3 book deal with his then publisher and figured he would just write something so sensationally offensive that he could get a lot of publicity if the publisher refused to publish it. Even then it was more notorious than admired; it was the film director Mary Harron who saw it as an opportunity to satirise the '80s.
He's never had any real talent, other than for being a snarky bitch.
[quote]Someone has not read "Less Than Zero."
I envy that person.
He should have gone into directing.
[quote] But look, whatever, I helped a lot of people. I didn’t necessarily fuck all of those people but I helped them."
Wow. Sounds rather sociopathic.
Ugh, that's all he could land? His boyfriend is disappointingly fug. He should just stick with hired whores. Depressing.
He's such an angry pathetic man.
BEE is with the boyfriend for the boyfriend's connections, not the other way around. If you read the NYT profile about The Canyons, he's desperate to get a gig in movies, but the best he can do at this stage is funding movies himself with that ancient nutcase Paul Schrader and hiring Lindsay Lohan and James Deen for the notoriety. They couldn't even get the film accepted to Sundance, and Sundance will take any old crap nowadays.
OMG, this guy = Lindsay Lohan
He begs for attention. Now, he's shopping a memoir. Can he take a hint, and realize that his career is now Twitter, and no one cares about his stupid, self-loathing, bullying, Republican ass?
It takes a pretty big cunt to try and declare gay people sub-human. Ellis needs to die in a grease fire. He is Rush Limbaugh.
BEE is a dinosaur from the Reagan era.
[quote]If you're alive in 2013, you don't need to go to a party to find drugs.
Maybe if you live in LA or New York. That doesn't apply to all of us.
Hahaha...oh shit! I just realized that after all these years, I've been confusing Jay McInerney for Bret Easton Ellis. Basically, I thought that Jay McInerney wrote everything that has been written by BEE.
"Oh my God. I'm back. I'm home. All the time, it was... We finally really did it ... You Maniacs! You blew it up! Ah, damn you! God damn you all to hell!"
We are switching to the new platform for The DataLounge this weekend. All of our mobile users have been using it for over a week and all first time users have been using it for about a month - which adds up to well over one million users. So we're ready to end this phase of the testing and move everybody to the new site. (more)
And yes, we've changed the look and some of how it operates.
Yes, we know you just *hate* it in well in advance.
Yes, we know we suck.
Yes, we are the biggest suckers that ever sucked.
But it was time for a change and with the huge shift to mobile it was long overdue. We've taken this opportunity not only to update the look but also make major changes under the hood (or "bonnet" if you're either British or pretentious or both). And we have to prepare for 2016 - a presidential election year where we can normally expect to see a 60% jump in traffic (yes, we've seen 5 presidential elections so far…Christ we're old).
The site has a bunch - nay, plethora - of new features which will make the site more usable: better search, the ability to ignore posters and threads, see link previews, to pick up a thread where you left off, spam and malware filtering and more.
If you want you can go explore and see for yourself, Click here.
And while running the tests we've noticed two interesting reactions to the new system - people are spending more time on the site and more people that come stay around longer and look at more stuff. Both good things. Yay!
Possibly we've not slain all the dragons and there will be issues that come up during the switchover. There's a help button in the lower right hand corner of the page which you can use to send us bug reports.
Please include as much information about the hardware (PC, Mac, Tablet, Phone etc), operating system (Windows, Mac OS, Android, iOS etc) and browser (Chrome, Safari, Opera, Internet Explorer etc) that you are using as possible to help us replicate and fix the problem.
Please note that complaints about colors, fonts, icons and the like are not "bugs" - they are design choices that we've made and we expect one or two cases of world-class bitching. But they won't actually cause headaches, scurvy, heart attacks, Restless Leg Syndrome, Morgellon's Disease or the vapors (but have your smelling salts at hand just in case).
Talking to DataLounge servers. Please wait a moment...