Jamie Foxx's nude scene in 'Django Unchained'

From what I've read online, Foxx has a nude scene where his cock and balls are shown. Anyone here seen it yet? Post your reviews!

Once you see it, you can't unsee it. It's traumatic. The man should never remove his clothing again. The horror, the horror...
The lighting is very strategic and he is hanging upside down, but you can still see its a nice sized flaccid dick.
R1, from what I hear he has a big cock
Huge bush and balls.
When will the screencaps be out?
R2 is correct in that the scene is shot very carefully, with bright light overexposing the area of the frame where Django's junk is. (Which, actually, kind of makes you stare at it harder trying to figure out if you're seeing what you're seeing.) It's a pretty terrifying scene, so don't go in expecting jack off material. And yes, it seemed pretty large to me (cock AND balls). But would Foxx really do a scene like that, where is face and crotch are NOT in the frame at the same time? Wouldn't he just use a body double?
People do realize Jamie Foxx has had a nude pic floating around the internet for quite a while now? As you can see dude has a beautiful and hefty cock. You get a clearer shot there than you do in Django though even in the movie you can see he has a substantial package hanging down.
http://www.omgblog.com/images/2009/Jamie-Foxx-Nude.jpg
Yes, the scene will put you on the edge of your seat. Its a wonderful piece of cinema, you are torn between being concerned for Django, but you still want to see what he's working with. I dont think Jamie had a double, what would be the point? Everyone can see his dick online and he clearly is comfortable being nude.
http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lp2ke2wXtz1qir2nlo1_400.jpg
He's also comfortable showing his bulge on TV. Saw Foxx on Letterman a few years ago in a fitted gray suit and the damn thing was obvious as a codpiece. Would suck the brother dry.
why is it that the omg blog links always come up as forbidden?
So, what? Yeah, he has a penis. It is no shock to see it. Grow up, dudes.
I want him!
He looka like a man.
Miss Swan
Better link to the nude photo from OMG
http://www.omgblog.com/2009/08/omg_is_he_naked_jamie_foxx.php%23.UN86sra28oU
I know the female slaves were used as concubines. But what about the men? Surely there were gay white men back then as there are now. What better way to have downlow sex than to "buy" a Mandingo stud? Rent his services out to your friends for extra cash? No wonder they always sold at auction in the nude.
Just another little piece of history they don't want to talk about, R15.
I have no doubt that occured R15, slaves were property and you could use them as you saw fit. For obvious reasons though there wouldn't be much record keeping about it..
Jamie is much thinner in the movie than he is in the photo at R14.
Just saw the movie and Jamie Fox is HOT HOT HOT and hung like a horse. God Bless him
r14 when a hot guy shares a pic with a toilet it just wilts my willie
Whole lotta facial wasting going on in recent pics.
No screencaps out yet?
;
Has Jamie addressed this scene yet?
I got all horny and wet looking at that pic. Mmmm
Lana%20Kane
Django balls, Django balls, Django got away...
shaka
l;
Screen caps?
Here is why I think it was a body double, the naked pics of Jamie on the interweb I believe shows that he's cut. In Django when you see his peen it looks uncut so me. That would make sense right. Slaves wouldn't be circumsized right? Any way most of the film you do get to enjoy Jamie's sizable cock bulging in his trousers. That's always a treat for me.
I think they usually use body doubles, but they can also put prosthetic foreskins, or complete larger prosthetic penises on actors. For years I thought that MarkieMark was really hung like John Holmes until someone finally told men they used a phoney dick on him in that movie. I also thought that I had seen Cheech Marin in all his glory in one of those Cheech and Chong movies, and then found out that it was a body double that I was looking at. In the Oz series, there was a man who bit off the end of the dick of a man who was raping him, and then later in the series, they showed the man with what was made to look like a badly mutilated dick.
he's a douche, so in love with himself, fugly as shit, too
Who cares? He's ugly (good actor, but ugly). Denzel Washington he's not.
[quote]For years I thought that MarkieMark was really hung like John Holmes until someone finally told men they used a phoney dick on him in that movie. Everyone knew that one was supposed to be fake, dear.
Jamie Foxx's cock was fake!
Bradley
Why have none of you realized that IF this was Foxx's real penis, it would mean that Walton Goggins (the actor playing the character who was supposed to castrate him) had to fondle his junk throughout the scene? That didn't happen.
Anon
R29, you paid way too much attention and energy into analyzing his penis.
Yes, I've seen it and it's beautiful! Huge dick and balls in a terrific body. I don't understand negative comments like I've sesen here. Do you feel threatened? That's your problem, not Jamie Foxx's problem. Apart from that he is a great actor.
Naked Peter
His penis is average.
d
Are you people really this fuckin stupid? There is no way in Hell Hollywood censors and ratings would ok a scene where one actor has a firm grip on another man's junk in most of the scene unless it was an obvious fake, the same way he got away with all that water balloon splashing wrong-colored blood without severe edits or NC-17 rating instead of R. If you ever watched a Bonus feature in your life you know that scene probably took a half/whole day to shoot. You think you can "act" so well you can keep your balls in the chestnut position on cue for that long? You only see Jamie Foxx's head for one or 2 headshots and the rest of the time you have no idea whose actually hanging upside down. Whether or not he would hang upside down for a half day or it was a stunt double, its obvious their junk was tucked into that oversized chestnut sack and the prostethic cock was overtly fake to get by the censors. Plus, who knows about Walter Goggins, but he has a bit part in that movie - do you really think he would go along with holding Jamie Foxx's cock all day take after take, and do you think Foxx would be? Youre all here fantasizing about a fake Hollywood rubber cock. Might as well slap it to Boogie Nights and Baseketball
anonymous%20
Foxx did not disavow Jimmy Kimmel's assertion that it was all him in Django.
l
r40 seems to have a lot invested in trying to disprove that it was Foxx's dick.
boy i saw the movie 4x while it was in theaters ...i love Jamie Foxx i think he's gorgeous what ever he comes out lookin like is sexy and i could hear sing all day he kills every movies every and every scene he plays ...get it sexy
QueenLarose
R44 GURL! You need some remedial english education, STAT.
You do know JF is a short guy? Maybe he's 5 ft 5, maybe. He use to go to my gym when he had his tv show. Always came in with huge bodyguards and 2 or 3 fem queens. No, I'm not kidding. These queens were screaming!
AND?
Dios Mio!
his bod is tight
#40 is correct... The scenes with his penis showing are a prosthetic. It isn't a lighting trick they used, just a prosthetic that is slightly off colored. The one scene with the top down view of his balls looked real though.
it is obviously fake
At first I thought it was real, until I remember it was a hollywood film and there was no way his penis was going to make an appearance. They can create faces and wounds with fake skin. Why wouldnt they make a fake penis? Im more worried about the white man that was holdin ghis junk. The way he stroked it before he left the room was extremely gay. SO happy when Djengo killed him
yum!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Why so few screencaps on the internet?