Hello and thank you for being a DL contributor. We are changing the login scheme for contributors for simpler login and to better support using multiple devices. Please click here to update your account with a username and password.

Hello. Some features on this site require registration. Please click here to register for free.

Hello and thank you for registering. Please complete the process by verifying your email address. If you can't find the email you can resend it here.

Hello. Some features on this site require a subscription. Please click here to get full access and no ads for $1.99 or less per month.

Christina Hendricks: 'Calling me full-figured is just rude'

For better or for worse, most of the profiles we’ve read on "Mad Men" star Christina Hendricks, 37, throw in a mention or two of her enviably curvaceous figure.

Video:

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 574June 2, 2021 7:17 AM

Would she prefer "fat fuck?"

by Anonymousreply 1October 6, 2012 12:49 AM

She really is an idiot. She's confusing Full Figure with Plus Size. She bought the tits and thrusts them out every where she goes and when someone comments on her figure, she's gets upset.

by Anonymousreply 2October 6, 2012 12:49 AM

As opposed to "fat"?

by Anonymousreply 3October 6, 2012 12:50 AM

How about curvy with major breast implants?

by Anonymousreply 4October 6, 2012 12:51 AM

Later she changed her mind and remarked, "You can call me anything as long as you don't call me late for dinner."

by Anonymousreply 5October 6, 2012 1:10 AM

She passed full figure this season and is now downright obese.

by Anonymousreply 6October 6, 2012 1:25 AM

And then they showed the entire interview even with the gaffes. How come?

by Anonymousreply 7October 6, 2012 1:26 AM

Isn't she girdled to hell and back in the show?

by Anonymousreply 8October 6, 2012 1:33 AM

Christina says she wears her glasses all the time even to award shows. No, Christina, you don't.

Your tits are front and center sans any glasses, you full-figured mama.

by Anonymousreply 9October 6, 2012 1:34 AM

Full-figured is not an insult -- it's just a description. I mean, they called Jane Russell "full-figured" in this Playtex bra commercial.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 10October 6, 2012 1:43 AM

Fine, you're a cow.

by Anonymousreply 11October 6, 2012 1:44 AM

She has such a beautiful face. Those fake tits are huge!

by Anonymousreply 12October 6, 2012 1:49 AM

And Christina, of course you always try so hard to hide your full figure.

Wherever on earth did anyone ever get the idea that your extraordinary bazzooms might cause anyone to think of you as full-figured?

by Anonymousreply 13October 6, 2012 1:51 AM

[quote]She passed full figure this season and is now downright obese.

No she isn't. You don't even know what actual obese looks like, do you, Karen Carpenter?

by Anonymousreply 14October 6, 2012 2:10 AM

She's a fat cunt.

by Anonymousreply 15October 6, 2012 2:16 AM

She's just Kathy Bates without the cancer.

by Anonymousreply 16October 6, 2012 2:21 AM

DL, Would you call Marilyn Monroe "full-figured?" There's a difference between "curvy" and fat. Of course in Hollywood a naturally busty women with toned hips and a size 10 might be considered all of the above.

by Anonymousreply 17October 6, 2012 3:35 AM

"Full figured" is not an insult, but of course it's never polite to comment too much on anyone's body, even in a flattering way. I'm sure she's sick to death of talk about her bod, and all the veiled allusions to her poundage.

And yes, she is corseted to hell and back on "Mad Men", women in those days wore girdles, cinch belts, and bullet bras. It's a great look for her, much better than anything she's ever work in real life.

by Anonymousreply 18October 6, 2012 3:39 AM

She is full figured. Christina is plumper than Marilyn was. I think she carries weight well, but would look better if she lost about 10-15 lbs (like she was earlier in Mad Men).

by Anonymousreply 19October 6, 2012 9:53 PM

She probably IS clinically obese. You'd be surprised at what physicians consider obese.

by Anonymousreply 20October 6, 2012 9:55 PM

Christina is about 5'7". Clinical obesity (BMI above 30) starts at about 190 at that height. Christina is NOT 190. She might be 170 at most, and probably 160.

by Anonymousreply 21October 6, 2012 10:02 PM

Honestly, I think she is fat. Full-figured is a compliment.

by Anonymousreply 22October 6, 2012 10:02 PM

No, Christina, they're merely being diplomatic and polite.

Plus there's no such term as "fat-figured."

by Anonymousreply 23October 6, 2012 10:05 PM

It is rude to call her full-figured since she's clearly "rubenesque"

by Anonymousreply 24October 6, 2012 10:08 PM

Marilyn Monroe was much thinner. She would have been called 'curvy' or hourglass. Hendricks is full figured b/c while she's curvy, she's way heavier than most curvy celebs of the past. She's a big girl. Nothing wrong with that.

by Anonymousreply 25October 6, 2012 10:15 PM

R24 - actually the figures in the paintings Rubens painted were very full on bottom, but not so big in the boobs.

by Anonymousreply 26October 6, 2012 10:17 PM

And her ass is still flat as the Midwestern Plains.

And just as wide.

by Anonymousreply 27October 6, 2012 10:22 PM

How rude?

by Anonymousreply 28October 6, 2012 10:24 PM

She should totally play Ginger Grant in the Gilligan's Island movie.

by Anonymousreply 29October 6, 2012 10:26 PM

Her proportions are so odd. From the tits down she's really fat (just look at her midsection and thighs when she's not wearing clothes that hide it or girdle it in), but her arms and face are skinny. She has a pretty face, though.

by Anonymousreply 30October 6, 2012 10:30 PM

She's got a bit of a belly, but not much. I like her proportions, though she could lose a little.

by Anonymousreply 31October 6, 2012 10:37 PM

Full-figured = Big tits, matching hips and a small waist.

For some reason, men seem to like this look.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 32October 6, 2012 10:42 PM

R32, I thought that that was just curvy. So what was Marilyn Monroe? What size dress does Hendricks wear, without a girdle. Size 10 is now average for ladies, although not for actresses.

by Anonymousreply 33October 6, 2012 11:18 PM

I'd guess Christina is a 12 now. MM at her absolute heaviest was a 6-8 in today's sizes.

by Anonymousreply 34October 6, 2012 11:23 PM

She does have a flat ass and small arms.

How weird.

by Anonymousreply 35October 6, 2012 11:25 PM

Exactly. Marilyn was never bigger than a six 8 of today. Marilyn was a C cup and at her heaviest 140 pounds.

Even with vanity sizing, Hendricks is at least a size 12. She's at minimum 40 inches on top and a 40 in hip area. Her waist isn't Marilyn's 22 inches either, she's more like 29 inch waist with heavy corseting/girdle.

by Anonymousreply 36October 6, 2012 11:32 PM

They pad her for Mad Men.

In real life she is probably full figured but the cameras make her look a little chubby.

by Anonymousreply 37October 6, 2012 11:32 PM

R36, I think MM was a solid D at her heaviest. MM also had an odd midsection, very thin waist, but she almost always had a belly pooch. Marilyn also had comparatively plumper arms. Marilyn's figure is probably closest to Scar Jo's today - though Scarlett doesn't have as defined of a waist.

by Anonymousreply 38October 6, 2012 11:40 PM

Someone is in denial. They girdle Christina up to the gills in Mad Men. In real life her waist is huge without the girdle/spanx cinching her in. Lucky for her in Mad Men it's expected that a woman would be wearing girdles and bullet bras to show off the curves.

by Anonymousreply 39October 6, 2012 11:43 PM

She looks like the pretty girl from the trailer park, in the face. In a non northern state.

by Anonymousreply 40October 6, 2012 11:48 PM

Yes, she is heavy. Luckily, it suits her...but she IS heavy.

by Anonymousreply 41October 6, 2012 11:53 PM

Even without the girdle, Christina's waist isn't huge. Actually, R40, I think Christina looks like the hot waitress at a southern diner.

by Anonymousreply 42October 6, 2012 11:58 PM

She also resembles those sex workers in the documentaries of the legal brothels, like C ranch. Same type.

by Anonymousreply 43October 7, 2012 12:03 AM

Christina, give us a week and well take off the weight! You'll have your own ad campaign too.

by Anonymousreply 44October 7, 2012 12:04 AM

She looked good in the leaked cell phone pics

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 45October 7, 2012 12:10 AM

She looked great, too bad about the dead ugly husband.

by Anonymousreply 46October 7, 2012 12:16 AM

R32, So if most men prefer the curvy look, why are most actresses the opposite?

by Anonymousreply 47October 7, 2012 12:41 AM

R47: Good question.

by Anonymousreply 48October 7, 2012 12:50 AM

It is rude, she's not some old lady who is full-figured. The bitch is "Thick"!

by Anonymousreply 49October 7, 2012 12:50 AM

Christina is downright skinny compared to a lot of American women today.

by Anonymousreply 50October 7, 2012 1:38 AM

She looks a hella lot hotter in r45's pix.

Damn!

by Anonymousreply 51October 7, 2012 1:50 AM

Yeah -- and I'm sure you boys all look like fucking Adonis.

by Anonymousreply 52October 7, 2012 1:51 AM

Don't call me tiny!

by Anonymousreply 53October 7, 2012 1:53 AM

Don't call me African-American!

by Anonymousreply 54October 7, 2012 1:53 AM

Don't call me butch!

by Anonymousreply 55October 7, 2012 1:54 AM

Her boobs look real.

by Anonymousreply 56October 7, 2012 1:58 AM

Her boobs are obviously fake. You can see the outline of the capsules in some pictures. And there are old photos of her in playboy that are obviously pre-augmentation.

by Anonymousreply 57October 7, 2012 2:03 AM

She's about the same size as Nigella Lawson at her heaviest.

by Anonymousreply 58October 7, 2012 3:45 AM

R32, because the camera puts on 10 pounds, and because America is conditioned to pick apart the weight of females in the media.

Most men settle for rotund because they can't attract what they see on TV or well-made porn. They say they don't want skinny women, but what they mean is they don't want Twiggy or the early Kate Moss. They do not look for plump women, but if that's the best bet, they're ok with it.

Plump is ok if they bring a lot of value, especially if they love sex and aren't lazy

by Anonymousreply 59October 7, 2012 4:47 AM

R32, Thanks for responding. I wasn't advocating plump for TV, just Marilyn Monroe style curvy.

by Anonymousreply 60October 7, 2012 4:53 AM

A few decades ago, there were more sexpot TV actresses who were pushing chubby: Adrienne Barbeau on Maude, Marilu Henner on Taxi, Loretta Swit on MASH (early years), etc.

by Anonymousreply 61October 7, 2012 4:58 AM

She's a fat fuck

by Anonymousreply 62October 7, 2012 5:00 AM

My acting teacher thinks she is a one-note actress. He says she tries to be sexy in every scene she is in instead of connecting with the other performers. No subtlety in her performance at all.

by Anonymousreply 63October 7, 2012 5:05 AM

I love her on Mad Men but her film career, despite several film roles, is going absolutely nowhere.

by Anonymousreply 64October 7, 2012 5:06 AM

R63 - your film teacher has not watched enough Mad Men. Yes, often, she plays up the sexiness, but she has made Joan into a very complex character.

R64 - So what? Joan has become an iconic character on an iconic TV show.

by Anonymousreply 65October 7, 2012 5:17 AM

Is it the dress, or has Christina put on more weight?

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 66October 21, 2012 10:36 PM

I'm 5'4" and if I weighed even 135lbs, I'd consider myself pretty fat. Good for her but I don't think I could let myself get that large.

It is really bizarre, as others have mentioned, that she has a thin face and arms.

by Anonymousreply 67October 22, 2012 12:03 AM

R67, I'm 5'3" and start feeling chubby around 130 (where I am now).

by Anonymousreply 68October 22, 2012 12:15 AM

I'm 5'3" and you don't WANT to know what I weigh. I go up and down. But I think Christina Hendricks has to "own" that she's an actress, and it's a pretty visual medium, especially film and TV. I read online somewhere that she finds it frustrating, to be a size 14, when it's time for costume fittings.

As well, she might: most actresses, for good or bad, these days are size 0, 2, 4, 6; an 8 is considered bordeline chunky (not be me: but an not an actress.)

There are people who have had breast reduction. Not saying she should, but I've read about plenty of people, NOT in showbiz, that have.

TO the question within: I would pleasantly but vehemently DISAGREE that calling her full-figured is just rude. Uh, NO, dear: it just shows that people have, you know: EYEsight??!!

by Anonymousreply 69October 22, 2012 3:03 AM

She needs to pay more attention to what she's wearing.

by Anonymousreply 70October 22, 2012 3:38 AM

she has a bm once a week

by Anonymousreply 71October 22, 2012 3:43 AM

Huh? R71

by Anonymousreply 72October 22, 2012 4:08 AM

New pics, even fuller.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 73October 27, 2012 11:01 PM

At the season 6 premiere, even heavier

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 74March 22, 2013 3:46 AM

When Mad Men is over no one will talk about her at all. She needs to shut up and tighten that girdle.

by Anonymousreply 75March 22, 2013 3:49 AM

LOL r5

She is full figured, so what's her fucking problem.

by Anonymousreply 76March 22, 2013 4:00 AM

She looks fantastic on the show,but in real life she rarely wears clothes that suit her.

I don't find her a one note actress at all.

by Anonymousreply 77March 22, 2013 4:24 AM

I've only seen her in Firefly and Mad Nen, but she was great in both.

by Anonymousreply 78March 22, 2013 4:32 AM

Big difference between full figured, a bit overweight, and fat. All depends on how PC you're being

by Anonymousreply 79March 22, 2013 5:44 AM

Boo hoo, fatty. You make a shitload of money and are on a hit show, tough shit if you get "offended" when people talk about your gross body that is always on display. If it were me I would ask if you were in your 5th trimester with that gut. Oh and nice cankles.

by Anonymousreply 80March 22, 2013 5:54 AM

If by 'full' they mean 'full of pie and ice cream' then it fits.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 81March 22, 2013 8:26 AM

Hi webbie!

You put blocks and permanent PT on huge chunks of the US and Europe, preventing countless innocent people from posting...

Yet here I am. You will never be rid of me.

You've ruined DL.

Stupid cunt.

by Anonymousreply 82March 22, 2013 8:34 AM

My god, she is big.

by Anonymousreply 83March 22, 2013 10:44 AM

Isn't she the actress who has bm's the size of squirrels?

by Anonymousreply 84March 22, 2013 11:34 AM

She really is a big woman, to call her "full-figured" is a compliment as she's clearly overweight.

by Anonymousreply 85March 22, 2013 12:14 PM

She is gorgeous and a decent actress. I guess she is a bit sensitive about how she is presented in the media. Every single article mentions her figure. I guess that must get tedious. As though that's all she is about. Her Joan is great in a show where there are few characters to care about. Most of them are horrible. Love thd show though.

by Anonymousreply 86March 22, 2013 12:20 PM

Her face isn't beautiful, she's a "jolie ladie" at best. She's wants the media to talk about her "full-figure" constantly, probably because she doesn't want to give up pie.

by Anonymousreply 87March 22, 2013 12:28 PM

Her face on its own would never garner any attention because she's pretty/average at best. She's one of those girls who think they're better than they are because their breasts get them attention. Your chest is turning heads, dear, not your face.

by Anonymousreply 88March 22, 2013 1:12 PM

I think she's gorgeous but do admit she is thick by Hollywood standards. Still, I like that she isn't a lollipop headed anorexic like everyone else.

by Anonymousreply 89March 22, 2013 1:22 PM

[quote]Her face on its own would never garner any attention because she's pretty/average at best. She's one of those girls who think they're better than they are because their breasts get them attention. Your chest is turning heads, dear, not your face.

Yes! If people stopped looking at her image and judged solely by her facial features. They'd see she's quite plain.

[quote]Still, I like that she isn't a lollipop headed anorexic like everyone else.

Most respected Hollywood actresses are a healthy weight. Hendricks is overweight.

And her fake breasts aren't fooling anyone.

by Anonymousreply 90March 22, 2013 1:28 PM

Many Hollywood actresses are too skinny: Angelina Jolie, Keira Knightly.

If CH's face is not at least pretty then I'd like to know who is pretty/beautiful.

It's not just about her lovely breasts. I like to think they're real bye. Most women would not go for breast implants that big. Plastic surgeons might even advise against that size, given the strain it can put on your back.

by Anonymousreply 91March 22, 2013 3:06 PM

[quote]Many Hollywood actresses are too skinny: Angelina Jolie, Keira Knightly.

Jolie is too thin. I don't know if Knightley is naturally thin or not, but she is quite slim.

However most fraus don't like to admit that most A-List actresses in Hollywood are a perfectly healthy weight (slim yes, but not malnourished). They also like to delude themselves into thinking Hendricks "curvy" body is the type men find attractive.

[quote]If CH's face is not at least pretty then I'd like to know who is pretty/beautiful.

Grace Kelly.

[quote]It's not just about her lovely breasts. I like to think they're real bye. Most women would not go for breast implants that big. Plastic surgeons might even advise against that size, given the strain it can put on your back.

She was totally flat-chested before. She's gotten implants in addition to gaining weight.

Facially, I don't think she's attractive at all. Although it is nice to see an actress in Hollywood embrace her pale skin.

by Anonymousreply 92March 22, 2013 4:10 PM

It's not a "perfectly healthy weight" if you have to do drugs and/or develop an eating disorder to maintain it.

by Anonymousreply 93March 22, 2013 4:22 PM

First World problem.

by Anonymousreply 94March 22, 2013 4:28 PM

[quote]It's not a "perfectly healthy weight" if you have to do drugs and/or develop an eating disorder to maintain it.

Most don't have eating disorders or take drugs. They just diet.

by Anonymousreply 95March 22, 2013 5:18 PM

She's gorgeous.

Plus, what R94 said.

by Anonymousreply 96March 22, 2013 5:18 PM

She is bovine.

by Anonymousreply 97March 22, 2013 6:08 PM

R81, she's a FAT FUCK.

by Anonymousreply 98March 22, 2013 10:13 PM

R91 - Most Hollywood actresses are too thin, but Christina has had too much lunch. She does have gorgeous skin.

by Anonymousreply 99March 22, 2013 10:21 PM

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 100March 22, 2013 10:28 PM

Whoa r100. Those pics are not good, she is huge and she has ham hock arms too.

by Anonymousreply 101March 22, 2013 10:34 PM

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 102March 22, 2013 10:41 PM

She looks better in R100 link.

by Anonymousreply 103March 22, 2013 10:44 PM

R92, where are the photos it her flat chested? If she really was flat chested and went for this size then she really is dumb and her plastic surgeon totally irresponsible.

Admittedly I've really only seen her in Mad men where she is usually well covered and wearing a lot of underwear.

Straight men really do like big breasts though it isn't usually a deal breaker. Women like CH and Nigella Lawson really are considered gorgeous. It isn't just some media myth. They could both maybe lose a kilo or two for health reasons but have such pretty faces and nicely curvy bodies this doesn't detract. Is every overweight/obese woman considered attractive therefore? Of course not.

R92 you've selected possibly the most beautiful Hollywood actress ever to argue your case - Grace Kelly. CH isn't as beautiful but then who is?

by Anonymousreply 104March 23, 2013 12:13 AM

here she is before and after. She had tits, just not huge ones.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 105March 23, 2013 1:04 AM

Wow r105 she was kind of cute before, had a little Lauren Holly thing going on. Now she's gross. Did she just get big tits so she could excuse getting obese? Like how Jessica Simpson got pregnant again to get off her crappy weight watchers diet.

by Anonymousreply 106March 23, 2013 1:06 AM

She's nowhere near obese for fucks sake. Dramaqueens.

She is quite a lot heavier than when she was young though, so of course her boobs would be bigger. Boobs are just fat. That dress in the after pic is just gross, I don't think her tits look that insane normally. Just saying. She could have easily have a boob job too.

by Anonymousreply 107March 23, 2013 1:23 AM

sorry but that pic at r81 is an obese woman. This is her without girdles.

by Anonymousreply 108March 23, 2013 1:49 AM

I bet her uncorralled boobs hit the top of her feet.

by Anonymousreply 109March 23, 2013 1:55 AM

What a fat fuck

by Anonymousreply 110March 23, 2013 1:59 AM

[quote]R92 you've selected possibly the most beautiful Hollywood actress ever to argue your case - Grace Kelly. CH isn't as beautiful but then who is?

Yes, that was unfair. Beauty's in the eye of the beholder but I just don't think the woman's face in R105's link is pretty in fact at times she can look downright homely.

A good way to judge someone's looks is to imagine them without makeup and bald. Somehow I think people are judging Hendricks looks on her overall image and that fact the the media and other people keep saying she's beautiful.

I'm not sure what it is, maybe it's the manly chin. Here's a photo below, admittedly not the best angle but it shows her without that pouty pose she seems to be pulling in every other picture:

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 111March 23, 2013 2:19 AM

I'm just not seeing the supposed beauty everyone keeps talking about.

This one's fairer, head on angle:

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 112March 23, 2013 2:20 AM

She had a nice voluptuous shape the first season of Mad Men. But she's gained about five pounds each season.

by Anonymousreply 113March 23, 2013 2:34 AM

Ugh r11, she's got those little baked bean teeth. Like George and Jerry's coach in high school

by Anonymousreply 114March 23, 2013 2:38 AM

Sorry I meant r111

by Anonymousreply 115March 23, 2013 2:46 AM

She was so beautiful and lithe as "Saffron" in those Firefly episodes (although that was 10 years ago.).

by Anonymousreply 116March 23, 2013 3:04 AM

How did she gain such a massive amount of weight? She seems to have put on about fifty pounds, what did her agent think? Wasn't she worried for her career. She is very big for an actress.

by Anonymousreply 117March 23, 2013 3:13 AM

The weight gain has been gradual.

by Anonymousreply 118March 23, 2013 3:23 AM

R111 & R112 is my online doppelganger. I concur.

When she's not contorting her visage in that pose by splaying her lips and lifting the cheeks, she's plain as dog shit in the face. She has that southern trailer park demeanor and features, Think Reba McIntyre. The Judd mother.

If we're talking gorgeous heavy weights then Delta Burke would fit the bill. Now that is some face. She's a beauty on any level. Not this fly by night Tits McGee and her makeup job.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 119March 23, 2013 3:42 AM

You're doppelganger here, R119 and I also agree with you on Delta Burke, she had beautiful cat-like eyes.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 120March 23, 2013 3:48 AM

My link failed. Imagine beautiful eyes.

by Anonymousreply 121March 23, 2013 3:51 AM

Doppel, your link doesn't work

by Anonymousreply 122March 23, 2013 3:54 AM

I'll look in the mirror -and see you.

by Anonymousreply 123March 23, 2013 3:57 AM

Look at this link... if it works...

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 124March 23, 2013 4:02 AM

Soooooooo-eeeeeeeee!

by Anonymousreply 125March 23, 2013 4:03 AM

Delta was gorgeous.

by Anonymousreply 126March 23, 2013 4:11 AM

124, dare I say Delta is even more beautiful than Vivien Lee in Gone With The Wind? Her eye shape is catlike, almondesque.

by Anonymousreply 127March 23, 2013 4:24 AM

Holy Hell!! A plastic surgery dizasstur! Now that's a sin.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 128March 23, 2013 4:32 AM

I think she looks lovely r128

by Anonymousreply 129March 23, 2013 4:35 AM

Cheek implants aren't for everyone. Especially one whose weight fluctuates. She looks more akin to Roseanne before her botched surgery. RoRo had her cat shaped eyes erased or were they just squinty? Don't remember.

by Anonymousreply 130March 23, 2013 4:54 AM

Delta would've been perfect as Elizabeth Taylor in a biopic in the early eighties.

Delta has Type II diabetes, which might explain her face's puffiness in recent years.

When Delta gained weight during "Designing Women" the media were quite nasty. Yet Christina is being applauded for her "curvy" figure.

by Anonymousreply 131March 23, 2013 10:35 AM

You're absolutely right r131. I remember they even had that (very special) episode where she overheard people calling her fat from a bathroom stall or something, to address that she did know she was getting shit about her weight. I don't remember her being half as big and she was a great actress. That's weird and I am glad you brought it up because you would think it would be less acceptable now but I guess not.

by Anonymousreply 132March 23, 2013 10:41 AM

I disagree but I'd certainly like to hear from Miss Hendricks why she thinks it's rude.

In any event, I love her.

by Anonymousreply 133March 23, 2013 1:47 PM

If I were Christina, I would find being called full-figured tedious and boring from hearing it constantly. Being an accomplished person - and she is - and constantly being linked to a physical attribute is always demoralizing, no matter what that physical attribute is. But I would like to think I'd have the presence of mind to not confuse the annoyance with with rudeness. She is full-figured. And proof there is nothing wrong with it.

by Anonymousreply 134March 23, 2013 1:50 PM

[quote]If I were Christina, I would find being called full-figured tedious and boring from hearing it constantly. Being an accomplished person - and she is - and constantly being linked to a physical attribute is always demoralizing, no matter what that physical attribute is. But I would like to think I'd have the presence of mind to not confuse the annoyance with with rudeness. She is full-figured. And proof there is nothing wrong with it.

She encourages it. Full figured is the politest way to describe her, she's overweight.

by Anonymousreply 135March 23, 2013 2:22 PM

There's no way around it. Full figured doesn't really cut it for this doll. Grotesque is the only word.

by Anonymousreply 136March 23, 2013 5:13 PM

Wow. r129's link is TRAGIC.

by Anonymousreply 137March 23, 2013 5:19 PM

Hendricks has a plain face. I always roll my eyes when people say she's beautiful.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 138March 23, 2013 5:29 PM

She also looks much better as Joan than as Christina.

by Anonymousreply 139March 23, 2013 9:47 PM

She may look better as Joan but her shelf precedes her into every scene. Not a pretty sight, and I would think she has trouble walking almost anywhere.

by Anonymousreply 140March 23, 2013 9:54 PM

She looks better here.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 141March 29, 2013 6:35 AM

Better than what? Puh leese.

by Anonymousreply 142March 29, 2013 11:01 AM

Better than in some recent pics.

by Anonymousreply 143March 31, 2013 5:59 AM

She looked even bigger on the new Mad Men episode.

by Anonymousreply 144April 12, 2013 12:30 AM

I always thought full-figured was a polite way of saying fat. She is certainly not fat. That being said, I always referred to her as the lady from Capital Knockers City. Is that better?

by Anonymousreply 145April 12, 2013 12:39 AM

She's not quite fat, but she is pushing fat. She is now past voluptuous.

by Anonymousreply 146April 12, 2013 12:44 AM

I'm a straight chick and I found myself getting turned on my R[45] pic post.

by Anonymousreply 147April 12, 2013 12:46 AM

Can anyone take her seriously either as an actress or as tits on wheels?

by Anonymousreply 148April 12, 2013 12:46 AM

She'll miss being called full figured when they're labelling her WEHT?

by Anonymousreply 149April 12, 2013 12:49 AM

LOL for R147 I'm a gay dude and I too found myself turned on by that pic.

by Anonymousreply 150April 12, 2013 12:52 AM

She has huge fake implants like Dolly Parton and she's fat. What does she expect?

by Anonymousreply 151April 12, 2013 12:55 AM

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 152May 10, 2013 1:14 AM

She's pretty and a good actress, but I hate the character of Joan. She's cuntier than Betty truth be told.

by Anonymousreply 153May 10, 2013 1:17 AM

Joan is sharp tongued, but she's not whiny like Betty. She's also managed to make something of herself.

by Anonymousreply 154May 10, 2013 3:26 AM

It's a good thing Christina's got the Joan role going for her. It's the best she's gonna get, I'm afraid. If only she wasn't so grotesque. Her talent isn't full-figured at all.

by Anonymousreply 155May 10, 2013 1:23 PM

She must have the world's best publicist:

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 156May 10, 2013 1:53 PM

She has an unusual body. Her face and her limbs are a lot slimmer than her torso.

by Anonymousreply 157May 11, 2013 4:42 AM

ok, is lard ass acceptable?

And those boobs are just ridiculous.

by Anonymousreply 158May 11, 2013 5:11 AM

Just Damn, r81.

by Anonymousreply 159May 11, 2013 5:30 AM

Her face is so beautiful. How does she not get carb face or double chins?

by Anonymousreply 160May 11, 2013 5:53 AM

Soooo-eeeeee!!

by Anonymousreply 161May 11, 2013 10:44 AM

How much more weight must she gain before the media start calling her fat?:

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 162May 11, 2013 11:50 AM

Don't bother. She's there.

by Anonymousreply 163May 11, 2013 12:04 PM

Actually, I think it's a real disservice to the nation's health to call fat women "full-figured" or "curvy" -- they're fat, maybe even obese, and if they don't have Type 2 diabetes, joint pain and heart disease, they will.

by Anonymousreply 164May 11, 2013 2:03 PM

She's definitively chubby.

by Anonymousreply 165May 12, 2013 3:39 AM

She's built like Tyler Perry's Medea

by Anonymousreply 166May 12, 2013 3:57 AM

[quote]Don't bother. She's there.

Of course she's there, but the media are still being complimentary to her, whilst suggesting that women half her size [italic]are[/italic] fat.

by Anonymousreply 167May 15, 2013 12:26 PM

The media should stop obsessing over women's looks. It's perverted and pathological the way women are constantly being scrutinized. Of course, it's a savvy tool to powertrip women but I am bored with the fucking nagging in regards to women's appearance.

by Anonymousreply 168May 15, 2013 12:50 PM

[quote]The media should stop obsessing over women's looks. It's perverted and pathological the way women are constantly being scrutinized. Of course, it's a savvy tool to powertrip women but I am bored with the fucking nagging in regards to women's appearance.

That sounds somewhat reasonable. But Hendricks is the one pushing everyone to talk about her "curvy", "womanly" figure, so they don't call her fat.

by Anonymousreply 169May 15, 2013 12:56 PM

It seems to be the way to promote this show. They talk about her tits and Jon Hamm's huge cock.

by Anonymousreply 170May 15, 2013 1:10 PM

I like her curves - unlike many here - but admit that she is overweight (not obese). I think she gets away with it because the weight hasn't gone to her face. Anyone obese claiming her as one of their own, is having themselves on.

I still think she is healthier looking than some of the stick insect actors around the place.

by Anonymousreply 171May 15, 2013 1:18 PM

[quote]I like her curves - unlike many here - but admit that she is overweight (not obese). I think she gets away with it because the weight hasn't gone to her face. Anyone obese claiming her as one of their own, is having themselves on.

Yes, but at times she does look at the heavier range of the overweight category, see R81's link. Constance McCashin has a better figure than her, despite her infamous love of junk food:

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 172May 15, 2013 1:37 PM

Yes, R172, but I have to work out like a fucking *bitch* to keep my svelte figure.

by Anonymousreply 173May 15, 2013 11:29 PM

What if we just call her a great big fat person.

by Anonymousreply 174May 16, 2013 12:25 AM

Christina Hendricks is a human roach nest!

by Anonymousreply 175May 16, 2013 12:30 AM

But ya are, Blanche.

by Anonymousreply 176May 16, 2013 1:14 AM

Describe her to me. I know what would be first on my list.

by Anonymousreply 177May 16, 2013 2:55 AM

She'd totally rock the cheese ball contest at michfest.

by Anonymousreply 178May 16, 2013 7:44 AM

She looks so matronly:

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 179May 16, 2013 9:18 AM

So matronly...and so grotesque.

by Anonymousreply 180May 16, 2013 11:56 AM

She's lost considerable weight.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 181August 10, 2013 11:32 PM

"Curvy" is a shape, not a size. Marilyn Monroe was absolutely tiny-- she hips were 36 inches-- but her waist hip ratio was the definition of curvy.

Hendricks is just fat.

by Anonymousreply 182August 10, 2013 11:44 PM

r182, you have to factor in the bust. Hendricks is (was?) busty.

by Anonymousreply 183August 10, 2013 11:48 PM

Marilyn fluctuated, but you are right, she was curvy based on her proportions.

Christina is curvy herself. She has a relatively small waist for her bust and hips. She's also no longer fat based on the recent picture.

by Anonymousreply 184August 10, 2013 11:49 PM

She's craftily dressed in black. Her tits still precede her into any room. And now she just looks weird.

by Anonymousreply 185August 10, 2013 11:56 PM

Look at how slim her waist is, R185. She's lost weight.

by Anonymousreply 186August 11, 2013 12:01 AM

I think MM's hips were 36 at her smallest. They were not 36 in Some Like It Hot or Niagra.

by Anonymousreply 187August 11, 2013 3:34 AM

She claims her boobs are real.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 188August 11, 2013 3:48 AM

In news that will please the yearnings of many men, Christina Hendricks is set to play a stripper in the film adaptation of Gillian Flynn's best-selling thriller "Dark Places." The "Mad Men" actress joins Charlize Theron, Chloe Moretz, Nicholas Hoult and Corey Stoll in the Gilles Paquet-Brenner ("Sarah's Key," "Pretty Things") film.

Hendricks, who is no stranger to attracting buzz, plays Krissi Cates, who years ago accused a man (Stoll) of being a child molester. Krissi is down on her luck and must address secrets from her past that have implications for the accused man's older sister (Theron).

"Dark Places" marks one of two acclaimed Flynn novels to ink a movie deal recently. "Gone Girl," a 2012 best-seller, will receive a David Fincher adaptation, with Rosamund Pike and Ben Affleck in the lead roles.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 189September 1, 2013 1:51 AM

Even slim Christina still looks grotesque.

by Anonymousreply 190September 1, 2013 2:23 AM

Big titters!

by Anonymousreply 191September 1, 2013 2:26 AM

I feel bad for this girl. People discuss her figure and her shape so much, but it really has nothing to do with her. Men love to tell anyone who will listen that they think she's hot, because it's a way of bragging that they aren't shallow because they'd fuck a fat girl. And women love to applaud her full-figured shape because they think it will help them to better accept their own physical flaws. Because she's overweight, people think it's okay talk about her in a strictly sexual sense. But if she had an athletic body, and people said they same things about her, it would be perceived as being as creepy and exploitative as it is. Not to mention a weird form of pity.

But, most of all, if anyone gains a little weight, the LAST thing they want people to discuss is their weight. And that's all anybody discusses about her.

by Anonymousreply 192September 1, 2013 2:36 AM

i WISH someone would call me "full figured!"

by Anonymousreply 193September 1, 2013 2:46 AM

Let's face it, Christina. As the years go on, calling you full-figured would be a high compliment.

by Anonymousreply 194September 1, 2013 12:41 PM

What kind of weirdo are you r192? Sure, some women might enjoy calling a heavier woman sexy in order to feel better about their own weight. (Though the ONLY celeb I see that working for right now is Hendricks, actually.) But there isn't a single men in this universe who pretends to lust after the sex bomb secretary from Mad Men so that they don't seem shallow. Are you insane?

by Anonymousreply 195September 1, 2013 11:59 PM

She's fortunate in having a thin face.

by Anonymousreply 196September 2, 2013 12:04 AM

[all posts by ham-fisted troll a removed.]

by Anonymousreply 197September 2, 2013 12:29 AM

R197 - She is talented. She's been able to make Joan into a complex character.

by Anonymousreply 198September 2, 2013 12:37 AM

I'm not saying they're pretending, R195. I'm saying they're more vocal about their lust for her than they would be with someone of a more conventional shape because they think that makes them seem more admirable.

by Anonymousreply 199September 2, 2013 8:31 AM

Or maybe they like big boobs, R199

by Anonymousreply 200September 2, 2013 9:10 PM

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 201September 7, 2013 11:28 PM

I'd call that a hell of a lot more than full-figured. I'd call that wearing a tablecloth to enhance her tittays. Poor baby.

by Anonymousreply 202September 8, 2013 12:09 AM

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 203September 23, 2013 10:11 PM

I'd prefer her naked body to Claire Danes skinny and gross looking body! Hendricks has the perfect fuck body.

by Anonymousreply 204September 23, 2013 10:22 PM

Somewhere right in between Claire and Christina would be nice.

by Anonymousreply 205September 23, 2013 10:26 PM

Honey, you should consider being called full-figured as a full-blown compliment. Take it in the spirit it's intended.

by Anonymousreply 206September 24, 2013 8:43 PM

Christina carries it better than Kirstie.

by Anonymousreply 207September 24, 2013 10:37 PM

I dated Tom Irwin right after his breakup with Christina. The girl is a total bitch. She used him hardcore. I think she's great on Mad Men, but she is typical Hollywood: soulless.

by Anonymousreply 208September 24, 2013 11:05 PM

This bitch has been 37 for 200 years. God damn.

by Anonymousreply 209September 24, 2013 11:12 PM

She's 38.

by Anonymousreply 210September 24, 2013 11:14 PM

And her cup size is M, for MAMMOTH.

by Anonymousreply 211September 24, 2013 11:25 PM

Her size worked in the early days of Mad Men. Now she's carrying too much weight and it doesn't look good anymore.

She's not a blimp but she is fat. The industry standards for the industry she chooses to work in actually do matter.

She looks much prettier in person, really gorgeous.

by Anonymousreply 212September 24, 2013 11:35 PM

She's put on at least 20 lbs since Mad men started.

by Anonymousreply 213September 24, 2013 11:40 PM

She's like Sandra....from Confederate Northern Virginia where they still worship Robert E. Lee.

Yes, she's hot and beautiful but like Sandra, she's hiding A LOT (this is all conjecture, I'm sure).

by Anonymousreply 214September 24, 2013 11:40 PM

Sandra who?

by Anonymousreply 215September 24, 2013 11:43 PM

Here's a younger Christina in a commercial.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 216November 18, 2013 12:04 AM

Jeez, have never seen her before. I googled her, she's a life support for two buckets of silicone.

by Anonymousreply 217November 18, 2013 12:15 AM

R217 - You've never seen her before?

by Anonymousreply 218November 18, 2013 12:18 AM

No 218, I don't have cable. Breaking Bad, Sopranos etc., I've never seen them.

by Anonymousreply 219November 18, 2013 12:22 AM

She is on Mad Men. But she's been talked about a lot.

by Anonymousreply 220November 18, 2013 12:31 AM

And the bitch denies her udders are implants.

by Anonymousreply 221November 18, 2013 12:57 AM

Bitch should be lucky anyone finds her flabby, pasty, flat-ass attractive at all.

by Anonymousreply 222November 18, 2013 2:02 AM

Hard to believe in that commercial she once looked human (forget full figured).

by Anonymousreply 223November 18, 2013 2:24 AM

She looked great in Firefly.

by Anonymousreply 224November 18, 2013 3:46 AM

She also looked fine and was terrific in the 2011 NY Philharmonic production of Company with Neil Patrick Harris, which finally got aired on PBS a few weeks ago. She played the dumb airline hostess April really well, although she did strip down to her slip and bra, and, well, she probably shouldn't have.

by Anonymousreply 225November 19, 2013 9:28 PM

She's a good actress.

by Anonymousreply 226November 20, 2013 3:24 AM

She's still a house, good actress or not. Christina, honey, I think you should get used to "full-figured gal" and take it as it's meant: a high compliment.

by Anonymousreply 227November 20, 2013 8:43 PM

I don't know what her problem is. I have her figure (although my E cup size is natural)and I love it. So do the men--and women.

by Anonymousreply 228November 20, 2013 8:55 PM

R228. Are you a man or a woman?

by Anonymousreply 229November 20, 2013 10:17 PM

I know, Christina. I feel the same way when people talk about my giant, long, thick penis straining to escape my pants .

by Anonymousreply 230November 20, 2013 10:41 PM

A man with an E cup size?!

by Anonymousreply 231November 20, 2013 10:50 PM

She'd look better if she lost 20-30 lbs.

by Anonymousreply 232November 20, 2013 10:52 PM

R231. These days you can't be sure. It never hurts to ask! LOL!

by Anonymousreply 233November 20, 2013 11:28 PM

Big Tina's interviewer's rebuttal:

[bold]Hollywood's voluptuous beauty was offended? Go (full) figure...

[bold]Kate Waterhouse:

Last week I dropped the F-bomb and it went global. No, I didn't swear - the international media storm was because I called the Mad Men actress Christina Hendricks 'full-figured'.

I asked: 'You have been an inspiration as a full-figured woman; what is the most inspiring story that you can remember?' It seemed inoffensive to me, so I was shocked when she refused to answer the question and told me it was 'just rude'.

I was not intending to be rude. In fact, I think she is one of the sexiest women on the planet. Indeed, I would die for some of those curves! But no one can deny that Hendricks is voluptuous and, whether she likes it or not, she has become a poster girl for full-figured women - especially when considered next to your typical size zero Hollywood actress. Advertisement

I hope she realises that refusing to own up to the fact that she is full-figured only breeds more insecurity on body acceptance.

Unfortunately, she has now made the term full-figured a dirty word.

In response to my story, the editor-in-chief of the US-based Plus Model Magazine, Madeline Jones, told me she was disappointed by Hendricks's reaction. 'I was personally offended by it. She is a curvy woman and she is fuller than most women in Hollywood, so therefore she is a role model to plus-size women,' she said.

'She is a role model to 65 per cent of American women and millions around the world. What a powerful statement she could have made. She should be humbled that she can inspire so many people. The fact that she made such a big deal about it shows truth about how she feels and how she feels about her plus-size fans.'

Curiously, on the same day as my interview, Hendricks answered questions from News Ltd, including 'Have you ever felt a time in your career that you have had to change just to fit a model type' and 'Have you ever thought 'Oh gee, should I lose weight?'' She answered: 'It's important to embrace who you are and celebrate who you are and we are all completely different and I think that's gorgeous.'

Exactly right! For the record, full-figured is defined as 'amply proportioned', it does not mean fat or obese. It is a term to describe buxom and shapely, with broad hips and lots of sensuous, womanly curves as opposed to an androgynous waif-like figure. To me, this is political correctness gone mad.

So why did she take offence? No issues or topics were off limits for the interview and in my weekly Date with Kate column I often discuss weight, health and fitness. Her publicity people had approached me as she was being paid a significant sum of money to promote a brand of glasses in Australia.

As a journalist, my role is to ask what our readers would like to know. Her shapely appearance is an important part of her appeal, so it would have been unprofessional not to ask the question - albeit politely and with the best intentions. When I asked Kim Kardashian - who is also regarded as voluptuous in Hollywood terms - a similar question, she replied: 'I feel excited that young girls look up to me and I'm not your typical stick-skinny girl.'

Hendricks later told The Sun-Herald that she prefers her shape to be described as 'feminine'. But does that mean that I'm not feminine because I'm slight?

Since referring to Hendricks as full- figured, I have had countless abusive tweets, emails and comments about my weight. But I choose not to take offence. Yes, there are plenty of things I would change about my body. I would love bigger breasts and I'd kill for long legs. But I am proud of my body because I know that I eat well and I am healthy.

Above all, I celebrate women of all shapes and sizes.

by Anonymousreply 234December 5, 2013 8:22 AM

Link for above:

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 235December 5, 2013 8:22 AM

Sorry.[/bold]

Closing bold tag.

by Anonymousreply 236December 5, 2013 8:26 AM

[quote]And the bitch denies her udders are implants.

Her breasts are big because she gained so much weight. They're probably quite saggy without support. I have a friend who's built just like her. A good bra makes all the difference.

Look at what Lohan's (now obviously real) large breast looks like from the side. That's clearly a natural (and premature) sag.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 237December 5, 2013 9:34 AM

[bold]Bold over, yet?[/bold]

End.

by Anonymousreply 238December 5, 2013 1:23 PM

In this picture.....

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 239December 5, 2013 1:44 PM

And this one.....

You can see how Christina would be a great WW

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 240December 5, 2013 1:48 PM

[/bold]Back fat

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 241December 12, 2013 2:06 PM

Ham-hock arms

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 242December 12, 2013 2:10 PM

Side profile

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 243December 12, 2013 2:12 PM

She is gorgeous.

by Anonymousreply 244December 12, 2013 2:15 PM

[quote]She is gorgeous.

Oh, dear.

It's "ginormous", sweetie.

by Anonymousreply 245December 12, 2013 2:26 PM

Full-figured is putting it mildly, and kindly.

by Anonymousreply 246December 12, 2013 2:33 PM

Back fat #2

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 247December 12, 2013 6:25 PM

Big Tina endorses everything. She looks like a gal who enjoys her margarine:

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 248December 12, 2013 6:53 PM

Give her a fucking break, she is a hot mess, but she was a scream in the Neil Patrick Harris version of Company, and should better more comedy turns.

by Anonymousreply 249December 12, 2013 7:23 PM

Rose Mcgowan's fat little sister

by Anonymousreply 250December 12, 2013 7:38 PM

R220 - She does not have the WW look.

by Anonymousreply 251December 13, 2013 2:33 AM

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 252December 15, 2013 7:53 AM

She does look gorgeous. Even in photos revealing backfat, the entire rest of her looks amazing. She's thick and beautiful, lets accept it and move on.

by Anonymousreply 253December 15, 2013 10:14 PM

R252 - That's actually flattering. Who is with her?

by Anonymousreply 254December 15, 2013 10:21 PM

She's unhealthy.

by Anonymousreply 255December 16, 2013 7:49 AM

Why does no one remark on her resemblance to Gabourney Sidibe?

by Anonymousreply 256January 15, 2014 6:08 PM

.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 257February 6, 2014 9:12 AM

.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 258February 6, 2014 9:12 AM

Have never understood the obsession with this sow. Bad dye job and her breasts are disgusting. Massive mounds of shapeless fat, squished together and overflowing under a too-tight top. Maybe quantity over quality matters to straight men, but I've seen good tits and these ain't good tits. These are fat girl tits.

by Anonymousreply 259February 6, 2014 9:18 AM

[quote]Plump is ok if they bring a lot of value

We're talking about women like they were steaks at the local Kroger now?

by Anonymousreply 260February 6, 2014 9:18 AM

Remember she has BMs the size of squirrels.

by Anonymousreply 261February 6, 2014 9:54 AM

She is full-figured and gorgeous. This is such a tedious thread. Let it go.

I love how you Americans obsess over certain celebrities being "fat". The truth is that more than 50% of your population is overweight. Not sure why you take it out on this woman or Jennifer Lawrence (who basically has the perfect figure) when there are millions of truly overweight men and women you could target.

by Anonymousreply 262February 6, 2014 11:44 AM

Her younger self had blondish hair and a normal-sized bust. If she regrets the attention her artificial hair and breasts generate, she should return to her more natural features.

by Anonymousreply 263February 6, 2014 4:45 PM

Better than calling you fat bitch-chi-sha... go run 'long now...

by Anonymousreply 264February 6, 2014 4:50 PM

There are far worse things she could be called

by Anonymousreply 265February 6, 2014 4:54 PM

Let Tina alone! What's done can't be undone and she'll just have to live with all the augmentation! And so will we.

by Anonymousreply 266February 6, 2014 6:13 PM

Probably best to say nothing then ! Calling her 'full figured' is being 'kind'. She's borderline Zaftig. Really. Give her a few more years and you'll see. PLUS, truth is the ideal for the past 40,50 years has been women that are no bigger than a size 8.

by Anonymousreply 267February 6, 2014 6:23 PM

R262 - Christina is several sizes larger than Jennifer Lawrence.

by Anonymousreply 268February 6, 2014 9:02 PM

Howzabout ZAFTIG?

I love that one...

by Anonymousreply 269February 6, 2014 9:34 PM

Zaftig fits Christina.

by Anonymousreply 270February 6, 2014 9:43 PM

Call her a whale

by Anonymousreply 271February 6, 2014 9:48 PM

Gut at 0:25

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 272February 9, 2014 10:10 AM

I like the glasses R272

by Anonymousreply 273February 9, 2014 10:42 PM

Funny thing is, in recent photos (last several months), she appears to have lost about 15-20 pounds--maybe not from her boobs but from her midsection, and looks much better. In that last photo upthread she looks way thinner than last year's show (including her face). Maybe calling her full-figured has actually worked...

by Anonymousreply 274February 9, 2014 10:55 PM

She has lost some weight and is getting back her shape.

by Anonymousreply 275February 9, 2014 11:01 PM

Unflattering

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 276February 23, 2014 1:35 PM

Hindenberg

by Anonymousreply 277February 23, 2014 1:42 PM

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 278February 23, 2014 1:51 PM

Before

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 279February 23, 2014 1:53 PM

After

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 280February 23, 2014 1:54 PM

Pot Belly

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 281February 23, 2014 1:55 PM

Pot Belly 2

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 282February 23, 2014 1:57 PM

"Side gut". How's that for her nickname?

by Anonymousreply 283February 23, 2014 1:57 PM

[italic]Although Hendricks had to be dragged away from the hot dog stand, she promised to return.[/italic]

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 284February 23, 2014 1:59 PM

That before picture is hot! The perfect woman. Shame she didn't get famous earlier.

by Anonymousreply 285February 23, 2014 2:00 PM

.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 286February 23, 2014 2:14 PM

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 287February 23, 2014 3:22 PM

.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 288February 23, 2014 3:25 PM

R279 looks like early in Mad Men's run.

by Anonymousreply 289February 24, 2014 1:08 AM

Mooooooo!

by Anonymousreply 290February 24, 2014 3:29 AM

She looked slimmer at Sundance this year:

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 291February 24, 2014 3:41 AM

The size of squirrels, people!

by Anonymousreply 292February 24, 2014 10:47 AM

She looks best at the weight @ r279

by Anonymousreply 293February 24, 2014 10:55 AM

^^ Yeah, WHAT are you going on about?

It's unfortunate that she'd understand a comment about being 'full-figured' to be negative. I sensed it as a nod to her having delicious curves--a welcome sight, from a purely lustful perspective. But, I do understand it was kind of dim for the interviewers to have not worded it more carefully.

And I [italic]love[/italic] a girl in glasses.

...Here's a heartbreaking Mad Men scene, when Joan's good friend Carol admits that she loves her.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 294February 24, 2014 3:48 PM

R259 = very gay man

by Anonymousreply 295February 24, 2014 3:52 PM

Who said "I'm so over you" in 1960.

by Anonymousreply 296February 24, 2014 11:03 PM

All right, you're not full figured, You are FAT!

by Anonymousreply 297February 24, 2014 11:35 PM

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 298February 25, 2014 12:24 AM

There's STILL an expedition lost inside those sagging, droopy, oversized meat curtains!

by Anonymousreply 299February 25, 2014 12:51 AM

Squirrels, I tell you - SQUIRRELS!!

by Anonymousreply 300February 25, 2014 1:49 AM

R298 Elizabeth Moss's face is terrifying in that pic.

by Anonymousreply 301February 25, 2014 2:55 AM

[quote][R298] Elizabeth Moss's face is terrifying in that pic.

Julianna Margulies looks awful in that picture with Tom Hanks. She took the zero percent body fat a tad too far.

by Anonymousreply 302February 25, 2014 3:11 AM

"morbidly obese" would be more accurate

by Anonymousreply 303February 25, 2014 3:26 AM

Holy cow, R299. You are an off-the-chart 'mo.

As for us gay girls, [italic]I'm getting that tingle in my tummy[/italic] just looking at these photos of her.

by Anonymousreply 304February 25, 2014 3:29 AM

Elisabeth looks overweight too, and she does not pull it off well.

by Anonymousreply 305February 25, 2014 3:43 AM

[quote]Elisabeth looks overweight too, and she does not pull it off well.

I saw Elisabeth M. in NYC last summer when she was shooting a film and she does not look overweight. She looked petite in person. It is crazy how much weight a camera adds.

by Anonymousreply 306February 25, 2014 4:00 AM

Camera or no camera, it's completely obvious that E. Moss is slender. Some people are just insane.

by Anonymousreply 307February 25, 2014 8:41 AM

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 308March 7, 2014 12:03 AM

No joke - SQUIRRELS. Seriously.

by Anonymousreply 309March 7, 2014 10:52 AM

Tipping me over in a field is even ruder!

by Anonymousreply 310March 9, 2014 12:55 AM

What's this squirrel shit?

by Anonymousreply 311March 9, 2014 1:00 AM

Big Tina looked fatter than ever in her full-figured interview:

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 312March 12, 2014 6:15 PM

Loud prints don't work on big women like Christina:

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 313March 27, 2014 6:03 PM

No they don't.

by Anonymousreply 314March 27, 2014 7:21 PM

Big Tina's outfit from the interview:

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 315March 29, 2014 1:09 PM

I actually like it R315

by Anonymousreply 316March 29, 2014 9:37 PM

Are they really as big as SQUIRRELS?

by Anonymousreply 317March 30, 2014 3:41 AM

Timeline of her weight gain:

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 318April 9, 2014 1:30 PM

Nothing about Hendricks is natural as this 1999 photo proves.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 319April 14, 2014 9:27 PM

That's some photo, R319! Thanks for posting it.

by Anonymousreply 320April 14, 2014 10:28 PM

ROLF, R245.

by Anonymousreply 321April 14, 2014 10:34 PM

R319 - She's not flat chested there.

by Anonymousreply 322April 14, 2014 10:40 PM

bump

by Anonymousreply 323April 17, 2014 1:22 AM

How about "Facunt" or "C-Barge"?

by Anonymousreply 324April 28, 2014 7:45 PM

[quote]How about "Facunt" or "C-Barge"?

Appropriate. But Hendricks official DL designation is Big Tina Hendricks or Fat Sow Christina Hendricks.

See AnnE for for Anne Hathaway whilst Anne Fakeaway or Anne Fauxhumilityway also work she's already been given an official name.

by Anonymousreply 325May 1, 2014 11:13 AM

She's looking thinner on Mad Men.

by Anonymousreply 326May 1, 2014 9:02 PM

[all posts by childish idiot removed]

by Anonymousreply 327May 1, 2014 9:08 PM

Are they really as big as squirrels?

by Anonymousreply 328May 2, 2014 5:12 AM

Yes, as big as squirrels.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 329May 2, 2014 6:32 AM

Just saw her in "God's Pocket," where her breasts looked beyond ridiculous. They were practically up to her neck and nothing on her moved naturally. I watch a LOT of indie movies with a lot of different body types and never even notice when someone doesn't have a Hollywood figure... until Christina.

by Anonymousreply 330May 2, 2014 9:38 AM

.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 331May 2, 2014 9:42 AM

.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 332May 8, 2014 1:07 PM

Christina Hendricks: 'Calling me full-figured is just true.'

I fixed that for you.

by Anonymousreply 333May 8, 2014 1:38 PM

I thought she looked good in R331's pic.

by Anonymousreply 334May 8, 2014 9:54 PM

.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 335May 9, 2014 8:03 AM

.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 336May 9, 2014 8:03 AM

Too fussy. Makes her look even fatter.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 337May 15, 2014 4:48 PM

That's a good pic R337

by Anonymousreply 338May 16, 2014 2:57 AM

Is it true she's really good in God's Pocket?

by Anonymousreply 339May 16, 2014 3:03 AM

Mel Brooks: "Calling me Jewish is just rude"

by Anonymousreply 340May 22, 2014 10:32 AM

She looked much slimmer in the last Mad Men where Bob Benson proposes.

by Anonymousreply 341May 22, 2014 11:24 AM

She looked mammoth last season.

by Anonymousreply 342May 22, 2014 5:11 PM

She looks like the fat office frau:

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 343May 28, 2014 6:48 AM

.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 344May 28, 2014 7:45 AM

.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 345May 28, 2014 7:45 AM

.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 346June 1, 2014 2:28 PM

.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 347June 1, 2014 2:30 PM

.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 348June 1, 2014 2:30 PM

.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 349June 1, 2014 2:31 PM

.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 350June 1, 2014 2:32 PM

.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 351June 1, 2014 2:34 PM

Full figured is better than overweight cow!

by Anonymousreply 352June 1, 2014 2:36 PM

.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 353June 1, 2014 2:37 PM

Good lord are those huge knockers real?

She looks pregnant in the belly area. Unless she has stopped wearing Spanx.

by Anonymousreply 354June 1, 2014 2:39 PM

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 355June 4, 2014 10:02 PM

On the Tonight Show. Definitively slimmer, and looking gorgeous.

by Anonymousreply 356June 24, 2014 4:21 AM

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 357July 19, 2014 12:05 PM

No, R355, she looks huge. Her face and arms are still but her body's huge. She isn't even curvy. Look at the photos above. Her waist is bigger than her husband's and barely goes in. She's Spanxed to the max in every outfit. Can we see a photo of her where she isn't covered up and in shapewear. She's overweight.

by Anonymousreply 358July 19, 2014 12:10 PM

She looks the same size as always in that gold skirt ^^. If you think she isn't overweight take a look in the mirror. She has a gut.

by Anonymousreply 359July 19, 2014 12:14 PM

Her waist is about 30 inches with girdle. It might be smaller than her hips and boobs but there's no denying her hips are wide.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 360July 19, 2014 12:18 PM

Her publicist works over-time to promote her "curviness". She's just a great big fat person. She should be thankful no one called her "stocky" or "big boned".

by Anonymousreply 361July 19, 2014 12:24 PM

Her waist.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 362July 19, 2014 3:07 PM

I'm an ass man and big tit fan...but some curious reason she does nothing for me. On paper that hip-to-waist ratio may perhaps equal classic hourglass; in reality, however, it's the waist numbers that matter most. Hendricks waist is far too thick and merely makes her upper body, shoulders, hips, and overall appearance robust or matronly.

Academic studies have found that by altering a models picture by narrowing just the waist to achieve the perfect ratio 0.7(IIRC); or alternatively only altering the hips (broadening) but leaving waist unaltered..the smaller waist wins virtually every time among males studied. Moreover, guys will specify a preference for an smaller waist than the standard 0.7 ideal.

In my opinion that real ideal sexy curvy woman is a mixture of the delicate and plushly fleshy. Christina, however, is in BBW territory. Not that that's a bad thing. In keeping with the shows era, I think "curvy" should be reserved for classic Gina Lollobrigidas, Sophia Lorens, Marilyn? (in her nude pics she has no ass or tits to speak of).

Hendicks's lustrous luminescent alabaster skin IS kinda hot tho.

by Anonymousreply 363July 19, 2014 4:32 PM

She's a top heavy hourglass.

by Anonymousreply 364July 19, 2014 9:30 PM

WTF? Is some brazen cad copping a feel in R355? LOL

by Anonymousreply 365July 20, 2014 1:13 AM

That's hysterical R365 and it looks like a woman's hand.

Maybe a randy lesbian?

by Anonymousreply 366July 20, 2014 1:17 AM

You must be at least kinda gay, R363, if Christina Hendricks does nothing for you.

In her 1960's Joan get-up, she is unquestionably sexy.

by Anonymousreply 367July 20, 2014 1:17 AM

R365 good question.

by Anonymousreply 368July 20, 2014 1:18 AM

I like her character on Mad Men (although I did not watch the previous season because Winer lost me and I can't be bothered if he can't be bothered), and in general I think she is a good actress. However, she seems to be in the most shit indie movies that she does over her hiatus. Except for Drive, which she had a minor role, she cannot seem to get in any decent movies. I hope that changes once Mad Men is over next year.

I will say that I see her having a film career over John Hamm. He does not have that elusive "it" factor for the big screen.

by Anonymousreply 369July 20, 2014 1:34 AM

Christina in Company (2013). I can see her having a Broadway career.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 370July 20, 2014 1:41 AM

BMs the size of squirrels. Just reminding you.

by Anonymousreply 371July 20, 2014 4:49 AM

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 372August 2, 2014 8:11 AM

Rounded

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 373August 2, 2014 8:14 AM

.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 374August 2, 2014 8:15 AM

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 375August 2, 2014 8:16 AM

.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 376August 2, 2014 8:18 AM

She has a gut in everything.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 377August 2, 2014 8:18 AM

.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 378August 2, 2014 8:21 AM

.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 379August 2, 2014 8:22 AM

Paleyfest

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 380August 2, 2014 8:24 AM

Frau-ish

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 381August 2, 2014 8:26 AM

i liked her in Company.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 382August 2, 2014 8:30 AM

What did R220 mean by WW?

by Anonymousreply 383August 2, 2014 10:44 AM

Wonder-woman, R383?

by Anonymousreply 384August 2, 2014 12:05 PM

The bitch is fat. Her ass is incredibly flat as well. She actually has a horrible shape if you look at her sideways, but her boobs camouflage all of the problem areas.

by Anonymousreply 385August 2, 2014 12:09 PM

She looks slimmer in R379

by Anonymousreply 386August 2, 2014 5:53 PM

Thank you 384!

by Anonymousreply 387August 2, 2014 5:58 PM

She has rather pronounced collar bones.

by Anonymousreply 388August 2, 2014 9:33 PM

She looks more like a walking mountain range to me.

by Anonymousreply 389August 2, 2014 11:13 PM

R358 Her husband looks very skinny though. If she is overweight then she's the best looking overweight person in the world.

by Anonymousreply 390August 2, 2014 11:27 PM

I think she looks wonderful.

A normal sized woman, and one who is put together and cares about her appearance. Looks classy and doesn't look bland, suburban or as if she stopped giving a fuck.

by Anonymousreply 391August 2, 2014 11:39 PM

Perhaps it's rude to call someone full-figured. But then it's also rude to call someone fat, even though it may well be true.

by Anonymousreply 392August 2, 2014 11:45 PM

Interview in The Guardian to promote her film with PSH, God's Pocket. Disappointed to learn she's one of those people who register their pets as service animals so they can carry them on planes, despite all lack of therapeutic need.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 393August 3, 2014 6:34 PM

R393's link

"I've been asked by Hendricks's PR not to ask any questions about her body in the interview. But, obviously, I try to bring it up anyway. Hendricks spots the approach from a mile off. "Don't do it," she says firmly, before I even get to the end of the sentence. She smiles but it's quite clear she means it. She finishes her raw steak and then places her knife and fork together on the plate. Just like Joan, there's a steely underwiring beneath that pale-skinned, blush-cheeked exterior."

by Anonymousreply 394August 4, 2014 4:11 AM

I love the subtle dig at her eating raw steak. Bitch, you can stall me all you want but I am gonna write that you are a COW!

by Anonymousreply 395August 4, 2014 4:25 AM

And the wine.

by Anonymousreply 396August 4, 2014 4:27 AM

Joan being a total bitch to Paul Kinsey:

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 397August 4, 2014 4:31 AM

Huge Tina

by Anonymousreply 398August 4, 2014 4:51 AM

R397 - Paul deserved it.

by Anonymousreply 399August 4, 2014 4:55 AM

R386, that photo is older, all the others are recent.

by Anonymousreply 400August 4, 2014 5:13 AM

If R379 is Christina looking 'good' I don't want to see what she looks like now! Those melons she calls tits look like they're suffocating.

by Anonymousreply 401August 4, 2014 5:22 AM

I think she jacks up the size of her implants each time she puts on weight (see link). She's either delusional or in denial if she thinks people aren't going to comment on those freakish chin rests. In contrast, Dolly Parton responds with humor and doesn't take herself so f*ing seriously.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 402August 4, 2014 6:45 AM

[quote]I think she looks wonderful. A normal sized woman, and one who is put together and cares about her appearance. Looks classy and doesn't look bland, suburban or as if she stopped giving a fuck.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 403August 4, 2014 7:44 AM

Obese.

by Anonymousreply 404August 4, 2014 7:48 AM

What do you queens care about her weight? You don't see straight guys going on about Jonah Hill.

by Anonymousreply 405August 4, 2014 7:58 AM

[quote]You don't see straight guys going on about Jonah Hill.

No, but you see gays guys discussing his disgusting obesity.

by Anonymousreply 406August 4, 2014 9:16 AM

Well, actually maybe straight guys do make cracks on his weight but the difference is he is is/was/is once again genuinely obese. Christina Hendricks isn't. I doubt many straight guys are put off by her weight.

by Anonymousreply 407August 4, 2014 9:48 AM

And my point is gays aren't supposed to fancy her, just as straights aren't supposed to fancy Jonah Hill or other guys.

by Anonymousreply 408August 4, 2014 9:52 AM

She has what might be called a Lainie Kazan figure.

by Anonymousreply 409August 4, 2014 11:25 AM

She'll be lucky if she's called anything once Mad Men ends.

by Anonymousreply 410August 4, 2014 7:29 PM

[quote]And my point is gays aren't supposed to fancy her, just as straights aren't supposed to fancy Jonah Hill or other guys.

The gays don't fancy him either. At any weight.

by Anonymousreply 411August 5, 2014 12:46 AM

She seems to be doing well in theater.

by Anonymousreply 412August 5, 2014 5:10 AM

There was a blind about her getting turned down at auditions specifically because it's thought she is too fat, and that she is losing weight and is considering a breast reduction.

by Anonymousreply 413August 14, 2014 7:56 PM

where was that BL?

by Anonymousreply 414August 17, 2014 12:41 AM

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 415August 17, 2014 6:36 AM

Husky

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 416August 17, 2014 6:37 AM

That lardy thigh.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 417August 17, 2014 6:37 AM

R415 - That was a well done video.

by Anonymousreply 418August 17, 2014 6:54 AM

She’s Melissa McCarthy without the jokes.

She’s Precious without the welfare check.

by Anonymousreply 419August 24, 2014 7:15 AM

There’s a deluded three hundred pound frau on this thread. Everytime it gets bumped up, she’s there heralding Big Tina’s weight loss and how she’s soooooo not fat.

by Anonymousreply 420August 24, 2014 7:15 AM

Profile shots are not her friend.

by Anonymousreply 421August 24, 2014 7:17 AM

.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 422August 24, 2014 7:18 AM

It’s rare to see obese people care like her. Most have given up.

by Anonymousreply 423August 24, 2014 7:19 AM

She looks normal. Considering the normal ‘Murkin, that’s not a healthy thing.

by Anonymousreply 424August 24, 2014 7:24 AM

The stop for Curvytown was forty pounds ago. She’s in Fatgirltown.

by Anonymousreply 425August 24, 2014 7:25 AM

If she only wants to lose weight for roles then she’ll gain it back. She needs to want to lose it for the sake of her health.

by Anonymousreply 426August 24, 2014 7:27 AM

She's lovely, and not at all obese.

by Anonymousreply 427August 24, 2014 7:28 AM

R427 = Ginny in Billing.

What happened to those brownies Shelley brought in, Ginny?

by Anonymousreply 428August 24, 2014 7:31 AM

If she only wants to lose weight for roles then she’ll gain it back. She needs to want to lose it for the sake of her health.

by Anonymousreply 429August 24, 2014 7:31 AM

She was miscast in Company. Too fat to be believable as a sexy air hostess. I see the baby voice and now she’s supposed to be sexy, but she isn’t, she’s big.

by Anonymousreply 430August 24, 2014 7:32 AM

Her phony baby voice sounds so odd on a great, big, fat woman.

by Anonymousreply 431August 24, 2014 7:33 AM

Big boobs, big thighs —— where’s the nipped-in waist?

by Anonymousreply 432August 24, 2014 7:34 AM

She’s not an hourglass. Her waist doesn’t go in —— without Spanx.

by Anonymousreply 433August 24, 2014 7:35 AM

She’s a cello.

by Anonymousreply 434August 24, 2014 7:36 AM

Darlin’, she’s a whole orchestra.

by Anonymousreply 435August 24, 2014 7:37 AM

Once the roles stop coming in after Mad Men ends, she’ll probably blow-up.

by Anonymousreply 436August 24, 2014 7:37 AM

She needs to get back to here Firefly weight. What happened?

by Anonymousreply 437August 24, 2014 7:38 AM

Maybe she has a glandular problem.

by Anonymousreply 438August 24, 2014 7:39 AM

Too much lunch R437

by Anonymousreply 439August 24, 2014 4:50 PM

She's a lot thinner than Melissa.

by Anonymousreply 440August 24, 2014 10:27 PM

She's a life support system for those silicon melons.

by Anonymousreply 441August 24, 2014 11:47 PM

She looks thinner here at an Emmy pre-party.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 442August 25, 2014 1:13 AM

She doesn't, R442. Although, black suits her. Dark colors are slimming.

by Anonymousreply 443August 25, 2014 8:31 AM

Bump

by Anonymousreply 444October 8, 2014 9:17 PM

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 445October 8, 2014 9:21 PM

Wonder what this bitch looks like naked

by Anonymousreply 446October 8, 2014 9:22 PM

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 447November 6, 2014 10:37 PM

What about "Ed-Asner-esque" ?

And what's more, this discussion is useless without pie. And ice cream.

by Anonymousreply 448November 7, 2014 1:48 AM

How is it this bitch keeps getting younger with every article written about her? She's gotta be well into her 40s now.

by Anonymousreply 449November 7, 2014 2:06 AM

Born 1975 supposedly.

by Anonymousreply 450November 8, 2014 12:27 AM

She at least looks proportional in that outfit in R447

by Anonymousreply 451November 8, 2014 4:30 AM

She has a thin skin and hates the constant carping over fashion faux pas or what she perceives as the non-issue of her weight. "I am too emotional," she admits. "I do take things personally because someone is always wanting to criticise or say something negative. I don't know why it is. I'm sure there's tons of blogs out there about how horrible Meryl Streep is." She guffaws at the thought. "And we all know that's not true."

She's right that her physical attributes come up again and again whenever she is interviewed or written about. On one level you can understand why – in a world where wraith-like thinness in actresses is revered, Hendricks is full-blooded proof that gorgeousness can exist, and be embraced, in a different construct. Her costumes in Mad Men – fitted dresses with nipped-in waists and knee-length pencil skirts worn over uncomfortable girdles and underwired long-line bras – only served to accentuate her hourglass figure and have influenced a host of fashion designers.

On another level you can also see why Hendricks is fed up with talking about it, because it is demeaning to suggest that the success of any woman's work depends on her vital statistics rather than her talent.

I've been asked by Hendricks's PR not to ask any questions about her body in the interview. But, obviously, I try to bring it up anyway. Hendricks spots the approach from a mile off. "Don't do it," she says firmly, before I even get to the end of the sentence. She smiles but it's quite clear she means it. She finishes her raw steak and then places her knife and fork together on the plate. Just like Joan, there's a steely underwiring beneath that pale-skinned, blush-cheeked exterior.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 452November 22, 2014 11:02 PM

Call her a fat cunt who can't dress for shit who is weeks away from emulating the last phase of Joan Crawford's career and see what she says. Full figured never bothered Marilyn Monroe or Jane Russell. Pretentious basic cable twat. Better yet, TWUNT! El Twunte Grande!

by Anonymousreply 453November 28, 2014 3:41 AM

Do you ever get tired of your own nastiness, R453?

by Anonymousreply 454November 28, 2014 3:52 AM

She's chubbier than Marilyn was.

by Anonymousreply 455November 28, 2014 3:54 AM

I'm totally gay, but I would love to explore Christina's curves.

She is sex on a stick.

by Anonymousreply 456November 28, 2014 3:56 AM

no 454. It keeps me alive. I kill your pets! I KEEL them!

by Anonymousreply 457November 28, 2014 3:57 AM

Calling me sarcastic is just true.

by Anonymousreply 458November 28, 2014 4:01 AM

[quote] "Call her a fat cunt who can't dress for shit who is weeks away from emulating the last phase of Joan Crawford's career and see what she says. Full figured never bothered Marilyn Monroe or Jane Russell. Pretentious basic cable twat. Better yet, TWUNT! El Twunte Grande!"

R453, your post made me laugh till tears rolled down my legs.

by Anonymousreply 459November 28, 2014 4:05 AM

[quote]I'm sure there's tons of blogs out there about how horrible Meryl Streep is." She guffaws at the thought. "And we all know that's not true."

Could she be pretending that she hasn't been on DL before?

by Anonymousreply 460November 28, 2014 11:07 AM

[quote] Calling me full-figured is just rude.

Would she prefer fat?

by Anonymousreply 461November 28, 2014 12:17 PM

She is overweight, but Christina does have great skin.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 462November 30, 2014 1:02 AM

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 463February 13, 2015 10:08 PM

You know, Hendricks had no problem earning money as a model while playing up, to put it lightly, her enormous assets. If she did not have the body type she has she never would have been cast on Mad Men.

She uses her voluptuousness to make money and get acting jobs but she is clearly unhappy about the way she looks. Weird!

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 464February 14, 2015 3:47 AM

What are we supposed to call her? Slender and petite? Should the Australian journalist phrased her question as, "Well, chubbo you've probably inspired a lot of other chubbos. Are there any chubbos that inspired you?"

The chick has got issues.

by Anonymousreply 465February 14, 2015 4:00 AM

R465 If the journalist was Australian then I'd be surprised if they didn't say something like that.

by Anonymousreply 466February 14, 2015 4:03 AM

She's more fat than curvy.

by Anonymousreply 467February 14, 2015 4:09 AM

R464 -"If she did not have the body type she has she never would have been cast on Mad Men."

She has gained about 20 lbs since Mad Men started

by Anonymousreply 468February 14, 2015 4:15 AM

She's fat. More attractive than most fat girls, sure, but she's still fat.

by Anonymousreply 469February 14, 2015 4:23 AM

I think Hendricks is unbelievably beautiful. I'm a 9 on the kinsey and I'd do her- gorgeous. Nice to see a woman with an actual figure, I'd gladly have that voluptuous ginger on my arm.

by Anonymousreply 470February 14, 2015 4:31 AM

How much do you think she weighs?

by Anonymousreply 471April 25, 2015 9:33 PM

R465 they are supposed to not ask her about her body. It is considered rude to be commenting on a woman's tits or ass or size. If she were a size zero, no one would bring it up in interviews. At most you'd get a how do you keep in shape question.

by Anonymousreply 472April 25, 2015 9:50 PM

Straight men love her. They don't seem to think she's fat, but they think women much thinner than her are.

by Anonymousreply 473April 25, 2015 10:09 PM

Christina Hendricks is a homely fatso who got lucky by landing the part of Joan.

She has used her enormous breasts and the rest of her "curves" to draw attention to herself and to land parts and now whines, "Why does everyone make such a big deal about my body????" (And then she proceeds to show up on the red carpet with her "twins" sticking out the top of her gown.)

Because you have used it as a selling point hon'! Ever hear of breast reduction surgery (and while we're at it, ever hear of but firming exercises?)?

Christina Hendricks LOOKS like she has emotional problems and that red hair looks hideous on her.

Once Mad Men is done and over with Hendricks, Jones and Hamm will be done and over with too.

by Anonymousreply 474April 25, 2015 10:54 PM

Come on, she's not homely at all. Elizabeth Moss is homely.

by Anonymousreply 475April 25, 2015 11:02 PM

Zac Efron is full figured, rigtht? Thas's wahat all the posts were about wasn't it.

by Anonymousreply 476April 25, 2015 11:08 PM

I agree with R475. There is nothing homely about her. She has lovely features.

by Anonymousreply 477April 25, 2015 11:32 PM

R471 Anyone?

170 lbs? 180 lbs?

by Anonymousreply 478April 26, 2015 12:22 AM

160-165

by Anonymousreply 479April 26, 2015 1:19 AM

R474 you sound like a jealous frau. She is a bit overweight but her coloring is beautiful.

by Anonymousreply 480April 26, 2015 1:26 AM

I agree R480

by Anonymousreply 481April 26, 2015 1:32 AM

I think you're an ugly woman, Christina. I saw the picture online, and I felt compelled to tell you how disgusting you look, and you have a cigarette. You're not woman enough to be called full-figured. You're just nasty.

by Anonymousreply 482May 11, 2015 11:19 PM

Based on these pics, it looks like she has lost weight.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 483May 11, 2015 11:43 PM

bump

by Anonymousreply 484June 24, 2017 1:45 PM

She is ultra touchy about the thing she's famous for.

by Anonymousreply 485June 24, 2017 1:59 PM

Haven't heard 'bout her in ages... How's that post Mad Men career workin' out?

by Anonymousreply 486November 29, 2017 8:32 PM

She would never do anything to bring her attention!

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 487November 29, 2017 8:48 PM

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 488December 13, 2017 8:00 PM

The press should take these cunts at their word and never, ever, ever again mention how they look. At all. Now matter how good or stunning or sexy, just not mention it. Then we'll see how they like it.

by Anonymousreply 489December 13, 2017 8:30 PM

[quote]Haven't heard 'bout her in ages... How's that post Mad Men career workin' out?

She's been pretty active actually. She was in that show "Hap and Leonard," and the Comedy Central sitcom "Another Period." She's also on some Canadian show, a drama, can't remember its name.

She was in "Neon Demon" and has been in a bunch of small pictures as well, such as a comedy with Michael Shannon, "Pottersville," which had a very limited release and then went to on-demand.

So she's working. And let's remember she didn't leave Mad Men in prima donna fashion like a David Caruso.

It is a bit strange that she is so touchy about the attention people pay to her figure. She's a good actress though so I think she gets tired of the relentless discussion of her huge tits and ass.

by Anonymousreply 490December 13, 2017 9:05 PM

She has horrible bunions. Must be all the weight of her full figure pressing down on her heel-shod feet.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 491December 13, 2017 9:18 PM

Serving FUPA

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 492February 17, 2018 4:29 PM

She reminds me of a fatter Ree Drummond.

by Anonymousreply 493April 6, 2018 6:12 PM

I don't know, I don't think she is fat but it seems like women with naturally big breast, do have to watch their weight because they gain easily.

by Anonymousreply 494April 6, 2018 6:15 PM

I thought those were her natural tits?

by Anonymousreply 495April 6, 2018 6:16 PM

Trailer park face. FAS Face. Inbred Southern brothel face..in spades. Damsly.

by Anonymousreply 496April 7, 2018 1:37 AM

She owes her career to "Mad Men" when they made the fat bitch wear all those support undergarments: 1950s girdles, bullet bras, etc.

by Anonymousreply 497April 7, 2018 1:47 AM

She was on some late night talk show (Kimmel?) a while back and looked huge.

by Anonymousreply 498July 11, 2018 6:37 PM

Those are not her natural breasts. When she was on that SyFy show, they were small. Now they are gigantic. Weight gain cannot explain the difference

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 499July 11, 2018 6:57 PM

The thing I can’t stand about her is the disingenuous bullshit.

by Anonymousreply 500July 11, 2018 6:59 PM

[quote]Weight gain cannot explain the difference

It can, actually. When you look at her tits in the righthand image in r499, you can see that even though she's skinny, the tits are ready to take off once she packs on the pounds, and the girl does think of a pint of Ben and Jerry's as single serving.

by Anonymousreply 501July 11, 2018 8:00 PM

R501 Agreed. When she gains weight it goes straight to her tits, then her belly, then her thighs.

by Anonymousreply 502July 11, 2018 9:13 PM

R499 weight gain or loss can make a huge difference in breast size. Some women gain most of their weight in their thighs or ass or stomach and a lucky few do gain mostly in their chests. Her boobs aren't that small in that old picture. There's a lot coming out the sides of the bikini top. They're pretty good sized for a woman that thin.

by Anonymousreply 503July 11, 2018 10:31 PM

She a big fat girl.

by Anonymousreply 504July 11, 2018 10:32 PM

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 505November 12, 2018 2:52 PM

I can't find the commercial where Jane says, "We full figured gals have our problems!" Full figured sounds better than plus-size, zaftig, blowsy, or a bunch of other rude terms that have passed through this thread over the years. The point is more that most of these descriptors of women's bodies are negative sexist value aimed only at women.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 506November 12, 2018 3:21 PM

^^Ugh, "negative, sexist value JUDGEMENTS aimed only at women."

by Anonymousreply 507November 12, 2018 3:22 PM

Yes, let's go with the accurate and gender-neutral 'fat'.

by Anonymousreply 508November 12, 2018 3:31 PM

Girdled to hell and back and that is still a huge gunt / pot belly.

And she's too fat for that smouldering look.

by Anonymousreply 509November 12, 2018 6:01 PM

She has a beautiful face. She now would probably look older if she lost weight.

by Anonymousreply 510November 12, 2018 7:05 PM

She's F A T plain and simple. F A T, not "full figured."

by Anonymousreply 511November 12, 2018 7:08 PM

[quote]I thought those were her natural tits?

Watch the Mad Men season 1 finale and then the season 2 premier.

by Anonymousreply 512November 12, 2018 7:12 PM

But she did gain a lot of weight, R512.

by Anonymousreply 513November 12, 2018 7:40 PM

When they get a profile shot in that video at 1:46 she looks really fat.

by Anonymousreply 514November 12, 2018 7:42 PM

Just because she got them big udders don't make her somethin' special!

by Anonymousreply 515November 12, 2018 8:02 PM

Candid photos of her make it clear what a fatty she is.

Which is fine, but why does she get all bent out of shape about being called something as discreet as "full figured?"

by Anonymousreply 516November 14, 2018 3:33 PM

She's too cis for that outfit. It would look better on a transwoman.

by Anonymousreply 517November 15, 2018 5:21 PM

That belly, those thighs. She's a pear, not an hourglass.

by Anonymousreply 518November 17, 2018 12:41 PM

Has she yet moved into Shelly Winters roles?

by Anonymousreply 519November 17, 2018 1:20 PM

ironic

as she has alwys strutted around with them jugs out to here, like she was the new diana dors…

. HOW U THINK SHE GETS WORK????? TALENT????

by Anonymousreply 520November 17, 2018 1:22 PM

why u think she got those huge implants

for fun?

they paved they way for her career honey,

by Anonymousreply 521November 17, 2018 1:23 PM

Its repulsive how she alwys has those fake tittys on display for maximum exposure.

oh, uh, now she is a uh....dramatic actress.....

by Anonymousreply 522November 17, 2018 1:25 PM

I'm still not convinced they're not just lard.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 523November 17, 2018 3:41 PM

What does she weigh now? She's heavier than when she started Mad Men.

by Anonymousreply 524November 17, 2018 3:42 PM

She is a lot heavier than when she started MM.

by Anonymousreply 525November 18, 2018 1:46 AM

Fattie

by Anonymousreply 526November 18, 2018 3:33 AM

LOOKIN AT EARLY PIX WHERE SHE GOT NO TIT

AND THE ONES NOW WHERE SHE GOT DOLLY PARTON SIZE JUGS, MAN SHE IS FAKE AS FUK

by Anonymousreply 527November 18, 2018 7:10 AM

is she embarrassed about having a career based on leading men and producers wanting to just suck on her tittys till its time to go home? xxx xxxxx had her kneel over a bucket and milked the udders like a dam cow. soppy milk all over he floor, for the cats.

love the storys of stagehands and cameramen waiting in line to have a go at them, these men are not gentle with tittys, they slobber on em real hard....her screams of joy could be heard in harry cohns office over in Forest Lawn. ide give a weeks wages to see the video of it.

by Anonymousreply 528November 18, 2018 7:15 AM

How many operations did it take to go from tiny tits to gargantua tits? Her obsession with bigger paid off evidently, she has work.

by Anonymousreply 529November 19, 2018 4:45 AM

Or how many donuts?

by Anonymousreply 530November 19, 2018 6:28 AM

Good god, the comparisons of her before and after tits are unreal, for her to cry wolf now is bizaree, they were her entre to any work at all...

by Anonymousreply 531November 19, 2018 10:45 AM

Hmm... girl...

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 532November 20, 2018 2:59 PM

Are those tits real? I recall seeing photos of her much thinner. She was slim all over I don't recall her having huge boobs.

by Anonymousreply 533November 20, 2018 3:19 PM

Her boobs were much smaller here. A weight gain usually doesn't give a woman huge fake looking tits.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 534November 20, 2018 3:21 PM

[quote] A weight gain usually doesn't give a woman huge fake looking tits.

Yeah, it absolutely does, and they don't look fake.

by Anonymousreply 535November 20, 2018 3:36 PM

How about pumped up mess?

by Anonymousreply 536November 20, 2018 3:46 PM

She's ultra zoftig, and has a full belly. I don't think it's a bad look for her at all -- on some women it can be quite attractive, and she's one of them. But she should stop being such a diva about how she's described. She's not the Queen of England, she's a TV actress, and yes, to a very large extent, they are judged based on their appearance. That's why they make millions of dollars a year (potentially).

by Anonymousreply 537November 20, 2018 4:09 PM

If R532 is anything to go by she's getting too fat for any of the euphemisms, 'curvy', 'voluptuous', 'zaftig' and, yes, 'full-figured'. Fat's the only word that can describe her now. She's heading into Aidy Bryant territory.

by Anonymousreply 538November 20, 2018 4:59 PM

Is she a nice lady?

by Anonymousreply 539November 20, 2018 6:57 PM

Not when you call her full-figured, R359.

by Anonymousreply 540November 20, 2018 7:19 PM

She had small tits when younger, but the fake big jugs have gotten her a lot of roles … evidently.

Her coy 'o judge me on my talent ok?' is disgusting.

by Anonymousreply 541November 21, 2018 9:06 AM

And her "Don't talk about my body!" with her tits hanging out.

"Talk about my tits! Just not the pot belly beneath them."

by Anonymousreply 542November 21, 2018 9:16 AM

whats with her hubby/ who/what is he

some blog said he was a slob , I don't know, her teats have given him a good livin, and imagaine all the hot slobberin he has done on them ALL NIGHT LONG

what do she and hubby say when famous rich stars beg to pay to suck on em? im told her moans of joy can be heard a block away when she is getting a good rough milking...

by Anonymousreply 543November 21, 2018 9:29 AM

saw a cartoon of her sledding down a hill on her boobs hilarious

by Anonymousreply 544November 22, 2018 11:27 AM

Looks like she ripped that dress.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 545November 24, 2018 3:27 PM

Couldn't get into it otherwise.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 546November 24, 2018 3:28 PM

[post redacted because linking to dailymail.co.uk clearly indicates that the poster is either a troll or an idiot (probably both, honestly.) Our advice is that you just ignore this poster but whatever you do, don't click on any link to this putrid rag.]

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 547January 26, 2019 9:03 AM

Gurl, put down the fork.

by Anonymousreply 548January 26, 2019 9:50 AM

She can’t dress herself.

by Anonymousreply 549January 28, 2019 1:45 AM

Her breast are horrendous. Does she not see how terrible they are?

by Anonymousreply 550January 28, 2019 2:03 AM

I like her but why is she so sensitive about people discussing her physical appearance? It's a big part of why she's successful in the first place. She's actually quite a good actress but she's not Maggie Smith. A big part of her charm is her ample blockbuster bod. It puts money in the bank for her.

by Anonymousreply 551January 28, 2019 1:41 PM

Without those implants, she would be quite flat-chested and yet have a ginormous ass. Don't think i have ever observed that figure type before. Usually flat-chested fat chicks get fat everywhere, especially around the midsection.

Is her ass fake too, a la the pioneering work of kim kardashian?

by Anonymousreply 552January 28, 2019 2:04 PM

I had an ex whose best friends was like that R552. She was tall and flat-chested. It was like she had two different parts for her body, the top being rather normal and the bottom ballooning out.

by Anonymousreply 553January 28, 2019 3:05 PM

Still don't think they are implants.

by Anonymousreply 554January 28, 2019 4:56 PM

I think they're just fat too. They're majorly sagged and she's majorly wide without support.

by Anonymousreply 555January 30, 2019 3:14 PM

I work with a woman who was slender around 2002-3 when I first knew her. She had a baby in 2009, and let herself go, and hasn't slimmed down to this day. She has a slender face, arms and her legs are not terribly big, but her behind and especially her belly are incredibly large, and her tits are gigantic, like ten times bigger than they were before the weight.

by Anonymousreply 556January 30, 2019 5:55 PM

....

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 557February 13, 2019 2:01 PM

If she WEREN'T being called full figured, she'd REALLY complain.

by Anonymousreply 558February 13, 2019 2:32 PM

I call her fat. She’s way past “full-figured.”

by Anonymousreply 559February 13, 2019 2:49 PM

She and Bryce Dallas Howard both look like fat trailer park whores with Chrissy Metzness increasingly in their futures.

by Anonymousreply 560February 13, 2019 2:54 PM

Chrissy Hendricks

by Anonymousreply 561March 30, 2019 10:11 AM

the sow had huge titty implants put in long time ago as she knew her talent wouldn't get her parts.

she has worked them udders good, and now has some roles! yay fatty!

by Anonymousreply 562March 30, 2019 10:18 AM

I haven't seen a show where she didn't flop them tittys around, her dramatic roles make me laff .

she belongs on a pole in Encino....

by Anonymousreply 563March 30, 2019 10:35 AM

Tin Star with tim roth looks good on amazon prime video, but tits McGee (la Hendricks) is in it.

pass.

her fake udders lend an air of inauthenticity to a film..

by Anonymousreply 564March 30, 2019 12:46 PM

are pix somewhere of her before the udder implants. theyr huge now, maybe her man likes to slobber on em all big n fake like that. cant u see her goin oh oh oh daddy yes....HARDER

by Anonymousreply 565March 31, 2019 5:43 AM

Stout AF

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 566January 12, 2020 7:53 AM

there are lots o pix early in her career showing she had small booobs. but she got the big tit implants and got sassy and....then roles cam in. . she shows off them fat cans all she can. they were on full vew on mad men, for gods sake. her nickname was titty o' shagenauessy...

disingenuous of her to downplay her full titty figure.....phat tittys and ass yea baby, spead da love

by Anonymousreply 567January 12, 2020 9:58 AM

R566 is bump bitch.

OP link is dead. Why bother?

by Anonymousreply 568January 12, 2020 11:51 AM

This thread has been updated periodically over the years to document her weight gain.

by Anonymousreply 569January 12, 2020 12:47 PM

yea she had small teats early on in career, but as she got bigger implants, roles came in so she went big bust, and it worked.

ya ole ho

by Anonymousreply 570January 13, 2020 3:54 PM

Where is that list of actors/directors/producers who said they have slobberd on her jugs?....alleged

by Anonymousreply 571January 14, 2020 9:09 AM

omg John Houston would have sucked/chewed on them till they were raw meat....he loved women

by Anonymousreply 572January 15, 2020 3:10 PM

Christina Hendricks was so good in Mad Men the Thunderdome: we don't need another hero yoohoo! But she was at her best in la Callas, Jimmy Dean on the cover of the magazines we love you.

by Anonymousreply 573June 2, 2021 7:11 AM

A frau attempts humor

by Anonymousreply 574June 2, 2021 7:17 AM
Loading
Need more help? Click Here.

Yes indeed, we too use "cookies." Take a look at our privacy/terms or if you just want to see the damn site without all this bureaucratic nonsense, click ACCEPT. Otherwise, you'll just have to find some other site for your pointless bitchery needs.

×

Become a contributor - post when you want with no ads!