That not a dress size, that's the circumference of her brain.
She resembles a small house.
Anna Wintour, in YSL
She is more like a size 0 dress size and 00 jeans/pants. She does representthe general female celebrity population.
All that makeup can't hide malnutrition.
Actually, R3, she's smaller than the average celeb female, but either way, that's not what she said.
Bitch, please .... go have some bangers and mash.
I think those sizes aren't taking US vanity sizing into account. Traditionally UK sizes were always one size bigger than the US (so a UK6 equals a US4) and then that changed to being two sizes different (so UK6=US2). However with the rise of insane vanity sizing over the past few years, there is no longer any real correlation between the sizes in the two countries. A 6 is generally the smallest size you can buy in the UK. A handful of stores sell size 4s, but size 0 or 00s do not really exist here. At least not in mainstream shops. She does appear to be a UK 6.
This is bound to upset the fats.
Go clean your wig, R8.
I don't understand the size thing. How does one number account for width and height?
When I shop at TopShop, my only real dealing with UK sizes, a UK 4 equals a US 0.
r9, explain your post. Are you fat?
Not at all, R12. But your post at R8 betrays you.
I'm r12, not r8, so again, could you explain what you're talking about? I assumed you thought someone called you fat or something.
Why did you assume that, R12?
I'm a 4/6.
In other sizing conversions, A-list in UK = D-list in LA.
She and Michelle Duggar went to the same school
I bet her little butterball baby weighs more than her at this point.
Leave her alone. She may be retarded, but she fought to make something of herself.
Ha ha. And the average woman weighs 95 pounds - the average man? I guess 120?
Why do people at DL defend fat?
They're not, but what she's saying is we should all be 20 pounds underweight, and for most, that requires being anorexic or bulimic.
I don't think she is a $. As I said, I am a 4/6, 5'3" and 125.
The very fact that you're declaring certain sizes to be "20 pounds underweight" and using words like "anorexic or bulimic" shows that you're not being objective. You're trying to slant things in favor of those who may resent that they can't fit into lower sizes.
Can someone please answer r10? I don't understand it either.
She's even thinner now than she was in that "after" pic at R38.
All her weight is now in her breast implants. Take them out and she's 25 lbs.
Some now use the "body mass index" to define obese (more than 30), overweight (25 to 29), normal (20 to 24), and underweight (less than 20). Oh and there's "morbidly obese" (over 35.)
Studies are coming in now that "overweight" people live longer than "normal" and a lot longer than "underweight" (even when factoring in that some underweight people have cancer or AIDS or some other life-threatening disease which is causing their weight loss.)
People's opinion of how much fat a person has on them is basically just fashion. Morbidly obese has a bad prognosis. Even plain old "obese" is not much worse than "normal" (which again, is worse than "overweight.")
How much fat we like to see one someone is "fashion." Survival is the goal of evolution, and hell, we're all gonna lose our looks anyway, even if you're slender. I'll go with living longer (and healthier) any day over looks, especially past 50.
The theory is that the extra weight gives you a "cushion" in more ways than one - when you become ill with flu or pneumonia or whatever, having fat stores is valuable in surviving the crisis.
LOL. WW for r17.
Why hasn't someone come up with negative sizing chart yet? We want to go from wearing size 00 to -8 or - 10. Or better yet, -16
There are negative sizes now.
The objective for women is to disappear.
Please post links to studies in peer-reviewed journal that show that overweight people live longer, r42, because in 14 years as a biologist I've never heard such a thing. Unless you are referring to the infamous Canadian study published in the journal Obesity which really got massively misinterpreted.
No half decent scientists would ever say that any one factor increases or decreases human life expectancy (not counting specific issues like smoking causing death from lung cancer) because there are infinite variables, both genetically and in terms of environment, and it's impossible to isolate in order to study.
There is actually a popular trend that says the opposite - there have been (proper, peer-reviewed journal) studies done on mice and rats that show that living on a severely calorie restricted diet and maintaining a low BMI dramatically increases life expectancy. Of course with mice and rats it's easy to study because you can standardize other variables, which you can't do in humans. It's impossible to test in humans but there are many people and people within the scientific community who do believe that this increases human life expectancy too. I personally am skeptical and think that many of the people within that movement (not referring to scientists but normal people who chose to live that lifestyle) are nuts. But the point is there is real science behind it, which there just isn't for the claim that overweight people live longer.
Being skinny might be a fashion thing, and the question of where the line is drawn between "normal" and "overweight" certainly is more cultural than biological (the BMI system is very flawed). But being very overweight or obsese is unquestionably a medical issue - obesity is a major killer and causes all kinds of serious medical issues, not to mention complicating other medical issues, surgery, etc.
Study showing that slightly overweight people live longer. ctual study is in the journal Obesity.
That study hrefers only to those who are "slightly" overweight (it states that obese and very obese people die sooner than people of 'normal' weight).
Anyway correlation does not equal causation. No decent scientist would ever claim that any single factor increases or decreases human life expectancy because there are too many variables to be able to study. It's likely that people who are of normal weight/slightly overweight have access to better healthcare and healthier lifestyles overall, than obese or very underweight people.
You said "Please post links to studies in peer-reviewed journal that show that overweight people live longer," and went on a little tirade. Yes, correlation does not equal causation, but you cannot say that being somewhat overweight has been shown to be detrimental to your health. In fact, a few extra pounds may be good for you.
She is SO ugly, I am baffled why anyone thinks she's a beauty, she's barely plain and being skinny doesn't help her appearance.
Bland and whitebread and totally uninteresting with no style, but not ugly.
It's not a "tirade" to point out that obesity is not healthy - that could equally describe the poster who has in multiple threads been screaming about "BMI Nazis" and that people's opinions about obesity/morbid obesity and how much people should weigh are just fashion.
Obesity is a serious medical condition. It is dangerous and unhealthy. One single social science report showing that out of one group of people, those who were "slightly overweight" (not obese) tended to live longer (which does not prove correlation or take into account the million other potential factors) -- especially when there are so many biological scientific studies showing that living on a reduced calorie diet increases life expectancy - is not a very convincing argument.
She's ugly to me R52, I can't see it any other way, but I realize others feel differently.
There's a big difference between being a few pounds overweight, and being obese. The poster getting all huffy about body Nazism and fat hysteria was talking about obesity. Not fit and healthy people who are a few pounds over what some chart says is their ideal BMI.
Posh is still a twat living in cloud cuckoo land though.
R54, I was in the wrong thread - I was actually referring to Samantha "don't hate me because I'm beautiful" Brick. VB just looks malnourished and tries to hide it with makeup.
R53, I agree that obesity is not healthy, but that's not what the original question was about. You in R47 said, "Please post links to studies in peer-reviewed journal that show that overweight people live longer," I showed you a study.
I can't stand that bitch and her "bloof" lips. She always has the same vapid expression on her face.
I can't understand how she's been able to conceive? I thought anorexics experienced cessation of their menstrual cycles?
She's gay men's ideal of the perfect body. If they had this much power back in the day, Marilyn Monroe would have been laughed out of Hollywood.
If she's actually a size 4, that's pretty admirable. I always figured she's a size 0.
"Oh my God. I'm back. I'm home. All the time, it was... We finally really did it ... You Maniacs! You blew it up! Ah, damn you! God damn you all to hell!"
We are switching to the new platform for The DataLounge this weekend. All of our mobile users have been using it for over a week and all first time users have been using it for about a month - which adds up to well over one million users. So we're ready to end this phase of the testing and move everybody to the new site. (more)
And yes, we've changed the look and some of how it operates.
Yes, we know you just *hate* it in well in advance.
Yes, we know we suck.
Yes, we are the biggest suckers that ever sucked.
But it was time for a change and with the huge shift to mobile it was long overdue. We've taken this opportunity not only to update the look but also make major changes under the hood (or "bonnet" if you're either British or pretentious or both). And we have to prepare for 2016 - a presidential election year where we can normally expect to see a 60% jump in traffic (yes, we've seen 5 presidential elections so far…Christ we're old).
The site has a bunch - nay, plethora - of new features which will make the site more usable: better search, the ability to ignore posters and threads, see link previews, to pick up a thread where you left off, spam and malware filtering and more.
If you want you can go explore and see for yourself, Click here.
And while running the tests we've noticed two interesting reactions to the new system - people are spending more time on the site and more people that come stay around longer and look at more stuff. Both good things. Yay!
Possibly we've not slain all the dragons and there will be issues that come up during the switchover. There's a help button in the lower right hand corner of the page which you can use to send us bug reports.
Please include as much information about the hardware (PC, Mac, Tablet, Phone etc), operating system (Windows, Mac OS, Android, iOS etc) and browser (Chrome, Safari, Opera, Internet Explorer etc) that you are using as possible to help us replicate and fix the problem.
Please note that complaints about colors, fonts, icons and the like are not "bugs" - they are design choices that we've made and we expect one or two cases of world-class bitching. But they won't actually cause headaches, scurvy, heart attacks, Restless Leg Syndrome, Morgellon's Disease or the vapors (but have your smelling salts at hand just in case).
Talking to DataLounge servers. Please wait a moment...