She was known for natural looks, void of fake tan and thick make-up. But Ashley Judd looks a far cry from her Hollywood heyday. The actress sparked plastic surgery rumours when she appeared on a Canadian talk show to promote her new TV series, Missing. The 43 yr old sported a puffy 'pillow face' - the term given to women who overuse facial fillers- although she doesn't appear to have gained weight to her figure.
Fans took to Twitter to question her looks on The Marilyn Denis Show on CTV in Toronto. One asked: 'What happened to Ashley Judd's face? Another plastic surgery butcher job?'Another said: 'It looks weirdly puffy but she doesn't appear to have gained weight.'And one user questioned: 'Anyone else completely weirded out by Ashley Judd's new face?,' while one simply wrote that it looked 'Just a mess.' Increasing numbers of celebrities are getting the plumped-up look, as opposed to the pinched back 'wind tunnel' results of a face-lift or the 'frozen' Botox look.
Well when was the last time ANYONE saw a recent photo of bleached-asshole Lara Flynn Boyle?
I think she fucked her face up and went into hiding.
If you've had lots of liposuction, your face will get fat. Especiallly if you had your underchin area done. You have to gain weight somewhere, so you gain it where you still have fat cells. Woemn who have their stomachs and thighs and hips lipo's gain weight in their breasts and asses.
Agree, R11, although R14's theory is interesting.
Looks like her cheeks would pop if you took a pin to them. Shes always been an idiot.
Exactly R3 - I posted about this in the plastic surgery for men thread. Even top docs are pushing fillers when they should be performing actual surgery.
Ashley Judd was absolutely gorgeous. There was no need to mess with anything. Her face looks nothing like it use to. Ashley was one of the HOTTEST women around, much more attractive than your typical hollywood women.
I don't think it's weight gain - the rest of her body isn't heavy. It could be prednisone - but I am going to guess she had fillers.
You don't get fillers injected into your cheeks. Fillers go inside of lines -- brow furrows, nasolabial folds, marionette lines, lips, to the side of the eye to hide the hollow look after eye bags have been suctioned out. You couldn't possibly inject fillers into someone's cheeks like that.
Do you know how many cc's it would take to fill someone's cheeks like that? Fillers are sold in vials of 0.8 cc, 1.5 cc, 2 cc. You'd have to inject bottles and bottles of the stuff.
R18 - yes you can get fillers injected into your cheeks. I was at a PS yesterday and he is pushing a new procedure (fillers) called "wow cheeks"
Seriously. I guess it's the new thing. I posted about the "wow cheeks" procedure in the PS surgery for men thread.
And this doc is one of the top facial plastic surgeons in Manhattan pushing this nonsense.
Rule #47. You gotta go with what works.
I don't get this trend at all. These people can presumably afford top cosmetic surgeons, yet they invariably look atrocious. Just in the past week we've had similar stories about Judd, Lisa Rinna, Emmanuelle Beart, and Cindy Crawford. There's the perennial cautionary tale of Lindsay Lohan. NONE of these women are old enough to need more than the most subtle procedures, should they feel compelled to alter anything.
If enough women (and men) fuck their faces up, will natural aging become stylish? Or will our standards of beauty change to redefine duck lips and swollen cheeks as desirable?
Middle age, perimenopause.
Just because people can afford to spend money and trick the eye as to their real age, they aren't, in fact, physically younger than they look.
Fat. Age weight gain. Nothing more, nothing less.
"Wow cheeks", R18!? Holy hell. They should change it to "Blow cheeks", because it looks like blow bloat.
[quote]These people can presumably afford top cosmetic surgeons, yet they invariably look atrocious.
And that's the problem - the "Top" surgeons are pushing these horrible fillers. So naturally if a celebrity is going to get consults by the "top" surgeons, and they are all telling her to get fillers and other non invasive procedures, they most likely will go this route because they are trusting these top surgeons and their expertise.
But they still look atrocious.
I think she's on steroids. She's put on a little weight but not that much that her face would blimp out like that. Or could she be on any pharmaceutical drug, I remember she had some mental health issues a while back?
Steroids would explain it.
There need to be some rules for Hollywood
1. Enhanced lips or implants NEVER look good. NEVER EVER EVER
2. Enlarged/enhanced cheek bones NEVER look good. Never
only an idiot would do that sort of thing
I don't think a woman gets her own weekly TV show on ABC and suddenly puts on weight for the first time in her life.
Her body looks fan-fucking-tastic in the pilot but her face looks weird....
Zee melon extrait sometimes makes zee face look .... how do you say en anglais? Fuller. Much fuller.
Dr. Sebagh, ripening the melons
Ashley has the same unnaturally puffy face as her lying cunt of a mother - despite whatever nonsense claims that bitch says about aging gracefully.
Nothing about this family is real and the truly sad thing is these Judd bitches think the public buys all their phony bullshit.
Ashley Judd is as much of a lesbian as Kate Winslet.
Winslt doesn't ping to me. Ashley Judd does~!!!
In the photo R37 posted she looks older but very beautiful in the before pic. In the second she looks like a young fat chick who is just marginally cute. Why would any woman not prefer to look older but stunning? I dont get it.
[quote]Winslt doesn't ping to me. Ashley Judd does~!!!
Maybe you need to go over to L-chat, darling.
Don't tell me!
By the way i was just humorous in my previous posts about Ashley Judd. I mean she certainly pings to me as gay but i was just kidding about her feelings for Salma. They just both ping to me that's all. In addition, i forgot to write that they are both excellent actresses and they are very interesting to watch.
" In addition, i forgot to write that they are both excellent actresses and they are very interesting to watch."
OMG. Salma Hayek is a total joke, a truly untalented actress. Yes, I have seen "Frida", and she was awful.
R49 are you serious???????????????
Salma is a damn good actress! She is gripping when she acts.
I always feel sad when i hear that people who were ten years and more with someone make the decision to get a divorce. It's understandable but still...it's cruel and it's a blow to love. By letting someone go, you really give them the freedom to be happy again or to yourself to be happy? That is the logic?
Fine...Make it so simple then, if you think that life can be so simple.
Yes, learning someone really well is painful and not as dreamy as you would like it to be, however i'm glad that there are still couples that are many years together, paying the price and holding their love in a nest
"Oh my God. I'm back. I'm home. All the time, it was... We finally really did it ... You Maniacs! You blew it up! Ah, damn you! God damn you all to hell!"
We are switching to the new platform for The DataLounge this weekend. All of our mobile users have been using it for over a week and all first time users have been using it for about a month - which adds up to well over one million users. So we're ready to end this phase of the testing and move everybody to the new site. (more)
And yes, we've changed the look and some of how it operates.
Yes, we know you just *hate* it in well in advance.
Yes, we know we suck.
Yes, we are the biggest suckers that ever sucked.
But it was time for a change and with the huge shift to mobile it was long overdue. We've taken this opportunity not only to update the look but also make major changes under the hood (or "bonnet" if you're either British or pretentious or both). And we have to prepare for 2016 - a presidential election year where we can normally expect to see a 60% jump in traffic (yes, we've seen 5 presidential elections so far…Christ we're old).
The site has a bunch - nay, plethora - of new features which will make the site more usable: better search, the ability to ignore posters and threads, see link previews, to pick up a thread where you left off, spam and malware filtering and more.
If you want you can go explore and see for yourself, Click here.
And while running the tests we've noticed two interesting reactions to the new system - people are spending more time on the site and more people that come stay around longer and look at more stuff. Both good things. Yay!
Possibly we've not slain all the dragons and there will be issues that come up during the switchover. There's a help button in the lower right hand corner of the page which you can use to send us bug reports.
Please include as much information about the hardware (PC, Mac, Tablet, Phone etc), operating system (Windows, Mac OS, Android, iOS etc) and browser (Chrome, Safari, Opera, Internet Explorer etc) that you are using as possible to help us replicate and fix the problem.
Please note that complaints about colors, fonts, icons and the like are not "bugs" - they are design choices that we've made and we expect one or two cases of world-class bitching. But they won't actually cause headaches, scurvy, heart attacks, Restless Leg Syndrome, Morgellon's Disease or the vapors (but have your smelling salts at hand just in case).
Talking to DataLounge servers. Please wait a moment...