I just saw him in "A Dangerous Method" and he made no bulge at all in his outfits. Wonder where he hides it?
My guess is that clip is the equivalent of drag queens who squeeze-up every once of fat on their abdomen to create "cleavage". He's 1)fluffed damn-near hard and; 2) wearing a cockring (the shadow hides it).
But it make sense for the story; you can't be a sex addict without the equipment to entice.
Is that the best full frontal from the movie ? Not too good if it doesn't include the face. Looks like him but it could be anyone.
r2, he showed his cock before, and it was not hard at all. He's hung like a horse. In fact, his cock is even smaller than it was in the other film, and still big.
r3, it's all him.
Why was it shot in such darkness in the first place?
That shows how stupid it is to do nudity and then hide it in the shadows.
The lightened frames show how it should have been shot in the first place!
Wow. So that's the cock that Clooney couldn't shut up about?
It's certainly pretty big when it's flaccid.
Nice natural bush too!
His balls are also massive. He pisses in the film, and those boys are hanging like a bulls. They look like they must weigh 15 pounds.
The guy is so fucking hot! Those teeth he has scream sex. He's like a fox.
"His balls are also massive. He pisses in the film, and those boys are hanging like a bulls."
Hot. Do we have any screencaps of the balls?
Let me just check on something. That is a giant cock.
r9, I'll have to see if I can get an animated gif, because they're swaying all over the place in the scene between his legs.
r12, wtf are you talking about? It works.
Told you guys!
[quote]Why was it shot in such darkness in the first place?
To hide it.
They want to seem "real" by showing it, but they don't want to freak out the het men in the audience (or have the gay men and the women talking about it for the next fifteen minutes and missing the rest of the movie).
You're creeping me out, George.
It's a doozie! Thanks OP
Big dick, but his body is too fucking smooth.
Would drink his piss.
The brightened image confirms that he is uncut.
How can you tell, R20? What should I be looking for?
You can see the foreskin goes all the way down the shaft, R21.
Also there's no 'head' shape at the tip, as there is in cut guys.
It took the circ troll 20 posts to show up? He must have temporarily lost his internet connection.
Wow! Thanks for the link, Op!
What other films does he show his peter in? I'll be sure to see them all soon.
Off topic: Does anyone have any idea why he was not nominated for an Oscar this year?
I love hot White guys (Black guy)!
Because Americans punish actors who show their cocks.
I am always amazed as what qualifies as "huge" here. Though I guess it makes me feel better about myself.
R26, stop beating around the bush. If you don't think Fassbender has a big cock, how big is yours by comparison?
Do you think he is fluffed or semi-hard in this scene?
Some gay dudes are so immaturely fixated on penises. Yeah, males have penises. Big deal. Grow up, dudes.
[quote]Some gay dudes are so immaturely fixated on penises. Yeah, males have penises. Big deal. Grow up, dudes.
F&F the "straight-acting male" Mary!
He's a shower not a grower
Can't one be both, R31?
Well that just would not be fair!
He's like the new Colin Farrell. You just get the vibe that he's dirty and "fun."
I just saw the movie
It should have been called
"I'm really depressed and stare off into space all day long and then go home and watch porn"
well, i guess i also have a huge cock then. awesome!
Woooowwww it's a big cock. I'd just give him an OSCAR for his big penis, yummiii! :p
good cock lol
I think he is fluffed.
R35, add "and fill my office laptop to bursting with the nastiest porn I can find online" and you'd be pretty close.
I have to admit I rented "Shame" just for some naked Fassbender, but I ended up actually liking the movie, and also naked Fassbender.
Just heard about this movie today and am in lust with Michael Fassbender ever since I saw him in X-men First Class. So am def in the mood to fill my thrill by getting me some full-frontal Fassbender.
R42, if you've just heard about it today for the first time, you must be new to DL or not post often, because there have been dozens of threads about this
R31 is correct
How do we know if R31 is correct until we see his cock at full erection?
It's big but I reckon I'd take it.
Maybe it's an Irish thing...
You know like how Jewish and Asian guys are said to have really small ones, maybe most if not all Irish dudes have huge wangs...
It's beautiful, but yes, it's fluffed. No problem in that - it's still hot.
Jewish guys do not have small ones.
R49, Jewish guys have part of their cocks missing, so yes, they have smaller ones than average.
God he is divine. I am soooo attracted to him.
The more I look at that lightened up version, the stranger it seems. It looks like he is wearing some kind of cut out covering, otherwise he has the oddest thatch of pubic hairs I have seen. I don't see any big balls which would be obviously swinging as he walked towards us. The whole thing is a puzzlement.
Something about that meat is not kosher.
[R47] I can unfortunately tell you not all Irish men are well hung, from my experience, its been quite the opposite
Well Colin Farrell, Jonathan Rhys Meyers and Liam Neeson have big cocks.
why can't I open this link?
What browser are you using R55? It works in IE9, Chrome and Firefox.
R51, he's so hot it actually hurts doesn't it?
the cock croweth but the hen delivereth the goods.
The cock groweth and the hen enjoyeth.
[quote]The more I look at that lightened up version, the stranger it seems. It looks like he is wearing some kind of cut out covering, otherwise he has the oddest thatch of pubic hairs I have seen. I don't see any big balls which would be obviously swinging as he walked towards us. The whole thing is a puzzlement.
That's an issue with the film being shot dark and lightened up a lot in the clip. The deepest shadows around his cock and balls bottomed out into pure black in the original footage, so there was no info in those areas that could be lightened to show any detail. There could have been a lower contrast used in the lightened clip to also lighten the shadowed areas more, but that wouldn't reveal any more detail.
R54 I don't think JRM is as hung as the other two.
You think Colin Farrell is bigger than JRM?
Hamm has more ham than Fassy.
Not necessarily, R63. We don't know for sure.
We must ask both men to challenge each other to a Measuring Contest.
Several members of DL will be chosen as the judging panel.
The king of snakes.
I don't think he's THAT big. Trust me, i've seen alot of cocks and their are "showers" and "growers". the majority of us are "growers"--he's the type that will stay the same length but just get hard. Also, he's a small guy, so he looks hung like a bull.
R66, that's only true to an extent. While he is probably more of a shower, when you're bigger as a shower than some who are growers, you are still pretty damn big.
R66, you mean it's an optical illusion?
Have you ever noticed that the penises are really tiny on Greek and Roman statues? What's up with that?
R69, I forget the exact reason why, but I remember learning a bit about it in one of my classical art courses once. My teacher said that the ancient Greeks & Romans preferred small & normal-sized penises because they viewed big ones as vulgar-looking.
They also disliked exposed penis heads and preferred ones with foreskins.
Yeah, super nice peen but why does he look like crap all of a sudden? He looks like he's aged 10 years in the last few months. He clothes are bizarre and he looks anorexic. What's up with him?
Notice it's Irish guys: Farrell, Fassy, Neesom that are hung???
Is that Zen R67?
Thanks R70. I was not aware.
Just checking to see if the swinging dick shows up in the little box without clicking the link.
Is this flaccid dick considered to be NFSW?
BUMP to scare off the fraus and freepers.
I hope you all get fired and your husbands leave you for looking at COCK online, bitches!!
If looking at MF's perfect peen would set me free from both of those things, I'd have used it as my screen saver and wallpaper long ago.
[quote]Just checking to see if the swinging dick shows up in the little box without clicking the link.
Yes, it most certainly does!
Clearly Webbie didn't think this change through.
I'm not seeing any swinging dick preview.
It was there an hour ago but now it has disappeared.
Very dangly, I like Mike's cock.
The anti-gay anti-male webmaster has a new purpose in his/her/its sad, lonely life: censoring cocks!!
It's still dangling on another Fassbender thread.
His girlfriend can handle all of that?
[quote]I just saw him in "A Dangerous Method" and he made no bulge at all in his outfits. Wonder where he hides it?
I can't believe i've noticed this, but, aside from droopy crotched and/or baggy pants, another reason that some decently or well-endowed guys lack bulge is because, if you look from the side profile, some guys cocks really sit completely in front of their legs, while other guys have thighs that jut out some, and their pubic area is simply more recessed, so their cocks sit more actually between their legs, so no prominent bulge unless they're wearing really high crotched, tight-fitting pants, as to accent the cock sitting between the legs.
Guys with small dicks point, which shows a bulge. Fassy hangs straight down = no bulge.
I just read that the guy with the world's largest penis (9.5 inches flaccid and 13.5 erect) was stopped by airport security because they thought there was something out of the ordinary there. The could see that bulge!
He has obviously had a bit of 'privacy' before the take. I wake up in the moring like that all the time. Some ladies fail to understand essential cock mechanics, for instance I'm like an acorn when it's cold but when its warm your chap hangs out rather like this if you're of a pretty decent or average size. Basically he's jimmied himself.
Quite big dick.
Where do insane gay guys like R50 come from?
S H A V E that hairy bush.
R49, you are truly an idiot. The foreskin covers the glans. When the foreskin is removed it doesn't affect the length of the penis.
I think you're the anti-circ troll who keeps call a cut dick "mutilated."
There's nothing there. There's frequently nothing there in links to blogs. Why?
If his cock doesnt get any bigger when its hard then its not that impressive. He could just be a show-er not a grower. Size only matters when its being put to use, not when your walking around.
I dont know what the big deal is; it doesnt look that big at all. Maybe need to see it hard and see if hes a shower or grower...but gay men can tell you its not huge at all. The most noticable thing is what looks like a full bush considering so many men these days are overtrimming or shaving down there