Can younger people today tell when a song has been autotuned, or have they become so accustomed to the effect that it sounds normal to them?
I think autotune is obvious, but I'm an elder. Still, when the electronics kick in, the voice gets a sort of supernatural bur not heard in nature.
I would think it would be a good device to train singers -- as long as you hit notes at the correct pitch, your voice will sound normal.
Most people, young and old, have no clue what autotune is.
I only learned about it here -- but I'm grateful for all the exciting things I've learned on DL over the years.
I once heard a story about Autotune. A young female singer who does a lot of background vocals was hired by an L.A. producer to record an album of songs, paid well for it, and sent on her way. A year later, she turned on her car radio, only to hear her voice, severely Autotuned, singing one of the songs from the recording session, and attached to the name of a famous pop diva of Puerto Rican descent.
It's Friday, Friday...
I heard some studio musicians talking about working with Taylor Swift. They said that every note she sings needs autotune.
If only they could similarly improve her lyrics, R6.
I have siblings high school- and college-aged who listen to pop music exclusively and have no idea what autotune is nor any ability to recognize it.
Is autotune a proper noun? Like Xerox?
Was double trackIng voices used for correction or simply enhancing vocals?
Autotune, like the Black Eyed Peas and many other uses it, it not what the technology was designed for.
Properly used, the technology is 100% undetectable pitch correction. Almost all singers use it today, but you can not tell.
The popularity of using the Autotune software for dramatic effect, started in 1998, with Chers song, "Believe".
[quote]Properly used, the technology is 100% undetectable pitch correction. Almost all singers use it today, but you can not tell.
Many have said they can always tell.
R4, Taylor Swift sings live constantly at her concerts, and her performances on numerous awards shows which are many.
Autotune obviously is not used with her live performances.
She doesn't always sing particularly well live, although she often does fine. Her voice is too 'little girl-ish'.
I can see that for her recordings on CD's, though, autotune would perfect her sound more.
Cute face, check. Autotune, check. That's all that's needed now to become a "pop" singer. How many of these people even know how to play an instrument? Most of them prance around to heavily choreographed routines with huge mikes wrapped around their faces. What's being fed to them through the ear piece, the words to the shitty song? Once in a while they might pick up a guitar and pretend to strum a few notes like Madonna.
R14, which 'pop singers' are you refering to?
Do you have any names?
I blame Cher.
Totally fake obviously, r13. To her credit, Miley's actually a good live singer. I remember she and Taylor did a duet on some award show, and Miley was very good, while Taylor sucked balls.
Yes, Cher's autotune songs are very obvious.
I'm a Nashville songwriter.
Autotune is used on everything, Period.
Every producer and singer has a choice: they can spend all night trying to get the vocal pitch-perfect, or they can spend a fraction of the time and get something "close enough" and let autotune correct it.
I've used autotune on some INCREDIBLE singers who sing 99% of the notes correctly, but just needs a little help here and there, and I've used it on singers who have a great sound to their voice, but they have terribly pitch. If it's done correctly, YOU CAN NOT HEAR IT, NO MATTER ANYBODY SAYS. It's not always evil, but it has allowed for some singers to have careers that wouldn't otherwise have had them.
Imagine if someone like Johnny Cash would've ben autotuned. It makes the singer of a song a machine, not an organism.
JLo, Madonna, Britney, most of them.
R17, you're thinking of the duet with Taylor Swift and Stevie Nicks on the awards show where Taylor sounded a bit off key.
Taylor Swift has never done a duet with Miley on an awards show.
R13, is that video of Miley on The Today Show a disaster because the recording is malfunctioning? She can't possibly be singing that badly on her own. No way.
R19, can you name some names of performers who otherwise would not have had a career without autotune?
R22--that Today video has a fake soundtrack. It's a parody.
I like the expressions on the faces of the little girl and boy at 1:21.
R27's video is with autotune.
R10 is correct.
And any young person who has taken choir class knows what autotune is, even if they don't know exactly what it is. When it's used for that chirpy robo-voice effect, it's plainly obvious a human can't replicate that with their own voice.
Music teachers talk about autotune to their students. I think sometimes people who don't know kids these days think they're a lot more gullible than they are. A lot of them are growing up not trusting things their parents still trust (tabloids, newscasts, etc.). The internet tends to burn out the gullibility quickly.
You know who didn't need Autotune?
Top this, kiddies!
[quote]It makes the singer of a song a machine, not an organism.
I love this phrase, and I agree with you.
Justin Bieber just farts into the microphone.
Autotune takes care of the rest.
In some of her performances on the Grammys, Taylor Swift is shockingly off key. But, with all the flashing lights and dry ice who hears it?
In one her most recent awards show performances, Taylor sang a poignant, moving ballad she with nothing except her own guitar playing....
and she sounded remarkably good and got a standing ovation from the audience.
And it was not an easy audience to please consisting of the music world of performers and industry insiders.
No band, no smoke, no dry ice, no fireworks, no video, no light show....
just a song she wrote and playing her guitar alone on stage.
It was really quite good.
I have heard her sing less well though.
Nashville guy, why can't autotune be used for a live performance, when vocals have to go through a mixer anyway?
The purpose of Taylor Swift is to sell records to the teenage daughters of White, Republican Americans. Nobody outside of this demographic knows who Taylor Swift is.
Her songs are pretty bad, so history will not remember her either. Having said that, she makes the anti-gay right wingers, who rule Country radio, serious cash.
oh for christ sakes, R38, millions of teen and pre-teen daughters of democrats love Taylor Swift too
you are really a know-nothing buffoon
When was autotune made available? Did the 70s rockers use it?
An early (1982) approximation of Auto-Tune before there was Auto-Tune (1997).
Listen to the first "Love come down .. all the way down."
[quote]YOU CAN NOT HEAR IT, NO MATTER ANYBODY SAYS
I can always tell because voices are supposed to have imperfections. Whenever I hear any recording with smooth, glass-like vocals, you just know it has been enhanced. Too bad because those little imperfections are what give a voice character. Can you imagine what they wouldve done to Janis?
Some replies in this thread are confusing Auto-Tune with a vocoder.
JLo made-makes her career on Autotune...so its traditional use was unknown/undetected.
ECK could actually sing...not autotuned.
[quote]Taylor sounded a bit off key.
It's not "a bit" off key when it comes to Taylor Swift. Her live performances are an assault on the ears of anyone who knows music. The teens who buy her records have grown up with noise that is mislabeled as music so they have no idea that she can't carry a tune in a bucket.
Used constantly on Beiber. His superstardom has astounded me.
The average person doesn't even know about what key a song is in and what notes are supposed to be sung.
r37, I think they actually do have that technology. I remember when the Spice Girls reunited and were going on tour, there was talk about some new piece of mixing equipment with the autotune built in, so if somebody sang a wrong note, the software would "catch" what they had sung in a millisecond, but would tune it to the correct note before it was amplified. Useful for Posh Spice, who couldn't sing for shit.
It's hard to use autotune live for two reasons:
one, singers always sing songs a little differently; they change a note here and there. autotune wouldn't recognize what note the singer was going for.
two, if the singer hears something different in the monitors than what he sings, it messes him up. it's like talking on a speakerphone with a slight delay. it's just disorienting enough to not be workable.
Isn't that why they lip synch R51?
They didn't have "autotune" during the 60's and 70's...we had real talent during that era.
Taylor Swift has to be one of the worse live singers of the generation. I've had the misfortune of seeing her live three times (for concerts where she was one of the acts) and all three times were awful. In fact, Kesha was singing during one of those shows and Kesha was a better live singer than TS. Wacked.
And, Taylor wins every award.
Children who grow up singing in choir or who have parents who play decent music at home can tell if something has been autotuned or not.
However. The Miss Justine Bieber fans could very well think that how she "sings" is all natural.
Don't awards shows now basically require auto tune. It's not just so that crappy singers can sound better. It's also used for singers who can give outstanding live performances, just as a sort of "insurance" plan. Once that "just in case" mindset gets imbedded in production circles, it's no wonder that everyone from the crappiest to the very best live singers get autotuned.
So you can use autotune live?
I've always heard something off with Shakira, Beyonce, JLo, Britney, Rhianna, etc....for lack of a better description, it's a metallic harmonic whine that I hear.
I don't hear it with Babs, Celine, Old Whitney, Old Mariah (but definitely New Mariah, which puzzles me).
Many country artists (for example) use autotune singing live.
It's no great technical challenge: MANY artist "play along" with pre-recorded instruments (drum machines, synths, backing vocals - even their own vocals). The live musicians are good enough to stay in sync. The autotune device is pre-programmed with the melody and corrects the live singer in a couple of milliseconds.
The more the note is corrected, the more "fake" it sounds (like the deliberately effected vocals in Cher's 'Believe').
One easy way to tell is that heavily autotuned live vocals lose their vibrato (which is a voice's natural wavering of pitch) so that they sound "even", like an organ note.
"Oh my God. I'm back. I'm home. All the time, it was... We finally really did it ... You Maniacs! You blew it up! Ah, damn you! God damn you all to hell!"
We are switching to the new platform for The DataLounge this weekend. All of our mobile users have been using it for over a week and all first time users have been using it for about a month - which adds up to well over one million users. So we're ready to end this phase of the testing and move everybody to the new site. (more)
And yes, we've changed the look and some of how it operates.
Yes, we know you just *hate* it in well in advance.
Yes, we know we suck.
Yes, we are the biggest suckers that ever sucked.
But it was time for a change and with the huge shift to mobile it was long overdue. We've taken this opportunity not only to update the look but also make major changes under the hood (or "bonnet" if you're either British or pretentious or both). And we have to prepare for 2016 - a presidential election year where we can normally expect to see a 60% jump in traffic (yes, we've seen 5 presidential elections so far…Christ we're old).
The site has a bunch - nay, plethora - of new features which will make the site more usable: better search, the ability to ignore posters and threads, see link previews, to pick up a thread where you left off, spam and malware filtering and more.
If you want you can go explore and see for yourself, Click here.
And while running the tests we've noticed two interesting reactions to the new system - people are spending more time on the site and more people that come stay around longer and look at more stuff. Both good things. Yay!
Possibly we've not slain all the dragons and there will be issues that come up during the switchover. There's a help button in the lower right hand corner of the page which you can use to send us bug reports.
Please include as much information about the hardware (PC, Mac, Tablet, Phone etc), operating system (Windows, Mac OS, Android, iOS etc) and browser (Chrome, Safari, Opera, Internet Explorer etc) that you are using as possible to help us replicate and fix the problem.
Please note that complaints about colors, fonts, icons and the like are not "bugs" - they are design choices that we've made and we expect one or two cases of world-class bitching. But they won't actually cause headaches, scurvy, heart attacks, Restless Leg Syndrome, Morgellon's Disease or the vapors (but have your smelling salts at hand just in case).
Talking to DataLounge servers. Please wait a moment...