Why Were People Like Matt Hughes Born With Such Humongous Cocks?
From an evolutionary perspective, why did nature provide them with such equipment? Was it to ensure impregnation? Why would humans need cocks this big? Did these freaks of nature not evolve and are holding a genetic strain from our original ancestors?
OP, nature prefers diversity, one manifestation of which is a variety of sizes of any particular organ, including but by no means limited to the penis.
r1, a cock that big is difficult for many women to take. What's it's purpose then?
Maybe its to prepare women for giving birth.
r2, first of all I think you are underestimating vaginas. Hell, even anuses can take Matt Hughes as we can all see in porn. let alone, a naturally lubricated vagina.
Second, to the extent you might have a point, which I doubt, many people have organs that are not well developed for the tasks for which those organs have adapted, including the functions of eating, breathing, seeing, etc.
Even assuming, for the sake of the argument, that a very large penis is an obstacle to the evolutionary function of a penis, why single such a "problem" out and ask why such a thing would happen, when the world is full of anatomically challenged people?
I've spoken to Danny, aka Matt Hughes, and he told me that very few women can take it. The length of the vagina can only stretch so many inches. Matt is way beyond the per-determined size.
Why do some people have longer fingers than other people? Why do some people have broader shoulders than others? They're centainly not necessary. You can have shorter fingers or smaller shoulders and still get by just fine in life.
I think when you just consider size in terms of dick size only is where you get--excuse the expression--hung up. All body parts in almost all people differ, and yet we never question why my legs might be longer than yours. We just get hung up on dick size because it's intriugingly sexual.
Why do some women have larger breasts than others? Smaller breasts would work just as well to nurse a baby.
Bottom line: Humans come in all shapes and sizes simply because they do.
Who is Matt Hughes?
r7, there are freaks of nature. We're not talking about 8 inches. We're talking about 10, 11 and 12"!
Devin Moss (aka Jamie, Corbin Fisher) also has a ginormous cock (like 10 inches & thick), and he says that very few guys in his personal life can take it. A couple guys on CF took it and had hands-free ejaculations. I would think it would hurt WAY too much.
For insatiable gay bottoms, thank you jeebus!
He's so unattractive.
Well it's got to be genetic. King Dingo and Phat Daddy are real life brothers and well...
they're not exactly tiny.
Hughes may have a big schvanztucka, but the rest of the package is vomitous. He's white as snow, spindly bodied, and has ugly moles all over his body. And facially, well let's just say he looks rather "special".
"I've spoken to Danny, aka Matt Hughes, and he told me that very few women can take it. The length of the vagina can only stretch so many inches. Matt is way beyond the per-determined size."
Ok, I'm trying to understand this.
First of all, a man with a huge cock doesn't have to stick it completely inside an orifice to fuck that orifice. In fact, often men with smaller cocks than Mr. Hughes - 99% of the population - and even much smaller ones - don't shove their entire dicks inside while they are fucking. Why would he? To illustrate this further, how often, in porn, do you see men fucking without completely plunging their cock inside the ass or pussy they are fucking? Quite often.
Next, Mr. Hughes fucks ass on screen with no problem. Does it make sense that he would have any difficulty getting a pussy to accommodate his cock if, as we see, asses clearly can?
Finally, some of you are speaking of this in terms of an evolutionary question. Why such a cock? What purpose would nature have in forming such a cock?
But you are talking about a single large penis, not a trend in human development. If penises, in general, were getting much larger, then the question why, what purpose does it serve for continuation of the species, for survival, for natural selection, would have some moment. But you are confusing that non-event with the mere phenomenon of a few men having extremely large penises.
A few people are less than 4 feet tall. A few people are more than 8 feet tall. A few people have 11 fingers.
Are you asking yourselves what the evolutionary plan for these occurrences was as well? Of course not.
For these reasons, the answer to the question which makes no sense is merely that some men have extremely large penises, just like some people have other unusual physical traits, and Matt Hughes happens to be one of them.
I've seen bigger.
[quote]But you are talking about a single large penis, not a trend in human development. If penises, in general, were getting much larger...
Actually R15, we are speaking about an evolutionary trend. Human males have evolved the largest penis size in relation to body size of any primate. Gorillas are hung like mosquitoes.
There are, of course, larger cocks in nature, but they are attached to larger animals: whales, elephants, and the favorite of Catherine the Great, the horse.
No one knows exactly why men have such relatively big dicks, but it obviously has something to do with selective pressure from human females. And so, even if we believe in "intelligent design", we say "Thank you God."
Matt is interesting, really amazing cock but yeah the rest of him ok but not great.
jamie/demon moss really is a hottie.
There's that guy that fucked ashley ryder, he's pretty hung. Steven Prior, I think?
[quote]Next, Mr. Hughes fucks ass on screen with no problem. Does it make sense that he would have any difficulty getting a pussy to accommodate his cock if, as we see, asses clearly can?
pussy and ass are completely anatomically different. the vaginal canal averages about 6" long and then dead-ends at the cervix/uterus. the ass has many feet of tubing.
I am no embryologist, that's for sure - but I think it has something to do with the amount of male sex hormone the embryo/fetus receives in utero. From my years of study (as a lay person - he he) it seem that these men not only have large penises, but also large testicles. There's something going on that's not only possibly genetic, but is also definitely hormonal. This is also probably why many of these men aren't the brightest bulbs in the chandelier. All that juice went to their crotch - leaving their brains a tad deficient. Any biologists on DL to provide their opinion on this hypothesis? Is it even a feasible one?
Frankly, we're more excited about the size of a guy's wallet.
"Actually [R15], we are speaking about an evolutionary trend. Human males have evolved the largest penis size in relation to body size of any primate. Gorillas are hung like mosquitoes."
r17, what the fuck you talking about?
"we are speaking" about Matt Hughes huge dick, not the fact that humans have, relative to their body size, the largest penises of any primate.
They are two completely different subject.
If you want to start a thread on why humans have evolved the largest penis size in relation to body size of any primate, that would be enchanting. But that isn't what this thread is about.
"pussy and ass are completely anatomically different. the vaginal canal averages about 6" long and then dead-ends at the cervix/uterus. the ass has many feet of tubing."
They are completely different. Pussies lubricate. Asses don't. And pussies can, and often do, accommodate, in full, objects of greater length, than six inches, including a large percent of the word's penises when they are inserted in them to the max. Which they, as well as penises much, much larger than six inches, don't need to be, in order for both the woman and the man to fuck. Men and women can fuck without the entire penis entering the vaginal canal, just like men and men can fuck without the entire penis entering the ass.
r20 you certainly are no embryologist. Your theory has no validity.
"One characteristic among primates has been clearly targeted for possible selection by Fisherian female choice--male penis size. Primate males living in groups with many females and many males, groups in which promiscuity is the mating rule, have long penes (Dixon 1978). Male chimps, in fact, use their penis for display toward estrous females. Because a longer penis would give a female pleasure (note that the human male has the longest and thickest penis of any primate), female choice might have been a factor driving penis length to extremes among primates." (Small, Meredith F. (1993) Female choices: Sexual behavior of female primates. Cornell Univ. Press, Ithaca, 1993 pp. 109)
Ive heard Dr. Oz say (take it this for what it's worth) that human reproductive organs are already very large in proportion to begin with, even the regular size penises, compared to other mammals. And humans are also one of the few mammals to not have retractable penises. We also have big brains, so humans reproductive organs might just be that big so our brains can feel what's going on down there.
So the other animals in the animal kingdom think we are nothing but brains and reproductive organs over populating the planet.
[quote]So the other animals in the animal kingdom think we are nothing but brains and reproductive organs over populating the planet.
Well, we [bold]have[/bold] pretty much been nothing but a lot of big dicks to them in the end.
Anyone ever watch that show on TLC "Strange Sex"?
Check out the guy at the link -- scroll down to the segment titled "Well Hung."
Let's do the math.
The preoccupation with large cocks, as here on DL, makes it clear that large cocks are attractive to a great many people.
With me so far?
Being sexually attractive makes having sex more likely.
Still with me?
Having sex makes reproducing more likely?
So, to recap. Sexual attractiveness makes reproduction more likely. An attractive cock, like an attractive face, body, etc., is part of this picture. Large cocks found attractive by many.
Therefore, one can make an argument for a natural purpose in a large penis.
However, the fact is that nature prefers variety in all matter of organs. Cocks are organs. "Everyone's different" as Kinsey said. Differentiation insures adaptation as a species to whatever the balance of nature might throw at us (including the variety of forms of preferences among our fellow humans for, say, large cocks, small cocks, average cocks). Cocks are not excluded from the diversity program. And that is the more likely explanation of why certain men have extremely large dicks or extremely small ones.
r7 "bottom line" Heh heh.
Nobody ever said life was fair, OP. I'm bigger...and I will always beat you.
It's God's plan, plain and simple
God endows skinny, dog-faced boys with big dicks because they are skinny, dog-faced boys.
I think you guys need to remember porn inches versus real inches. If a porn star says he has 10 inches, he more than likely has 8 inches. Plus a lot of porn stars are tragically short, which makes big penises look even bigger. The porn stars who say that people have trouble taking their cocks are keeping up a myth to keep the dollars rolling in. Yes their are guys with 10, 11 and 12 inch cocks, I've had an 11. It all works out. It doesn't hurt if you're doing it correctly.
Irish men have, on average, the smallest dicks in the west. South Africans, and the Dutch seem to have among the largest on average.
[quote]Irish men have, on average, the smallest dicks in the west. South Africans, and the Dutch seem to have among the largest on average.
The French beat the Dutch and the Irish are basically on par with Americans.
Evolution has given been larger limps for things such as pulling down fruit from trees, and such. There's a reason for these phenomena. What is the purpose of having a massive dong? I've heard that in nature, the male wants to get his semen up inside the female further than the male before him to ensure conception.
r14, love the YF reference!
If you took 2% of the volumn of Matt Hughes' cock, and incrased my cock by that volume... he wouldn't miss it (hell, he might even like it better), while mine would grow noticably enough that I'd be utterly delited.
Hate having a small penis
How much does Matt cost? Is he on rentboy?
[quote]Mr. Hughes fucks ass on screen with no problem.
Those are professionally trained stunt asses. Do not attempt to do that at home.
R39... Don't know about Matt hughes but Devin is on one of the rent sites. Would love to play around with that massive dong.
Who is Devin?
Btw, why does Matt Hughes have sex with women?
The thrusting during coitus displaces sperm already inside the woman's reproductive tract to make a clear path for the thruster's ejaculate. It may be that a more massive penis creates a more intense vaccum for optimal displacement of sperm already present. By the way this hypothesis relies on a premise of polyandrous mating by the female (as is practiced by our nearest primate relatives), as presumably there would be no evolutionary advantage in a man's displacing his own sperm from a previous visitation. In any event, humans certainly have much larger penises, and not just relative to size, than any other primates. See Sex at Dawn, Ryan and Jetha (Harper Perennial 2011).
In addition, many people find large penises attractive, and large phalli fascinating, which could invite sexual selection. And just as with any kind of sexual activity, oral, anal, manual, vaginal, there is no requirement that the entire penis be inserted into an orifice for sex to be exciting or successful.
Finally, penises, er, coming in all sizes, er, fits will with Kinsey's endless differentiation model, explaining not only a Hughes-size penis but the princess tiny meats among us as well.
I think that dick is an evolution for realy porn stars or for me who. Need bigger sizes :)) i think his is the perfect size for me and belive me all i can take it easy :))
Many cocks in this world are just too big for me. There's only so wide my mouth opens. Any bigger and all I'm going to be able to do is jerk you off.
To bring beauty and joy to the world and insane pleasure to the holes of a lucky few.
Does he have a brother? If so does he have a big cock? What about his father`s cock?
I think that the reason some men are born with huge cocks is that the huge cock is actually a conjoined twin that didn't fully develop
the french have huge dicks. the italians are not bad either. americans tend to be avg although there are plenty of big-dicked american guys too. lots of big brits too.
It could be genetics as far as the men in his family starting with his father something's we just get passed down to us because of it being hereditary in our families
Take just 2% of the volume of his cock and balls, and he wouldn't miss it at all. Add that same volume to my cock to make it bigger, and it'd make a good, noticeable difference.
Europe has bigger dicks than America. It's been studied for the last couple of years.
Randon mutation due to possible selective pressure.
I think small penises are much more attractive. They are an aristocratic ideal. A horse-hung cock belongs on a dirty and possibly stupid person.
Big dicks are nice to look at and play with but some are just to big to be useful to anyone who isn't a trained sword swallower.
[quote] They are an aristocratic ideal.
I wonder if a team of scientists are sequestered in a lab somewhere desperately searching for the Big Dick gene.
Why is it that sizemeat(over 8 inches on the tape measure) is nearly always attached to very nasty unpleasant individuals, often with faces that could stop a clock?
You think of big cocks and balls as a hyper masculine thing but most of the time the truly super huge freak show sized cocks are attached to skinny hairless baby dyke twinks.
"It could be genetics as far as the men in his family starting with his father something's we just get passed down to us because of it being hereditary in our families "
So true. My father had an average size dick. I inherited my big dick from my mom.
Humungous sizemeat was created for the pleasure of homosexuals, since fish have no appreciatia of it and thus do not deserve it.
Yeah, I've seen that a lot too R60. Not surprising since it is just random but a lot of times huge cocks are attached to little twinks, many of who never even want to top.
Anyway, I like big dicks in porn, but in real life average to slightly above average is preferred.
Much more fun giving oral sex to someone that isn't huge, a sore jaw and choking sucks. I prefer to top but if I do bottom there is no way in hell I am doing it for someone horse hung.
I never really get what makes big dicks so awesome outside of looking cool, which admittedly they do.
It takes a long dick to get inside a fat woman to impregnate her. If you have both a fat mand and a fat woman well there is no such thing as to long a dick.
It takes a long dick to hit the male G-spot. THAT'S what makes them so awesome.
BTW I think Matt Hughes is straight...he always coughs up a lot more sperm when he fucks women than in his gay scenes.
People like Jeff Stryker blow the theory some of you have about dog face skinny boys with big cocks.
I wonder how different my life would have been with this? Lots of friends, money, travel and sex, sex, sex.
You know it's true (NSFW)
Quiet often, a humongous cock was actually an underdeveloped twin brother
Jeff Stryker is the definition of dog face.
[quote]I wonder how different my life would have been with this? Lots of friends, money, travel and sex, sex, sex.
One of my exes has a much bigger, better-looking cock than that -- and while he's had a lot of sex, that and his dick haven't made him happy. He has few friends, no money (he's declared bankruptcy twice), and he's prone to crippling bouts of depression. Just a tremendously insecure man, which always astonished me, given his "gift."
He wasn't doing it right, R70.
Matt has switched to straight porn exclusively. I don't know how those little chicks he's fucking can handle all of that meat.
It's fuckin' pathetic that people in the USA don't understand any science.
First of all remember this: Evolution does NOT DO WHAT IS BEST.
It does what WORKS.
Second: Evolution does NOT back up and redo a process. It goes forward.
The point of life is simply to live long enough to reproduce. As long as a trait allows you to live long enough to pass on that trait, you will be considered a success.
So if a large penis allows a person to live to be able to reproduce it will pass on that trait. Same for a small penis.
Since penis size really doesn't effect choice so much, it is a non factor.
The best example of bad evolution is where the windpipe crosses the food passage. It's obvious a bad design flaw. A lot of organisms probably died out because of it. Till one "freak" organism developed a cough reflex and that took care of that.a
But bad design does not stop the trait from being passed on as long as it enables you to live long enough to reproduce.
What a ridiculous conversation, but since you seem to want to be clinical:
A vagina can give birth to a baby which is, on average, 20.28 inches long and a little over 8 pounds. If a pussy can adapt to that, it surely can take a 10" penis.
Most probably a genetically long penis was meant to reach closer to a cervix to ensure impregnation (the sperm would have less distance to travel). This helps to ensure procreation.
Unfortunately, fellow friends of Dorothy, there is no genetically homosexual reason for a super-sized penis except maybe that it can rub the prostate better. And of course, it looks super-hot!
Well we know that a baby holding uterus can blast open a cervical cap and the vagina can expand to accommodate the discharge of the baby.
But one would thing that if nature is favoring longer penises, then nature would also favor deeper vaginas.
Why? Because, for some reason, it would 'work'.
I've been with a lot of guys, and I have noticed that the short, skinny twinkish guys have the biggest cocks. One particularly memorable guy was a former Mormon missionary. He was boyishly cute, about 5'7" and probably no more than 120 lb wet. The first time I saw his dick, I was speechless. A good footlong and incredibly thick. He laughed and told me that he always gets a stunned reaction from guys the first time they see it.
r76 - wouldn't nature favor more shallow vaginas, since that would insure impregnation by even the smallest penis?
r46, not if nature abhors a vacuum. In essence nature also abhors tiny meat.
[quote]Was it to ensure impregnation?
But, does it ensure impregnation directly, or at least relatively to other cocks? I doubt it.
[quote] People like Jeff Stryker blow the theory some of you have about dog face skinny boys with big cocks.
Except Jeff and Chad Hunt are **inches** shorter than Matt Hughes. Jeff and Chad are short dudes who, with shaving and a lot of great camera angles, have managed to make the XXX buying public believe that their thick seven-to-eight inchers are 10+.
Not so. Especially not for Chad Hunt, who is about as tall as Prince.
Because some guys are born with asses that hunger for them.
[quote]Except Jeff and Chad Hunt are **inches** shorter than Matt Hughes. Jeff and Chad are short dudes who, with shaving and a lot of great camera angles, have managed to make the XXX buying public believe that their thick seven-to-eight inchers are 10+.
Untrue. I have personally grabbed onto Chad Hunts cock at some performance he was doing. His cock is a 10" bat. Michael Lucas on the other hand uses a bit of smoke an mirrors.
Evolutionary speaking human males do have larger penises than other primates as pointed out before. As the species progressed females preferred mates who could copulate face to face standing up as opposed to "doggy" style. This had an advantage when it comes to seeing predators while fucking giving the couple a 360 degree view. Penises needed to be longer to reach the vagina in this position.
But as far as monster sized cocks today I believe it comes down to genetics yes and hormones the fetus is exposed to at certain points in gestation - similar to homosexuality I think.
[quote] Untrue. I have personally grabbed onto Chad Hunts cock at some performance he was doing. His cock is a 10" bat.
That might be so, R96, but they used to promote Chad as being 13" or more.
I could completely see him being a solid 9 or 10, but it looks like an elephant's trunk on him especially since he's shorter.
The long cocks are by nature meant for breeding. A long cock goes deep into the vagina to squirt cum to fertilize the eggs. Short cocks have trouble impregnating. Long cocks are better for impregnating; there is a 100% chance a scrap with a long cock will impregnate on the first try. It's a biological fact. Those men pictured were born to breed offspring, despite their cocks being fondled and sucked by gays. Nature intended them to be fertile and to fertilize woman's eggs with the length of their cocks. And that's also why their cum tastes so pungent and sticky, it's laden with sperm meant to impregnate.
Science, my dears, science!
I've had Chad Hunts dick in my hand and to some degree in my mouth. He is a shorty but he does have a 10" dick. ( he bottoms too) nice guy
R99 does/did Chad escort?
Here we go again with the "ten inch dick" myth. So his dick is longer than a piece of paper is wide?
Whenever actual rulers and tape measures get used on camera in porn, little tricks are used to avoid actual, honest measurement. Because the numbers are a weird brand and fantasy that have been built up and no one wants the grade inflation to catch up to reality.
You hold a tape measure up to Chad Hunt, he might hit eight inches. And that is still huge. And that's a fact!
[quote]So his dick is longer than a piece of paper is wide?
If you mean an 8x11 sheet of paper? Yes. What a weird comparison.
He doesn't have a 13" cock, no. But he does have a solid thick 10" inches. He was doing a performance years ago at the Stonewall in NYC upstairs. At one point he was out and hard and guys were grabbing onto it. That got him even harder. He has no problem sharing in that way. Thick, thick, long beautiful cock.
And he is a sweet guy. I chatted him up online once and was talking about his son and his partner, etc. Very easy going laid back.
Michael Lucas as I said before, is a skinny 8.5, maybe 9" uncut cock. His dick is not as pretty as Chad's.
[quote]I've spoken to Danny, aka Matt Hughes, and he told me that very few women can take it.
When did you speak to him?
I have an 8-1/2 dick (measured, for real) but prefer submissive boys with small dicks and shaved bodies.
There aren't words for the kind of stupid that r98 is. "Pungent and sticky"? Jesus christ.
We recall that our ex-husband, who was a solid 9 inches long and 7 inches around, had the sweetest tasting gizz we have ever consumed!
(And we swallowed GALLONS of it!)
[quote]this guy has the world's most perfect cock
How many women has Manuel Ferrara had sex with now, R82?
Is there an estimate out there?
R112, I think that guy is called James. He's British and featured in many videos at English Lads, jerking off his uncut cock (he also pisses in one of them).
I only ever saw him do solos. Has he branched out into duos?
r113 google says his real name is Dominic Nel...Im glad he does porn but he is good looking he could be modeling or acting. I wonder what his ethnic background is, his skin is olive colored and its not just a tan
I don't know what his background is, R114, but he is uncut. Could be Spanish or Italian, I suppose. British accent, though.
James is bi guy with lots of reservations. He did make duos and get fucked, but only with a toy, cause taking a real dick would make him "gay".
At least "straight" Matt was not afraid of Kai Cruz's big real thing.
Maybe James is black & white - I've never thought about it. I'm not sure if he's ever been asked. Sometimes they discuss the background of the models, but I don't think they've ever done that with James.
[quote]Cock size varies more than any other human body part.
I believe that the correct answer is skin.
James is from South Africa.
White ancestry there is English and Dutch.
He does look like he has some black in him a ways back.
thanks r124 & r128 I was trying to think of who he reminds me of. He has great skin tone and facial features
James seems laid back which makes him attractive