Hello and thank you for being a DL contributor. We are changing the login scheme for contributors for simpler login and to better support using multiple devices. Please click here to update your account with a username and password.

Hello. Some features on this site require registration. Please click here to register for free.

Hello and thank you for registering. Please complete the process by verifying your email address. If you can't find the email you can resend it here.

Hello. Some features on this site require a subscription. Please click here to get full access and no ads for $1.99 or less per month.

Janet Jackson''s "Number Twos" Tour Ain''t Selling

They're releasing one date at a time, places that only a has-been would go to, and those aren't even selling. The tour starts in the beginning of February. Three dates have been announced so far. She can't even perform shows in Europe or the US, because she knows no one will come to see her. She's going to be performing in places that look like high school gymnasiums. Her people have said that this tour will totally be stripped down, and that there will be no pyrotechnics. "Just Janet." Good god!

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 142August 9, 2018 11:06 PM

Jacksons are so last-century.

by Anonymousreply 1January 5, 2011 10:07 PM

"Number Twos" is a fitting name for how this is turning out

by Anonymousreply 2January 5, 2011 10:10 PM

There may be no pyro, but you can bet your sweet ass those fucking storybook inflatable sets and a stool to cry on will be provided. She has yet to do a tour without them.

She has been canceling shows since Velvet Rope Tour because she does the same shit tour after tour after tour. Why pay to see the same shit over and over again?

by Anonymousreply 3January 5, 2011 10:12 PM

Janet's number 2 concert is just like the Velvet Rope, but with different costumes. I loved the Velvet Rope, and have no problem if it's not different.

by Anonymousreply 4January 5, 2011 10:16 PM

From press release:

"This tour will differ from her previous concert schedules in that she will perform music exclusively from her chart topping CD NUMBER ONES. There will also be a focus on venues that will allow Janet to be up close and personal in a much more intimate setting. This show is JANET more revealed, more intimate, and more personal than ever before. Don%E2%80%99t look for special effects. Just look at Janet."

by Anonymousreply 5January 5, 2011 10:38 PM

Oh dear.

by Anonymousreply 6January 6, 2011 12:54 AM

Don't look at us. We never went to her concerts.

by Anonymousreply 7January 6, 2011 1:06 AM

What's the concert tour's advertising slogan?

"When you think of Number Twos, think of... JANET JACKSON!"

by Anonymousreply 8January 6, 2011 1:13 AM

Hmm, should I book 2 weeks or 3 at the Garden next year? Maybe they'll just build a new, bigger venue for me and save me some time.

by Anonymousreply 9January 6, 2011 1:37 AM

No wonder she's looking to marry some millionaire hubby.

by Anonymousreply 10January 6, 2011 11:12 PM

At least they didn't call it b'day..

by Anonymousreply 11January 6, 2011 11:14 PM

[quote]you can bet your sweet ass those fucking storybook inflatable sets and a [bold]stool[/bold] to cry on will be provided

Pun intended?

by Anonymousreply 12January 6, 2011 11:18 PM

i'll go.

by Anonymousreply 13January 6, 2011 11:38 PM

"Why pay to see the same shit over and over again?"%0D %0D That hasn't stopped people from seeing Cher.%0D %0D OP is a bitter hater. False claims that aren't backed up.%0D %0D I'd see Jackson's show too. At least it isn't two hours of lame shit than no one has heard of. Jackson is smart enough to give her fans what they want, and not an ego driven has been desperately trying to recapture faded glory. %0D %0D And good for her on dropping the sexual antics. There's nothing more pathetic than pretending you're some hot piece of ass when you practically need a walker to get around stage. %0D %0D

by Anonymousreply 14January 7, 2011 12:08 AM

If Janet Jackson is so smart, why aren't her "fans" buying tickets?

She didn't give up the sexual antics. She road a guy and simulated fellatio on him just a few months ago at the Essence festival.

She's atrocious!

by Anonymousreply 15January 7, 2011 12:17 AM

Why can't Janet Jimmy and Terry make a decent album anymore? Thats all she really needs to do to get her fans on board again.

by Anonymousreply 16January 7, 2011 12:23 AM

"Jackson is smart enough to give her fans what they want, and not an ego driven has been desperately trying to recapture faded glory."%0D %0D %0D %0D Please, the only reason she is doing this tour is to try to recapture faded glory. %0D %0D %0D "OP is a bitter hater."%0D %0D %0D Calling people haters is so third grade. Nothing sadder than a 40 year old acting like a kid (I know you're 40 because no one under 40 cares about Janet)

by Anonymousreply 17January 7, 2011 12:37 AM

"For the love of God, somebody please shit in my mouth!"

by Anonymousreply 18January 7, 2011 12:43 AM

No R17, I'm in my late twenties.%0D %0D And most of the people in my age range know and love Janet. Can't say the same about other entertainers from that era, who get a big "Who?" when they're named.

by Anonymousreply 19January 7, 2011 12:50 AM

I'm a sad Janet Jackson fangurl!

by Anonymousreply 20January 7, 2011 12:52 AM

She ROAD a guy?

Christ fucking almighty.

by Anonymousreply 21January 7, 2011 12:55 AM

good god, no one told her "Number Twos" would be a bad name?%0D %0D Does she need the money?

by Anonymousreply 22January 7, 2011 12:58 AM

" I lap up qweef splatter! "

by Anonymousreply 23January 7, 2011 1:01 AM

r17/r20 = racist Janet Jackson hate troll. %0D %0D Bye cunt, go finger your prolasped hole to that old gristled bitch who shall not be named.

by Anonymousreply 24January 7, 2011 1:02 AM

"And most of the people in my age range know and love Janet"%0D %0D %0D Liar, liar. You are making stuff up to try to prove a point. Young people don't care about Janet anymore.%0D %0D %0D R24 is just a dumb race-baiting troll who calls people racist when they don't like untalented black singers. I bet you think Rihanna is the best singer in the world. You're dumb.

by Anonymousreply 25January 7, 2011 1:05 AM

I'm so sad that I have to stoop to calling people racist because they don't like one singer who is black! To qualify as a non-racist you have to love every black singer who ever had a hit!

by Anonymousreply 26January 7, 2011 1:07 AM

I love Janet. Every other female pop artist just recycles what she did first.

by Anonymousreply 27January 7, 2011 1:11 AM

" I finger bang my grandmother's old stretched out leather cunt daily! "

by Anonymousreply 28January 7, 2011 1:13 AM

"You are making stuff up to try to prove a point."%0D %0D Whatever. Young people know Janet's hits.%0D %0D See, she didn't have a Lady Gaga come and knock her off her pedestal. %0D %0D I know that second part wounds you. Good. %0D %0D

by Anonymousreply 29January 7, 2011 1:16 AM

No r25/26 you are a racist dolt that comes to shit on every Janet Jackson thread, without fail.%0D %0D Go wash your rancid cunt with your white hood bitch.

by Anonymousreply 30January 7, 2011 1:19 AM

[italic]And most of the people in my age range know and love Janet. [/italic]

You're a fucking lunatic. No one knows or gives a shit about Janet under the age of 18. She's lucky if even any kids remember her being the old lady who popped out her tit with Justin Timberlake.

[italic]Young people know Janet's hits.[/italic]

BWAHAHAHAHAHA!

by Anonymousreply 31January 7, 2011 1:24 AM

lol @ r30. I love when the DL Black Panther bunch get riled up!

by Anonymousreply 32January 7, 2011 1:25 AM

The Jacksons are over.....nobody is buying anything of theirs.

by Anonymousreply 33January 7, 2011 1:32 AM

Janet will always have new gayling fans, as long as pop whores continue to reference her shit!

by Anonymousreply 34January 7, 2011 1:39 AM

Who's referencing her shit? Nobody is talking about her but us!

by Anonymousreply 35January 7, 2011 1:41 AM

Lady Gaga & Beyonce

by Anonymousreply 36January 7, 2011 1:44 AM

[italic]Lady Gaga & Beyonce[/italic]

Oh, dear.

by Anonymousreply 37January 7, 2011 1:52 AM

"No one knows or gives a shit about Janet under the age of 18."%0D %0D Now it's eighteen. %0D %0D I think it's funny that fans of a certain entertainer have to take their blazing hatred and bitterness over their idol's failures out on everyone else. %0D %0D Hey, I know Janet's best recording days are most likely behind her. I accept reality. Nothing more pathetic than people prentending a faded entertainer is still hip and relevant. %0D %0D You should just hope that grandma doesn't brake a hip on that stage sometime. All that moving around is dangerous for a woman of her advanced age. %0D %0D %0D %0D %0D %0D

by Anonymousreply 38January 7, 2011 1:56 AM

[quote]Oh, dear.%0D %0D Oh dear nothing. At least they are more talented than that old wretch that shall not be named. Thats why I believe gays over 40 have no taste! You made her possible.

by Anonymousreply 39January 7, 2011 2:03 AM

The fur thing was it for me and Janet. That was the end. What she did was despicable. I let the collaboration with Beenie Man slide.

On top of everything else, she hasn't made a decent album in nearly 14 years. Her last good one was "The Velvet Rope". She would be smart to go the artistic/experimental route, take the critical acclaim, not worrying about albums sales, because let's face it, she can't sell albums anymore. The sex thing has really gotten old anyway. I really do wonder if the woman was sexually abused as a child at this point.

I do know that she doesn't have a record label. She's going to be 45 this year, and if she releases another album, that won't come out until next year, which is when she'll be nearing 46. She is not going to sell to kids, and adults are not into her sex crap. She would be smart to go into more mature territory, something other than sex. I don't know if she'll take the hint though. She seems to be trapped in the same bubble her brother was in.

You have to also remember that she doesn't have a big back catalog. It's Control, Rhythm Nation, janet., The Velvet Rope, and "All For You" from the album, All For You. That's four albums, plus one song from a fifth for her to choose songs from. She does the same ones over and over again each time live. It's beyond boring. Look at Madonna, she has now 11 albums to choose songs from, and that doesn't even include her "Best of" albums which housed new material, and soundtracks. Janet doesn't even change the dance routines. The public doesn't want it, and I can't believe she isn't tired of doing the same dance steps all these decades. Her last tour was a bomb, and she had to pull out. She did like 10 shows, and canceled all the rest. She looked horrible on stage then too. She was beyond fat. I'm surprised she didn't have a heart attack dancing. Don't even get me started on the costumes.

She really gets on my nerves with that cutesy baby talk shit she always does in interviews. What the fuck is wrong with her? The whole family talks like infants. It ain't cute, honey!

At least she dumped Jermaine Dupri. All in all, she's done in terms of music. She could do more films, but it's not like she's going to win an Oscar. She's old, and she's black. There aren't a lot of roles out there fitting that criteria. Maybe she'll just work behind-the-scenes for people or something.

by Anonymousreply 40January 7, 2011 2:09 AM

All For You was very good album. Pretty much overlooked.

by Anonymousreply 41January 7, 2011 2:31 AM

No, r141. "All For Poo" was a horrible album, and the beginning of the end for her. She was trying to be hip with the kids. It was tragic.

by Anonymousreply 42January 7, 2011 3:00 AM

No, it was not tragic. She did a very successful tour for ALL FOR YOU and she was still "hip with the kids" in 2001. Her last tour was tragic. But I don't expect you geezers to remember all of this.

by Anonymousreply 43January 7, 2011 3:11 AM

r43, she canceled her 2001 "All For You" tour because of sales, and tried to pass it off as fear of the 9/11 event. She's a flop.

by Anonymousreply 44January 7, 2011 3:14 AM

r44, she cancelled her dates in Europe. Not the entire tour.

by Anonymousreply 45January 7, 2011 3:21 AM

bump

by Anonymousreply 46January 8, 2011 3:37 AM

Duh, r45. She still CANCELED though.

by Anonymousreply 47January 8, 2011 3:40 AM

You haters need a nice SCALDING hot coffee enema, courtesy of Ms. Jackson.

by Anonymousreply 48January 8, 2011 1:20 PM

How can she think this is a good idea after her last tour bombed? She doesn't even have a new album to help ticket sales.%0D %0D After an artist with her high profile has so many flop albums, it's clear they bring nothing to the table.

by Anonymousreply 49January 8, 2011 1:46 PM

Exactly R49. Janet thinks she can coast on her brother's death whilst offering absolutely nothing new. Every concert, every dance move, every breathy coo between and during some of her songs - same ole' shit.

When someone posted news about Janet's upcoming tour, I said it would FAIL big time, and as this post points out - I was right.

Sorry Janet - come up with some fresh, new ideas and people might actually want to see you.

by Anonymousreply 50January 8, 2011 2:37 PM

Nice package alright.

Think I'll have to ride it tonight!

Tee-hee!

Tour!

Edit!

Break!

Cancel!

by Anonymousreply 51January 8, 2011 2:55 PM

it ain't selling because tickets aren't on sale yet.

The tour is playing theatres. Good for her for wanting to give her fans an intimate experience. What she is doing with the 20 under 20 program and keeping her set-list fluid is great.

The only thing better than Janet crazies are the inexplicably bizarre anti-Janet crowd. Lots of them in this thread!

by Anonymousreply 52January 10, 2011 6:59 PM

[italic]it ain't selling because tickets aren't on sale yet.[/italic]

They are on sale, you moron!

by Anonymousreply 53January 10, 2011 8:25 PM

presale begins wednesday, and general sale on friday, per ticketmaster.

....you were saying?

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 54January 10, 2011 8:30 PM

r53 = a bloated and bitter Whitney, incapable of doing shows anywhere

by Anonymousreply 55January 10, 2011 9:12 PM

The show has on sale in Asia since December, butt-head! It hasn't sold out. That's what we've been referring to, r54. Try to keep up!

by Anonymousreply 56January 10, 2011 9:15 PM

Bye Whitney/r56! Go give Clive a call so you can rag on Janet with him. He'll love it, he has nothing else to do, much like yourself!

by Anonymousreply 57January 10, 2011 9:20 PM

r57 = Janet's right floppy granny tit, the one that ended her career.

by Anonymousreply 58January 10, 2011 11:30 PM

r58 = an ancient looking Rene Elizondo, running up to AMSCOT to cash his alimony check

by Anonymousreply 59January 10, 2011 11:56 PM

see what i mean? 53-59 = crazies!

by Anonymousreply 60January 11, 2011 3:58 AM

He deserves it, r59. He was one half behind the success of her career. After he left, she was never the same.

by Anonymousreply 61January 11, 2011 4:01 AM

r61 = a bitter Tina Landon, still fucking with old man Rene

by Anonymousreply 62January 11, 2011 4:06 AM

R61,

How much success has Rene had after Janet?

by Anonymousreply 63January 11, 2011 4:13 AM

Rene retired babe, just as Janet should have a long time ago.

by Anonymousreply 64January 11, 2011 4:29 AM

TITTYGATE!

Never forget!

Never forgive!

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 65January 11, 2011 6:00 AM

NORTH AMERICAN TOUR DATES

03/07/11 Mon The Chicago Theatre Chicago, IL

03/08/11 Tue The Chicago Theatre Chicago, IL

03/12/11 Sat Sony Centre (formerly Hummingbird Centre) Toronto, ON

03/16/11 Wed Mohegan Sun Casino Uncasville, CT

03/18/11 Fri Radio City Music Hall New York, NY

03/22/11 Tue DAR Constitution Hall Washington, DC

03/25/11 Fri The Borgata Hotel Casino and Spa Atlantic City, NJ

03/26/11 Sat The Borgata Hotel Casino and Spa Atlantic City, NJ

03/29/11 Tue Fox Theatre Atlanta, GA

03/31/11 Thu Fabulous Fox Theatre St. Louis, MO

04/02/11 Sat Verizon Theatre (Formerly Nokia Theatre) Grand Prairie, TX

04/06/11 Wed Wells Fargo Theatre Denver, CO

04/08/11 Fri Comerica Theatre (formerly Dodge Theatre) Phoenix, AZ

04/09/11 Sat Santa Barbara Bowl Santa Barbara, CA

04/14/11 Thu Gibson Amphitheatre Universal City, CA

04/19/11 Tue Bill Graham Civic Auditorium San Francisco, CA

04/22/11 Fri Caesars Palace Las Vegas, NV

04/23/11 Sat Caesars Palace Las Vegas, NV

by Anonymousreply 66January 12, 2011 2:32 AM

well??

by Anonymousreply 67January 12, 2011 4:31 PM

.........

by Anonymousreply 68January 13, 2011 4:49 AM

anyone else get their presale tix today? they went pretty quickly!

by Anonymousreply 69January 13, 2011 5:52 PM

[quote]anyone else get their presale tix today? they went pretty quickly!

OMFG!!!!! I'M SOOOOOOOO EXCITED!!!! I BOUGHT 2 AND CAN'T WAIT!!!!!

I THINK LA IS SOLD OUT!

by Anonymousreply 70January 13, 2011 6:23 PM

I'm going. :)

by Anonymousreply 71January 13, 2011 7:44 PM

both los angeles shows are sold out.

by Anonymousreply 72January 14, 2011 10:15 PM

The gays really will go see anything.

by Anonymousreply 73January 14, 2011 10:24 PM

Can't wait to see her in LOS ANGELES!

by Anonymousreply 74January 15, 2011 3:23 AM

luuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuv janet!!!!

by Anonymousreply 75January 15, 2011 4:18 PM

[quote]She ROAD a guy?%0D %0D Yeah, she picks a guy from the audience. Then puts him on a revolving bed strapped in, then she rides him, and performs sexual acts. It's funny actually, more than sexual.

by Anonymousreply 76January 15, 2011 4:26 PM

She sold out because the places she's playing are the size of a high school gymnasium. LMFAO!

by Anonymousreply 77January 15, 2011 4:28 PM

:)

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 78January 15, 2011 4:31 PM

I love that song. Thanks, r78.

by Anonymousreply 79January 15, 2011 4:36 PM

r77 you can't have it both ways. Your argument is that she's completely irrelevant and can't sell out anything which clearly she can. Secondly there are high school gyms that can sit 10000 people. So...

by Anonymousreply 80January 15, 2011 4:38 PM

[italic][R77] you can't have it both ways. Your argument is that she's completely irrelevant and can't sell out anything which clearly she can.[/italic]

Nope. Keep making shit up.

[italic]Secondly there are high school gyms that can sit 10000 people.[/italic]

She's a flop, and one of the industry's biggest jokes now. Even her fans are embarrassed.

by Anonymousreply 81January 15, 2011 4:41 PM

She's clearly still relevant based on the volume of haters that crowd a thread whenever her name is brought up. Who would expect her to sell millions of albums now, the woman has been in it for 20 something years! Her shows will continue to sell because they are always good, if you've actually been to one you'll have to give her credit for that.

by Anonymousreply 82January 15, 2011 5:09 PM

Her shows SUCK! It's the same mimed show every single time! She's horrible. This is the reason why her tickets don't sell. It's going to end up like her last flop tour. She can't even get a record deal. At least she isn't fat this time. That's one good thing I guess.

by Anonymousreply 83January 15, 2011 5:15 PM

" I wipe back to front! "

by Anonymousreply 84January 15, 2011 5:16 PM

she sold out the LA date in less than 10 minutes and there are othere dtaes that are now sold out as well.....who was it that was saying she's a flop?

by Anonymousreply 85January 15, 2011 10:56 PM

Wow I can't believe a Janet Jackson thread got past 20 posts and was the home of this much insanity. %0D %0D I don't care one way or another about her but 'intimate' is usually a euphenism for ' we can't sell enough for the big venues'.

by Anonymousreply 86January 16, 2011 12:11 PM

Janet has sold out 80% of her shows in just a few days.

by Anonymousreply 87January 17, 2011 10:19 PM

You go girl!

by Anonymousreply 88January 17, 2011 10:41 PM

Not hard to do when the venues only seat about 1000 people.

by Anonymousreply 89January 17, 2011 10:50 PM

[quote]Not hard to do when the venues only seat about 1000 people.

In LA it's 13,000 total.

by Anonymousreply 90January 17, 2011 10:53 PM

13,000 is small...for LA

by Anonymousreply 91January 17, 2011 10:57 PM

r89 = Oprah, getting her 29th pound of mac & cheese

by Anonymousreply 92January 17, 2011 10:57 PM

Good for her!

by Anonymousreply 93January 17, 2011 11:39 PM

A performer who can't sing should never do a stripped down show.%0D %0D

by Anonymousreply 94January 18, 2011 12:11 AM

Janet can sing, better than Madonna, and now Whitney Houston.

by Anonymousreply 95January 18, 2011 12:17 AM

I think Madonna has a better voice than Janet...which isn't saying much. I loved Whitney's last album.

by Anonymousreply 96January 18, 2011 12:22 AM

Janet can sing on key all the time, unlike Madge. But Madge doesn't lipsync most of a concert like Janet.

by Anonymousreply 97January 18, 2011 12:25 AM

why so much hate for janet?

by Anonymousreply 98January 18, 2011 4:23 PM

Was Rene on the downlow?

by Anonymousreply 99January 18, 2011 7:49 PM

.

by Anonymousreply 100January 20, 2011 2:16 AM

She's been #1 all week on Ticketmaster, and just dropped to #2. Sounds like she's selling to me haters.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 101January 20, 2011 2:30 AM

she's been adding second dates in cities all over this tour, so she's not only selling, but popular demand is requiring more shows!

by Anonymousreply 102January 20, 2011 7:09 AM

My boyfriend is a big JJ fan, and wants to go to her recently announced concert in St. Louis. I think the tickets are too expensive, but I'll take him nonetheless and sit through it (that's love).

But, I'm expecting that a lot of people are going to wait until the last two weeks before the concert, which is at the end of March, to buy tickets. People don't have a ton of money these days, the tickets are expensive, and JJ, although she certainly has her fan base, doesn't have a huge rabid fan base like she used to. So ticket sales may be slow, and if that's the case, I bet the concert gets canceled.

by Anonymousreply 103January 20, 2011 7:26 AM

Then again, reading some of the replies, which I didn't before, the concert may very well be a sell out.

by Anonymousreply 104January 20, 2011 7:44 AM

R104,

The tickets seem to be doing well in St. Louis. THey are going for $150 - $500 on Stub Hub. Hope they are not sold out.

by Anonymousreply 105January 20, 2011 11:48 PM

[quote]She's been #1 all week on Ticketmaster, and just dropped to #2. Sounds like she's selling to me haters.

Or maybe no one else is having tickets go on sale this week. Ya think, Janet?

by Anonymousreply 106January 20, 2011 11:52 PM

To all you dumb a$$es on this post, the Janet tour is selling out everywhere. Give it a break! It's too bad you scum bags have lived passionless lives, working 12 hours a day with nothing to show for it! Get a life, go enjoy it, and quit hating on people.

by Anonymousreply 107March 14, 2011 11:44 PM

She sold out Reliant a couple of weeks back here in Houston. I didn't go but a coworker did and said it was fun. She's added an obligatory tribute to her dead brother, apparently.

Oh, and the tickets were only $18.

by Anonymousreply 108March 14, 2011 11:55 PM

Janet is not as big a star as she once was. Do you expect her to sell out MSG for pete's sake.

by Anonymousreply 109March 15, 2011 12:00 AM

"Janet is not as big a star as she once was."%0D %0D Obviously the ticket sales tell a different story. %0D %0D "Do you expect her to sell out MSG for pete's sake."%0D %0D She's been there and done that. And who cares at this point? People want to go to hear the hits and have a good time.%0D %0D %0D

by Anonymousreply 110March 15, 2011 12:06 AM

[quote]Obviously the ticket sales tell a different story.

Well for $18 I would hope she could push them.

by Anonymousreply 111March 15, 2011 12:09 AM

I have to say, I never believe one word that comes out of her mouth. I don't think she really cares about anyone and I doubt that many people care about her.

by Anonymousreply 112March 15, 2011 12:10 AM

Janet + MSG? LOL! Please!

by Anonymousreply 113March 15, 2011 12:25 AM

I saw some clips on YT from the tour. I would definitely go. Janet is actually singing her songs instead of having a huge track behind her. Her voice is very good. Janet still has more rhythm than any of these R&B whores out today, and her dancers are perfection.

by Anonymousreply 114March 15, 2011 12:36 AM

Madge v. Janet singing arguments are ridiculous.

They both are capable pop singers, and not much else, though they have both occasionally shown a little more substance to their vocals, but not that often.

Compared to "real" singers, they're not even close, but that's not the point. They are/were pop superstars. They both have their strengths and very clear weaknesses.

by Anonymousreply 115March 15, 2011 3:20 AM

Um r113 I saw Janet at MSG in 2008.

by Anonymousreply 116March 15, 2011 3:26 AM

R116 I hope you enjoyed it because it will never happen again.

by Anonymousreply 117March 15, 2011 3:47 AM

She just sold out three shows in Chicago and the reviews were actually pretty good. While there are some vocal tracks, the reviewer said it was a much more authentic, less rigid show.

by Anonymousreply 118March 15, 2011 4:19 AM

She looks fab!

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 119March 25, 2011 1:52 AM

She looks fat!

by Anonymousreply 120March 25, 2011 2:08 AM

Janet needs to tell that hussy LaToya to go down an implant size.

by Anonymousreply 121March 25, 2011 2:21 AM

Love Janet!

by Anonymousreply 122March 26, 2011 1:52 AM

Bitch sold out 3 dates in NYC. I went last Saturday. It was amazing. Janet's still got it, bitches.

by Anonymousreply 123March 26, 2011 4:34 PM

Why is it called "# twos" and why is there, what looks like, a turd on the cover?

by Anonymousreply 124March 28, 2011 1:22 AM

I saw an advert for the concert in the local paper and the photo of JJ writhing onstage in an ugly outfit while looking very middle-aged was not a great way to sell tickets. She looked tired and at least a decade past her prime. And that's how I feel about her as a performer. I'm 38, how are the young hip folks going to feel?

by Anonymousreply 125March 28, 2011 1:42 AM

Hey gramps at r125 I'm 28 and Janet is everything.

Respect.

by Anonymousreply 126March 28, 2011 3:17 AM

Shouldn't she be booking indian casinos?

by Anonymousreply 127March 28, 2011 3:32 AM

R126, I wrote, "young hip folks", why are you responding?

by Anonymousreply 128March 29, 2011 3:30 AM

$18 a ticket? That's so cute. Some people charge 20 times that and still sell out stadiums.

by Anonymousreply 129March 29, 2011 3:52 AM

Janet secretly married Rene on March 31, 1991

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 130April 1, 2011 2:29 AM

LOS ANGELES! TONIGHT!!!!!!!!!

by Anonymousreply 131April 14, 2011 6:27 PM

She's a sweet thang, but ain't got much musical ability at all!

by Anonymousreply 132April 14, 2011 6:55 PM

I read the concert is only 75 min long.

by Anonymousreply 133April 14, 2011 6:58 PM

r132 = A toothless Whitney!

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 134April 14, 2011 7:11 PM

Janet was awesome last night in LA. She came on at 9:15 and left the stage @ 11:10. Fucking great show! She still has it!

by Anonymousreply 135April 15, 2011 3:28 PM

Sadly, there are two Janet Jackson fans on this board who insist that Janet is still relevant. Stop trying to make her happen fellas. Anyone can sell out a venue these days - hello! - Charlie Sheen. And his ticket prices aren't as dirt-cheap as this no-talent, Minnie Mouse-voiced, ugly twat that can only dance if there is a troupe behind her.

So for you TWO fans on this board - please enjoy the show. Just stop trying to make her happen, and stop pushing this lame thread to the front over and over again.

by Anonymousreply 136April 15, 2011 3:53 PM

[quote]Sadly, there are two Janet Jackson fans on this board

Well, you wouldn't know that so please go back to eating your crap sandwich, dear.

by Anonymousreply 137April 15, 2011 4:33 PM

You need Janet!

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 138April 15, 2011 8:00 PM

Good one R137. Yawn.

by Anonymousreply 139April 15, 2011 9:38 PM

[quote]Yawn.

That's original.

by Anonymousreply 140April 15, 2011 11:46 PM

Let's discuss!

by Anonymousreply 141September 21, 2014 4:54 AM

Nothing ever changes for loser Janet.

BUMP or BURP.

by Anonymousreply 142August 9, 2018 11:06 PM
Loading
Need more help? Click Here.

Yes indeed, we too use "cookies." Take a look at our privacy/terms or if you just want to see the damn site without all this bureaucratic nonsense, click ACCEPT. Otherwise, you'll just have to find some other site for your pointless bitchery needs.

×

Become a contributor - post when you want with no ads!